Post a controversial opinion

twitter user @dril is tiresome

(i guess i hate fun but i find his style so mannered that i can only take it in very small doses. is he a sacred cow around here? never seen a word against him)

I don't find him funny. I like @pixelatedboat and @KrangTNelson which seem to be the same basic audience so not sure what I'm not getting with @dril

Whom among us does not have a style as mannered as dril’s tbh

twitter is just tiresome

if rich americans identified as rich americans half as quick as they identified as anything else in internet arguments we'd all get a lot more done

i get why dril is funny but so much funny shit like that gives me hipster runoff sociopath vibes.

i can't understand liking pixelatedboat more than dril tbh

if rich americans identified as rich americans half as quick as they identified as anything else in internet arguments we'd all get a lot more done

otm

krang is occasionally funny but hacky as fuck tbh and basically indistinguishable from the thousands of randos adding toppers to his posts. pb is the same but worse

dril rules

i can't understand liking pixelatedboat more than dril tbh

or especially krang ffs

wins otm

dennis perrin vs dril

They are all bad.

somehow also otm

yea

all twitter posts are bad

otm

pixelated boat is good because often enough people who should know better get tricked by his photoshop jobs.

krang and pixelatedboat are not in the same category as dril. they break character all the time, if there even is one. they just read like internet personalities to me, whereas dril or kattwillferrell or DigimonOtis are performance artists.

are rich americans incapable of objectivity?

Read that as "are irish americans incapable of objectivity?" tbh. Tough question.

lol

idk what objectivity has to do with it rly but id be willing to listen

as an aspirational american i'd like to know the impetus for your controp above

you are aspiring to be an american?

yes i've been so inspired by them lately!

lol

Wittiness is frequently tedious.

each vampire weekend album has been worse than the previous

there's a thread for that

There's a board for that

With an ironic title

its quite easy to separate eg Michael Jackson's music from his persona from his crimes against children

cut him some bloody slack, it's not like he hung out with Spiked/Living Marxism writers:p

do you think the same about r. kelly? (srs q)

the well-developed argument (available on ilx threads on the topic) on r. kelly is the fact he revels in the accusations and behaviours in much of his later stuff, so theres a clearer line there between transgression and product

Ted Bundy was not good-looking

nobody was then

he's no Richard Ramirez for sure

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/38/59/e4/3859e4144ae2fd112a8c66b8c77a1801.jpg

Ted Bundy was not good-looking

― omar little, Wednesday, January 30, 2019 2:26 PM (twenty-one minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

he was "good looking for a serial killer".

having him played by "good looking for a movie star" Zac Efron in a movie is beyond ridic

being really into true crime is a character flaw

xps looks like if Freddie Mercury took a pic of himself for a dating app

xp it would seem important to cast someone handsome, wasn't that his honeytrap?

Zac efron is totally creepy looking - I’ve never understood his appeal

The Wolf of Wall Street > Casino >>>>> Goodfellas

The Wolf of Wall Street > Casino >>>>> Goodfellas

It's kind of predictable, I guess, that the genuinely controversial opinions itt are also inconsequential.

yeah, come on, I like Casino, but it's the opposite

I can’t abide The Wolf of Wall Street’s glorification of big money rapiers. It’s almost as bad as an Adam McKay movie. it’s the worst film Scorcese ever made in my opinion