Why Did They Retire?

Molitor was definitely one of the best "old" hitters ever. 225 hits at age 39! He probably could have hung around for another couple of years as a pinch hitter if he wanted to.

I think Molitor pushed it about as far as he could. There was clear decline his last three years, he was 41, and, by his own standards (and in the context of peak-PED-era), he really wasn't much of a hitter his last year.

Dave Cash?

Steady and solid through the '70s, MVP votes three consecutive years, hits .321 with the Expos in 1979, has his first negative WAR year with the Padres in '80, gets released, and--at the age of 32--never plays again. Was no one interested, or did he just retire?

Cash went to spring training in 1981 but was released as the season started on April 4. He hit just .172 in the exhibition games for the Padres, yet it was still a shock to him to be let go. Cash said, “I know I hadn’t produced during the spring, but I was playing on a slightly injured knee. It occurred in batting practice, and the knee bothered me a bit after that. I’m not using it as an excuse, but it did have an effect.” After his release, he attempted to catch on with a team that would be a contender, but things never worked out.

Thanks...so he definitely wanted to play. I though he might have gone to Japan, which many players did at the time.

not Japan but...

In 1989, Cash played for the Orlando Juice of the Senior Professional Baseball Association. He hit .321 in 35 games with the team. The next season, he played for the Florida Tropics and hit .304 in 14 games before the league folded.

Javier Vázquez? His Wikipedia doesn't say anything about a career-ending injury.

In 2009, at the age of 32, he had a career year for the Braves: 6.2 bWAR, 4th in Cy Young voting. In 2010, he had the worst year of his career since his rookie season over a decade ago, but he bounced back in 2011 for the Marlins. He was 5-8 with a 5.23 ERA in the first half, but 8-3, 2.15 after the break. For the year, 2.8 WAR. In September of 2011, he was almost untouchable: 5 starts, 5-0, 0.71, 38 IP, 21 H, 36 K, 3 BB.

Granted free agency, never pitches in the majors again.

Appropriately, Vazquez’s final start, on September 27, came against the franchise that drafted him, but was now located in Washington, and it finished in dramatic fashion. He had gone all the way as the Marlins and Nationals were tied 2-2 with two out in the bottom of the ninth. Marlins manager Jack McKeon had already decided that Vazquez would go out for the 10th, but Bryan Petersen made the decision moot as he smacked a game-winning solo shot. It was a nice way to go out.

“I’ve been blessed to be in the big leagues for 14 years. I feel it’s time,” he said after the game. “I’m glad I’m pitching well because it would be tough retiring on a bad note.”

Although Vazquez never pitched after that, he did consider representing Puerto Rico in the 2013 World Baseball Classic, but knee surgery prevented him from participating.

he spoke of retirement after the season, citing all the years spent toiling on the mound away from his family as a factor that could make him decide to call it quits.

Retired so he could spend more time with his family? I thought only politicians do that.

If he had pitched another few years he had a great chance at 3000 K's and 200 wins, and could have retired with around 50-60 WAR. That's a Raffy Palmeiro type of semi-HOFer (rarely great, almost never among the best in the league, but durable and good for a long time).

Was definitely surprised at how strong (and consistent) his career box was.

Some guys seem to get a boost when they know it’s their last hurrah.
Could be he’d made up his mind after the first half of that last season.

Didn't realize how close he made it to 3000

I loved Vazquez for fantasy and would draft him every year even though he rarely had helpful rate stats. I don't think anyone thought of him as a potential HOFer while he was active, which might be one of the reasons he was willing to retire when he did

I was at the game in Montreal where he gave Dontrelle Willis his first loss. Always loved watching him pitch.

I seem to recall Vazquez got roasted pretty good in the NY media for his failed season in pinstripes.

His fellow ex-White Sox Mark Buehrle was another one of that time that seemed to be still 'professional starting pitcher' when he called it quits at age 36.

Those guys made so much money, it is not surprising they might look at all the travel and the crap and said - see you later.

