Albums in 5.1 surround

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (88 of them)

I have that on bluray, but for some reason I've never really given it a proper listen. I'll do that once I have the time, will report back here.

Tuomas, Monday, 26 November 2018 21:25 (five years ago) link

Okay, I listened to it, and it is genuine surround mix... Though the back channels are mostly used create a space effect, most of the action is in the front and middle channels.

If you wanna hear albums that seriously use the back speakers to do some crazy things, you should get Isao Tomita's quadraphonic albums from the 70s, they've all been released on SACD in recent years. The Debussy one is k my favourite, it sounds incredible. Though the most ridiculous surround effects are probably on his version of Holst's Planets.

Tuomas, Monday, 3 December 2018 17:53 (five years ago) link

Cool. Are there any such albums also on DVD, or are they all SACD-only?

Philip Nunez, Monday, 3 December 2018 18:08 (five years ago) link

Perhaps a stupid question, but when you're listening to a 5.1 CD, what setting should you use on your receiver? Standard or something else?
When I listen to CDs, I usually go with an all-channel stereo setting, but I doubt I'd be getting the full effect with a 5.1 mix. I don't see any specific setting on my Pioneer for a 5.1 mix for CDs.

Jazzbo, Monday, 3 December 2018 18:18 (five years ago) link

Cool. Are there any such albums also on DVD, or are they all SACD-only?
I don't think so, but if you wanna enter the SACD world, Sony's BDP-S6200 model is fairly cheap DVD/Bluray player that also plays SACDs (or DSD files, if you're downloading your music). It's the one I have.

I mentioned this on the SACD thread, but for some reason even Sony's official website doesn't mention state it, but when you connect the BDP-S6200 to the net, and update the firmware, it adds a SACD/DSD decoding option that isn't in the factory settings, and after that you can play the 5.1 layer on SACDs (or DSD files from a memory stick). The player costs less than 200 euros, so it's much cheaper than most other SACD players, which tend to be made by audiophile brands like Marantz.

Tuomas, Monday, 3 December 2018 18:48 (five years ago) link

Perhaps a stupid question, but when you're listening to a 5.1 CD, what setting should you use on your receiver? Standard or something else?
When I listen to CDs, I usually go with an all-channel stereo setting, but I doubt I'd be getting the full effect with a 5.1 mix. I don't see any specific setting on my Pioneer for a 5.1 mix for CDs.
You need a receiver that can decode a surround signal... Playing the all-channel stereo doesn't do that, it just replicates the stereo signal to the back and middle speakers, so any 5.1 action is lost. These kind of receivers are usually marketed A/V receivers, as most people buy them to play movie audio through them. People who want to listen to music in 5.1 are such a niche market that I think only audiophile brands produce receivers specifically for them.

The receiver I use is the Yamaha RX-V673, it's an A/V receiver, but it has a lot of settings for music too, and it sounds quite good to my (non-golden) ears. It was 700 euros when I bought it but probably cheaper now, I'd definitely recommend it if you wanna invest in a surround system. (It supports 7.1 too, but that's too crazy even for me, no way is there space for those middle speakers in our apartment.)

Tuomas, Monday, 3 December 2018 19:00 (five years ago) link

Oh, sorry, I think I misunderstood you, so your receiver does have a surround option, but you're asking how to play CDs with a 5.1 sound?

Well, regular CDs can't have a surround sound coded in them, it's not technically possible. Only SACDs do, and for those you need a dedicated SACD player, like the one I mentioned before. Some 5.1 receivers, like the Yamaha I have, do have an option for "fake surround", i.e. a setting that codes a stereo signal into something resembling surround that plays in all speakers. But I mostly use it with movies/TV shows that are in stereo, because IMO it emphasises the middle speaker too much, and at least in my set it's the smallest one, so I don't like having so much of the music coming through it.

So for music I just use the "play stereo through all speakers" setting, which has more oomph, but obviously there's no surround effect then, not even a simulated one. But IMO there's no point of playing music mixed to stereo with the fake surround effect. It works nicer with TV shows in stereo, because it puts the dialogue into the middle speaker, which makes it easier to hear.

Tuomas, Monday, 3 December 2018 21:06 (five years ago) link

DVD Audio discs play 5.1 as would its Blu-ray equivalent.

bodacious ignoramus, Monday, 3 December 2018 21:16 (five years ago) link

Yeah, they do, but DVD-audio discs need a player that can decode them, and many players, such as mine, only decode DVD-video, not DVD-audio (as DVD-A discs were an audiophile thing that never really took flight). Thankfully most audio DVDs have separate DVD-A and DVD-V layer, so you can get the surround sound with even a regular DVD-V player. The bitrate will be lower, but I think you really need to have the proverbial golden ears to notice any difference.

