Friend Infected With Right Wing Brain Worms - What to Do?

i mean do you need a step by step blueprint for how that would go down bc i could write up some speculative fiction but i feel like it could easily be left as an exercise for the reader

Its a start! But I would want to know

1) What changes
2) What percentage chance he would have of getting those changes through parliament
3) What kind of timeframe

I'd have further questions like how he would handle a parliamentary rebellion, whether the changes would have popularity with the public or not, what the role of the police and the military would be - but those are difficult without knowing the answers to 1) and 2)

No Mordy please can you write this up I could do with some comedy rn.

i feel like it could easily be left as an exercise for the reader

― Mordy,

this is where it runs into trouble for me, because I'm having trouble imagining what these things are, and how they are going to happen. Sadly I also have trouble imagining a Corbyn government is really going to have much success in achieving 5% of its stated aims, never mind unstated aims of which I'm unable to properly imagine!

My pt is that you could say the same for trumps imminent genocide but ilxors don’t feel compelled to explain how it would actually go down

The idea that a 'Corbyn government' will be able to do anything genuinely radical or far left is laughable tbh. No chance.

That much is clear. But I assume Mordy is wondering whether the notion that a Johnson government would get anything radical done at the other end of spectrum is any less laughable.

My sense is that the left, even when it reaches the highest rungs, has its hands tied more often than the right.

imminent

come on, man

anvil what if they said "corbyn constantly sympathizes with regimes in places like cuba, venezeula and paramilitary organizations like hamas and hezboillah consequently if he were elected we might expect him to make changes that would make us more like those places"

I guess it depends on your definition of radical. To me, the notion that the British government would be promising to protect soldiers who’d shot children and used civilians’ skulls as ashtrays might have seemed a touch too far even by the depressing standards of human rights in Northern Ireland, but I’d argue that’s pretty fucking radical bearing in mind the PM before this one apologised & acknowledged that the crimes were crimes.

Mordy has a talent for speculative fiction and you guys shouldn't suppress it like this.

Ah, my mistake. He’s just perfectly calm and idly speculating as he always does.

My pt is that you could say the same for trumps imminent genocide but ilxors don’t feel compelled to explain how it would actually go down

― Mordy, Monday, July 15, 2019 11:48 AM (eighteen minutes ago) bookmarkflaglink

1. gridlock in congress means the right to a hearing within a reasonable time isn't enforced, and the allocation of more immigration judges never happens
2. with the judicial branch's hands tied and a huge backlog, DHS/ICE are told to push their boundaries
3. said agencies have already started aggressively picking up undocumented immigrants who aren't criminal offenders, and have "accidentally" picked up citizens who weren't carrying proof of citizenship -- which is somewhat nebulous in that we don't have a national citizenship card
4. conditions in the camps continue to degrade, judges continue to see fewer people, access to lawyers is further restricted

you could write this all up to left-wing brain worms, especially if you view some of the arrests as fringe cases and not common, but...

tbc the left does the same thing to the right where they extrapolate from their first principles and their seeming commitments to all kinds of horrors that the right-wingers themselves would blanch at and of course then the left finds some right-wingers who do want the US to be an ethnostate or liquidate all minorities or whatever horrors so it's easy to see how this thing works. you believe X. i think X would lead to Y. some ppl who vote similarly to you explicitly want Y. consequently you want Y too. maybe the process is more obscure with your friend but i don't think anyone is totally immune to this particular ideology game.

tl;dr = both sides do it

My pt is that you could say the same for trumps imminent genocide but ilxors don’t feel compelled to explain how it would actually go down

― Mordy,

This is better but I'm still uncertain as to which ilxor(s) though! If people are saying things but are unable or unwilling to explain, then yes it falls into this territory too!

you could write this all up to left-wing brain worms, especially if you view some of the arrests as fringe cases and not common, but...

― untuned mass damper (mh),

You could, but the more tangible an argument is, the less abstraction there is, the harder it is to do that. There can be disagreement because there is more there to agree or disagree with, so it becomes less brainwormy. The problem with brainwormed perspectives is so much is hidden or unexpanded on, and its hard work to get whatever is going on in there to come out

that's fair. if they were planning to kill people systematically, they'd probably be killing more people unsystematically

six different Ferguson activists have been murdered, nearly all in motor vehicles, and several others have been driven off the road, shot at in cars, or had a six-foot python planted in their car

it's not the federal government, but it seems like someone has a system

yeah those stories were disturbing. i was mostly focusing on government violence and violence towards hispanics, but right-wing extremist violence has certainly been on the rise.

i don't believe the trump administration is preparing to commit genocide, but im also not sure how different it would look from our current situation if they were preparing to commit genocide.

― mott the hoopleheads (voodoo chili)

for fun while i was taking my driving school course i started reading the 3rd edition of adam jones' "genocide, a comprehensive introduction"

it's a really interesting book and i've learned a lot from it even though i've only finished the first chapter (to be fair that first chapter is a 100+ page overview)

some good talk about stuff like "we charge genocide", contested cases, and so on.

fun exercise for the reader: how many of stanton's 10 stages of genocide apply to the trump administration?

http://genocidewatch.net/genocide-2/8-stages-of-genocide/

I got to six

more geared towards engaging with teh olds, but:

What To Do If The Older People In Your Life Are Sharing False Or Extreme Content

lol at John Cusack, 53, exemplifying this scourge

“There's a good chance your family member doesn't understand that and might be horrified at what they're sharing. And so there’s a point to intervene and let people know, ‘Hey, I know, this was probably not what you meant, but…’”

uh

not a bad article by any means, but it doesn't really address old people sharing hateful shit because they're friends with other old people who like hateful shit

(nb I am old)

