PMs change and lol we're all gonna die (but brexit will never end)

has there been any follow-up* on cummings sacking sajid javid's aide last night?

*informational or kremlinological

nothing i’ve seen. i mean i assume its for the yellowhammer leak.

this is good on why vonc isn’t likely to be the best approach:

Opponents of the Prime Minister’s Brexit plan have been exploring two avenues of challenge. The first is through a statutory vote of no confidence, as stipulated in the 2011 Fixed-Term Parliaments Act. The Leader of the Opposition would have to table a motion, and the following day MPs would vote on whether “This House has confidence in Her Majesty’s Government.” If successful, a 14 calendar day period would then begin, where an alternative candidate must demonstrate support of at least 320 MPs, be appointed Prime Minister and then win a statutory vote of confidence. If no candidate, or the original PM, cannot regain confidence, then an election would follow.

Opposition MPs are now reluctant to follow this for two reasons – firstly that neither Jeremy Corbyn, nor any other candidate seems likely to win a vote of confidence. Secondly, that an election after the 14 day period has elapsed would probably be held after 31st October.

The second route being explored is to pass legislation, in a similar manner to the Cooper-Letwin Bill in March, which orders the Government to seek an extension from the EU. The previously successful legislation took five days to pass the Commons and the Lords, so with time looking even shorter in early September, opponents of a no-deal Brexit cannot afford any delay. They must also look to the Speaker of the Commons to bend Standing Orders to allow a substantive motion to capture time off the Government, which currently controls all business in the Commons.

bercow’s response to proroguing suggests that he would enable this. tho lord’s fillibustering can’t be ruled out.

Story I heard was they were told to delete old social media postings that might make them seem like hypocrites; Javid's SPAD refused presumably because of Streisand effect, was sacked.

The posts were deleted and suddenly twitter explodes with receipts of Javid's hypocrisy. xp

agree Corbyn would struggle to win a VONC, but am certain this is because parliament is full of cunts

the legislative approach feels like little more than another stalemate and there will be Lords who definitely filibuster

Cumberbatch will be already thinking about the scene where he ruthlessly turfs the insubordinate Hammond mole out onto the street.

This is Sonia Khan, once of the Taxpayer's Alliance, so, you know, cry me a river.

Sorry if that sounds harsh.

Not harsh at all, wouldn't care if she was dropped into a shark tank!

i don’t think anyone cares, it’s just...

*what’s going on in there?*

and the answer is of course very strict messaging, very strict control and don’t put any of those idiot fuckers anywhere near tv. which works fine until a GE.

seems good? bad news for the Territorial Alliance?

OMG!!!
A v small ray of sunshine in ongoing national shitshow..but @BBC has introduced a new policy on think tanks! That includes info on "funding"!!
*faints*
Look! And it only took all of us going on & on for years (& a strategic ambush of the director general at a public event) pic.twitter.com/ZYCSydRHbF

— Carole Cadwalladr (@carolecadwalla) August 30, 2019

It doesn't seem all that significant unless they're going to stop allowing think tanks with opaque funding on shows.

I haven't noticed Kate Andrews on the beeb for ages, but sadly she's still alive.

these people are like the "historians" who turn up on every "did the Templars fake the moon landing?" and "hey guys let's have another look at the Nazis" documentary - they cite their countless TV appearances on their websites as proof of credibility and then get invited onto loads more TV shows because hey clearly they're experts

*bizarro and me falling over one another to note that YES the templars DID fake the moon landing, wake up sheeple*

this has an example of that, and as an extra added bonus, the "academic" in question is from our old friends Spiked https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-glasgow-west-49435041

that's just terrible writing from the Beeb isn't it? "Author and academic", no credentials, no sense of their standing within their own unnamed academic field, any one of us could turn up as an author and academic on those terms and say whatever we felt like

Yeah, unforgivably poor. Her credentials seem to be that she has written some books along the lines of "universities eh, what's that all about?", and that along with being friends with Brendan O'Neill is enough to make her an "expert". It's illustrative of the BBC's problems with "balance": balance is seen to be off-setting some perfectly reasonable initiative or POV with someone who has nothing to offer or is actively acting in bad faith, as in this example.

i've seen Claire Fox being present on shows as the nominal left wing balance a few times. it's beyond a joke.

that's Claire Fox MEP to you, buddy

Use her full title, Claire “The Bosnian genocide never happened” Fox MEP

Didn't her sister write a similar piece about the Rwandan genocide? I could check but on the phone rn

*bizarro and me falling over one another to note that YES the templars DID fake the moon landing, wake up sheeple*

xps to myself

yep Fiona Fox wrote a toxic piece for LM called "Massacring the truth in Rwanda" which described the use of the word genocide as an "emotional overreaction".

The fox sisters and Nora mulready worthy nominations for the continuing awful contributions of the Irish diaspora to public life

Just linking this excellent Rory Stewart content for xyzzzzzzz & mark s

chuckling at the filename of this photo of Rory Stewart pic.twitter.com/2h9rcv0fLj

— Henry Dyer (@Direthoughts) August 30, 2019

: )

Always glad to be reminded that we're a bunch of oil paintings here, don't know what I'd do if I was sharing my thoughts with people who were only mentally, not physically, the elite.

not sure that’s about the looks so much, as the self perception of “best” as serious quizzical-but-kindly interrogative look.

and that he called it that in da metadata.

xp Rory Stewart’s looks are like the least of his worries and picture wise that’s way better than most of the ones out there. It’s the labelling of it as best, as though he sat there and very seriously ranked a number of photos before lighting on one as “best” and uploading it without renaming it.

- speaking as someone who is not physically elite and who generally prefers “weird” looking men!

Wow, thanks.

Looks like there’s more than one communist on here who can’t read!

*throws little-read book down in front of gyac*

real talk, folks: rory stewart is, objectively speaking, a hideous hose-beast

deal with it

he's no rory mcgrath

his face looks like a mummified cat's arsehole, his skin looks like he's survived an airlocking.

but I'm a believer in shaming tory twats by any means necessary, throw the decent conduct rule-book out the window with these bastards.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EDNacr-WkAAHC7I?format=jpg&name=large

he's just pulled (a pint of tequila flavoured lager)

it's a still from the Terence Davies trilogy obv (best pic)

one for the real england thread shurely

he's trying too hard for that thread imo

appearance on Real England does not equal endorsement

oh i know, but it seems to be reaching too hard for real englandness. but i suppose that is real england as well.

that stage patrician demeanour of your Stewarts has been at least partly performative since the moment you stopped being legally entitled to horsewhip the peasantry at will

i don't think r stewart is naming his own website assets? could be wrong,
he does speak dari after all

Sad times for Britain's ancient and hallowed democracy, which dates all the way back to when Catholics in Northern Ireland got the vote in 1969

— Frankie Boyle (@frankieboyle) August 29, 2019

I met a Liberal Democrat a few weeks ago AMA:

He said "I am a Liberal Democrat". He had a striped shirt and did that cardigan thing that rich people do when within 100 yards of a river.

I think it was the first time I'd met a self-identified one in recent years. I said 'how come you are a Liberal Democrat, thats quite unusual these days" but I wasn't really able to get an answer. I thought he might say something about EU/Remain, but he didnt. He said he voted remain but now thinks we should leave. I was sadly unable to ascertain what it was that made him a Liberal Democrat. I think it's something to do with the appearance of being one of the adults in the room, the identity of not being zealous or childish. Until recently I think you would have said 'this man is a conservative"