What are those albums that are so off-course even the hardcore fans needn't bother

Tim I guess we would include Blood on the Tracks in that list - "A lot of people tell me they enjoy that album. It’s hard for me to relate to that. I mean, you know, people enjoying that kind of pain?" He sure never went there again.

As a byproduct of their intense identification with and/or fetishism of the artist-qua-artist, pop stans tend to hold a lot of values we might otherwise associate with rockism: an emphasis on how personally meaningful or deeply felt the artistic product is, whether it is "brave" or "bold" or autobiographical. In particular, they tend to be attracted to the fetishism of "difficult" works that only the fans can truly understand.

With Madonna, for example, this manifests not just in a lot of consensus-conforming stanning for Like A Prayer and Ray of Light, but also contra-stanning for Erotica and (perhaps more surprisingly) American Life.

But it's fair to say that the pop stan appreciation of Impossible Princess is definitely not premised on her working with the Manic Street Preachers (I'd actually be surprised if there were many people at all who held that position: "Where The Wild Roses Grow" seems like the more obvious candidate for kylie-but-credible).

xpost - yeah that's a good one. I feel like i've read Robert Smith say similar things about Pornography, although that may be more "you're only that young and self-absorbed once".

I don’t have particularly fond memories of Pornography, but I think it’s one of the best things we’ve ever done, and it would have never got made if we hadn’t taken things to excess. People have often said, “Nothing you’ve done has had the same kind of intensity or passion.” But I don’t think you can make too many albums like that, because you wouldn’t be alive.

sorry for the derail

actually thanks a lot for that link! One of the best RS retrospective interviews I've read (although it's always puzzling to see his self-awareness and critical sense dissolve after Wish)

Can somebody confirm or deny that Big Star's "In Space" belongs in this thread, I've never listened to it, I can't bear to, I love that band so much and can't deal with a sad ending.

― flamboyant goon tie included

i like the first song "dony"! i don't know who wrote it. the rest is your standard alex chilton self-sabotage thing as far as i remember. i get it, i've done the self-sabotage thing and i don't have nearly as much to sabotage as chilton did, but it's still painful.

regarding my only liking music to be "oblique", i've had plenty of people accuse me of that, but i don't think it's true! like you i will listen to music that i openly admit to be terrible, but i don't really ever choose listen to music i don't enjoy. even if other people are repulsed by it, even if _i'm_ repulsed by what i'm listening to, doesn't mean i don't also like it on its own merits, whether that's "metal machine music" or 1980s aor.

Depends on how 'hardcore fan' is defined, but a lot of hardcore Who fans don't bother with 'Endless Wire', any of individual solo albums, or even 'It's Hard' or 'By Numbers'.

― just another country (snoball), Thursday, September 12, 2019 4:56 PM (yesterday) bookmarkflaglink

Who fans are all over the place. I know Who fanatics who will seek out every pressing variation of the Lisztomania soundtrack, and others who hate everything after Tommy.

I've never known any Who fans to ignore By Numbers, but there seems to be consensus on It's Hard being awful and Endless Wire not "really" being the Who.

For me, there's maybe two near-brilliant things on It's Hard, alongside their worst-ever songs. And Endless Wire is mostly wonderful ("Mike Post Theme" and "Tea and Theatre" are two of the best things they've ever done), though the production isn't great.

fgti for the record you are 100% wrong about Royal Trux, The Goslings and Popol Vuh. just letting you know.

and yeah also absurdly judgemental and wrong with the whole "liking it just to be oblique angle" - you don't get to tell me why I like things

I wasn’t accusing you of liking things only to be “oblique”! It was a general comment, an acknowledgement that I do it, myself, sometimes— not “listening to music to be oblique” but “claiming to rate albums highly that aren’t very good”— and it’s less about being “oblique” I suppose as it is about doing so to appear “interesting” I guess

wrong again, but whatever. I guess you can't actually envision someone appreciating Twin infinitives as a great album, your loss imo

I suppose if the track "Vuh" doesn't make the hair on the back of your neck stand up then it doesn't ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

I don't think I'm making myself clear, I like Twin Infinitives; also, I eat my own boogers sometimes. (The Emperor Wears No Clothes album with that band is "Cats And Dogs".)

I don't think it's a particularly ground-breaking or revolutionary idea that "some of the albums you love? you love them not because you enjoy them, but because you want to be a person who enjoys that album". Like... isn't this oftentimes how we're all talking about music?"

