People Who Live In Suburbs: Classy, Icky, or Dudes?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (4414 of them)
Also, that house upthread should be saved at all costs.

laurence kansas (lawrence kansas), Tuesday, 6 June 2006 12:14 (seventeen years ago) link

Legacy Village is a really strange one too, because it's right by a mall and in the center of a neighborhood that used to have storefronts.

DAVE, for #1 Hits of yesterday and today! (dave225.3), Tuesday, 6 June 2006 12:18 (seventeen years ago) link

that's an awesomely interesting home but in dire need of money. It's getting torn down because repairing it properly would probably greatly exceed its value. It sounds great living in homes like those until you actually are doing it, and you realize that updating even practical elements is a nightmare of expense. It will be sad to see that house go but I think it's safe to assume that it doesn't make economic sense to keep it around.

It would be nice if there were buyers out there who were actually interested in building homes like that instead of the ugly, elbows-to-assholes mcmansions that are invading the suburban countryside and gentrification projects around the country.

don weiner (don weiner), Tuesday, 6 June 2006 12:30 (seventeen years ago) link

legacy village is disgusting. if i were the kind of person who believed in direct-action, molotov cocktail-throwing kind of shit, then it would be at the top of my list.

lauren (laurenp), Tuesday, 6 June 2006 18:21 (seventeen years ago) link

teeny, that house was amazing! loved that pink/green bathroom.

Miss Misery xox (MissMiseryTX), Tuesday, 6 June 2006 18:28 (seventeen years ago) link

oh hey jody you reminded me of a couple of other things in the area you might be interested in (if you didn't know about them) already, first we're getting one of those little mall villages downtown "ballpark village" to go with the new busch stadium, and then we have this development going in in St Charles County (where most of the metro area's growth is), "New Town," from the same people who did Seaside Florida. Here's a recent article on New Town.

teeny (teeny), Tuesday, 6 June 2006 19:19 (seventeen years ago) link

Teeny, the current CLUI newsletter has a couple St. Louis articles you might be interested in... One on Cementland and another on St. Louis in general.

This statistic kinda blew my mind...

Though its gotten alot harder to meet people in St. Louis: The city lost half of its population due to outmigration between 1950 and 1990. Once the fourth largest city in the country, St. Louis was ranked as the 49th largest after the 2000 census.

LOL Thomas (Chris Barrus), Tuesday, 6 June 2006 21:23 (seventeen years ago) link

yeah, the city totally hemmoraged and it's pretty obvious when you drive around some of the neighborhoods...the houses were densely built but now they're gone or empty. We finally gained population this decade though. Thanks for the links!

teeny (teeny), Tuesday, 6 June 2006 21:46 (seventeen years ago) link

I live on an old city street, but we have old, grand bungalos built in the 20s. And some stupid asshole "custom builder" just put up a travesty in an empty lot a few houses down from us. It's a big fucking garage, with 5 bedrooms and a greatroom. Stupid fucks. It doesn't match the neighborhood at all...

This is what's been happening in Hinsdale, IL for years now (a few other older suburbs in the chicago area, too). It's completely retarded. People are attracted to the town and willing to pay relatively high real estate prices in large part because---unlike most other cookie-cutter suburbs in the area---there's a lot of neat, differentiated old houses there, and then they move in, tear one down and put up a "modern" gray monstrosity that sticks out like a sore thumb and barely fits in the lot. I just don't get it.

oops (Oops), Tuesday, 6 June 2006 23:03 (seventeen years ago) link

Pretty sure Cleveland has lost close to half of its population also; I know the city is now below 500,000 where is was once close to (or at) 1 million. (Metro area is 2.2M) Combination of outmigration + economic factors.

The faux-downtowns are everywhere now. There was an article in the _WSJ_ last week quoting a shopper in one of the ones in Dallas -- 'I don't go downtown, there's too much riff-raff down there'. There ya go -- The Urban Experience w/o all those pesky minorities and poor people!!

Legacy Village -- if the sterility doesn't scare you away, the lack of parking will. At least the Crocker Park developers mixed in a parking ramp.

And yes, let's hope some preservationist with deep pockets befriends the StL house.

