Let's have a fangirl freakout over Greta Gerwig's LITTLE WOMEN (Saoirse Ronan, Emma Watson, Florence Pugh, Laura Dern, Meryl Streep, Timothée Chalamet)

too little womany

Seen more than one criticism that the film doesn’t do enough to get you invested in the characters if you’re not familiar with the story but I don’t think it’s such a sin to expect the audience to know the story already.

The scenes of the characters exploding in motion and chatter all at once feel like beautiful direction from Gerwig, to me. The heart of the movie.

I agree, and it's one of the world's best-selling novels. Get over it!

Have not yet seen ‘19 but my wife showed me ‘94 on Christmas and I was moved. Cried at Beth’s first death scare but maybe too stoned, full, and emotionally spent by the time it finally happened. Cast was uniformly great and I’m eager to see Gillian Armstrong’s other work. She seems to have an eye for Aussie talent based on her films and music videos - working early with Cate Blanchett and Nicole Kidman. Anyway, excited for the new one but would love to hear from those who love the (most recent) old one. Kirsten Dunst was a highlight for me and it was interesting to see Christian Bale and Samantha Mathis coupled before of American Psycho.

'94 little women is really good! my favorite version so far, tho i'm looking fwd to this one

I'd rank them:

1994
1933
2019
1949
1978

and 1918?

https://news.letterboxd.com/post/187019729548/ranking-little-women

I was just googling and I hadn't even heard of this pbs version from last year that has Maya Hawke playing Jo.

didn't know there was a 1978 version, but it looks about as '70s as you can get. jan brady as beth!

Professor SHATNER

There was one last year (direct to disc/streaming?) w/Lea Thompson as Marmee.

^^Not The PBS one.

I very much did not like Gabriel Byrne as the professor in the 1994 version. He seemed a thousand years old it. It felt very weird.

Byrne aged quickly, like many Irishmen.

Wiped out after seeing this today because I spent about an hour straight in tears. This was my first exposure to the story at all, I’m assuming the dialogue was significantly modernized and or was great for that without drawing attention to itself. Really impressed with how well Pugh and the girl who played Beth played the same characters seven years apart, was almost like two completely different actresses in both cases.

if you've heard any Gerwig interviews, she incorporated a number of Alcott quotes (not from the novel) into the script.

Ah that’s interesting, I didn’t read anything about the film going in

it's one of the world's best-selling novels. Get over it!

I've seen every version, and the women are archetypes more than characters. This is fine.

It’s fine if that’s what you were expecting when you went in; I was not. Given the breathless and universal praise, it seems worth noting that this is - in addition to being spectacularly acted and wonderfully filmed - a bit of a soggy morality play and occasionally boring for it.

But i suppose it does say fangirl in the title.

Seen more than one criticism that the film doesn’t do enough to get you invested in the characters if you’re not familiar with the story but I don’t think it’s such a sin to expect the audience to know the story already.

This was exactly my experience: no familiarity with the story, took about a half hour before I was really drawn in. Maybe there is a version of this movie where we are given a little more time with the individual characters before we have the (enjoyable) scenes of them talking over each other. Or maybe that doesn't work. I still thought it was a great movie and would probably enjoy the first half hour more on a rewatch

And here's our Armond!

In this way, Gerwig bests Sofia Coppola. Coppola’s Civil War remake The Beguiled was half-heartedly misandrist, so Gerwig promotes the idea that women can have it all — including a sexy, exotic husband (played by Louis Garrel, hipster cinema’s default dreamboat). While Gerwig features the flummery of period picture luxe, she misses the bold Caucasian eroticism that made Coppola’s The Virgin Suicides peculiarly compelling.

Instead, Gerwig goes for arty effects. Just as Noah Baumbach imitated Bergman and Truffaut in Marriage Story, Gerwig imitates Alain Resnais through time-shift edits connecting the publication of Jo’s first book to memories of her family’s history. She gets away with this odd sophisticated device by maintaining emphasis on feminist resentment.

