"I'm a sovereign human being, I stand under common law only" - Thread of Freemen

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1630 of them)

Check out this twat

Unhappy pensioner who tried to cite Australian case law and William Pitt in defence against conviction has appeal delayed

In November John Timbrell pleaded not guilty to obstructing a police officer in Mitcheldean – despite freely admitting in court that he obstructed a police officer.

The 76-year-old told Cheltenham Magistrates’ Court a police arrest warrant is “fraudulent” if it does not have a wet seal.

Timbrell then described the officers as “badly trained dummies” who do not know the difference between ‘lawful’ and ‘legal’.

“Your rights as a police officer do not give you the authority to break common law,” he told PS Freeman.

“The fact a living man can refuse jurisdiction from a court is not known to many police officers.”

Timbrell then described the legal system as the “illegal system”.

Giving evidence to the court, PC Varden said: “I didn’t know what he was on about.”

mfktz (Camaraderie at Arms Length), Sunday, 27 January 2019 11:15 (five years ago) link

Mr McCabe asked: “Did you use the internet in your research?”

“I am not going to be trapped into that,” Timbrell replied.

some of these need their internet taking off them

unexplained drinking injuries (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 27 January 2019 11:26 (five years ago) link

Looks like he missed a trick by not making use of the fact that the police officer he obstructed was named Freeman.

the word dog doesn't bark (anagram), Sunday, 27 January 2019 12:32 (five years ago) link

this is getting worse and worse here as banks start to actually repossess the hard luck investors from the past double decade

our master of the high court is worth a google, hes been up to allsorts lately

david waster phallus (darraghmac), Sunday, 27 January 2019 13:18 (five years ago) link

two weeks pass...
two months pass...

Is this the right thread for these, er, pioneers?

US man could face death penalty over Thailand 'sea home'

"We're looking forward to freedom loving people to come and join us on the open ocean"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8bceePdFruU

Ned Trifle X, Thursday, 18 April 2019 15:53 (five years ago) link

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C3cjtSbWMAAVBRx.jpg

kinder, Thursday, 18 April 2019 17:09 (five years ago) link

one month passes...

this is old and yet in another more accurate sense, evergreen:
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1416262/Court-refuses-trial-by-combat.html

mark s, Saturday, 25 May 2019 18:22 (four years ago) link

yeve seen the ben gilroy vid right

daenerys baker (darraghmac), Saturday, 25 May 2019 20:58 (four years ago) link

four weeks pass...

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/jun/23/man-refused-to-register-sons-birth-high-court

[The judge] said the couple’s deliberate decision not to register the birth stemmed from the boy’s father’s unusual and somewhat eccentric beliefs about the concept of personal sovereignty. He said the boy’s mother was not prepared to register the birth herself, but was not opposed to somebody else registering it.

He said the father had a genuinely held belief in the power and writ of the individual. The father told the judge: “We are each our own sovereign. We are governed by a common law but only to the extent that we depart from three principles. These three imperatives are: to do no harm; to cause no loss; to inflict no injury.”

The judge said the father regarded registering a birth as the equivalent of making an entry on to a ship’s manifest. He argued that registering the birth would make the child “an asset to the country, which has boarded a vessel to sail on the high seas”.

The judge added the essence of the father’s objection was “his belief that registration will cause his son to become controlled by a state which he perceives to be authoritarian and capricious”.

van dyke parks generator (anagram), Sunday, 23 June 2019 17:50 (four years ago) link

the father’s objection was “his belief that registration will cause his son to become controlled by a state which he perceives to be authoritarian and capricious”.

He's both right and wrong about that one. The state is quite often authoritarian and capricious, and it does control those who live within its borders to a large extent, but his belief that failing to register his son's birth would have the slightest effect on this is just magical thinking of the worst sort.

A is for (Aimless), Sunday, 23 June 2019 18:18 (four years ago) link

https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/germanys-new-mini-reichs/

The Reichsbürger’s ethno-nationalist ideology most closely resembles American strains of right-wing state-denying and secessionist groups known as “Sovereign Citizens.” Many of the exact conspiracy theories, tactics, and legal maneuvers employed by German Reichsbürger are borrowed from the Sovereign Citizens, whose earliest groupings can be traced back to the 1970s. Often survivalist or white nationalist in nature, Sovereign Citizens deny the legitimacy and jurisdiction of the US federal government and especially the IRS, claiming that the individual is inherently sovereign or that the highest authority is the local sheriff (as commissioned by local “free men”).