Jeff Wright (JeffW1858), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 01:35 (seventeen years ago) link

Honestly, I don't think the house above is all that attractive (though surely better-looking than what will come in its place), nor does it seem very practical. Neat, sure. Interesting. An artifact of another time. But not very tasteful or well-designed. The idea that some couple 30 (40?) years ago wanted to custom build a house to their quirky taste is classic but the idea that someone else wants to do it now is dud?

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 02:33 (seventeen years ago) link

BTW, just as there are plenty of good people in suburbs, there are also plenty of people with the same crappy traits you guys are talking about living in cities. "OMG! I REALLY HOPE DOWNTOWN JERSEY CITY GETS A STARBUCKS SOON!" "WHY IS IT SO DIRTY HERE?" "THERE ARE ALL THESE THUG KIDS ROAMING THE STREETS"

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 02:34 (seventeen years ago) link

there are about 50 of those "old world" style galleries every square mile in Los Angeles

gear (gear), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 02:37 (seventeen years ago) link

i think it's got great contours, but i'm not that thrilled with the brickwork. i would re-do the facade. the midwest is crawling with awesome mid-century suburban-modern architecture -- here's hoping more of it doesn't get torn down.

sometimes it takes an earthquake to know where the fault lies (Jody Beth Rosen), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 02:38 (seventeen years ago) link

(xpost -- i'm talking about the missouri house.)

sometimes it takes an earthquake to know where the fault lies (Jody Beth Rosen), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 02:38 (seventeen years ago) link

there are about 50 of those "old world" style galleries every square mile in Los Angeles

i've spotted a few in LA but thankfully not THAT many -- probably more in OC.

sometimes it takes an earthquake to know where the fault lies (Jody Beth Rosen), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 02:39 (seventeen years ago) link

Yeah, I agree about the brickwork especially, and also much of the interior design is pretty hideous. Ironically I'd say it's exactly the kind of stuff that would have been decried as the worst in tacky suburban taste by self-congratulatory New York types 30-40 years ago.

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 02:44 (seventeen years ago) link

oh, i like the interior a lot. "ironically."

sometimes it takes an earthquake to know where the fault lies (Jody Beth Rosen), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 02:46 (seventeen years ago) link

I do like the bar, living room and kitchen.

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 02:52 (seventeen years ago) link

Anyway, I get oddly defensive about the suburbs for someone who's never even lived in one. I hate McMansions and strip malls as much as the next guy. But I don't think one can make too many generalizations about "people who live in the suburbs" being that that's the majority of Americans, and that "suburb" nowadays seems to be used to describe pretty much anything that isn't urban or rural -- everything from small towns that actually have their own real downtowns but happen to be near major cities to housing developments that aren't anywhere near a city at all.

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 02:56 (seventeen years ago) link

The interior is AWESOME.

The whole house is vaguely reminiscent of my grandparents' friends' house on LI.

tokyo nursery school: afternoon session (rosemary), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 02:58 (seventeen years ago) link

Doesnt everyone not in a small country town live in a suburb?

/pedant.

Trayce (trayce), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 03:10 (seventeen years ago) link

Neil Peart has spoken, ignore at your PERIL!!

Sprawling on the fringes of the city
In geometric order
An insulated border
In between the bright lights
And the far unlit unknown

Growing up it all seems so one-sided
Opinions all provided
The future pre-decided
Detached and subdivided
In the mass production zone

Nowhere is the dreamer
Or the misfit so alone

Subdivisions ---
In the high school halls
In the shopping malls
Conform or be cast out
Subdivisions ---
In the basement bars
In the backs of cars
Be cool or be cast out
Any escape might help to smooth
The unattractive truth
But the suburbs have no charms to soothe
The restless dreams of youth

Drawn like moths we drift into the city
The timeless old attraction
Cruising for the action
Lit up like a firefly
Just to feel the living night

Some will sell their dreams for small desires
Or lose the race to rats
Get caught in ticking traps
And start to dream of somewhere
To relax their restless flight

Somewhere out of a memory
Of lighted streets on quiet nights...

(cue some guy posting about how he hates reading lyrics, how i'm thirteen, how i wrote these lyrics myself, how this is a serious post, etc......)

timmy tannin (pompous), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 03:11 (seventeen years ago) link

Ah, had I actually read the blog I would know that the house was built in 1950 (though I assume some of the interior details are more recent).