I listened again to "Pharaos" last night (and I'm listening to "Hossianna Mantra" right now! it is so nice) and "Vuh" is pretty but a slog, it's really the A-side that bothers me, and even then, it's impossible for me to extricate the content from the reputation.

I've always found the idea of Popol Vuh more compelling than their actual discography, with the notable exception of 'Vuh'.

fgti for the record you are 100% wrong about Royal Trux

yeah I'm baffled at any RTX fan who thinks they aren't technically "good" - for one thing Neil is a *really* fucking good guitar player, def in my top 10.

and I mean that just on a technical level, he is a very fleet-fingered and versatile player.

I said "Royal Trux are a terrible band" and also "I love them", I at no point cast aspersions on Neil's guitar capabilities (and I wouldn't see why his capabilities on the guitar would have any bearing on whether his band is terrible or not, and whether or not I love them)

I do not understand why you cannot comprehend that somebody might have a more complicated relationship to a piece of music than simply "I love this, and thus the band is good, and thus Neil Hagerty is a really fucking good guitar player". There is stuff that exists that is not good, and I love it, and it is not good for reasons that are more complicated than Neil Hagerty's guitar chops, and I love it for more complicated reasons than x-y-z, possibly because I enjoy being the sort of person who listens to Twin Infinitives once a year at the very least as an ear-cleaning exercise.

And I am extremely not wrong about The Goslings. That is some goddamn terrible music, the worst I've ever heard, maybe and probably.

The literal only way I could communicate my love for Twin Infinitives was a very candid admission that I chew undigested sesame seeds that I find on my buttocks in the shower and I enjoy it

I do not understand at which point in the creation of this metaphor that I might have suggested that Neil Hagerty's fingers were not fleet

I guess I don't understand what you think is "not good" about something you love. that division between quality and appreciation doesn't make any sense to me.

Really? Music that I really love, like, say, Tori Amos or David Bowie, I have a far deeper understanding about what is good and what is bad about it. One might perceive that I'm actually not-a-fan of Amos or Bowie because I might speak about them so critically, but it's not the case at all-- the engagement I have with their work is far deeper, and I'm better able to analyze and understand and so on

I mean, case in point, I'm a huge fan of Sufjan, but that fandom only happened with Adz, and with C&L he's like... one of the greatest living songwriters. I say this as somebody who would roll their eyes when Chicago started playing on the cafe speakers when I was trying to enjoy some brunch. Critical engagement is a sign of respect, as far as I'm concerned

you're really wrong on Vuh. you may not like it but most people do and it's not an album that in any way shape or form fits this thread.

Well

That was one of like seven albums I posited as fitting this thread. Eno's "The Drop" is surely the cake

I don't imagine many here have heard it, but I dragged out Steve Harley's Hobo with a Grin because of this thread, and it still sucks. I love all the early Cockney Rebel stuff, but this is so stuffed with LA session hacks, uninspired songwriting and bad singing, it's just ghastly. And Steve agreed:

"I looked at that LP the other day – looking is enough. I can't bear to listen to it. It's the worst thing I've ever done. I just want to forget about it. Trash. In fact, I'm getting the old Cockney Rebel band together for a concert in London at the end of this month. And there won't be one song from the "Hobo with a Grin" LP in the set."[11]

xxp I actually get what you are saying about Royal Trux, think you make a good point, and personally interact the same way with Bob Drake's music.

The Drop doesn't really fix this either. It's not that left-field. It's not super memorable but it's hardly way way way out of the ordinary weird and bad for him.

Modulate by Bob Mould might fit though. I don't like it. I dont' know anyone who does. Maybe someone does.

The Wedding Present's Ukranian album probably qualifies.

Really wish I could un-read fgti's little yarn

Might be some Piano Magic and I'd be surprised if Kozelek doesn't have something that would fit someday.

I guess this kind of doesn't count, but it's not far away. As much as I adored Yeah Yeah Yeahs in the 00's - they made 3 fucking great albums, the reviews (and cover, g'damn) of Mosquito made it so I've never actually heard it.

Maybe that's off course? They didn't come back from it. Is it worth hearing?

^Albums you have spurned

Still not sure if albums from bands that have had a significant membership change should count here. Nevertheless, the J Geils Band released an album without Peter Wolf and the results were this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=289lzL6Eit8

xp I spurned yes. Is it worth my time going there? I've literally not heard good word of it.

