every time she (or anybody) mentions "Todd" alls i can think of is
http://www.mtv.com/onair/beavisandbutthead/images/flipbooks/meet_cast/todd/todd5.jpg
― flyover statesman (will), Friday, 3 October 2008 15:44 (fifteen years ago) link
all i kept thinking when she said "ahmadinejad" like six times in two minutes was, "damn i would love to have been in that prep room when they were teaching her how to say that"
Ha ha! Exactly! All I could think was, 'Settle down, Sarah, I heard you successfully pronounce his name the first time, no need to show off, now.'
― Michael White, Friday, 3 October 2008 15:44 (fifteen years ago) link
the palins are millionaires too fwiw fyi etc
― joe six pak (ice crӕm), Friday, 3 October 2008 15:44 (fifteen years ago) link
NRO hitting biden hard:
Biden's Grammar [John J. Miller]
Jason made a grammatical point. As an editor at NR, he has probably corrected my improper us of who/whom more times than I know. But I'd like to nitpick at Joe Biden anyway, because this one is a pet peeve of mine. Biden said this:
The issue is, how different is John McCain's policy going to be than George Bush's? I haven't heard anything yet. I haven't heard how his policy is going to be different on Iran than George Bush's. I haven't heard how his policy is going to be different with Israel than George Bush's. I haven't heard how his policy in Afghanistan is going to be different than George Bush's. I haven't heard how his policy in Pakistan is going to be different than George Bush's.
It's not different than, it's different from.
― and what, Friday, 3 October 2008 15:45 (fifteen years ago) link
corrected my improper us
― David R., Friday, 3 October 2008 15:46 (fifteen years ago) link
ZING
what's their stance on pronouncing "nuclear"?
― da croupier, Friday, 3 October 2008 15:47 (fifteen years ago) link
isn't it "different to"?
― caek, Friday, 3 October 2008 15:47 (fifteen years ago) link
WAAAAAAAAAAAAH WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH
― goole, Friday, 3 October 2008 15:48 (fifteen years ago) link
http://separatedbyacommonlanguage.blogspot.com/2007/07/different-fromthanto.html
― gabbneb, Friday, 3 October 2008 15:48 (fifteen years ago) link
NO! USA! USA! USA!
― gabbneb, Friday, 3 October 2008 15:49 (fifteen years ago) link
gabbneb you really don't have to spin that one for us
― goole, Friday, 3 October 2008 15:50 (fifteen years ago) link
If you said to, then you're probably British, although you might be from a Commonwealth country.
OTM.
― caek, Friday, 3 October 2008 15:50 (fifteen years ago) link
oh snaps
― Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 3 October 2008 15:50 (fifteen years ago) link
what's their stance on Palin referring to Obama as "Barack"?
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Friday, 3 October 2008 15:51 (fifteen years ago) link
I seriously see red whenever any elected official involved in energy policy or military technology says nukular.
― Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 3 October 2008 15:51 (fifteen years ago) link
'Reward is in heaven' isn't a necessarily mean thing for a devout person to say but it certainly came across as crass from Palin, somehow.
― Michael White, Friday, 3 October 2008 15:52 (fifteen years ago) link
yeah I didn't get that - it sounded like Palin was making a joke about how Biden's wife doesn't get paid jackshit...?
― Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 3 October 2008 15:52 (fifteen years ago) link
Attention Nabisco:
Meghan O'Rourke sez Sarah Palin is a character in a George Saunders story
― jaymc, Friday, 3 October 2008 15:52 (fifteen years ago) link
like "lolz yr wife is a shmuck for having a thankless public sector job haw haw"
x-post
― Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 3 October 2008 15:53 (fifteen years ago) link
the "her reward is in heaven" line was both completely cringeworthy to my ears and palin's most human, genuine moment of the debate
― lex pretend, Friday, 3 October 2008 15:54 (fifteen years ago) link
it sounded like a threat to me
― goole, Friday, 3 October 2008 15:55 (fifteen years ago) link
"your wives get SUCH good clouds in heaven, Joe, doggone it."
― da croupier, Friday, 3 October 2008 15:56 (fifteen years ago) link
Note: George Saunders did this two weeks ago, and not surprisingly much more convincingly.
http://www.newyorker.com/humor/2008/09/22/080922sh_shouts_saunders?yrail
― rogermexico., Friday, 3 October 2008 16:02 (fifteen years ago) link
the "reward is in heaven" thing I actually liked, and it looked like biden liked it too (hard to miss his smile). palin didn't really sound all that congenial saying it, but I think (as with her failure to react well to his choke up) she really does just have a resistance to offering much vulnerability or hospitality to the other side in a debate. imo this is a fairly common conservative politician trait
― Dominique, Friday, 3 October 2008 16:03 (fifteen years ago) link
In hopes of organizing a robust demonstration for the vice presidential debate this Thursday in St. Louis, the pro-Iraq War (and ostensibly pro-McCain) organization, Vets for Freedom, is resorting to offering local college fraternities hundreds of dollars if their members come and hold signs.
In an email obtained by the Huffington Post, Vets for Freedom field staffer Laura Meyer offered a fraternity at St. Louis University a "sizable donation" - plus free lunch - if it could use their pledges to demonstrate outside the VP debate.
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Friday, 3 October 2008 16:03 (fifteen years ago) link
have any of us lost a child and our wife in an accident? do we know what that experience is like? can we think for a moment that maybe sometimes for people who have experienced these sorts of things, weird things and phrases may trigger memories and flashbacks and that we get choked up at unexpected times? or do we expected our politicians to be robots and just answer the damn question?