The Chicago suburbs have a lot of really cool houses from that era that I would hate to see torn down, including my grandparents' former house, which my Grandma just sold. The lot is pretty small so I'd be surprised if it gets torn down.

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 03:12 (seventeen years ago) link

Doesnt everyone not in a small country town live in a suburb?

If you really want to be pedantic, not according to Wikipedia:

Suburbs are inhabited districts located either on the outer rim of a city or outside the official limits of a city (the term varies from country to country), or the outer elements of a conurbation.

The presence of certain elements (whose definition varies amongst urbanists, but usually refers to some basic services and to the territorial continuity) identifies a suburb as a peripheral populated area with a certain autonomy, where the density of habitation is usually lower than in an inner city area, though state or municipal house building will often cause departures from that organic gradation. Suburbs have typically grown in areas with an abundance of flat land near a large urban zone ...

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 03:18 (seventeen years ago) link

There's a new trend that I've noticed here in SoCal, in which large new tract houses are built on smaller than average-sized lots. They normally (in my area) start at the low $400,000s but are built cheaply as fuck. The closest thing I can compare them to are condos/townhomes, but detached. There doesn't seem to be any benefit to owning one, but they do seem to be popular.

naus (Robert T), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 03:33 (seventeen years ago) link

not a suburban trend, per se, but definitely pertinent to the tear-down discussion
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persian_palace

timmy tannin (pompous), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 03:35 (seventeen years ago) link

the original tract homes were built very small, and on very small subdivisions. today's mcmansion owners would have a conniption if they had to settle for a house with the square footage of an average apartment.

sometimes it takes an earthquake to know where the fault lies (Jody Beth Rosen), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 03:35 (seventeen years ago) link

I was being silly really, and maybe it is an aussie thing..? But even if you're 5 mins walk from the city centre you live in "a suburb".

Not the same thing as "the suburbs" I realise =) But here, unless you actually live in "Melbourne, 3000" as your postcode, you live in some suburb or other - some are innercity and old, some are new and sprawled and a long way out...

Trayce (trayce), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 03:40 (seventeen years ago) link

the original tract homes were built very small, and on very small subdivisions. today's mcmansion owners would have a conniption if they had to settle for a house with the square footage of an average apartment.

When I was younger I used to spend my summers with my grandparents on Long Island. I remember them taking me through Levittown once and pointing out the houses that still looked original from the outside. I didn't really appreciate it at the time, but now I realize that they were showing me the genesis of all that I despise about my culture.

naus (Robert T), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 03:58 (seventeen years ago) link

The idea that some couple 30 (40?) years ago wanted to custom build a house to their quirky taste is classic but the idea that someone else wants to do it now is dud?

the problem i have (if the issues of white flight, sprawl, land use, and inner city/inner ring suburban decay are put aside) is an issue of personal taste. from what i've seen, it really doesn't matter how much money you plow into new construction currently. you end up with basically the same thing (at least from the outside view) as your neighbors. perhaps you have a wine cellar and someone else has a pool or an in-law suite above the garage, but the building styles are pretty indistinguishable.

lauren (laurenp), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 12:51 (seventeen years ago) link

the problem I have is that all the new houses look so shoddily made! Although houses already cost so much money, if they were built to last I don't know how anyone could afford them.

teeny (teeny), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 12:57 (seventeen years ago) link

According to our local paper, local papers aren't making houses quite as big as they once were, no that evceryone is starting to realize how much it costs to maintain the McMansions and how much taxes are.

tokyo nursery school: afternoon session (rosemary), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 13:01 (seventeen years ago) link

austin has legislated against mcmansions.

Miss Misery xox (MissMiseryTX), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 13:02 (seventeen years ago) link

the problem I have is that all the new houses look so shoddily made!

that, too. the house i largely grew up in was built in the 50s. it had italian marble in the front hall and a sandstone fireplace in the family room, and it was a 3-bedroom split-level in a working/middle class community. you could spend hundreds and hundreds of thousands in a gated development today and not get that.

lauren (laurenp), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 13:13 (seventeen years ago) link

I never watch 60 minutes, but a few months ago, I caught a segment about McMansions or "starter palaces" ... There was a guy talking about the design of his parquet floor. He said it was a replica of a famous house in Paris called "the Versailles* House." Mike Wallace: "Do you mean the Palace at Versailles?" "Uh, yeah that's it."

