lol ok suzy
― Mordy, Thursday, 28 February 2019 16:32 (five years ago) link
haha^^^ yeah xpost. That shit above is insane. they can't help themselves.
― Yerac, Thursday, 28 February 2019 16:33 (five years ago) link
feel like accusations of sexism when someone is pointing out differences between two women politicians who are often compared to one another is pretty incoherent but if you really want to shut down any criticisms maybe try islamophobia?
― Mordy, Thursday, 28 February 2019 16:35 (five years ago) link
AOC is on another level to almost anyone else in congress.
― Trϵϵship, Thursday, 28 February 2019 16:36 (five years ago) link
Is Omar compared to AOC a lot? I am totally unaware of this. Is that why she is even being brought up on what was a positive take that the dem freshwomen in general did a great job yesterday.
― Yerac, Thursday, 28 February 2019 16:40 (five years ago) link
Elie Mystal had a very nice take that the freshman dem congresswomen were magnitudes better than anyone else during the hearing(s) because....
― Yerac, Thursday, February 28, 2019 10:39 AM (one hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
This was the post that precipitated Mordy's comments abt Omar. He wasn't pulling two women out of thin air. Calling sexism on that is bullshit.
― Rhine Jive Click Bait (Hadrian VIII), Thursday, 28 February 2019 16:43 (five years ago) link
oh because I put that (s) after hearing? OKKKKKK.
― Yerac, Thursday, 28 February 2019 16:45 (five years ago) link
tbh i think gummy's comment confused me above so mea culpa
― Mordy, Thursday, 28 February 2019 16:45 (five years ago) link
I think it was from Gummy accidentally saying Omar instead of Ayanna.
xpost.
― Yerac, Thursday, 28 February 2019 16:46 (five years ago) link
ftr AOC is an incredible talent and i'm more impressed with her all the time, i don't think it makes sense to claim that there's an entire class that is at her level.
― Mordy, Thursday, 28 February 2019 16:46 (five years ago) link
yeah i didnt read sexism at all but i'm just a dumb dude so idk
― (•̪●) (carne asada), Thursday, 28 February 2019 16:46 (five years ago) link
xps wait was there not a conversation grouping these three together and suggesting that each was superior to all the other commitee mebers? I hardly see how identifying Omar's percieved shortcomings in this context is sexist.
― Rhine Jive Click Bait (Hadrian VIII), Thursday, 28 February 2019 16:48 (five years ago) link
I think just as a general guideline, regardless of exactly what happened/who xposted/etc itt, it's nice to remember that when discussing our current rockstar new electeds, there doesn't always need to be a "winner" or direct comparisons made in order to say nice things about others.
AOC was solid as a rock yesterday. So excited for her future success.
― There's more Italy than necessary. (in orbit), Thursday, 28 February 2019 16:49 (five years ago) link
Yerac I wasn't taking issue w what you wrote btw
― Rhine Jive Click Bait (Hadrian VIII), Thursday, 28 February 2019 16:52 (five years ago) link
It's because Omar wasn't there yesterday (unless I missed it).
― Yerac, Thursday, 28 February 2019 16:53 (five years ago) link
I have no idea why dudes brought her up, apart from to knock her in comparison to AOC. She did a similar style great job on her Elliott Abrams questions the other day. I think they’re both really good.
Dudes, if someone’s telling you to consider your analysis might be a bit sexist/misogynoir, and that was not your overt intention, consider it might be an undercurrent. In any event, you did characterise the darker woman as over-emotional and less reliable than her colleague.
― suzy, Thursday, 28 February 2019 16:54 (five years ago) link
wtf
― (•̪●) (carne asada), Thursday, 28 February 2019 16:55 (five years ago) link
I thought she did a pretty bad job with Abrams the other day fwiw. Consider that not all politicians are equally talented?
― Mordy, Thursday, 28 February 2019 16:56 (five years ago) link
XP and in orbit OTM, there doesn’t need to be a winner of a contest here.
― suzy, Thursday, 28 February 2019 16:57 (five years ago) link
Overall I was amazed at how rare it was for anyone on camera yesterday to be able to speak in full sentences that actually landed where they were going. Like, worse than the general population of my workplace, which is saying something. AOC and all the Dems in general were better spoken than any GOPers afaict but really it was shocking. Aside from maybe Justin Amash, I could tell which party was speaking even when I wasn't watching the video just by listening for subject-verb agreement.
― There's more Italy than necessary. (in orbit), Thursday, 28 February 2019 16:58 (five years ago) link
xps oof back to read-only itt
― Rhine Jive Click Bait (Hadrian VIII), Thursday, 28 February 2019 16:58 (five years ago) link
Like, don't these people have to campaign and make speeches to get elected?? xp to self
― There's more Italy than necessary. (in orbit), Thursday, 28 February 2019 16:59 (five years ago) link
I think the best thing about AOC - which was probably indicative of the 2018 election as a whole - is no doubt her ability to draw more young people into this maelstrom of bullshit to make it a better place. I caught myself the other day thinking, jeez, this person (at least for now) really seems like a political virtuoso, where has she been?! And then my brain immediately reminded me, duh, she's almost 20 years younger than me, still in her late 20s, this is about as early as she can get in there.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 28 February 2019 16:59 (five years ago) link
^^^ I was shocked by how terrible some of the congresspeople with JDs(actively had practiced) were with their questioning.
