The Matrix Reloaded (full spoilers)

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (408 of them)
I am not British.

Stuart (Stuart), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 16:16 (twenty years ago) link

On the whole, I actually liked it - certainly much more than the first movie - and I wasn't annoyed by the retroactive bolt-on gnosticism kit.

Chris Barrus (Chris Barrus), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 23:31 (twenty years ago) link

Yeah, yeah, Kenan, but I was expecting to hate it.
I was honestly taken aback by how much I enjoyed it.

Squirrel_Police (Squirrel_Police), Thursday, 22 May 2003 02:16 (twenty years ago) link

I can't wait to see it... again!

I'm a little annoyed by the dismissive tone of "pop philosophy" in the reviews (for the first one too). I mean, this is philosophy in action for a mass audience!

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 22 May 2003 02:20 (twenty years ago) link

I'd agree that the philosophy seemed to be pretty well thought out. And asking why people start kung fu fighting for no reason in the matrix is kind of like asking why people randomly start singing in the middle of a musical.

ejad (daje), Thursday, 22 May 2003 02:39 (twenty years ago) link

I'm a little annoyed by the dismissive tone of "pop philosophy" in the reviews (for the first one too).

Reminds me of the reviews for Waking Life. Critics get very impatient with that stuff for some reason. I still don't get the hostility to any of the stuff said in Reloaded, since I found most of it very compelling. Then again, I read that kind of stuff for fun, so maybe it would be annoying to someone without an interest in it.

ryan (ryan), Thursday, 22 May 2003 03:32 (twenty years ago) link

Waking Life is like a compendium of stuff I've though about while stoned, and thought was cool at the time, but no so much the next morning.

Kenan Hebert (kenan), Thursday, 22 May 2003 03:48 (twenty years ago) link

on _waking life_ as a commarad said :"
One scene in Richard Linklater's "Waking Life" makes a reasonable attempt at introducing the concept of the Singularity, though it focusses more on accelerating progress / evolution than on AI. Transhumanism and volition-based "evolution" are there as well, but it's a fairly oblique approach and you'd probably need some previous experience of the ideas to fully appreciate what the character is saying. Still, it's the first movie I've seen which mentions any of this explicitly.

a transcript of the scene in question; not bad for a two-minute scene:

http://www.prism.gatech.edu/~gte484v/wakinglife/neohumanguy.html

The rest of the site, including an overview of the film:
http://www.prism.gatech.edu/~gte484v/wakinglife.html
"

Sébastien Chikara (Sébastien Chikara), Thursday, 22 May 2003 04:14 (twenty years ago) link

i'm with ryan...and the fixation on the flaws by most posters above intriguing - is it because you imagined better things happening (i'm not convinced that what Harry Knowles wouldve liked to see would've REALLY made it better...vampires etc. have no real place in the film at that point, tho they may be explored more in The Animatrix as was hinted at in the 'Beyond' episode with the 'haunted house') or you wanted to hate it? i did not want to love it particularly - i walked into the cinema having been exposed to very little hype before this week - and i came out pretty much blown away, tho admittedly feeling a bit stupid (partly for just loving it purely for the aesthetics, fx, technical execution etc.) and partly cos i could not keep up with what French bloke and the Architect were droning on about tho it was actually relevant and key to the fundamental concepts behind the series, in essence.

Neo fighting 100 Smiths was purely for fun, its funny people have such a hard time accepting that. surelt this is in the tradition of martial arts films and anime. it was possibly about honour and respect and a statement of intent by both parties. neither thought there would be a real outcome by fighting, but it was a chance to 'touch base' and showcase what they'd learned...as the Oracle's aide did a similar thing by fighting Neo to 'make sure you were The One' and Neo jokingly replies 'you could've just asked'...but that would've been boring! and if you were bored by Neo vs 100 Smiths then you might just be bored of life...and martial arts tradition possibly.

stevem (blueski), Thursday, 22 May 2003 19:29 (twenty years ago) link

I am not bored of life, steve, I am bored of this movie. But thank you for your concern.

Good essay here:
http://www.themorningnews.org/archives/reviews/unloading_on_the_matrix_reloaded.shtml

Kenan Hebert (kenan), Thursday, 22 May 2003 20:05 (twenty years ago) link

I just don't see how the concept of multiple Agent Smiths is any way exciting or an improvement on the previous movie--wasn't the whole idea that the agents looked more or less the same anyway? So great, they look even more the same now. Big whoop.

