a cult of personality without the personality
in other news, this is why Pelosi is good at her job: https://www.politico.com/story/2018/06/05/house-democrats-republican-spending-plans-598146
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 6 June 2018 16:19 (five years ago) link
The longtime appropriator pointed out that $15 billion within his own bill goes toward nuclear weapons and security. “To vote against that would be crazy,” he said
non sequitur if I ever heard one
― valorous wokelord (silby), Wednesday, 6 June 2018 16:22 (five years ago) link
As of pre-yesterday, OR had more wins than losses in 2018 endorsements, so I wouldn't write them off, just yet. Skewed a bit toward lower level races but part of the idea is to build a bench.
https://ourrevolution.com/results/
― Fedora Dostoyevsky (man alive), Wednesday, 6 June 2018 16:24 (five years ago) link
Re the politico takeaways - bernie totally abandoning our revolution is nagl― officer sonny bonds, lytton pd (mayor jingleberries), Wednesday, 6 June 2018 16:08 (five minutes ago) PermalinkNot sure what you mean by this. Bernie was never actually affiliated with OR, it was more like a group that branched out from his campaign and was inspired by him.― Fedora Dostoyevsky (man alive), Wednesday, June 6, 2018 4:16 PM (forty-five minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― officer sonny bonds, lytton pd (mayor jingleberries), Wednesday, 6 June 2018 16:08 (five minutes ago) Permalink
Not sure what you mean by this. Bernie was never actually affiliated with OR, it was more like a group that branched out from his campaign and was inspired by him.
― Fedora Dostoyevsky (man alive), Wednesday, June 6, 2018 4:16 PM (forty-five minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
its a small point to argue but if some organization runs off in your name you should maybe try to reign them in somehow? an example on my mind was on the this week in atrocity podcast.. some rich guy in CA basically started his own chapter and endorsed himself.
maybe im just having flashbacks to OFA starting off with promise then turning into a dumpster fire
― officer sonny bonds, lytton pd (mayor jingleberries), Wednesday, 6 June 2018 17:05 (five years ago) link
Skewed a bit toward lower level races but part of the idea is to build a bench.
Which is a damn solid idea and will yield solid benefits up and down the ballot.
― A is for (Aimless), Wednesday, 6 June 2018 17:08 (five years ago) link
Nice formulation here:
U.S. Sen. Dianne Feinstein is seeking another six-year term at age 84 and is expected to cruise into November when her likely opponent will be fellow Democrat Kevin de Leon, the former state Senate leader. There are 11 unknown Republicans in the race and none was backed by the party.
http://time.com/5302723/democrat-gavin-newsom-california-governor-primary-john-cox/
― Martin Landau Ballet (Leee), Wednesday, 6 June 2018 18:13 (five years ago) link
Indeed, why would the Republican party want to oppose Feinstein?
― A is for (Aimless), Wednesday, 6 June 2018 19:23 (five years ago) link
I don't think Feinstein's ever faced a Dem challenger so this will be interesting (she will still win, most likely)
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 6 June 2018 19:30 (five years ago) link
Newsom is a dick but A+ trolling herehttps://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/democratic-gubernatorial-candidate-in-calif-urges-trump-to-campaign-for-gop-opponent-as-much-as-possible/2018/06/06/0f5c2e06-69ad-11e8-9e38-24e693b38637_story.html?utm_term=.49725020a386
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 6 June 2018 19:33 (five years ago) link
Intercept roundup of election results:
https://theintercept.com/2018/06/06/california-primary-election-results-2018/
― Simon H., Wednesday, 6 June 2018 19:42 (five years ago) link
I kinda gathered Rohrabacher's race was worth watching partly because there was a fear that no Democrat would advance (do I have that right?). Which didn't happen, right?
― emotional support vegetable (Ye Mad Puffin), Wednesday, 6 June 2018 20:07 (five years ago) link
correct
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 6 June 2018 20:10 (five years ago) link
District 48 - Huntington BeachDana Rohrabacher GOP 30.3%Harley Rouda Dem 17.3%
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 6 June 2018 20:12 (five years ago) link
https://www.nytimes.com/elections/results/california-house-district-48-primary-election
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 6 June 2018 20:13 (five years ago) link
“The GOP minibus package on the floor this week is partisan, wrong-headed and dangerous.”
vroom vroom
― we used to get our kicks reading surfing MAGAzines (sic), Wednesday, 6 June 2018 20:16 (five years ago) link
Οὖτις, so theoretically if enough of the ~70% non-Redenbacher voters vote against him, he loses.
