who was america's best president?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (110 of them)
His teeth! Those cardigans!

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Saturday, 10 February 2007 22:11 (seventeen years ago) link

Haiti, Indonesia, Nicaragua, Iran

milo z (mlp), Saturday, 10 February 2007 22:14 (seventeen years ago) link

... and tony montana.

Eisbär (llamasfur), Saturday, 10 February 2007 22:14 (seventeen years ago) link

LBJ's Great Society stuff was pretty unfuckwithable.

Jimmy Carter doesn't belong on this list, but repellent? he is like an angel, come on.

horseshoe (horseshoe), Saturday, 10 February 2007 22:16 (seventeen years ago) link

Carter's foreign policy was every bit as inhuman as Reagan's. Worse than Clinton (depending on how you feel about the sanctions), probably even with Dubya, not as bad as Tricky Dick or LBJ.

milo z (mlp), Saturday, 10 February 2007 22:18 (seventeen years ago) link

god, it's really hard to imagine any U.S. president successfully pursuing legislation under the name "War on Poverty" today. :(

horseshoe (horseshoe), Saturday, 10 February 2007 22:18 (seventeen years ago) link

No way. I could easily see a GOP-led "War on Poverty." Only it would involve sterilization of the poor and disappearing the homeless.

milo z (mlp), Saturday, 10 February 2007 22:20 (seventeen years ago) link

disappearing the homeless.

And the GOP wonders why it can't nominate Rudy Giulani.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Saturday, 10 February 2007 22:21 (seventeen years ago) link

Look upthread for my other reasons to despise Truman. Recently reading the new Dean Acheson biography makes him look worse.

if you're talking about the National Security Act of 1947 -- um, you do realize that stalin was still around (and had soviet soldiers all over the place in europe and china) when that thing was signed, yes?

(i haven't read the acheson biography, so i can't comment on that.)

Eisbär (llamasfur), Saturday, 10 February 2007 22:24 (seventeen years ago) link

Yes, and Truman-Acheson poked and prodded Uncle Joe often enough to get the old man to say the hell with you and snatch Eastern Europe.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Saturday, 10 February 2007 22:25 (seventeen years ago) link

why hasn't don w. or whomever nominated RONALD W. REAGAN FOR WINNING THE COLD WAR?

mookieproof (mookieproof), Saturday, 10 February 2007 22:27 (seventeen years ago) link

milo, explain more about the badness of carter foreign policy

Save The Whales (688), Saturday, 10 February 2007 22:29 (seventeen years ago) link

He turned away Haitians seeking refuge from our friend Baby Doc Duvalier, enabled the Indonesian government in the East Timor genocide, built the road to Reagan's attacks on the Sandinistas (with leftover Somoza-ists and the help of the Argentine junta) and aiding the shah prior to the Iranian Revolution.

I'm probably forgetting a few, it's been a few years since I cared about recent foreign policy history enough to characterize it as anything but an unending parade of evil.

milo z (mlp), Saturday, 10 February 2007 23:04 (seventeen years ago) link

Yes, and Truman-Acheson poked and prodded Uncle Joe often enough to get the old man to say the hell with you and snatch Eastern Europe.

i think that the soviet occupation of eastern europe was a done deal by 1945, NS Act of 1947 or not. (my crack about FDR and yalta was a bit of a cheap comment on my part -- what COULD he have done at that point?) short of declaring HOT war (as opposed to COLD war) on the soviets & throwing the world (NOT just europe) into another global war -- or just packing up and leaving europe altogether (leaving the rest of europe wide open to the soviets and their supporters over there) -- i don't see what the alternatives would be, for truman or any other president.

Eisbär (llamasfur), Saturday, 10 February 2007 23:09 (seventeen years ago) link

TR. TR by a country mile! And I say this fully aware of how silly and borderline mundane it is to 'rate the presidents' in such an ILX way, but it's Saturday, the pro bowl sucks, I'm waiting on Chinese food delivery, and bored as all get out.

I don't think there is any dispute as to who the worst president is, is there?