slutsky (slutsky), Thursday, 22 May 2003 20:17 (twenty years ago) link

i absolutely loved it because Agent Smith seemed to literally represent a virus, a germ - multiplied, trying to overwhelm its target, to break it down and destroy it - suspend your disbelief and just enjoy the threat of consumption, of being overwhelmed. of course Neo doesnt flinch, maybe he is too confident...a little gulp wouldve been hideously cheesy probably but he obviously didnt expect Smith to multiply that rapidly so a little sign of being alarmed mightve been nice. although, rather than act like a mindless germ, as i mentioned before, Smith's intention is just to demonstrate his abilities to Neo - Smith's collective nonchalance at Neo's eventual taking of flight as escape route suggests he did actually see this coming, or some outcome other than either he or Neo being destroyed at this point. i find that interesting to think fo it that way. but really the appeal was FUCKING HELL, DOZENS AND DOZENS OF BODIES BEING THROWN AROUND LIKE NOTHING, THIS IS GREAT - pure virtual empowerment, classic videogame thrills taken to their cinematic pinnacle quite frankly.

stevem (blueski), Thursday, 22 May 2003 20:28 (twenty years ago) link

it was also very funny because it was so 'dumb and absurd'

stevem (blueski), Thursday, 22 May 2003 20:29 (twenty years ago) link

(doh! this was written before the last two posts)

i actually think the multiple smiths is meant to be some sort of thematic or conceptual point, tho i have no idea what. it's interesting that, finally being "free", he takes it upon himself to reproduce as much as possible, much like a virus (which is what he calls the human race as in part 1). if part 3 fails to develop this then i will be willing to call it pointless.

i didnt really care for any of the action scenes in either of the films, and action in general usually tends to bore me. martial arts stuff needs to be pretty for me to care, and too often in this film it fails to do that. but i really loved everything else, esp the belluci scenes.

ryan (ryan), Thursday, 22 May 2003 20:32 (twenty years ago) link

I admit that I liked the second half of the fight a little bit more. Still, when Neo seems more-or-less invulnerable it's hard to get caught up in it.

slutsky (slutsky), Thursday, 22 May 2003 20:32 (twenty years ago) link

Just tell me there's a scene where all the heroic Agent Smiths finally unleash a can of whoopass on Keanu and leave him snivelling and calling out for his mom and frankly I will sit through a twenty-hour philosophy disquisition on the meaning of laughter in Kierkegaard as conducted by Fishburne, Smith and Moss -- without a restroom break.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 22 May 2003 22:21 (twenty years ago) link

i just saw it again and i take back what i said. the fight in that room with the stairs and the freeway scene are great.

ryan (ryan), Thursday, 22 May 2003 23:48 (twenty years ago) link

I think the multiple copies of the agent smith are there to get our attention back to the concept of simulation, to prepare the viewer to learn that there are multiple perfect copies of the entire matrix who are run for strategic purposes

Sébastien Chikara (Sébastien Chikara), Friday, 23 May 2003 01:24 (twenty years ago) link

for philosophical fun on simulation and technology I suggest
"how to live in a simulation"
and "the simulation argument"

Sébastien Chikara (Sébastien Chikara), Friday, 23 May 2003 01:27 (twenty years ago) link

multiple perfect copies of the entire matrix

ala parallel universes? i must admit the whole 'this is version 6.0' thing bugged me a bit but its also quite cool - so The Oracle is a program and not an original human as was suggested in the first film, The One is also a Machine concept created to initiate the destruction of version 6.0 of The Matrix after The Architect (a machine himself i guess?) realised that humans in The Matrix were being given too much choice about their lives and there were too many bugs in the system (ghosts, rogue programs like Agent Smith etc.)...so perhaps in the third film Neo may have to resort to his 'original human' self in order to destroy the Machines (for to do anything else would just mean he is following their protocol or something? tho maybe not, as it looks like he wasn't supposed to carry his power into reality and destroy the Sentinel as he did?)?

other things i'm too dumb to work out: the guy who survived and is opposite Neo on the operating table at the end, i missed out on who this guy is exactly somehow. he was the guy on the same team as the one who cut his hand and was gonna kill Neo early on? was this the same guy taken over by SMith in Neo's dream at the start? or was it that ugly bloke himself who was the one Smith took over? so that was not strictly a dream? ack....also is Naiobi (sp) dead or not? i have to see this film again obviously

stevem (blueski), Friday, 23 May 2003 08:32 (twenty years ago) link

I finally just saw it, and with my superpower that turns lame into supercool and awesome (thanks to my epiphany while watching Hypercube), It's a supercool awesome movie! ROCK&ROLL!!!!

