US by jordan peele

Adam's completely incorrect opinion that an unhappy ending to Get Our would have been better (for, I dunno, George Romero's sake) makes me distrust him on this movie.

in general I prefer my horror movies (and satires) to have downer endings

also whether or not you agree w/ him, his argument is a little more than "for Romero's sake" there, c'mon

Interesting - I didn't really enjoy Get Out but the ending belatedly converted me. I thought "He's doing the Romero ending, that's nice but kinda boring" and was pleased it ended with a bit of kickass silliness instead.

can i start talking spoilers yet or would everyone rather i not

give it a week at least!

ok done

maybe i can vaguely allude to how enjoyable the musical cues are

#goodvibrations

Was going to say the same with the music cues. Really enjoyed this all around in a packed theater.

I should add that everyone I saw it with was head-over-heels for it.

yes my preview audience went wild over it, laughing and clapping

ooh illogical

― jolene club remix (BradNelson), Wednesday, March 20, 2019 8:42 AM

the low standards of horror fans in a nutshell

thanks morbs

maybe i can vaguely allude to how enjoyable the musical cues are

I was going to see it any event, but nothing piques my interest more. (I've gotta find the right, off-peak time to see it; a big-deal horror film with a packed house is the last audience I want to be part of, even I understand the argument that that's the absolute best way to see such a film.)

It was the first time in a couple years I'd been in that situation, and I was out of practice.

I don't want to sound like a drudge--laughing and clapping (and screaming), great, I do enjoy that. Unfortunately, talking-talking-talking is usually part of the package.

Some stranger sat next to me and he was alternating between audibly whimpering and nervously looking at his phone. He even took a call at one point. (heard behind me: "Is this motherfucker on the phone?"; I so badly wanted to indicate that no, I didn't know this dude)

this movie was a hot mess, the basic premise was pretty interesting but it was over-explained to all hell, and worse, that explanation just didn't really make any sense. i would have liked it much more in a leaner and more ambiguous form. Also, I found the tone to be all over the place -- yeah, jokes can work in this type of film, but I found that they were placed poorly. They often undercut whatever suspense/horror was playing out. Still, there were a lot of good ideas and awesome sequences in the film - the opening funhouse scene was terrifying, and the good vibrations kill scene was pretty beautiful imo

The matinee crowd today was cool, mostly quiet (rapt?) except for a well-timed "that's right!" after Adelaide's "I'll be the one making the decisions from now on."

I really liked everything about this, not sure I see how any part of it was illogical. Most people won't go up the down escalator, right?

This is the first time she's commanded a movie.

That she did.

Skillfully done rather than a rewrite-the-rules effort but I think most of us who have seen it and like it agree there. The implications of the ending (well, last fifteen minutes) are sometimes lost in the crush to get things done, but as I walked home I thought more about Nyong'o's acting choices as well as the initially-hidden beats of the script a bit more and I think it's really striking. It's not a Message On Our Times specifically, no, but it's got more to say about trauma as well as who gets lucky and who doesn't than I thought.

And it may not have been a downer ending on the small scale but the large scale suggests otherwise! Hell of a repurposing of that particular 1986 tidbit.

Oh yeah and interesting to see with a packed-out and fairly vocal crowd that I realized was probably generally at least twenty years younger than me. I kept wondering why people were more audibly spooked than I was but then it made obvious sense later.

Oh and: remembering how Peele rates Branagh's Dead Again means all the scissors stuff makes for an intriguing callback.

I don’t know... certainly was gripping, solid performances, one very impressive shot (toward the end - red Adelaide ECU frame right, Adelaide in BG), paced well, but the “message” here - there is one, it’s spelled out early on (“who are you?” “we’re Americans” - give me a break) - is too obtuse or simply not fleshed out enough to work. “US” double entendre, the MAGA red jumpsuits, people “rising up.” It’s reasonable to be disappointed by a movie that clearly sets out to say something and fails. No one but horror fans would care about this movie if it wasn’t made by the guy that did Get Out.

I suspect the millions who made Get Out a smash thought it a reasonably well done horror film. They do well in the box office, you know! People don't think about messages. The far worse A Quiet Place was a massive hit last year, remember?

but the “message” here - there is one, it’s spelled out early on (“who are you?” “we’re Americans” - give me a break) - is too obtuse or simply not fleshed out enough to work.

