moderation request: democratic bans

c/d: people responding to good zings by nonchalantly acknowledging them

d

except when I do it

my point still holds, tom is batman and chaki is the joker

does that mean us ladies can start lining up to be eye candy? I'll be Poison Ivy.

erm can one poster suggest ban another poster more than once

*worried*

p.s. 40 of you can go suck eggs

p.p.s. one last push amirite

no they cannot xpost

you knobend

"yo, UK, no bend :("

i understand bro

What were you getting suggest banned for LJ? The Mansun thread?

I had nothing to do with it this time, btw.

Absolutely no idea. Steady accumulation due to rants/jibes being taken too seriously, I'd assume. The (obviously deliberately OTT) Liverpool thread probably grabbed me about 5-10 more humourless SB's. Oh, and I suspected you hadn't SB'd me; you're not passive-aggressive about your objections, which is a good thing.

This is a rather fascinating study in watching someone who doesn't know when to stop learn the hard way.

Conversely, a fascinating study in anonymous victimisation of soft targets.

The fact that you think the Lpool thread would net more SBs than your regular daily conduct is o_O.

What have you learnt from this episode?

(Laurel otm and kinda my point with my question. You _never_ learn the lesson.)

Okay as someone contributing to this, I suggest we stop this conversation as it is a) becoming a personal attack, and b) likely to goad the people participating in it into acting like knobs.

ok

Hang on, I'm getting all this from Laurel/JJ etc about my "regular daily conduct", which confuses me, as I've actually made it my business on ILX to sincerely participate and attempt to improve relations rather than troll and irritate. If the latter seems to be happening, then there's some serious communication breakdown. Generally when I have a pop, I'm doing so with tongue firmly in cheek. What I've learnt is that ILX still thoroughly befuddles me. Can someone spell this lesson out?

Dan I am so glad you posted that, you just saved me opening a can.

LJ I am gonna e-mail you.

this fuckin guy

lou jag i'm gonna give you this one for free

you know how i say stupid shit on ilx and generally act like a dick like 80% of the time and still don't catch half the shit you do?

one of the reasons for that is if i get hardsonned i dont make 50 posts about myself and my "posting style" and how i just dont geeeeeet why everybody doesnt love me

pro-tip^

but ethan this is the first time i've done that in ages

point taken

Unfortunately, frequency means nothing once people have formed an impression of you.

ON BEING A MORE USER-FRIENDLY TROLL
or how make yourself easier to ignore
by Ethan "And" What, S.Trife, Ph.D

You Have Been Yellow Carded By a Moderator: keep up the ad hominem and you're getting a ban

wrong thread, dude

lou jag i'm gonna give you this one for free

you know how i say stupid shit on ilx and generally act like a dick like 80% of the time and still don't catch half the shit you do?

one of the reasons for that is if i get hardsonned i dont make 50 posts about myself and my "posting style" and how i just dont geeeeeet why everybody doesnt love me

pro-tip^

― and what, Tuesday, 21 October 2008 20:10 (3 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

FAQ this shit

LJ is too harmless to be banworthy

well, I think it's a good idea only if the potential bans are nominated by admins (e.g. TOMBOT starting a "should cankles be banned?" poll rather than King Boy Pato starting a "should Dom Passantino be banned?" poll)

― Curt1s Stephens, Saturday, August 2, 2008 2:03 PM (4 months ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

cmon these would be be funny

why don't we have democratic bans yet

sb'd u for that

for agreeing with you?

you're a threat to his individuality

must admit urge to see some kind of suggest ban statscock is high

some mod should leak it to the media

valerie plame has 49 suggest bans shhhhh

Bumping for relevant history

Not to pick on LJ, mind.