March family matriarch Marmee (Laura Dern) gets the film’s thesis statement: “I’m angry really every day of my life, but for 40 years I try not to let it get the best of me.” It sounds suspiciously defensive, like Dern’s blasphemous speech in Baumbach’s Marriage Story, and syncs with both Jo and Amy asserting, “Don’t tell me marriage isn’t an economic proposition!”

5
If these pussyhat speeches weren’t bad enough, Gerwig momentarily looks beyond herself to have Marmee lecture a black hospital worker: “I spent my whole life ashamed of my country.” It’s a Michelle Obama speech to which the token black character responds: “No offense; you should still be ashamed!” Never mind those who died in the Civil War defending Emancipation, the audacity of Gerwig’s literary update is to blend cultural illiteracy with feminist blandishment. Gerwig, Baumbach, Ronan, Chalamet and Dern represent a vanguard of genuine cynicism.

thanks for the dn Armond

btw the "angry" line from Marmee is in the book

maybe AW should read it

and he got "pussyhat" into NRO.

FEminiSt rEseNTmeNt was the name of my band in 1868.

gabriel byrne is bad in everything and nearly everything he's in is also bad

https://media0.giphy.com/media/63Ijq8ylsxUEjweGLd/source.gif

fwiw he was 44 in the Gillian Armstrong version

Shatner was older in that TV mini

Louis Garrel remains absurdly hot.

corrected, they both only seemed hundreds of years older than Jo. I only know this new guy playing the professor from The Dreamers.

He’s got a good head of hair

I would love for AW to review Anne of Green Gables.

ugh, that armond white review makes me wanna like this more

FWIW I've seen many people criticize the book on exactly the same grounds that White is. That said, the book is what it is. You can utterly 100% dispense of things like this from the 'canon' or any appreciation, or you don't have to.

Just about every film adaptation improves on the book.

Saw this today & loved it so much

The jumbled up chronology was a plus for me - it was exciting to see the story reframed differently and it made the payoff with the ending very satisfying

Ronan’s Jo was great - hard to fuck up that character but she brought great fire & heart & sadness in equal measure. Pugh’s Amy was much more enjoyable & a more humanized sister, she felt like too much of a villain carciature in Dunst’s portrayal of her.

Praise the lord for Louis Garrel’s Friedrich, what a casting choice. Never fully took to Byrne in the Armstrong version, it was way too on-the-nose paternal

And Chalamet’s Teddy was perfect. So languid & mischevious & adoring.

I loved the look, the color palette was freaking gorgeous & the set decoration & costuming just downright exquisite. The beach scene looked like a Seurat painting, I died.

Speaking of dying - the moment when Jo sees Marmie & realizes Beth is gone & whole theater is deep in their feelings, some old man in the back row says loudly “SHE DIED?”
my friend & immediately started laughing like “Ffs dude catch up”

*Marmee

Ronan's handled her career so well.

Saoirse Ronan and Timothée Chalamet both perform in a way that makes me feel more alive by way of sympathy with the amount of life they bring to every movement.

beautifully put

Speaking of dying - the moment when Jo sees Marmie & realizes Beth is gone & whole theater is deep in their feelings, some old man in the back row says loudly “SHE DIED?”
my friend & immediately started laughing like “Ffs dude catch up”

― terminators of endearment (VegemiteGrrl), Saturday, 28 December 2019 bookmarkflaglink

Well done for being one step ahead of some random lol.

Anyway watched this last night and if Garrel had any taste he would've hated her book and gone to California.

xpost oh cmon dude 95% of the audience knew she was dead!

The most depressing part of LITTLE WOMEN (1869) is not when Beth dies but when Jo's short story wins a prize of $100, reminding any fellow writers reading the book that freelance rates have remained roughly stable SINCE THE RECONSTRUCTION ERA

— Jennifer Morrow (@jenniferemorrow) December 27, 2019

sad lol

So did I! Found the comment iffy because I loathed the film, I guess.

XP best bit was the negotiations for better conditions/deal for her book in the end lol.