Tuomas, Monday, 3 December 2018 21:32 (five years ago) link

With blurays there's thankfully no such differences in decoding, as far as I know. If you have bluray player, it should be able to play any 5.1 audio bluray just fine.

Tuomas, Monday, 3 December 2018 21:41 (five years ago) link

Yep. My Samsung BD-J6300 Blu-ray player does not call out DVD-A specifically but plays every DVD-A disc in 5.1 surround that i've put into it connected simply over a HDMI cable.

bodacious ignoramus, Tuesday, 4 December 2018 18:38 (five years ago) link

Revive!

Are there any good ambient albums in surround sound? You'd think the format would we ideal for ambient music, but all I've managed to find are the surround DTS discs Pete Namlook put out on FAX in the years before his death... So any recommendations beyond the FAX stuff?

What are the best FAX 5.1 releases?

Naive Teen Idol, Friday, 7 December 2018 04:35 (five years ago) link

My absolute favourites are the 5 Labyrinth albums (Namlook and Lorenzo Montana), which have a really crisp and chill home-listening electro sound. The 5.1 sound is used nicely to emphasise both the mood and rhythm elements of the tracks, it sounds really cool and evocative.

Another big favourite are the two Elektronik (Namlook and Material Object) albums, they're the sort of gritty, experimental techno that's kinda atypical of FAX. Really excellent drum and rhythm programming, which sounds devastating in the 5.1 mix.

The final 2350 Broadway album is also in surround, it has some beautifully serene, enveloping drones, probably my favourite in that series. The Namlook/Le Mar album also has some nice drones as well as techno/electro tracks with beats, one of them especially uses the 5 channels for some fun, geeky gimmicks.

The Namlook/Move D albums of the 5.1 era are more varied in quality, but there are some gems among them too, especially the Raumland trilogy and Space & Time. They're kinda samey and the surround sound isn't used as noticeably as on some other releases, but there are some nice sci-fi effects on those too.

Namlook's 5.1 era solo albums are of more acquired taste, he seemed to put his more experimental drives there. The Urban Meditation series is mostly grey, foreboding drones, and the Pearl series is like modern electronic classical. Iterations is a unique album that experiments with loops that change every iteration. I think it's a fascinating idea, and the surround sound supports it effectively, but again, whether you like it depends on how you find this kind of experimental electronics. The only non-experimental solo work he released in this period is Subconscious Worlds, a fun, spacey techno album, kinda in the same mold as the Move D collabs, but without the irritating stretched vocal samples. If you like "classic" early-to-mid-90s FAX, that one is well worth checking out.

The final Dark Side of the Moog (XI) is also in 5.1. I'm not the biggest fan of that project, but the last album is one of the better entries in it, though I don't remember the surround sound doing much else than deepening the space drones. But if you like the DSotM series, it's certainly something you should hear.

Tuomas, Friday, 7 December 2018 21:26 (five years ago) link

DSOTM XI ?
hang on …

mark e, Friday, 7 December 2018 22:19 (five years ago) link

six months pass...

I got in to downloading a bunch of 5.1 records recently and playing them back via my laptop's HDMI output. Some highlights:

No-Man Schoolyard Ghosts -- this record is gorgeous and the mix is really sumptuous and subtle, Bowness's vocals are right up front in the center channel and all the strings, flutes, guitars and keyboards float around you. Excellent stuff.
Roxy Music Avalon -- per my post upthread, this one didn't disappoint.
2350 Broadway IV -- this is a really nice sounding record
XTC Skylarking -- Wilson's mix on this is exceptional, there are tons of little details that don't exist in the stereo mix, background vocals and whatnot. Oranges & Lemons is a good listen as well
Tears for Fears Songs from the Big Chair -- "Head Over Heels" on this is just everything you'd hope it would be
Moody Blues Seventh Sojourn -- this is a quad transfer but a really interesting listen in that it doesn't put everything in the front and sonics in the back, worth checking out

The one I'm jonesing for now is Propaganda's A Secret Wish

Naive Teen Idol, Sunday, 9 June 2019 03:49 (four years ago) link

If you're into Tomita's style of playing classical music on synths, all of his quadraphonic albums from the '70s have been released as 4.1 SACDs (they don't utilise the middle speaker because the original quadraphonic system didn't have that). They're all worth getting, but the Debussy ("Clair de lune") and Mussorgsky ("Pictures at an Exhibition") ones especially are a treat if you like this kind of synthesiser music. They all have some pretty fun surround trickery too, I guess to emphasise the novelty value of a 4-speaker system.

Tuomas, Sunday, 9 June 2019 09:38 (four years ago) link

I’d heard Tomita in surround was pretty glorious – Ultimate Planets is the second highest rated surround disc on Quadraphonic Quad. Alas no success pulling those down online yet.

