It's a Good Name for You: the Max Scherzer thread

Taking into account total WAR, seasonal WAR, World Championships (ultimately the whole point of a splashy free-agent signing), and how much of a public relations nightmare the player ended up being (which applies to three or four of these guys), I'd rank them this way:

1. Bonds (public relations nightmare and no World Championships, but still)
2. Either Maddux or Johnson--I can see arguments for both
3. Manny Ramirez
4. Scherzer
5. A-Rod (you could rank him third, I guess...lots of headaches near the end)
6. Beltre (would like to place him higher, but I don't think you can)
7. Palmeiro

yeah, i was talking about a-rod's initial 10-year/$252m deal with the rangers (which he then opted out from after seven years). i would argue that these things should be ranked by contract rather than stints with teams, although it's more difficult to parse.

i guess it broke the rangers, but that a-rod deal was very much worth it for value and still would have been even with the remaining three less impressive seasons. the yankees re-signing him after the 2007 season is far less defensible: eight years (not including the one he didn't get paid for), 23.3 bWAR, $226m

does ichiro count as a free agent signing?

by stints-with-teams, roger clemens with the jays has to be up there too. those two seasons were fantastic, and they traded him at exactly the right time because the remaining years were less so

write-in vote for miles (!) mikolas (!)

David Ortiz didn't have the WAR numbers during his two contracts w/the BoSox but he was an extremely good signing both times.

I thought of Ichiro...somehow that seems different to me, being his first major league team. If you throw him in, he's somewhere in the middle. Ortiz, of course--had it my mind he came over in a trade, but you're right. And for just a stopover, Clemens might rank #1 (even though we didn't get any closer than 26 games out).

Ichiro (2001-2012) - 57.1 (4.8/season)
Ortiz (2003-2016) - 52.7 (3.8/season)
Clemens (1997-1998) - 20.0 (10.0/season)

i would argue that these things should be ranked by contract

Yeah, I wasn't factoring in money at all (or what you may have subsequently gotten, in a trade or with a draft pick, when the player left), just results.

Why is this restricted to post-'93 signings? Deals longer than 3-4 years were relatively rare before then (Bonds' deal was an icebreaker IIRC) but on an AAV basis there were plenty of good deals in the 80's and early 90's-- Rickey and Winfield with the Yankees, Nolan Ryan with the Astros, even Molitor with the Jays.

I didn't consciously restrict it, just couldn't think of anything offhand. (I looked at Reggie with the Yankees.) Initially, I was thinking of long-term tenures, and it kind of veered off into shorter stays. Here are the ones you mention:

Henderson (1985-1989) - 36.0 (7.2/season)
Winfield (1981-1990) - 28.2 (3.1/season)
Ryan (1980-1988) - 25.5 (2.8/season)
Molitor (1993-1995) - 10.5 (3.5/season)

Henderson for sure. I definitely consider the other three singings very successful, and Molitor was huge in '93; I guess they don't quite rank with the others using WAR.

For everyone I've been calculating, I included the year-end total for players traded during their final season (e.g., Henderson). So their overall totals are very slightly off.

Sorry to go off-topic, but Max Scherzer will be starting tomorrow in Denver and needs 6Ks to break the club's single season record for strikeouts (Pedro '97)

Max who?

False Alarm, he'll be shut down:

Max Scherzer will no longer start tomorrow against the Rockies. Dave Martinez said they’ve decided to shut him down considering his workload this year.