Jermaine Dye?

Retired in 2009 after his age-35 season, no physical issues cited in his Wikipedia bio. He was coming off 27 HR/81 RBI, with a slash line of .250/.340/.453. For his last six seasons, his slash line was .276/.342/.515, including 44 HR/120 RBI in 2006 (5th in MVP voting), and 34/96 in 2008 (15th in MVP voting).

No one could have used him at DH?

Come Opening Day 2010, and Dye was still jobless. However, he only had himself to blame. He received offers from the Cubs, Brewers, and a $4 million deal with the Nationals, but turned them all down. A minor-league deal with the Dodgers presented itself, but he still declined. One former major-leaguer even dared to suggest that racism was to blame for Dye's unemployment.

Dye would ultimately announce his retirement in 2011, saying he was "at peace" with his decision, and that he would eventually like to get back into baseball.

https://www.batterypower.com/2016/5/23/11739800/braves-rewind-whatever-happened-to-jermaine-dye

So he did get offers (though for much less than the $11.5M he made in 2009).

.250/.340/.453 is probably pretty close to replacement level for a DH tbh. that 4mil deal would not have been a lowball

Comparable, to a degree, to yesterday's signing of Santana; one guy took the money, one walked away.

Yeah, I think the market for older DH-types just collapsed. Hideki Matsui was also 35 in 2009, MVP of the WS, nothing but solid years for the Yankees, and there wasn't much of a market for him. Went from making 13M/yr on a multi-year deal to 6M on a one year deal.

here's a guy i just remembered as a ChiSox stalwart, and glancing at his BR page it was wild how great his final season was.

https://www.baseball-reference.com/players/b/burnsbr01.shtml

the "why" however was a degenerative hip condition.

also: led the AL in bWAR as a rookie, and finished fifth in the ROY vote.

Not really a why-did-they-retire? candidate, more like a why-did-they-disappear? mystery. Rookie card that showed up on my FB wall:

https://i.postimg.cc/kXf19cgK/reggie.jpg

Madlock's the biggest star, so not a valuable card. But I noticed the bottom right corner: "There was another Reggie Sanders?"

Looked him up. Drafted in the 2nd round in '68, finally got some time in in '74 and played pretty well: 100 AB, .273/.308/.434. Ten percent better than league average, something to build on--and the Tigers were terrible at the time. (Also: hit a HR off Catfish Hunter in his first AB.)

That was it, the entirety of his MLB career. Wikipedia: "He was dealt from the Tigers to the Atlanta Braves for Jack Pierce in an exchange of minor-league first basemen on March 30, 1975. He was selected by the Chicago White Sox from the Braves in the Rule 5 draft on December 5, 1977." But he never had another AB in the majors. He did kick around the minors, and in '77 had a huge year for Durango in the Mexican League (AAA): .320, 28 HR, 119 RBI.

His Wikipedia page gives no explanation.

Shane Mack?

I came across something I wrote in a fanzine in the early '90s about him being underrated, so I looked him up on Baseball Reference.

His career starts slow in San Diego, then flourishes for the next five years in Minnesota. From 1990-94: .309/.375/.479, 130 OPS+, 5.3 WAR per 650 PA. Goes to Japan and has two good years, then comes back and has a good half-season in Boston (.315/.368/.438). Signs with the A's, is immediately traded to Kansas City, and has another good half-season (.280/.345/.449). They let him walk, he signs with San Diego, then retires without ever playing a game. He was 35.

Rusty Greer...Looking at answers for today's grid, the most games played by a Rangers-only player are Greer's 1,027. He was good! 100 RBI three times, .305/.387/.478 for his career, never hit under .270. Retired at 33. So I looked at his Wikipedia page: "Greer's aggressive style of play took a severe toll on his body, and he spent the remainder of his baseball career (i.e., after signing a big contract in 2002) undergoing and recovering from surgeries." He had two non-roster offers before the 2005 season but walked away.