A Nairn (moretap), Saturday, 24 May 2003 04:07 (twenty years ago) link

haha so then neo:ctrl+alt+del::the matrix:windows??!

teeny (teeny), Saturday, 24 May 2003 13:42 (twenty years ago) link

Ok, starting June 6th we're going be showing Matrix Reloaded at the IMAX theatre I work at. I have my own doubts as to how good it will look (giant screen films more susceptible to strobing and general wonkiness) and the trailer makes some scenes look even more cheap-CGI than they did in the 35mm theatre--100 Smith fight, the Agent leaping from car to car--but here's what I want to know: Would anybody here actually go all the way to the (often inconveniently located) IMAX theatre just to see the Matrix, you know, really big? I am biased because I have come to hate 70mm film and everything about it but given the spectacular failure of Apollo 13 in IMAX I can't understand the significant financial risk they're taking with this--after the hardcore Matrix nerds see it a couple times your audience is gone and you're stuck with the movie and a contract requiring you keep showing it twice a day. Seems silly to me.

So: does Big Matrix hold any attraction for you? Why? Is it another symptom of American bigger=better OTT-ism?

adam (adam), Saturday, 24 May 2003 13:57 (twenty years ago) link

Re: the ending - is Neo still in the Matrix? How else could he have stopped the sentinels? Surely they would have shown some of the big sentinel attack that's mentioned in the second-to-last scene if it had really happened, wouldn't they? And how does all this fit into the prophecy?

Frühlingsmute (Wintermute), Saturday, 24 May 2003 17:25 (twenty years ago) link

I took that to mean that the external world of Zion was another layer of the Matrix (which I suppose is what Mr. Architect is talking about in his lecture.)

slutsky (slutsky), Saturday, 24 May 2003 17:30 (twenty years ago) link

I need a transcript of that bloody lecture.

Frühlingsmute (Wintermute), Saturday, 24 May 2003 17:56 (twenty years ago) link

transcript of the wholedamn film is U&K...still confused by the ending am i

stevem (blueski), Saturday, 24 May 2003 18:02 (twenty years ago) link

Architect transcript:
http://www.theantitrust.net/articles/viewarticle.php?articleid=108.

teeny (teeny), Saturday, 24 May 2003 18:07 (twenty years ago) link

Thank you so much teeny!

Frühlingsmute (Wintermute), Saturday, 24 May 2003 18:16 (twenty years ago) link

*Again, the responses of the other Ones appear on the monitors: "Five versions? Three? I've been lied too. This is bullshit."*

funniest part of the movie

slutsky (slutsky), Saturday, 24 May 2003 18:21 (twenty years ago) link

Actually, this was my favourite part:

*Once again, the responses of the other Ones appear on the monitors: "You can't control me! F*ck you! I'm going to kill you! You can't make me do anything!*

With all the middle-finger action.

slutsky (slutsky), Saturday, 24 May 2003 18:21 (twenty years ago) link

"And maybe I'm alone in this, but I think those geek Wachowski boys got the sex stuff just right. I was shocked"

If you've seen Bound this wouldn't surprise you.

David Beckhouse (David Beckhouse), Saturday, 24 May 2003 18:23 (twenty years ago) link

The best part of the scene was when the Architect's screens showed the terrible things people are capable of: WWII, Vietnam, Cambodia, George W. Bush...

Frühlingsmute (Wintermute), Saturday, 24 May 2003 18:40 (twenty years ago) link

I love to hate when movies have scenes like that. See also: Fifth Element, The Abyss.

slutsky (slutsky), Saturday, 24 May 2003 18:43 (twenty years ago) link

Yes, it was a bit on the sappy side. Which reminds me...

Slo-mo action + lame philosphy lectures:
The Matrix Reloaded vs Chariots of Fire
FITE

Frühlingsmute (Wintermute), Saturday, 24 May 2003 18:56 (twenty years ago) link

If Reloaded had had the Chariots theme over those shots of Trinity falling outta the building it would've been 10X better.

slutsky (slutsky), Saturday, 24 May 2003 18:58 (twenty years ago) link

OTM.

Frühlingsmute (Wintermute), Saturday, 24 May 2003 19:02 (twenty years ago) link

Okay, I saw it again last night and liked it even more. The action scenes held up and the plot really snapped into focus. The tricky part for me is figuring out everyone's motivations.

1. So the Architect is the father of the matrix and the Oracle is the mother, right? This is not explicitly acknowledged by the Architect but let's assume so. She has said that she's a program, but she has also said that you can't necessarily believe what she says.
a. So her motivation all along has been to get neo back into the mainframe so that the system can be rebooted (so to speak) and zion can be destroyed. So she's bad?? I say that that was her purpose in the previous five matrices but that she has recently gone rogue for this one...she says in the park-bench scene that 'you've convinced me, Neo' or something to that effect. (this scene has way more useful information than I thought the first time.) I don't see what exactly he's convinced her of but whatever. Still possible that she hasn't gone rogue at all...