Just posted about the can't-miss symbolism in the Trump Films thread. I don't know, I think that's probably the best thing about the film (and Get Out). Peele is really talented, but I agree with the David Edelstein review I just read: the horror-film stuff almost holds him back--I find all that stuff a clever collage of other horror films at best, rather conventional at worst.

Sure, reasonably well done - that is a disappointment after Get Out, and the crowd I saw it with was totally tepid on it. Not that everyone will go in expecting a new social horror from Jordan Peele (though I know many will), but the “message” in Get Out is fully integrated into its dramaturgy. The horror and the message are one and the same. That’s what made Get Out so powerful, and it’s a high bar. This one is so much more obscure & confusing frankly.

Would love to talk spoilers because I have a problem with a pivotal monologue and the ending

I think this should be expected/assumed to be a spoilery space by now. Mark them with warnings if yer concerned.

yes

I did not get what the final twist added to the story tbh

made clear the Tethered's behavior was a matter of nurture and not nature, for one

that said I sort of assumed the twist before it was made explicit

Spoiler warning...To go back to the illogicality, though: if you've got mom and shadow-mom, and they spend the film going at each other, how, at the last minute, can you say that mom is shadow-mom? That doesn't work.

Another minor quibble. Before shadow-family shows up, mom tells dad that there have been all these coincidences anticipating their arrival. What were there, maybe three? The bible guy being taken away in an ambulance, okay, but the others were pretty weak: frisbee lands on a circle, clock shows 11:11...they're not even coincidences.

Spoiler warning...To go back to the illogicality, though: if you've got mom and shadow-mom, and they spend the film going at each other, how, at the last minute, can you say that mom is shadow-mom? That doesn't work.

This was my problem too.

i'm excited to watch it again

ending at the very least has at least caused me to think about this movie for days

Spoilers-I guess the twist shows that there's no intrinsic difference between the characters and their shadow selves, but I agree the twist wasn't necessary to drive this home. I've been trying to decide whether, if there was a message here, the twist strengthened or weakened it. I'm leaning towards thinking the movie would have been better without it.
When the presumed-shadow mom said to the actual-shadow mom, "You could have taken me with you" doesn't a line like that have more resonance without them having been switched?
I also would have liked it better without so much explanation, like that monologue at the chalkboard. (And while Lupita N'yongo was great, I found that voice difficult)

I thought the two most effective scenes were the opening in the funhouse, particularly where the girl spots her double from behind (interesting that this is what Rod Serling said inspired the TZ episode that Jordan Peele cites as inspiration for this) and the scene with the shadow family standing silently in the driveway, After that there was really no tension in the movie for me-and it was very early in the movie for the tension to be broken. It was still fun and entertaining, and the performances were all good.

that said I sort of assumed the twist before it was made explicit

Man, crazy that Larry Cohen's passed away this weekend given Miriam Bale's quite apt call via that tweet posted above. Us really DOES feel like a Cohen film, and I mean that incredibly positively.

As for said twist, I honestly was surprised, which may explain something of me more than anything else. But that made me more intrigued, not less.

Saw this friday night with a tipsy and excitable crowd, so much fun. Everyone really connecting on a visceral level.

I didn't assume the twist, but it occurred to me from the scene at the beginning with the the child psychologist. I'm not the biggest fan of twists in general. At least I'm still thinking about this one.
Maybe the twist and exposition were partly a way of explaining away the horror-movie convention of the central characters being treated so differently from others who were seemingly dispatched so expediently, but I don't think it was really necessary.

the shadow family standing silently in the driveway

Probably my favourite image in the film.

As you can tell, I have problems with the execution of the film. Most of all how prolonged the last 15 or 20 minutes felt, but, more broadly, from the moment the shadow-mom explains her life in the living room, right up until the final twist, it's basically just one long attempt by the Wilsons to escape; I don't know that there's a single new bit of information in that stretch, and that's half the film.

The more I think about it, though, I think the conception of the film--the Trump interpretation, which to me is inescapable (not to say that there aren't valid psychological interpretations concerning the self)--is fantastic. Family looks uncomprehendingly on some monstrous version of itself, one fueled by rage and resentment that has literally crawled up from the sewer (which, speaking honestly, is how most Democrats view most Trump voters).

"Who are you people?"
"We're Americans."

That's perfect--and coming from an African-American filmmaker, generous and empathetic above and beyond. I've always thought that at moments of great peril, a horror film can go places that more literal films can't get anywhere near. Night of the Living Dead and Rosemary's Baby confronting 1968, The Texas Chainsaw Massacre for Watergate and the Nixon meltdown, etc. Us is pretty great at that level, I'd say.