I'm not saying biden hasn't had a tragic life experience, or that he should be blase about it. just that during a highly rehearsed political debate he somewhat transparently rigged a response, one designed to lead himself down the path to experience an emotional moment. the question was "what's your achilles heel?" and rather than respond directly he went for the lifetime movie moment. so, biden 1 palin 0, heartstrings tugged, mission accomplished. nothing in the piffle palin coughed up made it necessary to go there.
it's manipulative, sure, but is really any worse than palin trotting out her goddamn kids and todd every chance she gets?
look, I can't stand sarah palin, but if you really think it's less manipulative to bring up your major life tragedy during a VP debate (masterfully or no) than to talk about being a hockey mom.... uh I dunno what to say here
― Edward III, Friday, 3 October 2008 16:05 (fifteen years ago) link
just that during a highly rehearsed political debate he somewhat transparently rigged a response, one designed to lead himself down the path to experience an emotional moment.
fair points, all of them. my follow up is: how and when did you first become aware that Biden was "transparently rigging" his response, and what made you so sure he was doing so?
― Maverick (Mr. Que), Friday, 3 October 2008 16:07 (fifteen years ago) link
when he stood for elected office.
― caek, Friday, 3 October 2008 16:11 (fifteen years ago) link
i could see his lips moving.
etc.
how many times was "around the kitchen table" said in this debate?
btw "her reward is in heaven" was vomit inducing. let's not let anyone lose faith in god because of senseless random meaningless death doggone it!
― Local Garda, Friday, 3 October 2008 16:12 (fifteen years ago) link
guys remember when Dick Cheney got called out for being the piece of shit that he is on a national stage? i could drink a case of that and not be full.
― horseshoe, Friday, 3 October 2008 16:13 (fifteen years ago) link
thank you, Joe Biden
i think you mean joe o'biden
― max, Friday, 3 October 2008 16:15 (fifteen years ago) link
her usual YA WANT SOME JUICE HON delivery
Genuine LOL
― Savannah Smiles, Friday, 3 October 2008 16:15 (fifteen years ago) link
just cause palin says "I'm a mom" that doesn't mean biden has to automatically say "I've been a mom too! a tragic tragic mom! *SNIFF*"
Sure it does. "I'm a mom" is supposed to be some sort of magic superpower that puts a tiny Sarah Palin inside the heart of every voting American who uses coupons or something. Biden's single-parenthood deflates that completely. And you're an asshole.
― rogermexico., Friday, 3 October 2008 16:17 (fifteen years ago) link
how and when did you first become aware that Biden was "transparently rigging" his response, and what made you so sure he was doing so?
it didn't feel right when it happened. yes, it was effective and emotional, but also out of left field. reading the transcript clarified the impression. and I can't be "sure" he was doing so, but this wasn't some free-wheeling coffee klatch, it was an extremely experienced + gifted politician debating during a high-stakes campaign for the second highest office in the land.
or what caek said
― Edward III, Friday, 3 October 2008 16:21 (fifteen years ago) link
If yr line had any merit, Biden would already be president.
― rogermexico., Friday, 3 October 2008 16:22 (fifteen years ago) link
t cause palin says "I'm a mom" that doesn't mean biden has to automatically say "I've been a mom too! a tragic tragic mom! *SNIFF*"
Sure it does.
well that's where we disagree. I agree I'm an asshole, though.
― Edward III, Friday, 3 October 2008 16:24 (fifteen years ago) link
although that's what it was in response to, i don't think that's the right comparison - it's biden using his circumstance versus palin mentioning her special needs kid, "diverse family", at every opportunity through the five weeks, to cloying effect. i thought biden could have gone further at some point to debunk the mainline to americanism that small-town families have monopolised.
― schlump, Friday, 3 October 2008 16:26 (fifteen years ago) link
score:
Emotion = 10Restraint = 2
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Friday, 3 October 2008 16:30 (fifteen years ago) link
― rogermexico., Friday, October 3, 2008 12:17 PM (12 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
― and what, Friday, 3 October 2008 16:31 (fifteen years ago) link
meanwhile Rich Lowry's in love:
I'm sure I'm not the only male in America who, when Palin dropped her first wink, sat up a little straighter on the couch and said, "Hey, I think she just winked at me." And her smile. By the end, when she clearly knew she was doing well, it was so sparkling it was almost mesmerizing. It sent little starbursts through the screen and ricocheting around the living rooms of America.
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Friday, 3 October 2008 16:31 (fifteen years ago) link
PEW PEW PEW
"little starbursts"
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Friday, 3 October 2008 16:32 (fifteen years ago) link
hahahaha
― Maverick (Mr. Que), Friday, 3 October 2008 16:35 (fifteen years ago) link
Peggy Noonan is zapped by little starbursts of joy:
Sarah Palin saved John McCain again Thursday night. She is the political equivalent of cardiac paddles: Clear! Zap! We've got a beat! She will re-electrify the base. More than that, an hour and a half of talking to America will take her to a new level of stardom. Watch her crowds this weekend. She's about to get jumpers, the old political name for people who are so excited to see you they start to jump.
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Friday, 3 October 2008 16:35 (fifteen years ago) link
It's so sweet that Rich calls ejaculate little starbursts.
― Alex in SF, Friday, 3 October 2008 16:36 (fifteen years ago) link
http://link.brightcove.com/services/link/bcpid1185304443/bctid1832907349
― and what, Friday, 3 October 2008 16:36 (fifteen years ago) link