Naive Teen Idol, Monday, 10 June 2019 16:29 (four years ago) link

I'd love to hear further thoughts on the Oranges & Lemons 5.1 mix, actually, because the stereo mix is notoriously crammed full of detail and it seems like the kind of record that would truly blossom with the addition of the extra channels.

Le Baton Rose (Turrican), Monday, 10 June 2019 16:35 (four years ago) link

I’d heard Tomita in surround was pretty glorious – Ultimate Planets is the second highest rated surround disc on Quadraphonic Quad.

That one probably has the most ridiculous surround effects I've ever heard on a surround album, basically just sounds jumping all across the listening field. So it definitely takes full advantage of the technology, your mileage may vary whether or not that's a good thing. :)

Tuomas, Wednesday, 12 June 2019 13:34 (four years ago) link

Personally, my favourite surround mix is probably on Björk's Medulla. It uses the surround field to great effect, but in an organic manner, it never feels like a gimmick like on some other albums.

Tuomas, Wednesday, 12 June 2019 13:39 (four years ago) link

haha when i was my fourteen my dad bought a 5.1 system and put all of the speakers in one place on the tv stand

meaulnes, Wednesday, 12 June 2019 14:42 (four years ago) link

also on the subject of flaming lips 'zaireeka', once i read a story on some forum about a young lad who bought it, set up four stereos in his living room to play it back... and his parents came home, walked in on him sat on the floor surrounded by the speakers and took him for a drug test lmao

meaulnes, Wednesday, 12 June 2019 14:47 (four years ago) link

I'd love to hear further thoughts on the /Oranges & Lemons/ 5.1 mix, actually, because the stereo mix is notoriously crammed full of detail and it seems like the kind of record that would truly blossom with the addition of the extra channels.

I hadn’t listened intensely to it until this post, but now that I have it does sound really good (tho I have to turn down my center quite a bit so the vocals aren’t too loud).

Something like “Garden of Earthly Delights” or “Across These Antheaps” really does open up, with all the backwards guitars, trumpets flourishes, synth stabs and the like separated out. “King for a Day” possibly sounds more like “Everybody Wants to Rule the World” than it did before, with Mastelotto’s drum parts spread more widely across the stereo/multichannel field.

A lot of Gregory’s guitars have more bite and definition while Moulding’s bass sounds positively fabulous in tunes like “Poor Skeleton Steps Out.” Even some tracks that left me a little flat before (such as “Hold Me My Daddy”) just *sound* good here.

Worth noting that “Chalkhills and Children” has an absolutely incredible mix, placed mostly in the front all the way into the end of the second pre-chorus when Wilson pushes the the vocals in the first big “But I’m getting higherrrrrr-errr!”crescendo to the side and back. It’s a pretty thrilling moment, as the rest of the song is quite discrete from that point forward with lots of things bouncing around.

The problem with this record continues to be that it’s too damn long. But it sounds significantly better in this mix.

Naive Teen Idol, Tuesday, 18 June 2019 03:59 (four years ago) link

FWIW, Tusk is absolutely incredible in 5.1.

Naive Teen Idol, Friday, 21 June 2019 13:52 (four years ago) link

three years pass...

Revive! Has anyone checked out Dolby Atmos? I just noticed that Wilson has remixed. The first three Chic records for it. I also realized that my basement TV sound bar will play it. I don’t have it set up with any rear channels or anything yet but maybe I don’t need to? I also see that Amazon music streams at least some stuff. Which is certainly easier than all the massive multi track files I have pirated onto my laptop.

Naive Teen Idol, Wednesday, 1 March 2023 14:24 (one year ago) link

Jerry Harrison had some stuff to say in that TapeOp interview:

I just worked with Ed remixing all of the Talking Heads albums for Atmos.

-You mixed everything in 5.1 before, right?

That was with Eric “ET” Thorngren. [See Eric’s interview this issue.] He did the bulk of the catalog. Ed did (Talking Heads:) 77, and he did about half of More Songs About Buildings and Food, and then Eric did the other half. Because Eric and I still had the sessions from the 5.1, we had a head start on thinking about this. When we were doing the 5.1, we listened to all of these different (surround) records. There were certain people who wanted to make mixes feel like you were on stage, with the musicians around you.

-Yeah, some strange placement of the listener, as if you’d joined the band.

We felt that was not a very successful way to look at it. The other thing is that we realized that people would have these stereo systems, and then who knew what the rest of the speakers would be. We used the faux center of stereo, as long as it was then reinforced with the center speaker. By the time that we’ve now reached with Atmos, people have more sophisticated systems. I think that surround audio could be wonderful, but the majority of people who are going to be listening to Atmos will probably be listening to it on headphones, to begin with.

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 1 March 2023 15:48 (one year ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.