US Politics, December 2019: Profound procedural deficiencies

Memo to Nancy Pelosi. Drop the "Good day, sir." It's petulant. Use "I continue to pray for you every day" instead. He hates that.

now imagine that thing in an anthology next to

https://s3.amazonaws.com/loa-production-23ffs35gui41a/volumes/images/000/000/452/listing/9781598530537.jpg?1447174672

I've seen more well-composed fourth grade book reports.

his lie-detector signature is still the best punchline to anything official with his name on it

lol there is no way in all the possible worlds that trump knows what the star chamber is

It's his nickname for "seventh floor bathroom" in the Trump Doral iirc

so he's definitely getting impeached tomorrow, correct?

Oh, it's on.

Drinks at my place!

he is definitely getting impeached tomorrow but who even cares at this point. though it's kind of nice to know that he's freaked out about it, despite the practially non-zero chance the senate will do a thing about this.

Why is it journalistic convention to refer to the language in texts like Trump's letter as "scathing"? Doesn't that imply rhetorical effectiveness?

the headline I'm seeing is "Trump sends fiery letter to Pelosi" which is just lmao

amazing that after 4 years of this the media either has no clue how to cover Trump or just can't be bothered to do it properly, like the way they constantly write articles that start with "The White House is considering blah blah blah" when its abundantly clear that "we're looking into it" is Trumpspeak for "I have no idea what you're talking about"

Has there been even one instance in this administration of "we're going to be looking into it" where "it" clearly got looked into?

they're looking into that

he is definitely getting impeached tomorrow but who even cares at this point. though it's kind of nice to know that he's freaked out about it, despite the practially non-zero chance the senate will do a thing about this.

― akm, Tuesday, December 17, 2019 4:51 PM bookmarkflaglink

Why are you still of the opinion that there was only a point to impeachment if removal was guaranteed?

Why is it journalistic convention... Doesn't that imply rhetorical effectiveness?

The journalistic convention being followed here is that, no matter what, the president must be regarded as as a functioning, capable human being. The Trump they are referring to there not the real Trump, but America's imaginary friend.

"Trump sends fieryfarty letter to Pelosi"

I'm not of that opinion.

from the Trump missive:

Your chosen candidate lost the election in 2016, in an Electoral College landslide (306-227)...

...

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/6c/Cartogram%E2%80%942016_Electoral_Vote.svg/381px-Cartogram%E2%80%942016_Electoral_Vote.svg.png

TBF he "won" 306 but there were 2 faithless electors who voted for John Kasich & Ron Paul instead.

Yes, but by the same rule, Clinton won 232. There's no way he won 306 and she won 227.

The Dems suck at 'messaging.' It comes from catering to their 'centrist' caucus.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EMCB1nPUcAA6XP4.jpg

the trump letter is honestly pretty good.

More due process was afforded to those accused in the Salem Witch Trials.

he plays the hits

the trump letter is honestly pretty good.

More due process was afforded to those accused in the Salem Witch Trials.

he plays the hits

its the most purestrain Trump we've gotten in a while

cousin ashley i am disappoint

The day the Washington Post ran the headline on the left, Bill Clinton’s approval rating was in the 60s, as it had been all year.

The day the Washington Post ran the headlines on the left, Donald Trump’s approval rating was below 50, as it has been every day of his presidency. pic.twitter.com/3HVvytU1yG

— Jamison Foser (@jamisonfoser) December 18, 2019

apples and oranges

If it's ok with Asshole, I'd be OK with the Senate approving Salem Witch Rules for this trial.

Bring back pressing.

NYT:

The accusations, untruths and wayward exclamation points piled up by the paragraph.

Some of the president’s closest advisers were involved in drafting the letter, but they did not include Pat A. Cipollone, the White House counsel who will play a large role in a Senate trial.

Instead, Eric Ueland, the director of the Office of Legislative Affairs, led the process, with input from Stephen Miller, the president’s top policy adviser, who often scripts many of Mr. Trump’s public remarks.

hey guys, anything going on today in american politics

good morning!

i see what u didn't do there

The minute I saw the strings of triple adjectives I knew that letter had been pulled out of Miller's sulfurous asshole.

Who knew the "C" in "C-Span" stood for coup? This is the most unfair process ever! We had no witnesses! Schiff and the Whistleblower and Hunter should testify! There is nothing wrong with the phone call! This is so partisan it hurts, have you no sense of decency or comity? We saw no documents, not a single one, this was all done in secret! This is tearing the whole country apart!

There, I saved you all the trouble of listening to the GOP response.

You say that like I was planning on listening to the GOP response in the first place

I will say, glancing at the coverage of people speechifying, that it is sort of refreshing to see some unfamiliar faces for once, even if I want to punch many of them. Surprised the GOP didn't try to shoehorn Nunes and Jordan into this spectacle, too.

xpost It is admittedly challenging muting and unmuting in more or less five-minute intervals.

likely nothin that will matter goin on

ILX in a nutshell.

the Democratic Party in a nutshell

and i hope they stay there

I like nuts!

It's up to the Bernienuts now

Bernie Planters

can everyone be quiet, i'm trying to listen to the campaign ads for next year

hey guys, anything going on today in american politics

― Fuck the NRA (ulysses), Wednesday, December 18, 2019 8:29 AM (one hour ago) bookmarkflaglink

my friend is suing the trump administration (along with the SPLC and some other orgs), not sure what else is happening?????

lmao there's a rally tonight

I think yesterday Trump pretty much directly called for Schiff to be murdered so it's gonna be...uh...interesting to see what he comes up with tonight

I heard like three seconds this morning in which some R guy said exactly this: "Republicans have not been able to subpoena documents or call witnesses"

Um my dude are you literally SIMULTANEOUSLY saying that you want to subpoena documents / call witnesses AND allowing Rs to ignore subpoenas and refuse to testify?

The hypocrisy would burn except we are now all so used to it that it's just a dull, tedious ache.