Greatest NBA players discussion and maybe a nomination thread IDK

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (16 of them)

i think i was trying to account for near-dominance with the all-nba first team selections (assuming in most cases that top 3 mvp vote getters would for the most part earn all-nba first team selections).

21st savagery fox (m bison), Saturday, 4 August 2018 14:44 (five years ago) link

i agree that there are some players who probably should have more or fewer mvps tho. i'd argue nash and rose shouldnt have any. jordan deserves at least one of malone's or barkley's or maybe both. guys like bill russell and dave cowens who somehow got mvps but not all-nba first team probably dont deserve from those yeares.

21st savagery fox (m bison), Saturday, 4 August 2018 14:46 (five years ago) link

also... *whispers* AI should never have won mvp either, shaq was a monster that year

21st savagery fox (m bison), Saturday, 4 August 2018 14:53 (five years ago) link

MVP is not for the best player, but for the most valuable. Shaq should have more MVPs, and was amazing in 2001. However, AI made that dogshit 76ers team contenders; the Lakers would have been damn good (but not champions) without Shaq. I wouldn't have complained if he got the MVP, though that doesn't make Iverson any less deserving.

HOWEVER, Derrick Rose can fuck right off.

EZ Snappin, Saturday, 4 August 2018 15:44 (five years ago) link

my test in these matters is "what would happen if you switch those players?" (and if they play different positions, sub that spot with a replacement-level player) and you can't convince me that a shaq-led sixers wouldn't have made an iverson-kobe lakers team quake. i dont wanna relitigate "what does valuable mean" here tho bc this is a family restaurant.

21st savagery fox (m bison), Saturday, 4 August 2018 17:50 (five years ago) link

Yet those teams were built around those special talents. What compliments AI doesn't compliment Shaq. So it's apples and oranges as they were both great that year.

HOWEVER, Derrick Rose can fuck right off.

EZ Snappin, Saturday, 4 August 2018 18:21 (five years ago) link

agreed about d rose, im just saying allen iverson was a worthy 2nd that year and u cant convince me otherwise

21st savagery fox (m bison), Saturday, 4 August 2018 18:23 (five years ago) link

Fair enough. Shaq was the most dominant player of the era, which is more important for this discussion than whether or not he won MVP in 2001.

I also admit to AI bias as he's the only NBA player I ever faced on a court.

EZ Snappin, Saturday, 4 August 2018 18:41 (five years ago) link

I think kevin pelton has a system like this right? championships added -- I don't have insider anymore so I can't see the methodology

http://www.espn.com/nba/insider/story/_/id/14671128/explaining-championships-added-all-nba-rank-kevin-pelton

k3vin k., Saturday, 4 August 2018 19:16 (five years ago) link

i mean im not a person who would say go to insider2text dot xyz but that is a thing some people might say in that situation

21st savagery fox (m bison), Saturday, 4 August 2018 19:18 (five years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.