Erick Fedde will start Sunday instead

— Jamal Collier (@JamalCollier) September 30, 2018

10+ K starts since 4/29/2008 (Max Scherzer's MLB Debut)
89 Scherzer
84 Phillies
78 Cubs
78 WSox
78 Rangers
75 Dbacks (3 by Scherzer)
75 Yanks
72 Mariners
66 Angels
63 Brewers
58 Marlins
56 Jays
56 Cards
53 Reds
52 Braves
48 Rox
42 Padres
41 Bucs
39 Royals
38 A's
30 Twins
20 O's

— Christopher Kamka (@ckamka) June 26, 2019

Dominant start today...Someone pointed out in an e-mail to James the other day how uncannily some of his basic career totals match Koufax's right now:

Scherzer (before today)

W-L: 166-87
IP: 2232.0
WHIP: 1.094
ERA+: 133
WAR: 57.6

Koufax

W-L: 165-87
IP: 2324.1
WHIP: 1.106
ERA+: 131
WAR: 53.1

Scherzer has a much better K/BB ratio (4.29 to 2.93), Koufax the better FIP (2.69-3.13).

ridiculous player

Koufax pretty good to.

Missing his next start. Last nine:

IP - 64
H - 40
K - 94
BB - 9
HR - 3
ERA - 0.84
Game Scores - 71, 59, 86, 73, 72, 77, 78, 84, 79

Just because I like checking such things, I was curious how rare it is for a pitcher to have seven consecutive starts with a game score over 70. Yes, that's cherry-picked two ways: the game score of 70, and the number of starts. I realize that. It's a completely arbitrary and therefore largely meaningless achievement.

Anyway, I checked the game logs for a bunch of famous seasons starting with Gibson in '68: Seaver in '69, Vida Blue in '71, Carlton in '72, Guidry in '78, Gooden in '85, Clemens in '86, Hershiser in '88, Maddux in '94/95, Clemens in '97/98, Pedro in '00/01, Johnson in '01/02, Kershaw in '14, deGrom last year. Hardly exhaustive, just wanted something I could manage in five minutes. From those seasons, the only ones to do it were Blue in '71 and Hershiser in '88 (the scoreless streak plus the start before). Gibson had an average game score of 76 in 1968, but not seven consecutive starts of 70+.

Let me rephrase: largely redundant achievement, in that it's just another way of measuring what we already know, that Scherzer has been pretty great the past seven starts.

what about arrieta that year?

what was that? 14? 15? sorry I’m a little drunk

Arrieta didn't have more than three in a row that year (2015). However, his Game Scores for his final nine starts were:

70, 69, 98, 81, 71, 68, 91, 84, 75

If we lower clem's (arbitrary) threshold, that's nine straight over 68.

If you loosen the parameters a bit, there are many more impressive streaks than Scherzer's just from that small group. If you go to a game score of 65, Gibson has a 15-game streak in '68 (May 17-July 30). His worst start during that run: 8 IP, 4 H, 3 ER, 5 K, 1 BB. He hit 80-89 nine times and was over 90 twice.

Speaking of whom, bad news:

http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/mlb/cardinals/2019/07/13/bob-gibson-battling-pancreatic-cancer/1727582001/

Day-to-day; not good when the best player and the best pitcher in the game are simultaneously down.

(Oops--thought I was posting on the Trout thread. He's the one who's day-to-day; Scherzer's on the 10-day.)

Is this common knowledge? I never knew it: he has heterochromia iridum, meaning his eyes aren't the same colour.

http://beckett-www.s3.amazonaws.com/news/news-content/uploads/2015/01/ScherzerSC2008.jpg

If he'd been on the '69 Pilots, he would have had an undoubtedly cruel nickname.

i think it's common knowledge around these parts -- he has the excellent nickname "Blue Eye" apparently, in addition to the more common "Mad Max". the former name is real Bond villainish.

11 years ago, on the day Max was called up to the bigs, felicity (arguably the best contributor to I Love Baseball) wrote:

Max Scherzer petrified 13 straight batters with his deadly gaze!

Difficulty: 8
Attacks: Pitch 1d3, Petrification

--You behold Max Scherzer . . .
--You are terrified by his 2-color eyes, and cannot move . . .
--You cannot see the release point . . .
--You hear Max Scherzer's fastball hissing!
--You have become a statue.

when will the 2008 Arizona Diamondbacks come back to earth?

so my advice young clem, is to stick around, maybe catch up on the archives.

Sorry for the duress and inconvenience caused by my redundant post.

