Clint Eastwood

(Earl manages two threesomes with attractive young women in the film)

!? lmao

The Mule does kinda feel like a perfect Pinkerton storm.

no one named Earl has ever had a threesome, c'mon

Earl ‘The Pearl’ Monroe disagrees.

I doubt the Sweatshirt's had one either

You can't say Warren wasn't warnin' y'all.

The Mule features what is perhaps the leakiest, most poorly run cartel in cinema history

Alm0nd calls it Eastwood's best movie ever: https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/12/movie-review-the-mule-clint-eastwood-honest-classic/

well, yeah

It also improved its box office this weekend

A long way to go to match Gran Torino's $148M but I have faith in that section of America.

it was a fairly stupid movie overall. naturally Eastwood's character redeems himself with his family in the end just by being a decent human being for one night, nevermind the fact that he causes his family a shit ton more pain in the end due to his job with the cartel.

also he like disobeys the cartel over and over again and they keep threatening him if he doesn't fall in line but they never do anything about it, also they use the same drivers on the same routes every single run making it criminally easy for law enforcement (who still need a tip from an informant anyway).

also we're to believe he kills two ripped, young cartel people who had him at gunpoint moments earlier. it's off-screen, but....I was lolling imagining how his frail ass could have pulled that off.

nevermind the last part, the internet seems to confirm the judge just made an awkwardly worded comment and wasn't actually saying Earl killed anybody.

Clint's performance in The Mule is near-great.

Try to understand what's actually happening in the film, Nee.

Ok

White Hunter Black Heart is underrated I think. Unusual and interesting film.

White Hunter Black Heart is just a lightly fictionalized compilation of various lurid John Huston legends into a coherent script. The legends are courtesy of Huston and are more to be credited for the interest you see there than anything Eastwood contributed.

You're wrong on that last.

It's based on a novel by Peter Viertel, who was working with JH on African Queen.

Getting back to The Mule, Clint's character is driven out of his horticulture business by the internet and complains loudly about cellphones in a couple scenes, so that softens his character for me... Anyway it's the latest in a series of "mea culpa" protagonists he's played (Unforgiven, MDB, Gran Torino).

It's based on a novel by Peter Viertel

Which was a lightly fictionalized compilation of various lurid John Huston legends. Huston's character was the focal point both of the book and the resulting movie. Had he not been such an interesting character, the novel and movie would not exist.

A movie was based om a book

It's not easy to make a good film given those circumstances! (Don't) see W.C. Fields and Me.

I don't like the 'mea culpa' films he has made, and he never seems to apologize for the really bad stuff. So much awful stuff in his relationship to Sondra Locke, and he makes a film about being too occupied with work, and everyone is falling over themselves to give him praise?

I don't like White Hunter, Black Heart, Africa and Africans just seems like a stage for John Huston to live out his morality play. The really great Eastwood films are Sudden Impact, Pale Rider and A Perfect World, imo. And it annoys me that he has actually made a few great films, would be much easier if he was only a villain. I'd rather be a bit annoyed and have Pale Rider, though.

yeah review via the life, fits you

ppl gen mean 'mea culpa' for some of the earlier work

I've never seen anyone say The Mule is about his earlier work?

It doesn't have to be specifically, but the estrangement from family expands upon a similar trope in Million Dollar Baby, to name one.

Edelstein:

For nearly half a century, his alter-egos did not take emasculation lightly: He’d rasp some variation of, “You don’t listen, do ya’ asshole?” and pull back his fist or pull out his big gun. But the nonagenarian Earl Stone isn’t Harry Callahan or Bill Munny or even the once-militant Walt Kowalski of Gran Torino. Early on, before he understands how easily they could kill him, Earl sasses his Mexican handlers. He says, “Ya vol, mein herr,” with a silly German accent. But when they start to rough him up and hiss cabron in his face, he does nothing, nada. He’s not a fighter. He only wants to sniff flowers. Clint Eastwood has aged into Ferdinand the Bull.

https://www.vulture.com/2018/12/the-mule-is-a-modest-twist-on-the-clint-eastwood-myth.html

kinda want to see Clint do a series of True Detective

he's mighty elderly

Yes, was just thinking he's now moving into the oldest-people-to-have-ever-directed-a-movie zone, if not quite Manoel de Oliveira just yet.

oh i was just thinking in terms of acting in it

I had to look up the last time that Clint had acted in something he didn't direct - turns out to be this, which I'd never even heard of before (don't think it got a UK release):

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trouble_with_the_Curve

My guess also is that Clint probably swore to himself long ago to never ever return to TV.

unless he talks to a chair

Eastwood's box office record is startling. I might be wrong, but he's quite along among filmmakers approaching 90 whose movies still make a tidy proit.

*profit

his return to TV for the RNC was a good appearance

in what sense are you using "good"?

yeah, but it's not tv, tho, it's HBO?

Had somehow not seen this playful image of birthday boy Clintus Eastwood until today! pic.twitter.com/gkwdoWFuAN

— 𝖇𝖚𝖒𝖕 𝖘𝖙𝖔𝖈𝖐 1776 (@NickPinkerton) May 31, 2019

Doug McClure?

yes it is! wow, "The Virginian" ran for 9 years.

I watched "Coogan's Bluff" a few weeks back. I know I had seen it a couple of times as a kid as it is a classic Eastwood marathon afternoon movie.

Coogan's Bluff has some interesting how things change scenes dealing with the police therapist character that caught my attention. The whole sequence with her starting in the squad room with the perp on to when she goes on a date with Coogan is darkly hilarious to watch with modern eyes as it is so sexist.

well this could be innnnteresting

https://collider.com/richard-jewell-trailer-new-clint-eastwood-movie/

Hmm. Wrongfully accused middle aged white dude vs. the government *and* the lying media. Seems likely to make everyone mad.

Thankful it's not a McVeigh movie

How did Magnum Force get a vote in this poll, but not Sudden Impact?

I wondered why Jewell was trending.

It gets a little sappy near the end, and the big interrogation scene where Jewell pushes back isn't really credible, but I thought this was pretty absorbing for the first hour-plus. I say that as a non-fan--first Eastwood film I've seen since J. Edgar, which was a complete waste. I see Kathy Bates got an AA nomination...as such things go, surprised Rockwell and/or Paul Walter Hauser (Jewell) didn't get one. Liked John Hamm, too, even if (or maybe because, I don't know) he turns into Don Draper now and again, especially when he asserts control right after the bombing.

Certainly could have done without all the Confederate flags, a reminder that this is chair guy, after all.

The level to which Eastwood clearly believes the script's worst tendencies is properly balanced by just how far Hauser goes toward making Jewell a credibly unlikable, suspicious person. This is likely Eastwood's best since Iwo Jima.

Not surprised or even particularly disappointed it went nowhere at the b.o. tho.