In the context of professional basketball, "length" refers to whether a player has longer arms than would be average for a person of their height. A common way to phrase this desirable abnormality would be to say, for example, that a 6' 10" player has the "wingspan" of someone 7' 2".
― A is for (Aimless), Saturday, 13 April 2019 03:18 (five years ago) link
agreed but i personally hate referencing forwards/centers as 'bigs' even more
― mookieproof, Saturday, 13 April 2019 03:20 (five years ago) link
had a date this weekend and was asked "oh, so you like sportsball then?"
and put a foot out the door : /
― d'ILM for Murder (Hadrian VIII), Wednesday, 24 April 2019 03:16 (four years ago) link
I compiled these commandments for student writing, negotiable if they write sentences pleasurable in themselves and/or they prove their arguments.
― recriminations from the nitpicking woke (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 27 April 2019 13:08 (four years ago) link
Like "have a good one," calls to mind literal defecation
― mick signals, Wednesday, April 10, 2019 1:43 PM (two weeks ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
I once worked with a guy who loathed this expression. I found this baffling because it seemed to me like such an inoffensive thing for a person to say. But now think I get it.
― Paul Ponzi, Saturday, 27 April 2019 14:22 (four years ago) link
this doesn't really annoy me -- the noun is too weird a concept to normalise really -- but i just encountered "veritable cornucopia" in a manuscript i'm editing and it did make me myles-na-gCopaleen at it a bit
what nature does the cornucopia always share with la scission dans l'internationale (situationniste understood)
both are VERITABLE
― mark s, Saturday, 27 April 2019 15:59 (four years ago) link
What other generous quantity is veritable?The plethora.
― mick signals, Saturday, 27 April 2019 16:21 (four years ago) link
smorgasbord
― d'ILM for Murder (Hadrian VIII), Saturday, 27 April 2019 16:27 (four years ago) link
feasts too
strunk and white advises that the editor substitute "motherfucking"
― mark s, Saturday, 27 April 2019 16:35 (four years ago) link
ha
― d'ILM for Murder (Hadrian VIII), Saturday, 27 April 2019 16:41 (four years ago) link
as someone whose mood on any given day is almost entirely defecation-dependent "have a good one"'s applicability on this front is only one more argument in favor of its high seriousness
― difficult listening hour, Saturday, 27 April 2019 17:10 (four years ago) link
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D5K2m8-XoAAYhX7.jpg
― mookieproof, Saturday, 27 April 2019 17:42 (four years ago) link
brb designing a metal teapot at the cum commune
― mark s, Saturday, 27 April 2019 17:48 (four years ago) link
the ultimate chaos didn't cum from the jizz flying everywhere in the trenches, it was having to gtfo nazi germany sharpish for most of 'em!
― calzino, Saturday, 27 April 2019 17:55 (four years ago) link
The New Yorker coining this phrase makes it ten times better.
― jmm, Sunday, 28 April 2019 12:35 (four years ago) link
"daddy?"
― Lil' Brexit (Tracer Hand), Sunday, 28 April 2019 12:49 (four years ago) link
I compiled these commandments
― Theory of Every Zing (James Redd and the Blecchs), Sunday, 28 April 2019 13:50 (four years ago) link
Anyway, now that I've read then: well done.
― Theory of Every Zing (James Redd and the Blecchs), Sunday, 28 April 2019 13:53 (four years ago) link
KINDERGARTEN CUM COMMUNE
seriously
― rip van wanko, Sunday, 28 April 2019 15:54 (four years ago) link
oh you mean you never got around to it. gotcha
tracer hand is a cop
― j., Sunday, 28 April 2019 16:04 (four years ago) link
What age are your students, Alfred? I'm going to use some of those with my Y11s (15/16 yr olds). Cheers.
― Good cop, Babcock (Chinaski), Sunday, 28 April 2019 16:07 (four years ago) link
Thank you! From eighteen to sixty-five.
― recriminations from the nitpicking woke (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 28 April 2019 16:11 (four years ago) link
Charles Boyer turning into Juliette Binoche.
My memoir title.
― recriminations from the nitpicking woke (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 28 April 2019 16:12 (four years ago) link
Lol
― Theory of Every Zing (James Redd and the Blecchs), Sunday, 28 April 2019 16:16 (four years ago) link
Using the Latin cum (pronounced "koom"), rather than the English "with", is an affectation, but not the worst affectation around. When spoken, it is easy to detect. When written it should be italicized to emphasize that it is Latin.
― A is for (Aimless), Sunday, 28 April 2019 17:03 (four years ago) link
even italicization seems a bit affected when the meaning is apparent. am I wrong? isn't it commonplace now to just type out Latin phrases normally, or at least the more common ones?
but even when cum doesn't mean splooge, it really shouldn't follow the word kindergarten. especially not when the next word is a noun that can be modified by this pairing to make a really lulzy phrase like that
― rip van wanko, Sunday, 28 April 2019 17:43 (four years ago) link
It could have been solved by putting dashes to indicate that it is a three-word phrase, like garage-cum-workshop.