Scherzer and Strasburg for their careers:

                     ERA	WHIP	K/9	BB/9	H/9	HR/9
Max Scherzer         3.20	1.092	10.6	 2.4	7.4	 1.0
Stephen Strasburg    3.17	1.086	10.6	 2.4	7.4	 0.9

Uncanny.

I'm curious to see how Strasburg does in his 30s. There are quite a few power pitchers whose inconsistencies seem to be tamed in their late 20s and their prime production continues well into their mid to late 30s even to their 40s with a few.

I lump Max in with that class of pitcher with preternatural calm and a murderous gaze, liable to go off and choke somebody to death if their control slips for a second. Kenny Rogers and Kevin Brown are two I can think of -- I'm sure there are others.

https://s.hdnux.com/photos/71/41/13/15078136/9/rawImage.jpg

lol yes

14 K in 7 innings against the Yankees. (99 pitches, but still in there.)

max scherzer is 0-for-45 this season with zero walks

he does have two sac bunts and a sac fly

gonna reach 3000 K in his next start

absolutely lights-out since being traded

is his deal with washington the best huge contract ever?

if you asked me how many pitchers are there with 3000 Ks i would've guessed more than 19. like at least 30.

anyway scherzer is #19

You could also track his game on another thread...80 pitches, two more innings.

Damn. A perfect game, 3,000th K, and an immaculate inning would have been a pretty good start.

Lowest ERA in 1st 8 appearances with a team, all starts (single season since ER official in both leagues, 1913):

2021 Max Scherzer, LAD: 0.88
1998 Randy Johnson, HOU: 1.00
1984 Phil Niekro, NYY: 1.04

— Sarah Langs (@SlangsOnSports) September 12, 2021

I really had no idea the "immaculate inning" -- nine pitches, nine strikes, three strikeouts -- was so rare. scherzer joined sandy koufax and chris sale as the only pitchers in history with three such innings in their career

I'm the only person on here who pays the least bit of attention to this tabulation (I won't call it a stat), but Scherzer moved ahead of Kershaw into 4th place on Baseball Reference's Cy Young Share list:

1. Roger Clemens (7 wins) 7.66
2. Randy Johnson (5 wins) 6.50
3. Greg Maddux (4 wins) 4.92
4. Max Scherzer (3 wins) 4.61
5. Clayton Kershaw (3 wins) 4.58
6. Steve Carlton (4 wins) 4.29
7. Pedro Martinez (3 wins) 4.26
8. Justin Verlander (2 wins) 4.21
9. Tom Seaver (3 wins) 3.85
10. Jim Palmer (3 wins) 3.57

Two two will be there forever, probably, but Scherzer may pass Maddux for third.

Two two = top two

Thought “two two” was some weird nick name I’d never heard before!

lol

Max Scherzer has "rattled some with his tough negotiating style" over the past few days https://t.co/hyhg976Erv pic.twitter.com/w54vrb88Ny

— SNY (@SNYtv) March 1, 2022

oblique strain, out 6-8 weeks

Dog bites man, man bites dog, Rafi bites Max.

https://www.mlb.com/news/max-scherzer-gets-dog-bite-on-throwing-hand

Verlander out for almost three weeks, pitches 5 no-hit innings with a walk and 9 strikeouts. Sixteen days between starts for Scherzer, 6 perfect innings with 9 strikeouts. Old guys need their rest to get by.

Terrible news for the Texas #Rangers:
Max Scherzer has a low-grade strain of the teres major muscle in his right shoulder that ends his season.

— Bob Nightengale (@BNightengale) September 13, 2023

Dodging the Casas rematch. Between this & Verlander vs the A’s Steve Cohen’s step is lighter today.

Will be joining Kershaw:

https://www.mlb.com/news/max-scherzer-back-surgery-on-herniated-disc

If he'd stayed healthy the past few years, I guess he would have hit 250 wins and 4,000 strikeouts. Doesn't really affect anything else, but too bad.