The car's on fire and there's no driver at the wheel - The Tory leadership elections

1) irreparability comes in hues; 2) dialectical teleology perished in WW2.

xp

something peculiar in the insistence on the one hand that so many things can be classed as dialectical teleology and otoh that it was at some point in the past dealt a mortal blow and is over now

The ideology =/ the 'thing' itself.

Note that I did not incriminate dialectics per se. When 'negative' or standing at a remove from an ultimate telos, I have no bone to pick with it (on the contrary).

it has bones to pick with us all

At worst it's exonerating the fact that the next PM freely uses racial slurs.

"1) irreparability comes in hues;"

Not in this case - Johnson has the same numbers in the house as May does.

Lol oh yeah she also went on camera and was like LET’S GET RID OF HUMAN RIGHTS TO PURSUE TERRORISTS

That may well be, gyac, but the May Archetype is perceived differently from the BoJo Archetype and, alas, these things do matter on the political stage.

Oh sorry, I didn’t realise we were on the political stage, I was only intending to address the ludicrous idea that May wasn’t an extremist and that she actively didn’t damage or ruin the lives of loads of people. Since apparently we’re going with bad faith nonsense itt?

The best least worst thing that May did was blink in the face of No Deal - but everything else that she did lead to the current shower performatively ripping their eyelids off.

Anyway she went to the end of the road, and she's not in the running to replace herself - it's reasonable to be dismayed that this buffoon is replacing her.

I have no idea what we're arguing about tbh.

whether dialectical teleology cures hemorrhoids :p

I wonder if May could have beaten Livingstone to be mayor

the petty squabbling of the left, a tale as old as time

may was a hard-right monster yes obv but optics uber alles - bozza will sharpen and focus the cultural divide and force a few centrist melts (eg my dad) to confront what they are. might even work out in the left's favour, via some sort of annus horribilis of legitimised racism.

either that or simply latinate idioms will be cool again

If this letter to Engels is anything to go by, it certainly didn't work for Marx: 'to finish [Das Kapital] I must at least be able to sit down. I hope the bourgeoisie will remember my carbuncles.'

3xp

I don't see how criticising someone for dismissing what Boris says as having no effect whatsoever has anything to do with defending May. It doesn't. It is in no way a defence of May.

Are we really incapable of analysing the differing effects of two different personalities as PM itt?

At no point did anyone defend May, what a load of fucking bullshit. This thread is so factional as to be absurd.

Make Latin Great Again

My cultural references are limited and I apologise in advance, but there's quite a bit of People's Front of Judea vs. Judean People's Front action going on itt (and elsewhere).

Iterum Latina Maxima Facete iirc

Facite, even. Fac it

Me pœnitet.

Look at the effect Johnson's having already!

I don't see how criticising someone for dismissing what Boris says as having no effect whatsoever has anything to do with defending May. It doesn't. It is in no way a defence of May.

Are we really incapable of analysing the differing effects of two different personalities as PM itt?

At no point did anyone defend May, what a load of fucking bullshit. This thread is so factional as to be absurd.

My cultural references are limited and I apologise in advance, but there's quite a bit of People's Front of Judea vs. Judean People's Front action going on itt (and elsewhere).

― pomenitul, Thursday, 13 June 2019 Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

I was even going to read some Hegel to make sense of your 2nd point but please no Monty Python. Didn't you know John Cleese was a hardcore Brexiteer?

I did, and it saddens me.

Yes it did, Gyac imo. Several people responded it to it too, Daniel, Stet, MDC, Pomenitul.

a few crass comments here and there

re: comments I don't see anything Johnson himself says as enough of a shift, as in it will make people who are not born here feel more unwelcome

I am not convinced it will be more than colourful comments

None of these things were said by you but I don't think it's exaggerating to say they're fairly handwavey.

Anyway it's not as if Boris is going to repeal what May did and just have fun saying racist shit instead.

ive often pondered the theory, call it the dennis wise proposition, that you could take out the likeliest to draw opprobrium in incremental steps from the ukpol threads and the net average level of rancour between participants would remain constant throughout the process

can we nominate the two least likely for an experiment in which they have their own ukpol thread and give it a week before they are fee-huriously hissing at each other in place of discussion

that would be good imo

tim and mark s, imo, fwiw

the other strand would be to chuck the four or five rightest-on into similar but.... we've already seen that work and it takes about three minutes

😆😊😋😆😊🤣😂

please no more Bojo/Bozza/Bonzo now I mean did the clown cunt get his hair did for nothing?