― emotional support vegetable (Ye Mad Puffin), Wednesday, 6 June 2018 20:33 (five years ago) link
that's right
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 6 June 2018 20:42 (five years ago) link
Here's the total breakdown in District 48:
GOP votes: 53%Dana Rohrabacher GOP 30.3%Scott Baugh GOP 16.1%John Gabbard GOP 3.2%Paul Martin GOP 1.6%Shastina Sandman GOP 1.4%Stelian Onufrei GOP 0.4%
Dem votes: 46.1%Harley Rouda Dem 17.3%Hans Keirstead Dem 17.2%Omar Siddiqui Dem 4.9%Rachel Payne Dem 2.1%Michael Kotick Dem 1.6%Laura Oatman Dem 1.4%Deanie Schaarsmith Dem 0.8%Tony Zarkades Dem 0.8%
Other: 0.9%Brandon Reiser Lib 0.5%Kevin Kensinger NPP 0.4%
GOP definitely has a registration advantage in this District, and Rohrabacher's had this seat for a very long time, so Dems will have to throw significant resources into the race to try and make up that 7 point deficit from the primary.
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 6 June 2018 20:49 (five years ago) link
Bob Menendez won his primary w/ 62% of the vote vs an unknown who spent no money
i guess the Dems will put up VOTE FOR THE CROOK, IT'S IMPORTANT billboards in NJ
― the ignatius rock of ignorance (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 6 June 2018 21:17 (five years ago) link
duh
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 6 June 2018 21:20 (five years ago) link
if he loses, they'll deserve it
― the ignatius rock of ignorance (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 6 June 2018 21:25 (five years ago) link
he'll win
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 6 June 2018 21:33 (five years ago) link
better the crook you know
― valorous wokelord (silby), Wednesday, 6 June 2018 21:38 (five years ago) link
I'm pretty sure he'll win; the Republican comes off like a real asshole in his ads, and not a let's-party asshole like Menendez but the kind of guy who calls the cops on his next door neighbor if the stereo's still on at 10:05 PM.
― grawlix (unperson), Thursday, 7 June 2018 00:21 (five years ago) link
― the ignatius rock of ignorance (Dr Morbius)
it's _new jersey_, where are they going to find an honest candidate?
― Arch Bacon (rushomancy), Thursday, 7 June 2018 01:33 (five years ago) link
They count Stacey Abrams among their candidates but she was endorsed by establishment Dems as well, who actually gave her money. I like the idea that they focus on lower level races, the long term vision of that though.
“As of pre-yesterday, OR had more wins than losses in 2018 endorsements, so I wouldn't write them off, just yet. Skewed a bit toward lower level races but part of the idea is to build a bench.”https://ourrevolution.com/results/― Fedora Dostoyevsky (man alive), Wednesday, June 6,
― Nerdstrom Poindexter, Thursday, 7 June 2018 01:40 (five years ago) link
THat's a fair point, and it may apply to other candidates too. OTOH I don't know what a fair way to measure is -- maybe OR put her over the top or maybe she would have been fine without them.
― Fedora Dostoyevsky (man alive), Thursday, 7 June 2018 02:58 (five years ago) link
*gasp* are you admitting that the Dem establishment actually backed a decent candidate
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 7 June 2018 03:01 (five years ago) link
In the Politico exposure they said that the win-rate among candidates more solely backed by OR is 40%
― Frederik B, Thursday, 7 June 2018 10:31 (five years ago) link
And they didn't just 'branch out' independently, just as one small example they got Bernie's campaign email list to build on.
― Frederik B, Thursday, 7 June 2018 10:32 (five years ago) link
oh this seems good
https://splinternews.com/democrats-vow-to-bring-back-stupid-and-harmful-spending-1826620867
― Simon H., Thursday, 7 June 2018 11:05 (five years ago) link
That article & headline seemed to me like utter propaganda when I read it last night. - headline seems a little biased- nobody’s really “bringing back” anything - the GOP has simply exempted the two spending bills they’ve been able to pass this Congress- entire piece is sourced from like, 3 quotes?- if you wanted to discourage progressives from showing up to vote in November this is almost exactly what you should be publishing So, hooray, good job.