This was decent
Didn't enjoy as much as Get Out

I was looking forward to a hysterical Armond White review, but they assigned it to someone else (to be fair? doubtful):

http://www.nationalreview.com/2019/03/jordan-peeles-get-out-follow-up/

Kinda ok with the twist. I mean it makes sense in that Red was weirdly the only tethered that spoke, and why she refused to kill the doppelganger kids and screamed when Pluto immolated.

And it does reframe her fear - someone is a lot more likely to fear someone coming back to take revenge if they know they wronged somebody violently years ago....and are inadvertently returning to their lair. Though are we really meant to believe that as many years as they visited that summer home, they never went to Santa Cruz beach once? Wouldn't Adelaide be anxious vacationing in a summer home that close to the scene of the crime?

But I also wonder how the tethered broke free enough of their hosts to be independent. Presumably that's what Red taught them to do? Since both bodies shared one soul. Explains why Pluto was weaker and just copied his host whereas the others didn't.

Thought it was pretty good. May see again.

“We’re Americans” is the clunkiest bit in the movie! MAGA red jumpsuit sewer people “rising up” gets the message across fine. What does the line even mean? I also take back what I said about it being well paced, it’s not, like others have said above it’s half an hour of build up and then a thrilling chase, and an exposition dump in the last 20 minutes. There’s no space to expand on whatever sociopolitical message was intended because of the very long chase. So we get the Americans line which sticks out like a sore thumb, and the wall across America of MAGA red shadow people at the end.

Good ingredients here. Shockingly bad execution.

They were mimicking Hands Across America, which the young Adelaide saw a commercial for on TV. One of the clues that Red was really Adelaide. They even reminded the audience of this before the twist.

It's not clunky at all. If you think it's overkill, then get rid of the red jumpsuits--I do not believe that most people (I certainly didn't) immediately equate red with MAGA; I don't believe red has been subsumed under that one very specific meaning.

In addition to the line showing solidarity amongst the Tethered, a show of power and uprising, it could also be seen as a critique of fundraisers like HAA, which made people feel warm and fuzzy inside, but fell way short of its fundraising goal and is looked upon with cynicism in retrospect

Xpost

or at least, that doesn't mean that adelaide does!

so yeah i'm finding more reasons for the exposition dump to exist

the entire context of the government project

government is not referenced

idk why I'm bothering tbh

i don't know why you're bothering either

or why it matters that the government isn't referenced

as a specific point it doesn't matter, but I'm suspicious of any reading that isn't firmly rooted in actual details of what's on-screen.

they stayed alive by eating the rabbits obviously but i don't particularly care that the exposition is stupid

The fun thing about this detail is that if you eat a diet solely composed of rabbit you will starve to death

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protein_poisoning

so they couldn't have picked a worse food source for their nonsensical plan!

thanks for that one cinema sins

and a merry christmas to you too

https://getyarn.io/yarn-clip/ef6b539e-4be2-4388-8d00-05251d9aee20

I loved the first 45 mins, and then spent the rest of the time alternately amused and exasperated. The middle part is definitely the weakest, as it basically becomes a home invasion thriller with this one kooky hook. The final reveal worked ok for me even if it doesn't entirely play fair with the lead character's childhood trauma.

it's a good home invasion thriller! also iirc the part where Peele gets to work more humour than elsewhere into the movie?

I loved this movie a lot and my takeaway from this thread is that I would thoroughly hate watching a movie with most of you

I also have some incredibly unkind thoughts on subconscious bias as expressed in some of the complaints about this movie but they are possibly more about my interpretation of the complaints than the actual complaints themselves.

(Primary being "the dialog was stilted" = "black people don't talk like that")

(I guess I do feel like going there)

thread revive got me all mixed up in light of other recent events. Jordan Peele threatening pre-emptive Iran strike, do I have that right?

say what now?

this is the us politics thread not the us politics thread

there's a broader melange of on-the-nose allusions: people wearing prison-style jumpsuits, chained and tethered and joined to each other, an underclass marked by this clothing and colour rising up

Probably should start a new thread but

☁️ pic.twitter.com/iiDRwVLmbr

— Jordan Peele (@JordanPeele) July 22, 2021

And I just posted this in the "No" thread.

Hoping for a "Oh Hell No" director's cut.

NOPE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HUgmq_8PlRY

Separate thread, my friend

Nope (dir. Jordan Peele)