From that review:

"Gerwig imitates Alain Resnais through time-shift edits connecting the publication of Jo’s first book to memories of her family’s history. She gets away with this odd sophisticated device by maintaining emphasis on feminist resentment."

The time shifts are incredibly light and are pretty standard fare now - not even worth putting that reference in, and even so the technical achievement very rarely carries a film by itself.

Can't even competently hate.

only a publication as irredeemable as national review would still run a writer as vile as armond white has become

Saoirse Ronan and Timothée Chalamet both perform in a way that makes me feel more alive by way of sympathy with the amount of life they bring to every movement.

― Swilling Ambergris, Esq. (silby), Saturday, December 28, 2019 12:58 AM

qftw

this already feels like a seasonal classic

"i hope he comes back, he would make a terrific friend for me"

My daughters (9 and 11) quote from this all the time and have nerded out on all the shot-by-shot cast analysis. Their fave is "There's also a lovely greenhouse!" (Tumbleweed)

Noah Baumbach's Little Men coming to Prime in 2022

what would be won or lost here if this was re-cut to be played out linearly? I actually ask because I was watching it with my mother, who loved the book as a child, but she was clearly confused and therefore didn't enjoy it. She's 85 though and often struggles with flashbacks etc. in film. She doesn't have alzheimers or anything related but I do wish I could watch a linear version of this with my mother. Ofc this is just me, I'm not saying it shouldn't have been made this way.

Chris Cooper is the absolute jewel in this version. I cried during a few of his scenes.

Perfect to re-watch this after The Shop Around the Corner.

rewatched tonight & introduced Mr Veg to the wonderful world of the Marchs

mr veg liked it a good deal! i knew he would because it is charming af

and I am so still deeply in love with it that i may watch it again tomorrow

also will go to cvs tomorrow to find a box hairdye similar to jo’s hair in the movie because i crave disappointment lol

chalamet is so 👌🏻👌🏻👌🏻

I have just watched this, wrapped in a blanket, it is a literal comfort blanket film for me. Saoirse’s eyes after Beth dies! The way Pugh throws the popcorn when the dad comes back! That heartbreaking scene where Laurie told Jo he married Amy!

Ah, it’s so great still. I think I will be watching this one for many years to come. And Chris Cooper is such a great Mar Laurence.

My only complaint is that Bob Odenkirk was a real weird choice for the dad. Chris Cooper was indeed great though.

I am rereading the book after many decades

my mental pictures for the characters are a mashup of the Gillian Jacobs & Greta Gerwig movies - this is how it breaks down in my imagination currently

Winona Ryder = Jo
wotsername Hermione = Meg
Claire Danes = Beth
Florence Pugh = Amy (but sometimes Kirsten Dunst ie when Jo cuts her hair & Amy gasps YOUR ONE BEAUTY I always hear in Dunst’s voice)
Susan Sarandon = Marmee
Odenkirk = Father
Timotheeeee = Teddy/Laurie
Cooper = Mr Laurence
Louis Garrel - Friedrich but only bc i am happier picturing him being hot instead of crusty

and the reason I think i picture Odenkirk is not his look but his voice? i hear Bob’s gravelly voice in the words of father. i think the casting does work but we just dont get many scenes w him unfortunately. if there was more of him, like the long scene in the book where he tells the girls what they mean to him & how theyve grown i think it would make more sense & it IS legit weird seeing him in the movie no argumenr

My only complaint is that Bob Odenkirk was a real weird choice for the dad. Chris Cooper was indeed great though.

oh i thought the reason for the bump here was the "lou alcott was a trans man" viral thread

"LOL it's Bob Odenkirk!" did take me out of the movie but it was such a rush that I wouldn't have had it any other way.

Do we have high hopes for the Barbie movie?

oh i thought the reason for the bump here was the "lou alcott was a trans man" viral thread

― Kate (rushomancy), Sunday, May 1, 2022 2:07 PM (yesterday) bookmarkflaglink

hate this thread, nice as it seems, made by a chronic internet charlatan

lol when jo reveals she cut off her hair and everyone gasps and amy says "your one beauty!"

my favorite line