The Australian sociologist Judy Lattas sees microstates as “a largely grievance-driven form of political protest” but with a much deeper significance for our present understanding of the nation-state and the individual. Small groups and individuals who declare their own state may take their vocabulary from the establishing ceremonies of larger states, but they “relocate” sovereignty onto an assertion of individual rights. Thomas Jefferson’s individual hand signing the Declaration of Independence represented not himself but the united will of the nation. Microstates insist that tiny groups and even single individuals also deserve the rights of a state.

j., Sunday, 23 June 2019 22:21 (four years ago) link

Pierce is doing what pundits do, taking a news story and spinning out a narrative. A lot of these narratives involve the future and the horrible consequences that will roll out of the original news story and day now.

Pierce could be right here. The implications of the Oregon Republicans openly embracing people who make serious threats of violence against their political opponents is ugly as hell and much too easy to normalize as just another baby step in a trend that's been building for more than a decade. But it's good to remember that pundits, like stock pickers, make a lot of bad or overwrought predictions, based on seeing trends that move only in one direction.

A is for (Aimless), Monday, 24 June 2019 23:15 (four years ago) link

is there a more positive narrative?

mookieproof, Monday, 24 June 2019 23:24 (four years ago) link

I can't see the future.

A is for (Aimless), Monday, 24 June 2019 23:48 (four years ago) link

xp no there isn't

Ambient Police (sleeve), Monday, 24 June 2019 23:49 (four years ago) link

Let's see about that. Hmmm. How about:

  • no actual violence occurs as a result of this act of political theater on the part of the Republicans.
  • the episode ends with the Republicans further marginalized in Oregon politics as a result of their stupid shenanigans.
  • the cap-and-trade bill is slightly altered to allow some face-saving but passes essentially as it is (which already contains a number of compromises to address the concerns of rural Oregonians and the 'mighty' timber lobby.
  • in the parts of the state where the more militant, gun-toting, confederate flag-waving minority flaunts their ugly beliefs, the less militant majority continues to worry mostly about making a living and raising their kids.
  • and the whole thing blows over.
I don't claim to be a clairvoyant, but this narrative about the future seems to me to exist within the realm of the possible. I offer it, not as prediction but as a possible "more positive narrative" that mookieproof asked for and sleeve asserts doesn't exist.

A is for (Aimless), Tuesday, 25 June 2019 03:51 (four years ago) link

does this... remind you of anyone?

More details: https://t.co/Dmz4U9Tj46

— JJ MacNab (@jjmacnab) July 2, 2019

Captain ACAB (Neil S), Tuesday, 2 July 2019 15:05 (four years ago) link

is it possible to be both a sovereign human being and a seven nation army?

coroner criticises butt (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 2 July 2019 15:12 (four years ago) link

one month passes...

Early in ILX's existence there was a Millar who posted here. Kind of a contrarian, given to outbursts. I wonder...

A is for (Aimless), Friday, 23 August 2019 17:11 (four years ago) link

lol

mookieproof, Friday, 23 August 2019 17:37 (four years ago) link

four months pass...

washington state senator is a real piece of work: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/12/23/us/matt-shea-washington-extremism.html

ex-wife testified that he insisted she walk on his left side because his sword, if he had one, would be on his right

also no one wants to arrest him due to fears of a violent confrontation

mookieproof, Tuesday, 24 December 2019 12:04 (four years ago) link

three weeks pass...

Kansas man asks judge's leave for sword battle with ex-wife, lawyer

A Kansas man has asked an Iowa judge to let him engage in a sword fight with his ex-wife and her attorney so that he can “rend their souls” from their bodies.

David Ostrom, 40, of Paola, Kansas, said in a Jan. 3 court filing that his former wife, Bridgette Ostrom, 38, of Harlan, Iowa, and her attorney, Matthew Hudson, had “destroyed (him) legally.” The Ostroms have been embroiled in disputes over custody and visitation issues and property tax payments.

The judge had the power to let the parties “resolve our disputes on the field of battle, legally,” David Ostrom said, adding in his filing that trial by combat “has never been explicitly banned or restricted as a right in these United States.”

He also asked the judge for 12 weeks’ time so he could secure Japanese samurai swords.