OK, now TOMBOT can show up and call me prejudiced for thinking the rich guy is a dolt and doesn't deserve what he has.

8Versailles pronounced correctly. No points deducted there.

DAVE, for #1 Hits of yesterday and today! (dave225.3), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 13:17 (seventeen years ago) link

8=*

DAVE, for #1 Hits of yesterday and today! (dave225.3), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 13:17 (seventeen years ago) link

lauren is completely OTM, I was scrolling to the bottom to post almost the identical thing.

Dave, I actually doubt dude is really rich. These ppl all be doing this by putting themselves into tremendous debt. At least from the ones I know buying into suburban monstrosities and middle-of-nowhere "luxury condos" etc.

Allyzay Rofflesbot (allyzay), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 13:20 (seventeen years ago) link

I totally believe that most of the people in these houses are in debt in to some pretty dangerous financial positions... Although this particular guy actually did have money... ("New" money though! mmm hmmm.)

DAVE, for #1 Hits of yesterday and today! (dave225.3), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 13:26 (seventeen years ago) link

Yeah, it occurred to me after I hit submit that if he was on 60 Minutes he's probably notable in some way besides "McMansion douchebag". Oh well.

I guess that's the thing I don't understand, going into tremendous personal debt to have...the same exact identical poorly made house as everyone else?

Allyzay Rofflesbot (allyzay), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 13:29 (seventeen years ago) link

All I know is that when I was little I wished we had things like NEIGHBORS and SIDEWALKS. But noooooo, my parents wanted a BIG HOUSE in the COUNTRY. Haha.

Laurel (Laurel), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 13:29 (seventeen years ago) link

I guess that's the thing I don't understand, going into tremendous personal debt to have...the same exact identical poorly made house as everyone else?

My wife was at a meeting (after getting lost in numerous cul-de-sacs) at someone's house in the suburbs (for work, not PTA, nor Pampered Chef) and someone in the group said, "I was in this house last week." My wife was the only one who did not understand that the person meant the same model of a house in another subdivision, and not the exact same house.

DAVE, for #1 Hits of yesterday and today! (dave225.3), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 13:43 (seventeen years ago) link

I'm in a split-level, built in the 60s. It's like my mom's full-time job keeping track of everything that is breaking and getting people in to fix it back up. I don't really like the split level because the downstairs is cold and dark and the upstairs is warm.

Those metroplexes confuse me, especially around Arlington. The developers completely turn away from an existing city and build a planned shopping/living center with underground parking that exists in its own little orbit.

Mary (Mary), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 19:38 (seventeen years ago) link

I imagine those McMansions that take up the whole lot also create drainage problems, which would be yet another justification for government to step in.

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Friday, 9 June 2006 02:48 (seventeen years ago) link

i'm against them for environmental reasons (as well as aesthetic ones, but taste is taste) -- if you have a big house, you use more electricity, create more garbage, probably waste more water too (kitchen sink, multiple bathrooms, not to mention the water necessary to clean all the sinks and floors and tubs and toilets). do the people in these houses really NEED all that space? why can't they just throw out some of the crap they accumulate?
I heard (i.e. not "made up" but not researched either) that the amount of space per capita in the U.S. (that is: square footage of house) is four times what it was fifty years ago. That may be due to smaller families, as well as larger houses.

DAVE, for #1 Hits of yesterday and today! (dave225.3), Friday, 9 June 2006 10:54 (seventeen years ago) link

two years pass...

og i miss the greenery

Surmounter, Friday, 11 July 2008 18:16 (fifteen years ago) link

the parks where like no one goes for some weird reason when you decide to go to the park

just empty

Surmounter, Friday, 11 July 2008 18:16 (fifteen years ago) link

i miss the trails in the woods, the delis where the highschoolers would pull up in their cars and like get a soda

Surmounter, Friday, 11 July 2008 18:17 (fifteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.