Pom - Brexit originated in that Python joke btw.

Ultimately he's just a soft priapic nobleman who'll be really easy to destroy. Hunt or Raab would be functionally worse. I fully buy into the notion that no matter the pain, Johnson will take down the Tories - his lack of principle or toughness will ensure this. He only really wants money, sex and to be liked - even if he's happy to spill blood to achieve this. They are three fairly substantial weak points

Sounds familiar

Can't believe the Tories have walked right into Labour's trap.

― FernandoHierro, Thursday, 13 June 2019 12:36 (two hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

this is quite obv a haughey smoker btw, bow down

there are deep long-term causes (which i think need to be faced and thought about) and effects arising from same: we can huffy as you like about the best way to respond to the "political stage" as it's probably about to present itself, and whatever additional evils it brings, but the long-term stuff is (a) what gave us brexit and may and bojo (and a bunch of bad stuff before all these), and (b) will carry on giving us bad (and in fact much worse) stuff if we don't tackle it. by comparison with all this, BJ is a symptom, yes (so was may) -- but of course i have a notoriously low and TomD-clowned opinion of BJ's effectiveness and ability to pull off much more than very trivial stunts.

i don't believe this long-term stuff can entirely be tackled within the political system as it currently exists (not least because as is it is in an advanced state of decay). i don't know what the corollary of this belief is, it's probably bad.

(tim is a big goth, that's where i'd start in on that one)

"call it the dennis wise proposition"

ffs more complicated + intellectual political science bs :p

Sounds familiar

― FernandoHierro, Thursday, 13 June 2019 15:37 (three minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

is this a tu quoque ffs

Nah just meant Trump! Jesus I wouldn't kill you like that.

None of these things were said by you but I don't think it's exaggerating to say they're fairly handwavey.

They were said by me, in response to LBI first and then to some of what Daniel was saying, to summarise that I don't feel Johnson will be a huge shift from May, that anything he does is a continuation from her work - and I very much stand by this.

I asked for some more concrete matter on how Johnson will make non-UK citizens feel more unwelcome, or for the hostility to increase and only Matt's Bannon comment seemed to go anywhere but gyac rightly pointed out we are already quite in alliances with the far right under May.

'Tu quoque' slated to replace 'whataboutism' as preferred means of indicating rhetorical hypocrisy under the new Latinate order.

nota bene: it's 'whataboutery' and it's a subtly different fallacy

You are already in alliances with the far right under May, but not with the US president's men, as you will be shortly under Johnson.

that said, crying whataboutery in bad faith is a far more pernicious fallacy on the internets these days than whataboutery itself

Also, good FH - I suppose we're about to find out if Trump could happen here! (It couldn't)

Addendum: they're the same according to Vicipædia (libera encyclopædia).

fwiw xyzzzz I don't think Johnson will make non-UK citizens feel more unwelcome - I just think he'll make those wishing to bash non-UK citizen's heads feel more welcome in society at large

I would say comments like his can have an effect on people. It is hard to quantify, I agree. Harder than policy, but I dunno, do you disagree that eg Trump's rhetoric is damaging? I am willing to accept that it emboldens people and brings racist arguments and defences for the same into mainstream discourse.

It isn't as measurable as policy but seems palpable. Equally I guess I can imagine people targeted by such rhetoric feeling more unwelcome, maybe that would depend on their being already more established or wealthy in this country than under the heel of Tory policy but still.

Surely many Muslim women would be scared and perturbed by someone who said the stuff Boris said becoming PM?

I just can't see it as insignificant, I suspect you don't hugely disagree, it's just a different emphasis. At no point was I defending May tho.

xpost to xyzzzz

I'd have tu quoque as a specific form of whataboutery, where the whatabout is aimed directly at one's antagonist rather than a tangential factor

also I'll stop this now sorry haha

eheu eheu more like