“There's a good chance your family member doesn't understand that and might be horrified at what they're sharing. And so there’s a point to intervene and let people know, ‘Hey, I know, this was probably not what you meant, but…’”

my dad is like "you're right, i can't believe i accidentally shared this information about all the people on welfare in washington DC who received free "Obamaphones" in 2009 in a free giveaway on a street corner, which i totally saw, no i swear i saw it and heard about it, it happened. instead, what i meant to share is this more important information about how i heard a muslim in minneapolis is married to 8 women and no one will do anything about it because of political correctness. thank you son"

he fit all that in a tweet?

twitter character limit is now 280?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kvnUOevwsKw

my dad prefers to send me these kind of messages via unexpected handwritten letters which close, "I love you my son"

https://m.media-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BMzY4NmY5MjYtMWMzMi00Y2QxLWI3NTctZTBlMzZkZjBhZTU4XkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyMjUyNDk2ODc@._V1_SY1000_SX1000_AL_.jpg

Karl sonned in a paternal love beef?

Here’s an unusual case -
In Scotland, St Andrews, I just saw a guy wearing a ‘Trump 2020 build the wall’ shirt. Now the American students are arriving this week, but this wasn’t them. I know the guy from psychiatric hospital: we’ve been in together a few times. I’ve never known him to speak. No idea what to do there.

I should have talked to him. Asked if he knows what the hard right does to people like us.

I would say anyone in Uk wearing a Trump 2020 shirt is purely. looking for reaction and don't give it to them or say "Oh I love that guy.too"

Sounds like your guy might be a different case though, if he's never speaking? Is it possible he's just wearing it for no other reason than he was given it?

It’s hard to say. He certainly does talk to people - it’s just that the times I’ve met him have been in hospital and he hasn’t spoken, dealing with a schizophrenic episode.

I think if I see him wearing it again I’ll engage and suggest that it might upset people.

One of the interesting things about younger trans people is that a lot of them do come from an alt-right background. I'd say that I've seen enough people with abuse, trauma, and/or mental illness issues who either support Trump or else say other alt-rightish things, dunk on other marginalized groups, that I'd hesitate even calling your case "unusual", at least here in America.

In a one on one environment I don't know what you can do, honestly. You can talk to him, but what's the clinical symptom they keep evaluating us on? "Insight"? A lot of us are bad at that, maybe he is too. Healing people who say and do things like this - and maybe it is a defense mechanism, maybe it is to keep people away - is a long process, it takes work and patience and, honestly, immersion in a healing environment where every time they say or do something cruel and hateful what they're doing is pointed out to them. One conversation, as long as you take sufficient precautions that it doesn't hurt you, might be part of that process, but you are a vulnerable person and your first priority needs to be to keep yourself safe.

It might be best just to ask him! just in a striking up conversation, in passing way. You don't actually have to say anything yourself on first conversation, just listen!

We think of situations rationally, or "rationally". Trump is a good case, we put people in boxes marked "economic anxiety", "racism", "manipulated", "family upbringing", and this probably covers the bulk of people, but there will be people out there with the strangest of reasons, reason you would never get if you had 50 guesses

All those boxes sort of bleed into each other as well, and not in a neat and precise venn diagram way.

Has anyone encountered anyone with centrist brainworms? Like, going to an extreme effort to find the most “balanced” or “neutral” take to avoid having a controversial opinion about anything?

pete buttigieg

Couple of those scaredy-cats on my Facebook feed, for sure. Usually they love talking about electability.

anvil seems to be our resident centrist brainworms ethnographer

My wife has the centrist brainworms. She’ll defend anyone’s opinion but mine.

Not those kind of centrist brainworms but I know a couple of middle-aged guys who definitely would have been Republicans up through 2004 or so who fetishize 'smart solutions' centrism.

*sigh* my "leftiest" friend from high school is a total Klobuchar/ Butteigeig ticket guy now.

i made a total shit-posty joke a few weeks back in a group text about a "unification" ticket w Romney/ Klob (Romney top of ticket for maximum UNITY -- Dems are congenitally illegitimate obv)... and he was totally into it. like, *ecstatic* about the idea.

he uhhh did inherit a ton of $$$ a few years back after both his parents passed and he and his sister sold off all the family land so

Centrist brainworms would be welcome in my family, I mean, my brother always tries to do this and his stupid in-laws' family has gone totally bonkers theocrat, and all they do is cut him off. I mean, brother and wife have loads of gay friends and they pull this shit. Like Trumpism has become this soul-sucking borg who ruins every holiday. We used to play cards and tell jokes and laugh and drink and now they make us watch "Dancing with the Stars". I mean, brother got chewed out for defending "homosexuals" at his church when he and their daughter go to gay weddings. I mean, I tried to butt in and say that gay weddings put dollars in the economy, but all of a sudden they're not capitalists now, either. Now the daughter wants prayer in schools when she never wanted that before and she's married to a libertarian.

My wife commented yesterday that every other post on that "Am I the asshole" reddit is people asking for permission to stop speaking to their relatives. I feel like this is the biggest fucking centrist brainworm in existence. Yes goddamn do you want me to text you a link to the fucking Kaddish, DO IT ALREADY.

ha yeah i'd kill for centrist brainworms in my immediate family and most of my aunts & uncles on both sides... some real prize chuds there. thankfully all the cousins are more or less centrist-y.

The thing was my dad was a total political crank who hated all religion but he was kind of a giant in the family, and in-laws are so insensitive, it's like they're saying like "yeah well he's dead now and now we have a new paterfamilias, Mr. Abortion All The Time." None of this divisive shit happened when my dad was alive. Not only is it insufferable, it's insensitive.

Both of my aunt/uncle pairs are complete religious nutjobs but I've discovered that none of my cousins turned out to be CHUDs, it's a minor miracle.