― Yerac, Thursday, 28 February 2019 17:00 (five years ago) link
I was shocked at how much better Michael Cohen, graduate of the alleged worst law school in the country, did than several of those chuckleheads.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 28 February 2019 17:03 (five years ago) link
Like, don't these people have to campaign and make speeches to get elected??
a lot of them don't
― we're far from the challops now (voodoo chili), Thursday, 28 February 2019 17:06 (five years ago) link
AOC is on another level than Omar. She's clear, confident, to the point, doesn't grandstand, makes substantive contributions, etc. She's a political wizard. Omar struggles to articulate her thoughts, she mostly produces political outrage soundbites. It's just not apples to apples.
― Larry Elleison (rogermexico.), Thursday, 28 February 2019 17:06 (five years ago) link
― Larry Elleison (rogermexico.), Thursday, 28 February 2019 17:08 (five years ago) link
They’re our main marketable product really
― moose; squirrel (silby), Thursday, 28 February 2019 17:14 (five years ago) link
I think because of what a crazy-huge national profile AOC has garnered in such a short period of time (at least half-driven by thirsty-ass dudes on the right), it's very easy to overlook that each of these people's main job is to represent the interests and needs of their constituencies. and just by the fact of their identities I think AOC, Omar, and Tlaib are innately already doing a better job than probably anyone any of these districts has had in a long time. without looking it up I know MN has large Somali communities and I assume that's true of Omar's district, and the same with Tlaib and Muslim-Americans and AOC and Puerto Ricans.
― Evans on Hammond (evol j), Thursday, 28 February 2019 17:15 (five years ago) link
new poll : Best New Congresswoman poll end 12/31/9999
― (•̪●) (carne asada), Thursday, 28 February 2019 17:15 (five years ago) link
I was shocked by how terrible some of the congresspeople with JDs (actively had practiced) were with their questioning.
This is mainly a function of lazy preparation and mediocre staff work, not just a tediously unimaginative Republican strategy that was dictated by the leadership. Most reps spend huge amounts of time on the phone schmoozing big donors and leave much of the serious work of research and legislative strategy to their staff, who brief them on what to do 'just-in-time'. That's why AOC praised her "overpaid staff" to them. She and they know where the real work gets done.
― A is for (Aimless), Thursday, 28 February 2019 17:19 (five years ago) link
The republicans’ whole project was to deflect. There wasn’t really a “good” way they could have done it.
― Trϵϵship, Thursday, 28 February 2019 17:21 (five years ago) link
Their whole tactic was to say Cohen was asking for it and he never said 'no'.
― Yerac, Thursday, 28 February 2019 17:24 (five years ago) link
Not a cool guy, obviously, but Cohen crushed it honestly, especially when he told them that he got in trouble because he did the same thing they were doing—defending Trump by any means they could
― Trϵϵship, Thursday, 28 February 2019 17:26 (five years ago) link
Wasn't this thread title going to be changed because it was terrible?
― Yerac, Thursday, 28 February 2019 17:26 (five years ago) link
No. Only pitchfork and stalin try to rewrite history.
― Trϵϵship, Thursday, 28 February 2019 17:31 (five years ago) link
The archives should stay as they are (barring something egregious obviously)
― Trϵϵship, Thursday, 28 February 2019 17:32 (five years ago) link
also this is insane to rank them in terms of jobs well done. All three were noticeable better than most/all. AOC is the winner if we are going there. sheesh.― Yerac, Thursday, February 28, 2019 4:13 PM (one hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― Yerac, Thursday, February 28, 2019 4:13 PM (one hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
this is true. i was responding to some posts above, but it is a silly game. sorry for contributing to it.
― affects breves telnet (Gummy Gummy), Thursday, 28 February 2019 17:34 (five years ago) link
although i should note that if people compare/contrast it's partly because1) they are all freshman congresspeople w/ high profiles2) they actually make lots of public appearances together, and IIRC aren't omar and tlaib AOC's apartmentmates?
so it's not like the only reason for "grouping" them is b/c they are women of color. they actually kind of run in a pack! in a good way!
― affects breves telnet (Gummy Gummy), Thursday, 28 February 2019 17:36 (five years ago) link
I could tell which party was speaking even when I wasn't watching the video just by listening for subject-verb agreement.
Well, that and having to reach for the volume button on my computer to turn down the blowhard GOP firebreathers.
― pee-tape pay per view special (Dan Peterson), Thursday, 28 February 2019 17:37 (five years ago) link
yeah I'm not sure what a "winning" Republican strategy could've been, given that Cohen was going to prison trying to protect Trump. still, I am pretty sure "yell and shame Cohen until you're red in the face" was probably not the best way to do it
― frogbs, Thursday, 28 February 2019 17:37 (five years ago) link
Let us remember that for at least 20 years the GOP has run people whose purpose is to be as incompetent as possible to show how incompetent the federal govt is
― Let's have sensible centrist armageddon (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 28 February 2019 17:44 (five years ago) link
i'm not sure you can call that "purposeful" -- it's just kind of a dynamic of its own.
― affects breves telnet (Gummy Gummy), Thursday, 28 February 2019 17:44 (five years ago) link
a vicious circle, if you will
― affects breves telnet (Gummy Gummy), Thursday, 28 February 2019 17:45 (five years ago) link
NHS, that's the mission, expressed in a leaked Bush-era memo.
― Let's have sensible centrist armageddon (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 28 February 2019 17:48 (five years ago) link
*nah
― Let's have sensible centrist armageddon (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 28 February 2019 17:49 (five years ago) link
That *would* be your autocorrect
― fuck the NRA (Neanderthal), Thursday, 28 February 2019 18:06 (five years ago) link
You're welcome!
― Let's have sensible centrist armageddon (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 28 February 2019 18:08 (five years ago) link