Really wish I could un-read fgti's little yarn

― #YABASIC (morrisp), Friday, September 13, 2019 1:33 PM (one hour ago)

rude

Nevertheless, the J Geils Band released an album without Peter Wolf and the results were this:

I remember that getting some FM airplay when it came out, for about a week. And iirc, Rolling Stone gave the album four stars, for some reason.

Piano Magic choice would probably be ‘Writers Without Homes’, except (a) i don’t really get why it is *so* bad and hated; (b) to the extent that I do get it, the complaint seems to be ‘it’s too Piano Magic’; and (c) I have no idea where its rep now sits vis a vis all the post-Disaffected albums that hardly anyone heard.

OTOH it’s a good choice in that they then rebounded with perhaps their best album in The Troubled Sleep Of..., give or take Low Birth Weight.

re: Kozelek i've gotten the impression that everything he's done after Benji has been too off course for me to bother with and the little i have heard of those records has been truly baffling

Writers is an amazing album and I think everyone likes it except Glen and that’s mostly to donate 4ad

I remember that getting some FM airplay when it came out, for about a week. And iirc, Rolling Stone gave the album four stars, for some reason.

― Montgomery Burns' Jazz (Tarfumes The Escape Goat)

because they never give four or five star reviews to shitty records by "classic rock" bands obviously past their sell-by date..

Rude

Lol no it’s fine, I’ve replaced booze with weed in my life and I’m enjoying some giggly stoned late night moments

there are a fair few Sufjan albums that fit this well enough but The Age of Adz is absolutely not one of them, despite being a left-turn, and is his best work. Enjoy Your Rabbit fits in every way except it dates back to before his breakthrough with Michigan, but it's roundly ignored in his discography for more reasons than that, being an instrumental electronic album that bears no resemblance to the rest of his work and isn't that good. there's also The BQE, which is also very ignored as it's the instrumental score to a film he made. it's not as much of a departure as Enjoy Your Rabbit is and the combination of electronics and orchestration did signal the direction he went in with Age of Adz, but it still doesn't really resemble his song-based work that much.

― ufo, Thursday, September 12, 2019 10:23 PM (two days ago) bookmarkflaglink

I have tried and tried with The Age of Adz but for me it belongs in this list.

― an incoherent crustacean (MatthewK), Thursday, September 12, 2019 1:17 PM (two days ago) bookmarkflaglink

Age of Adz is my favorite Sufjan record by a longshot. It's his true masterpiece (to date) in my opinion, and it feels more fitting for these times than it did when it was initially released, not to mention having aged beautifully. For an album to begin with a song like "Futile Devices" that explodes into this fantastic odyssey, and then to not just close with a song like "Impossible Soul," but to end with album with that final movement that brings you back down to earth and closes the capsule. Beautiful stuff.

I may have scrolled too fast, but Madonna I'm Breathless fits the bill (though I'll always rep for "Hanky Panky").

Also Kevin Ayers As Close As You Think. Never reissued, hard to find, never referenced even by diehard fans, and a terrible album that sounds foisted upon him during the nadir of his addiction.

I don't know what it means that I'm Breathless is my most-listened to Madonna album (also Ciccone Youth along with the s/t EP for Sonic Youth)

Tangerine Dream's Cyclone (1978) is unusual in that it has rock drums and a vocalist. It's odd - the basic sound is similar to the band's late-70s analogue records, but the sequencers are in the background more and there are lengthy flute solos. Unfortunately the vocalist sounds like a drunk man who broke into the studio and shouted over the backing tapes.

I've always wondered how fans of Lush think of the band. They started off as a shoegazing band, but for their one big commercial success they became cheeky cockney Britpop kids, and then they broke up, and when they came back in 2016 - "Out of Control" is really good! - they were shoegazing again. I assume they switched back to their former sound because Slowdive demonstrated that shoegaze was hip once more. Do Lush fans ignore Lovelife? When I was a kid Lush was the band that did "Single Girl" and the one about the Fiat 500 and the other one, but I realise now that Britpop Lush was an aberration.

What does "Out of Control" remind me of? It sounds like something else.

In the Lush thread there was a linked piece by Miki and it suggested to me that the "cheeky" approach was at least in part a reaction to how some critics were treating their more vulnerable songs.

Also on that thread I said "Out Of Control" reminded me of some Ween songs but I don't expect anyone else to agree.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Return_to_Santa_Monica#/media/File%3AEverclear_Return_to_Santa_Monica_(album)_2011.jpg

Everclear - Return to Santa Monica

ufo and Josh I will give it more time then, because when Sufjan hits he hits hard

Killing Joke's 'Outside the Gate' album.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QDnKEk8byiY