2020 Democratic presidential primary

the endless election stuff is going to kill me literally probably though

certainly it will kill our adverb use

it's sad. he was a fine figure of a tree and a ship, cut down in the prime of his youth by election stuff.

no i meant literally. bodily. 2016 aged me considerably.

gotta keep up that skincare routine

someone found a gray hair on my head a few months ago. or they said it was. i don't think it really was

at least now when your time comes, you'll know what to blame

his tombstone will read:

Treeship b. 199x - d. 2019 R.I.P.
He left us too young, done in by election stuff.

i was born in the 80s

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O1_D7MvQO7A

the 80s, eh? in that case, you're already old and needn't look any further for reasons you feel half-dead

Treeship, go to OKCupid and I'll hit on you for old time's sake.

i have a grey streak emanating from the back of my head. it's cool it means i'm a witch

oh i have a friend who has one long gray streak. i think it's cool as hell

gray hairs rule

I am 80% grey. I've been going grey since I was 15 so it just seems normal.

didn't obama already try that with smashing success for eight years

― j., Thursday, May 23, 2019 2:19 PM (eight hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

don’t know, but obama stans similarly strained to see nth dimensional chess moves behind all his own spineless statements, so I understand the association

Nancy more a Romulan than a Vulcan

Keep waiting for the day when the Homer Badman episode of The Simpsons isn’t devastatingly relevant to our media and culture. 25 years and counting.

Damn meant to post that in US Politics ah well

I've started leaping out at my gf from behind cupboards in an effort that she gets a grey streak like Claire Saffitz from Bon Appetit

don’t know, but obama stans similarly strained to see nth dimensional chess moves behind all his own spineless statements, so I understand the association

― k3vin k., Thursday, May 23, 2019

I guess we can argue about what "spineless" means.

As for chess: she doesn't have the vote for impeachment. That's obvious.

the thought of a long ugly campaign with Trump winning and another 4 years of this surreal bullshit...

I'm starting to freak out a bit.

A friend of mine sort of convinced me that "anybody but Trump" will not work again.

He also brought up a scary thought of people who want to see "shit go down" in their lifetime,
and that electing a crazy fucker like Trump is the best they can do for that.

https://www.alternet.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/trump-cnn-debate-chin-800x430.jpg

i would recommend not talking to your friend about this

I think bernie or biden or warren or whoever would beat him fwiw. Hillary was the unique candidate who could lose for a bunch of reasons, some her fault and some not. But I’m not a pollster

I do fear his re-election obviously. Especially because I think he is going to pursue an even uglier strategy to get re-elected—like he is already trying to open investigations into the democratic candidates

Please don't push me into "Good morning!"-ing this thread too.

Nothing to do, it's up to you

Hello, here is the most depressing elections quote I’ve seen lately: “How do you beat Big Daddy Trump? One of the ideas is that you beat him with Big Daddy Joe.” https://t.co/fdavF2JY80

— Lauren Tara LaCapra (@LaurenLaCapra) May 24, 2019

Big Daddy Joe

"I think bernie or biden or warren or whoever would beat him fwiw. Hillary was the unique candidate who could lose for a bunch of reasons, some her fault and some not."

I hope you're right. It's hard for me to believe that he's not being seriously challenged by his own party. What a bunch of wimps. They would rather see the country further divided than grow a backbone.

That’s true, but he is also still very, very popular among republican voters. So running against him not only requires some spine, but is also almost sure to end in humiliating defeat. And also, who is the upstart republican right now who challenges trump and is somewhat popular?

They should do it anyway if they are really concerned—to make a point. However they won’t because they don’t really care.

Why would any Republican challenge Trump when to do so would risk a Democrat getting elected?

He also brought up a scary thought of people who want to see "shit go down" in their lifetime,

I'm increasingly of the opinion that people with this mindset should be thrown into a pit of hungry bears so that they get their wish without it affecting those of us who see the value in trying to preserve a society.

Exactly. They care more about their party winning than the risk of America being run by a lunatic. Because their agenda is not to govern—they like the “deconstruction of the administrative state” or whatever Bannon called crippling ecological protections, education and healthcare

xp.

Redundant comment but it took a while for me to “get it”

It’s crazy how so many deeply pessimistic people don’t believe that things can always get worse

...good morning! :D

FWIW I think there's a chance of pulling the country back from the brink but it's only a slim chance and we don't seem to be really heading in that direction with any conviction so I maintain optimism but am bracing for a very ugly slow-motion crash nonetheless.

If the GOP flames out I think we could get on a different path.

They are a specific problem. There are deeply rooted pathologies in the country as a whole but they’re magnified but the way the Republican party does things

If the GOP flames out I think we could get on a different path

This is highly unlikely to happen, though, because the system is designed to favor them, particularly in the Senate. Population and demographic trends - the country getting browner in the aggregate, but large numbers of those brown people moving to cities and coastal states - will have the effect of consolidating white power (yes, that choice of phrase is deliberate) in the hands of senators from the empty states in the middle.

It’s true. But for America to become a functional country—not a perfect country, just one that is capable of addressing its problems in some sort of rational way—the GOP needs to no longer be one of our two major parties or else be transformed.

So it’s highly unlikely but deeply necessary.

If the GOP eats it, the country may find itself on the path to a bright new future. If I wake up tomorrow to find a pegasus in my bedroom, I may find myself on the path to magical adventures heretofore undreamt.

You can’t have a party like this control thebgovernment and have liberal democracy

That is true. But here we are.

Even if they were to suddenly become unelectable on the whole, they're still entrenched in the SC until the conservative justices start croaking.

It would be a different landscape if the GOP became a toxic brand—seen as the party of gangsters, con artists, and anti-government cranks. The supreme court would still block many things that need to happen, the fight for reproductive rights and gun control would continue, but we’d be in a different situation

I believe they are seen for what they are by a good number of people. The bigger problem is that this is precisely what a scarily-high percentage of the country wants them to be.

Yeah they’d need to get bored of this ideology