Of course he fucking did.

shared unit of analysis (unperson), Tuesday, 14 January 2020 20:25 (four years ago) link

broke, classist: making fun of Florida Man
funny, wholesome: making fun of sovereign citizens

bold caucasian eroticism (Simon H.), Tuesday, 14 January 2020 20:29 (four years ago) link

three weeks pass...

this lunacy has crossed to the UK. apparently here the magic words are "article 61 of MAGNA CARTA"

no surprise that there is a connection with brexiteers, antiquarians and a faintly hapless baron:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b09qhsc4

Li'l Brexit (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 5 February 2020 21:29 (four years ago) link

lol that was hilarious.

calzino, Wednesday, 5 February 2020 21:31 (four years ago) link

The first freemen I became aware of that prompted me to start the thread where in the UK

GK Chessington's World of Adventure (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 5 February 2020 21:40 (four years ago) link

i met my first in 2009 through work on ach1ll

BSC Joan Baez (darraghmac), Wednesday, 5 February 2020 21:42 (four years ago) link

it feels a very ancient kind of lunacy

GK Chessington's World of Adventure (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 5 February 2020 21:43 (four years ago) link

"antiquarian bookseller Gregg Lance-Watkins"

calzino, Wednesday, 5 February 2020 21:51 (four years ago) link

the guy who got sent down for drink driving and seriously hurting somebody then describes his prison time as his "apprenticeship" and says he had volunteered to be a hangman for the execution of the treacherous QEII!

calzino, Wednesday, 5 February 2020 21:54 (four years ago) link

whats the penalty under art 61 of the magna carta of an irish lad using a vpn to listen to this podcast

BSC Joan Baez (darraghmac), Wednesday, 5 February 2020 22:29 (four years ago) link

you get bled out till death like the subhuman pig eyed mick you are, overseen by an executioner who is a serial drink driver and did time for child porn in the 00's!

calzino, Wednesday, 5 February 2020 22:34 (four years ago) link

fuckit, will we chance it anyway lads hah?

BSC Joan Baez (darraghmac), Wednesday, 5 February 2020 22:39 (four years ago) link

one month passes...

Driving While Idiot

sorry for butt rockin (Neanderthal), Tuesday, 10 March 2020 20:01 (four years ago) link

sounds like a job for the freemen

it's not a car, it's a boat, and the dwi law only applies to airspace

Psychedics with Rosie Swash (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 10 March 2020 20:19 (four years ago) link

one month passes...

sovereign citizen storyline in the new BOSCH

mark s, Saturday, 18 April 2020 19:32 (four years ago) link

^^^ Was just coming here to mention this.

but also fuck you (unperson), Saturday, 18 April 2020 20:06 (four years ago) link

i'm just going to start posting coronavirus protest pictures here, rather than ruining all the other threads

let me be your friend on the other end! (Karl Malone), Monday, 20 April 2020 17:25 (four years ago) link

don't click this thread if you don't want to see freedom

let me be your friend on the other end! (Karl Malone), Monday, 20 April 2020 17:25 (four years ago) link

MAGA version of Tiananmen Square = blocking ambulances until someone reopens Waffle House

genital giant (Neanderthal), Monday, 20 April 2020 17:35 (four years ago) link

Consecutive tweets from @natalie_allison pic.twitter.com/LafzDsztRY

— Daniel Dale (@ddale8) April 20, 2020

mookieproof, Monday, 20 April 2020 17:36 (four years ago) link

this is a press release from the GOP in Virginia:

https://virginia.gop/liberate-virginia/

Richmond, VA – On Friday, President Donald Trump tweeted, “LIBERATE VIRGINIA, and save your great 2nd Amendment. It is under siege!” That tweet was accompanied by two others directed at the citizens of two other states also subjected to the tyrannical rule of incompetent liberal governors.

COVID-19 testing, the key to lifting public restrictions, stalls in Virginia
Timely COVID-19 information is vital, but Va.’s state government is falling short
During Governor Northam’s 2:00 PM press conference today, please consider asking him if shutting down Virginia is actually for our health. Before he attempts to enchant you with a canned “now is not the time for partisanship” answer in his Eastern Shore drawl, consider the following:

When the State tells you it’s safe to go to the store to buy a broom but too dangerous to go and buy a flower, it’s not about your health.
When the State shuts down thousands of private businesses but doesn’t lay off a single government employee, it’s not about your health.
When the State bans dentists because its unsafe, but deems an abortion safe, it’s not about your health.
When the State prevents you from buying gardening supplies because it’s dangerous, but allows in person lottery ticket sales, it’s not about your health.
When the State tells you it’s dangerous to go golf alone, fish alone, or be in a motor boat alone, but the Governor can get his stage make up and hair done for multiple TV appearances a week, it’s not about your health.

let me be your friend on the other end! (Karl Malone), Monday, 20 April 2020 17:36 (four years ago) link

When the GOP wants your vote, it's about your stupidity

A True White Kid that can Jump (Granny Dainger), Monday, 20 April 2020 17:48 (four years ago) link

is it freeman stuff tho

steer calmer (darraghmac), Monday, 20 April 2020 17:55 (four years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.