Or heck, both dashes and italics. But that wouldn't have kept me (or you lot) from snickering.
― Pontius Pilates (Ye Mad Puffin), Sunday, 28 April 2019 17:44 (four years ago) link
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chorlton-cum-Hardy
... the Bee Gees spent a large part of their childhoods there.
― Freddie Starr (Hitler in shorts) (Tom D.), Sunday, 28 April 2019 17:49 (four years ago) link
... not to mention Chorlton & the Wheelies
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fo6C_CebBqc
― Freddie Starr (Hitler in shorts) (Tom D.), Sunday, 28 April 2019 17:52 (four years ago) link
the cum wheelies, call them by their name
― mark s, Sunday, 28 April 2019 17:56 (four years ago) link
also: in latin it certainly means "with", but in english (as for example in that new yorker tweet) it doesn't mean "with", it's something more like "a cross between" -- hence it *isn't* latin and is only being put in italics to indicate it doesn't mean jizz (which of course draws even more attention to this meaning it doesn't have but can't shake off)
(lol shake off)
― mark s, Sunday, 28 April 2019 17:59 (four years ago) link
RIP chorlton on medlock
― ogmor, Monday, 29 April 2019 08:09 (four years ago) link
Getting increasingly pissed off with "gifted", which no-one (apart perhaps from lawyers) used in the UK until about five years ago, as I recall. We were all perfectly happy with "given" and "gave" back then. I heard a radio DJ announce at the weekend that Bowie had "gifted" All The Young Dudes to Mott the Hoople, which is almost certainly not the case.
― fetter, Monday, 29 April 2019 12:01 (four years ago) link
i saw 'mouse' used as a verb earlier today.
https://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2019/04/20-years-ago-microsoft-changed-how-we-mouse-forever/
i mouseyou mousewe mouse
― koogs, Monday, 29 April 2019 12:03 (four years ago) link
"mouse over" has been computer-speak for "hover" for more than 20 years!
― Lil' Brexit (Tracer Hand), Monday, 29 April 2019 12:11 (four years ago) link
I have never heard that before.
― Benson and the Jets (ENBB), Monday, 29 April 2019 12:11 (four years ago) link
there's a JavaScript "event" called "onmouseover" which means "when the user puts their arrow over this bit"
― Lil' Brexit (Tracer Hand), Monday, 29 April 2019 12:23 (four years ago) link
i will admit this is pretty niche
gift as a verb goes back to at least to milton, mouse as a verb is as old as cats
nouns becoming verbs has been an utterly absolutely basic process in (and strength of) english since the elizabethans at least tbh, if it genuinely distresses you go learn some other weedier language with declensions or equivalent nonsense
― mark s, Monday, 29 April 2019 12:36 (four years ago) link
calvin is correct, hobbes is wrong
― mark s, Wednesday, July 26, 2017 8:49 PM (one year ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― mark s, Monday, 29 April 2019 14:02 (four years ago) link
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/mouse#Verb . 1988 for computer mousing (mouse-over is, i think different, and more common). but there are 4 other definitions there i'd never heard of (a mouser, i guess is a thing that cats can be)
― koogs, Monday, 29 April 2019 16:14 (four years ago) link
"Please and thank you" is a trash way to ask for things
― p.j.b. (pj), Monday, 29 April 2019 16:29 (four years ago) link
calvin is correct, hobbes is wrong― mark s, Wednesday, July 26, 2017 8:49 PM (one year ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― milkshake chuk (wins), Monday, 29 April 2019 16:34 (four years ago) link
one that drives me nuts in my office is "sunset", as in "we'll be sunsetting this program over the next few months"
― One Eye Open, Monday, 29 April 2019 16:42 (four years ago) link
It drives me nuts when people abbreviate ‘thanks’ (an abbreviation itself) to ‘thx’.
― suzy, Monday, 29 April 2019 16:50 (four years ago) link
sry
― After Cease to Brexist (Noodle Vague), Monday, 29 April 2019 16:51 (four years ago) link
THANKING YOU
― Lil' Brexit (Tracer Hand), Monday, 29 April 2019 17:18 (four years ago) link
'thx' is better than being gushed upon
― A is for (Aimless), Monday, 29 April 2019 17:21 (four years ago) link
hey we've all got our own kinks
― After Cease to Brexist (Noodle Vague), Monday, 29 April 2019 17:23 (four years ago) link
It drives me nuts when people abbreviate ‘thanks’ (an abbreviation itself) to ‘thx’
okay "suzy"
― difficult listening hour, Monday, 29 April 2019 17:26 (four years ago) link