― Not the real Village People, Thursday, 17 May 2007 20:25 (sixteen years ago) link
― Laurel, Thursday, 17 May 2007 20:27 (sixteen years ago) link
― jaymc, Thursday, 17 May 2007 20:38 (sixteen years ago) link
― grimly fiendish, Thursday, 17 May 2007 21:59 (sixteen years ago) link
― Not the real Village People, Thursday, 17 May 2007 22:16 (sixteen years ago) link
― Tracer Hand, Thursday, 17 May 2007 22:35 (sixteen years ago) link
― grimly fiendish, Thursday, 17 May 2007 22:39 (sixteen years ago) link
― Not the real Village People, Thursday, 17 May 2007 22:43 (sixteen years ago) link
― the next grozart, Thursday, 17 May 2007 22:51 (sixteen years ago) link
― Madchen, Friday, 18 May 2007 11:33 (sixteen years ago) link
― Madchen, Friday, 18 May 2007 11:36 (sixteen years ago) link
― Nasty, Brutish & Short, Friday, 18 May 2007 11:40 (sixteen years ago) link
― Tracer Hand, Friday, 18 May 2007 11:41 (sixteen years ago) link
― grimly fiendish, Friday, 18 May 2007 12:18 (sixteen years ago) link
― Madchen, Friday, 18 May 2007 12:28 (sixteen years ago) link
― Tracer Hand, Friday, 18 May 2007 12:35 (sixteen years ago) link
― ledge, Friday, 18 May 2007 12:43 (sixteen years ago) link
― Tracer Hand, Friday, 18 May 2007 12:44 (sixteen years ago) link
― ledge, Friday, 18 May 2007 12:47 (sixteen years ago) link
― Madchen, Friday, 18 May 2007 12:50 (sixteen years ago) link
― ledge, Friday, 18 May 2007 12:55 (sixteen years ago) link
― ledge, Friday, 18 May 2007 13:05 (sixteen years ago) link
― grimly fiendish, Friday, 18 May 2007 13:07 (sixteen years ago) link
― CharlieNo4, Friday, 18 May 2007 13:19 (sixteen years ago) link
― Jamie T Smith, Friday, 18 May 2007 14:37 (sixteen years ago) link
― Jamie T Smith, Friday, 18 May 2007 14:54 (sixteen years ago) link
― nabisco, Friday, 18 May 2007 16:42 (sixteen years ago) link
― nabisco, Friday, 18 May 2007 16:46 (sixteen years ago) link
― Jamie T Smith, Friday, 18 May 2007 16:57 (sixteen years ago) link
― nabisco, Friday, 18 May 2007 17:57 (sixteen years ago) link
― Laurel, Friday, 18 May 2007 17:58 (sixteen years ago) link
― nabisco, Friday, 18 May 2007 18:00 (sixteen years ago) link
lol at maths panic on this thread.
― Alba, Friday, 18 May 2007 19:26 (sixteen years ago) link
xpost It's a misplaced (or dangling) modifier.
― jaymc, Friday, 18 May 2007 19:30 (sixteen years ago) link
Should sentence starting with "Surely" end with a question mark?
― Alba, Saturday, 19 May 2007 11:29 (sixteen years ago) link
not unless it's a question or you want to use a question mark
― RJG, Saturday, 19 May 2007 11:57 (sixteen years ago) link
Surely sentences of this type usually act as rhetorical questions?
― Alba, Saturday, 19 May 2007 12:40 (sixteen years ago) link
Surely they do.
― Curt1s Stephens, Saturday, 19 May 2007 14:38 (sixteen years ago) link
Surely (ha) that depends on whether you mean "surely" as "certainly" or as "it should certainly be the case that..."?
― ailsa, Saturday, 19 May 2007 15:24 (sixteen years ago) link
Sorry, that last one should be "it should certainly be the case that...shouldn't it?", shouldn't it?
― ailsa, Saturday, 19 May 2007 15:27 (sixteen years ago) link
Yes, indeed. The latter is far more common, though. It's just that sometimes the sentence is long and by the time you get to the end, the question mark might surprise the reader.
― Alba, Saturday, 19 May 2007 15:36 (sixteen years ago) link
Though that could be the case with a real question, too.
i think i read somewhere that questions can be divided into direct and indirect ones, the direct ones need a question mark and with the indirect ones its voluntary, "surely" is mostly used indirectly i would say and thus does not need a question mark.
as for the problem with "he or she", i use "its", works like a charm. "the tavern-keeper must spellbind its customers".
― Jeb, Saturday, 19 May 2007 16:01 (sixteen years ago) link
low income countries or low-income countries?
― Cathy, Saturday, 19 May 2007 17:27 (sixteen years ago) link
depends. are the countries low and ... no, sorry, i can't actually find any occasion when it wouldn't be low-income countries :)
― grimly fiendish, Saturday, 19 May 2007 17:37 (sixteen years ago) link
yeah, I thought so. I just keep seeing it without the hyphen.
― Cathy, Saturday, 19 May 2007 17:42 (sixteen years ago) link
yeh, you will. people be punctuation mooks :(
but as long as some of us keep flying the flag, there is hope for a better dawn.
(christ. that beer has gone straight to my head.)
― grimly fiendish, Saturday, 19 May 2007 17:46 (sixteen years ago) link
What part of speech is "low-income" in that case? It's not a compound adjective, is it, cause that's two adjectives together.
Should there be a question mark at the end of my previous sentence?
― Alba, Saturday, 19 May 2007 17:47 (sixteen years ago) link
The World Bank has two types of member countries: income and target. Income countries pay in, target countries take out. However, it's harder to get money down from the hilly high countries, so they prefer to use low income countries for their banking pleasures. or something
― stet, Saturday, 19 May 2007 17:55 (sixteen years ago) link
C-
― Alba, Saturday, 19 May 2007 18:05 (sixteen years ago) link