― El Tomboto, Thursday, 7 June 2018 11:52 (five years ago) link
if you wanted to discourage progressives from showing up to vote in November this is almost exactly what you should be publishing
so...basically publish nothing critical from now till Nov?
― Simon H., Thursday, 7 June 2018 11:54 (five years ago) link
Lol
― El Tomboto, Thursday, 7 June 2018 11:59 (five years ago) link
Maybe just avoid invective-soaked clickbait built on a skeleton of two remarks by old people which in no way constitute a platform plank or policy
― El Tomboto, Thursday, 7 June 2018 12:01 (five years ago) link
if major Dem players are pushing or even just appearing to push a dumb policy it seems worthy of public pushback in order to maaaybe help shame them into not doing that but clearly mileages vary
― Simon H., Thursday, 7 June 2018 12:02 (five years ago) link
Christ:
The Democrats haven’t won back the House of Representatives yet, but their leaders in the House already seem desperate to make sure everyone knows that if they do, they’ll do fuck all to put forward a positive vision for the country they want to run.
― Frederik B, Thursday, 7 June 2018 12:04 (five years ago) link
That won't shame anyone, that will just make Pelosi and the DCCC laugh all the way to the next donor meeting.
― Frederik B, Thursday, 7 June 2018 12:12 (five years ago) link
- if you wanted to discourage progressives from showing up to vote in November this is almost exactly what you should be publishing
So, hooray, good job.
― El Tomboto
relying on the splinter news constituency to bring about meaningful political change is about as warranted as expecting a tidal wave of 18 year olds to reshape the political map
― Arch Bacon (rushomancy), Thursday, 7 June 2018 13:38 (five years ago) link
the spell only works if you constantly say bad things about Republicans. the minute you slip from that and do something harmful like critical thinking, it stops the magic from happening
― Hazy Maze Cave (Adam Bruneau), Thursday, 7 June 2018 13:47 (five years ago) link
yeah, platform planks, always the basis of governance
― the ignatius rock of ignorance (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 7 June 2018 14:25 (five years ago) link
https://www.politico.com/story/2018/06/06/superdelegates-house-democrats-630357
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 7 June 2018 15:59 (five years ago) link
expecting a tidal wave of 18 year olds to reshape the political map
in general, people are more likely to vote when they perceive their stake in the outcome is sufficiently large to make the effort. that rarely applies to 18 year olds, whose stake is more about a theoretical future than an immediate present.
what I expect is that the cohort of young people who are already inclined to take this stuff seriously will enter the arena as more activist and radicalized than usual, but not in significantly larger numbers.
― A is for (Aimless), Thursday, 7 June 2018 16:19 (five years ago) link
what a monster
http://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/391214-pelosi-medicare-for-all-should-be-evaluated-if-dems-win-house
it's almost like her leadership is guided by what she knows her caucus will support
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 7 June 2018 19:44 (five years ago) link
yeah, it's almost like she's hedging and saying something totally non-committal because she sees writing on the wall
― Fedora Dostoyevsky (man alive), Thursday, 7 June 2018 19:48 (five years ago) link
So relieved that party centrists are paying vague lip service to policies they'll never actually support, democracy really works.
Also, you realize that this is only happening because of pushes from the crazy left wing of the party, right?
― Fedora Dostoyevsky (man alive), Thursday, 7 June 2018 19:50 (five years ago) link
it's happening because a majority of her caucus supports it. lol @ "never actually support" - if she has the votes, she'll pass it.
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 7 June 2018 19:56 (five years ago) link
which, yes, actually is how democracy is supposed to work
if the donor base supports it
― Fedora Dostoyevsky (man alive), Thursday, 7 June 2018 20:15 (five years ago) link
if she has the votes, she'll pass it.
― Οὖτις
also pelosi is a lifelong cat-herder with more ability than most to actually _get_ the votes
― Arch Bacon (rushomancy), Friday, 8 June 2018 00:22 (five years ago) link