2. Mr Smiths. Definitely rogue, explicitly pointed out by lack of earpiece. I'd go for the virus theory as well. He's out to cause trouble, but still has scraps of his prime directive to neutralize Neo. This is the first time such a thing has happened--that is, it didn't happen in the previous versions of the matrix...think back to the scene where Mr Smith drops off his earpiece and then the other three agents come in and fight Neo...one Smith says 'that happened as expected'...the other: 'it's exactly as it was before'...the first: 'well, not exactly'...*evil chuckles.*

3. Merovinginian et al: He is a powerful program who wants more power. By his nature he does not want a disruption in the status quo unless it brings him more power. He has been around for previous versions of the Matrix. I guess that he's making it hard for Neo to reach the mainframe (by keeping the Keymaker captive, etc) because then he'll have to start from scratch. I'm thinking of him as a brilliant industrial baron who could probably build an empire if he was dropped on a desert island naked if it came to it, but he'd much rather keep all the power he's accumulated.

And then the bit at the end where Neo repels the squiddies through the sheer force of his mind or whatever, I'm guessing that somehow he's still in the Matrix. Either the whole of Zion and the scorched world is just another level of the matrix or somehow they took a wrong turn through all those doors and entered a replica of the real world. I'd guess the first option really. Classic sci-fi plot device; leave you wondering at the end what world is really the dream world.

teeny (teeny), Sunday, 25 May 2003 14:04 (twenty years ago) link

What did the chocolate cake do to the woman in white? I couldn't decide if she pissed herself, or had to run off to the bathroom for a wank.

Eyeball Kicks (Eyeball Kicks), Sunday, 25 May 2003 14:15 (twenty years ago) link

After swearing I would never waste valuable braincells on any blockbuster film ever again, I was dragged to Matrix Re-Loaded this weekend. It was, as I expected, truely ghastly. The fight on top of the lorry was quite good but if this is the future of cinema (bascially a two hour ILM effects reel) then God help the silver screen and the chance for future Martin Scorsese's to break through...

Calz (Calz), Sunday, 25 May 2003 14:21 (twenty years ago) link

EK: remember the last confrontation between persephone and the Merovingian with the lipstick? Having gotten the pretty lady all horny, the M. met her in the bathroom for some action.

teeny (teeny), Sunday, 25 May 2003 14:31 (twenty years ago) link

Great stuff. I need that recipe.

Eyeball Kicks (Eyeball Kicks), Sunday, 25 May 2003 14:37 (twenty years ago) link

Also I thought it was pretty cute when the Oracle ate the candy "I just love candy" and the candy was actually the red pill from the first movie. (Maybe this was a hint that she really was revealing the truth.)

teeny (teeny), Sunday, 25 May 2003 14:55 (twenty years ago) link

Either the whole of Zion and the scorched world is just another level of the matrix or somehow they took a wrong turn through all those doors and entered a replica of the real world. I'd guess the first option really.

I think they (or at least Neo) are still stuck at the Merowingian's place because in the Superbowl trailer Trinity says "you give me Neo or we all die right here, right now" to the Merowingian.

Frühlingsmute (Wintermute), Sunday, 25 May 2003 15:02 (twenty years ago) link

The action scenes were good. That is all.

jel -- (jel), Sunday, 25 May 2003 16:46 (twenty years ago) link

1. Keanu as Messiah is a bit of a stretch.
2. Yes, some action scenes were good but even poor Jet Li kung fu is better than Keanu kung fu. Lawrence's kung fu is as bad as Dolemite's but not as funny.
3. The clone cluster fuck fight in the final scene in the Matrix skinny hallway was pretty funny. They all seemed to be dancing in a bad way.
4. The blond dreadheads were pretty stoopit!
5. Was Jada Pinkett really necessary?
6. Why wasn't there more Persephone?
7. Where is Rammstein when you need them?

Roman (Roman), Sunday, 25 May 2003 16:59 (twenty years ago) link

I'll definitely try to stay away from trailers for the next one: as great as the Burly Brawl (millions of Agent Smiths) was, I can't imagine my reaction if I hadn't seen it's later stages beforehand.

As a film, this was quite good. As the first half of a film, it might well be excellent. As an episode of The Invisibles, it's great.

Trinity says "you give me Neo or we all die right here, right now" to the Merowingian

Well, she says it, and someone else (who may or may not sound like the Merovingian) replies. The actual scenes could be at opposite ends of the movie.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Sunday, 25 May 2003 19:26 (twenty years ago) link

Is now when I confess that I didn't think that first one was that shit-hot and I have no plans to see this one?

luna (luna.c), Sunday, 25 May 2003 20:01 (twenty years ago) link

Not really. I suggest you do that in about eight years or so. Pref. in a thread about the films of Steve McQueen.

Nate Patrin (Nate Patrin), Sunday, 25 May 2003 20:38 (twenty years ago) link

Right, ok, I'll file that away.

luna (luna.c), Sunday, 25 May 2003 20:39 (twenty years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.