Roger Fidelity (Roger Fidelity), Saturday, 10 February 2007 23:12 (seventeen years ago) link

am i the only one (ok, besides haikunym and maybe alfred) who doesn't think it was wrong for lincoln to suspend habeas corpus? people talk as if it were thrown out the window for the duration of the war, but it was only suspended for certain periods in certain areas. besides, congress has the right to suspend habeas corpus in emergencies; the only reason lincoln didn't go through the proper channels is that congress was out of session when the war started (btw, a state government illegally seceding from the united states without at least holding a referendum on the issue strikes me as far, far, FAR more unconstitutional than anything lincoln ever did).

i think it's all too easy to forget that this was a war fought on american soil, where sedition actually did have the potential to influence the outcome of the war. if you compare lincoln's actions to woodrow wilson's absolutely indefensible attacks on dissent during world war I (a war that took place hundreds of thousands of miles safely away from america, a war that america had virtually NO chance of losing, and a war in which america had virtually no stake to begin with; the overwhelming reason we were even involved was that wilson was a self-righteous "idealist" who believed he'd been appointed by god to save the world from all wars ever - sound familiar?), abe looks like a saint. geoffrey stone, in "perilous times" (a great great book btw) notes that lincoln went out of his way to avoid locking up dissenters whenever he could manage it (compare to, say, the alien and sedition acts, which were passed during peacetime, and you'll start to see how unusual this was).

J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Saturday, 10 February 2007 23:18 (seventeen years ago) link

the more i learn about the cold war the more obvious it seems that it was pretty much all our doing. the soviet union had no intention of "spreading communism" to the rest of the world; that was a trotsky notion that stalin had tossed right out the window years before. there's no denying that stalin was a genuinely evil man and that the guys over here were just opportunistic and unprincipled, but that doesn't make the loyalty oaths and the national security act any less a betrayal of america's republican ideals.

i agree with alfred that every pres since FDR has been pretty bad. if i had to pick one it'd be LBJ, not just because of his domestic policies (the good done by his civil rights legislation just about balances out the damage done by vietnam) but because he was such a damned fascinating guy, on a shakespearean level - a genuinely tormented character torn between good and evil. ppl talk as if nixon was like that, but nixon was pretty much as shallow and phony and mean as he looked.

J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Saturday, 10 February 2007 23:28 (seventeen years ago) link

i didn't say that lincoln was WRONG or that his actions were indefensible, or worse than the actions of any other american president undertaken in the name of "national security." by saying that he engaged in "constitutional shenanigans," i merely meant to acknowledge that some of lincoln's actions went against what some felt -- and still feel -- are the traditional, constitutional powers of the presidency and that lincoln's actions needed to be explained w/n the context of his times.

and yes, domestically lincoln was a pussycat compared to wilson, FDR, or dubya -- shit, REAGAN was a pussycat domestically compared to any of those three (considering that, IMHO anyway, the soviets were a more grave threat than al-qaeda).

Eisbär (llamasfur), Saturday, 10 February 2007 23:32 (seventeen years ago) link

I quite agree, Eisbar

Roger Fidelity (Roger Fidelity), Saturday, 10 February 2007 23:34 (seventeen years ago) link

stalin's acts in eastern europe weren't so much about "spreading communism" as they were about providing a buffer between the USSR and the rest of europe. seeing how easily the nazis rolled through that region before attacking the USSR in 1941 -- as well as pre-existing western hostility to the soviet union -- his actions were comprehensible. that he imposed toadies in the countries occupied by soviet troops wasn't b/c he was hellbent on communism -- after all, stalin said that "imposing [soviet] communism on poland is like putting a saddle on a cow," so even HE knew the absurdity of the "spreading communism" rationale -- was more b/c they were easier for him to control.

Eisbär (llamasfur), Saturday, 10 February 2007 23:41 (seventeen years ago) link

Internally, Wayne Palmer has seen strife between Karen Hayes and Tomas Lennox, with Karen stressing the importance that the Muslim-American community has played in turning in terrorists, while Tom has drawn up plans for detention facilities. Wayne initially rejected Tom's plan, but reconsidered after the suitcase nuke detonated in Valencia. However, he ultimately decided the principles of American freedom were more important than the supposed security detention camps would provide, and rejected the proposal once again.

bobby bedelia (van dover), Saturday, 10 February 2007 23:53 (seventeen years ago) link

the more i learn about the cold war the more obvious it seems that it was pretty much all our doing.

perhaps, but it's easy to say now. it certainly doesn't excuse some of the western excesses during the cold war, but as eisbär says, the sovs were at least a real world power, unlike today's main bogeymen.

it is weird to look back and see claims that indochina or chile or greece would be the fatal domino, though.

mookieproof (mookieproof), Sunday, 11 February 2007 00:05 (seventeen years ago) link

does everyone hate woodrow wilson? i liked him. i can't remember why though

kyle (akmonday), Sunday, 11 February 2007 01:06 (seventeen years ago) link

W: "Hey, Moses! You should see what they've done to your Ten Commandments!"
M: "You think that's bad? You should see what they did to your Fourteen Points!"

Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Sunday, 11 February 2007 01:43 (seventeen years ago) link

this sort of knocks andrew jackson out:

http://www.newyorker.com/critics/books/articles/070129crbo_books_crain

my gut answer is truman but i have really no reason!

geoff (gcannon), Sunday, 11 February 2007 01:55 (seventeen years ago) link

woodrow wilson was a scum-sucking bastard:
http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1568/is_10_34/ai_98125294

Haikunym (Haikunym), Sunday, 11 February 2007 02:00 (seventeen years ago) link

that's a good article. here's a long excerpt from walter karp on WWI dissent (maybe the finest political essay i have ever read): http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Democracy_America/AmericaFreeNowDead_BA.html

J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Sunday, 11 February 2007 02:11 (seventeen years ago) link

The Karp book was revelatory in exposing Wilsonian horrors (and Vidal too, in Hollywood). Besides Polk and maybe McKinley, no other president pursued war so dogmatically by presenting himself as a man of peace.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Sunday, 11 February 2007 04:25 (seventeen years ago) link

you compare lincoln's actions to woodrow wilson's absolutely indefensible attacks on dissent during world war I (a war that took place hundreds of thousands of miles safely away from america, a war that america had virtually NO chance of losing, and a war in which america had virtually no stake to begin with; the overwhelming reason we were even involved was that wilson was a self-righteous "idealist" who believed he'd been appointed by god to save the world from all wars ever - sound familiar?), abe looks like a saint

OTM. What did it say about Wilson that HARDING pardoned Eugene Debs, rotting in jail for being a Red and opposing Wilson for the presidency?

the more i learn about the cold war the more obvious it seems that it was pretty much all our doing. the soviet union had no intention of "spreading communism" to the rest of the world; that was a trotsky notion that stalin had tossed right out the window years before. there's no denying that stalin was a genuinely evil man and that the guys over here were just opportunistic and unprincipled, but that doesn't make the loyalty oaths and the national security act any less a betrayal of america's republican ideals

OTM yet again. This is what I wanted to say but lacked the space, except I would change "pretty much all our doing" to "we allowed Stalin to force our hand."

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Sunday, 11 February 2007 04:29 (seventeen years ago) link

I'm a fan of Dwight D. Eisenhower but I really don't know much about what he did during his presidency, he just looked like a smiley kind of chap:

http://ardennes44.free.fr/EisenhowerDwight01.JPG

Kate, non masonic, Wednesday, 21 February 2007 20:59 (seventeen years ago) link

I wish I could say Martin Van Buren was the best president, because he had some bitchin' facial hair. Turns out he was just Andrew Jackson's bitch.

<img src="http://www.americaslibrary.gov/assets/aa/buren/aa_buren_subj_m.jpg">

molly mummenschanz, Wednesday, 21 February 2007 21:07 (seventeen years ago) link

oh, shit. old habits die hard.

http://www.americaslibrary.gov/assets/aa/buren/aa_buren_subj_m.jpg

molly mummenschanz, Wednesday, 21 February 2007 21:08 (seventeen years ago) link

Eisenhower played lots of golf and coined the term "military-industrial complex" on the pro

con -- vice president Richard M Nixon (tho Eisenhower kept him at arm's length much like the Reagan/GW Bush relationship)

I Like Ike mostly cause he was president when I was born. Not bad, but far from the best.

m coleman, Wednesday, 21 February 2007 22:15 (seventeen years ago) link

another big con for eisenhower -- his lack of enthusiasm for civil rights for blacks. he DID enforce brown v. topeka, true, but probably wouldn't have if it left to his own devices. anyway, serious civil rights legislation would have to wait till JFK and (especially) LBJ.

Eisbaer, Thursday, 22 February 2007 00:45 (seventeen years ago) link

http://www.rosecity.net/al_gore/bush_new_president.jpg

Curt1s Stephens, Thursday, 22 February 2007 00:59 (seventeen years ago) link

three years pass...

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/4f/Andrew_johnson2.jpg

nakhchivan, Friday, 11 February 2011 02:43 (thirteen years ago) link

shiroibasketshoes +- guus hiddink

nakhchivan, Friday, 11 February 2011 02:48 (thirteen years ago) link

everyone here more or less very much in character

Rich Lolwry (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 11 February 2011 02:50 (thirteen years ago) link

Fantastic discussion here, one of my favorite recent ILE threads:

U.S. Presidents - Cold War and New Millennium Edition

Rich Lolwry (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 11 February 2011 02:51 (thirteen years ago) link

eight years pass...

Eisenhower remains the only president or world leader, so far as I'm aware, that has a jacket style for a namesake.

Surprised designers havent bagged on a Napoleon pocket yet for hoodies. It's a comfortable place to rest your hand, if you've a jacket that allots it.

57mg/20floz, Thursday, 27 June 2019 12:44 (four years ago) link

Dickies Eisenhower jackets rule

Greta Van Show Feets BB (milo z), Thursday, 27 June 2019 12:46 (four years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.