TS: R.E.M.'s "Life's Rich Pageant" vs "Document"

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (194 of them)
"The variety and depth of LRP just isn't matched by Document."

Put a gun to my head and demand I choose one over the other, I'd probably go with LRP. That being said, Document heads into some interesting sonic territory on side two, once you pass "The One I Love." I'm thinking of "Fireplace," "Lightning Hopkins" and "Oddfellows 151" in particular. The band cooked up some new studio ideas with percussion and guitar for those, leading to a new style for them, kind of a feeback laden, Mission of Burma/Gang of Four-ish style, with maybe even some Sonic Youth moves dropped in (I'm pretty sure Peter Buck was name dropping SY in the press by 1987).

James, Tuesday, 6 December 2005 20:04 (eighteen years ago) link

"Fireplace" - OK. The Steve Berlin sax solo on that is great. Not so fond of "Lightnin' Hopkins" and "Oddfellows."

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 20:12 (eighteen years ago) link

document

kyle (akmonday), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 20:24 (eighteen years ago) link

i hope this wasn't already mentioned (just scanned through the thread), but what's interesting about LRP is that REM didn't write it, supposedly. They burned out after the Fables touring and almost broke up and this guy (can't remember his name... Jamie Ayers or something...) wrote almost all of LRP with Peter Buck. I don't know if this is completely true, or if maybe he just wrote a couple of tunes. I was aquainted with the guy when I lived in Athens and it was fairly common knowledge that he lived off of LRP royalties.

But, recently a friend gave me a dvd of an rem concert on some german show (the same show that wire dvd is from) and it was in support of fables and they played hyena and fall on me (with improvised verses), so they definitely wrote those themselves.

josecanseco, Tuesday, 6 December 2005 20:59 (eighteen years ago) link

I have no idea if this story is true or not, but it is true that LRP is heavy with older songs from the band's history. "What if We Give It Away" and "Just a Touch" were songs the band was playing around 1981 or 1982 (possibly with different lyrics, though). "I Believe" was recorded for Fables first (a recording which was not used). "Fall On Me" and "Hyena" were played on the Fables tour (the former definitely with different lyrics). And of course, one song is a cover of a 60's tune.


James, Tuesday, 6 December 2005 21:16 (eighteen years ago) link

i hope this wasn't already mentioned (just scanned through the thread), but what's interesting about LRP is that REM didn't write it, supposedly. They burned out after the Fables touring and almost broke up and this guy (can't remember his name... Jamie Ayers or something...) wrote almost all of LRP with Peter Buck. I don't know if this is completely true, or if maybe he just wrote a couple of tunes. I was aquainted with the guy when I lived in Athens and it was fairly common knowledge that he lived off of LRP royalties.

whoa! can anyone else substantiate this?

Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 21:26 (eighteen years ago) link

Woah! What a great thread idea! I think I have thought of it before and never started it.

It's tough.

the bellefox, Tuesday, 6 December 2005 21:29 (eighteen years ago) link

i won't be surprised if everyone thinks i'm full of shit.

it was a secret supposedly to the public, but in athens people were like "oh yeah that guy just lives off of rem royalties because he wrote most of lifes rich pageant". and these were mutual friends saying this. i never knew him well enough to hear it from his mouth, but that's what his friends said. i remember thinking at the time it was weird that someone could just live off of songwriting royalties but now that i know more about bizzzzzzzzzzz it makes sense.

josecanseco, Tuesday, 6 December 2005 21:53 (eighteen years ago) link

It sounds like an urban legend.

Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 22:39 (eighteen years ago) link

There's a J. Ayers credited on Old Man Kensey and Windout. Nothing for LRP though.

dan. (dan.), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 22:42 (eighteen years ago) link

When Document came out, there was an interview with Mills in the Houston Post. He talked a bit about recording LRP in Indiana. Mills didn't make any accusations, but he said suggested that it was strange that R.E.M. used accordian on LRP, and next year Mellencamp's Lonesome Jubilee has accordian busting out all over the place. I think he mentioned Mellencamp stopping by the studio while they were there. Can't remember if a Houston Chronicle writer did the interview or not.

el maury, Tuesday, 6 December 2005 22:50 (eighteen years ago) link

It was a pump organ.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 22:52 (eighteen years ago) link

(on LRP, anyway)

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 22:52 (eighteen years ago) link

Well, at the time Don Gehman was Mellencamp's producer. And Bill Berry is mixed to sound an awful lot like Kenny Aronof on LRP, which might be why I love the album so much.

Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 22:54 (eighteen years ago) link

and mellencamp owned the studio, i believe.

i had a friend who went to iu at the time, she told a funny story about stipe showing up at hoosier parties.

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 22:56 (eighteen years ago) link

xpost re: j ayers credited to two songs from fables.

interesting. i wonder if that's all it was then.

josecanseco, Tuesday, 6 December 2005 22:58 (eighteen years ago) link

Were people bothered at the time that REM had arena'd up their sound with LFR or did the progression seem natural?

No, because Fables was so damn slow and boring. It was good that they started rocking again.

LRP, no contest. I remember thinking at the time that, if not as mumbly as Murmur-but how could it be?- it was a bigger and better return to form.

k/l (Ken L), Wednesday, 7 December 2005 14:48 (eighteen years ago) link

xpost: Aww, Lightnin' Hopkins is a solid track, and I like Oddfellows a lot. At least give it credit for being another direction for REM.

js (honestengine), Wednesday, 7 December 2005 14:51 (eighteen years ago) link

three months pass...
Today's the day when we revive old R.E.M. threads (is it Mike Mills' b-day or something??)

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 17:40 (eighteen years ago) link

Nah, I'm bored at work (incoming calls) and in a bit of an REM mood, so it's all my fault.

LRP for me. Begin The Begin and These Days make politically conscious arena rock sound like a good idea. Cuyahoga was magnificent when they played it on the Up tour. I Believe is ace and Fall On Me possibly my fave REM song. The goofy stuff is great too. Anyone who doesn't like Superman is a humourless curmudgeon. I remember getting the reissue of Horses with the My Generation cover and had one of those euraka moments with the "I'm so young, I'm so goddam young" bit.

Document's a good album, but the production dates it. Still, some interesting G04 moves on there, as mentioned xpost. I'm a bit bored with The One I Love to be honest, but End Of The World is great fun (again, what sort of humourless curmudgeon do you have to be to hate this?).

LRP has infinitely better cover art too. Bill Berry's monobrow in a lo-fi collage!

stew!, Tuesday, 14 March 2006 19:26 (eighteen years ago) link

" I'm a bit bored with The One I Love"

So was I, for a long time, until I first listened to the live acoustic version, which was the b-side of the ITEOTWAWKI single. (You can find it on one of the "IRS Vintage Years" reissues as a bonus track - that's where I heard it). It's not radically different, but it has a strong folk-country sound which gives the song a new flavor. In a couple of interviews I've read over the years, Peter Buck as described the song as an Appalachian folk ballad, or something similar. I had no idea what he meant until I heard the b-side version.

James, Tuesday, 14 March 2006 19:32 (eighteen years ago) link

That's the edition I've got. You're right, it's a good version. It's a fine song, but I think I've just heard it a bit too often.

stew!, Tuesday, 14 March 2006 19:46 (eighteen years ago) link

LRP is where they rock out, man! Preemo.

Document had "King of Birds" and a really grand set of acoustic B-sides, but not near the record that LRP is.

christoff (christoff), Wednesday, 15 March 2006 15:48 (eighteen years ago) link

There really is something subpar about Document, and it just doesn't sound good... but it contains "The One I Love" so TEH WINNRE

Aaron A, Wednesday, 15 March 2006 16:20 (eighteen years ago) link

I'm with the Fables supporters, it's my favorite album. Maybe I lean towards the underdog, but I felt it was the last time R.E.M. seemed remotely interesting and enigmatic. It was a dark record that took some gnawing before you could sink your teeth into it. Whereas LRP bursts out of the gate like a showpony, all glossy and booming with that annoying 80s arena sound. It's the first time I could discern most of Stipes' lyrics, and they were painfully awkward. The sound was just too bright and ordinary. They sounded less like R.E.M. and more like, say, The Call. Remember them? A few great songs for sure, but that's when R.E.M. lost their allure for me. I was still excited when Document came out. An interview at the time had Buck saying he really hoped to be able to pop out an all-time classic on the level of Horses or VU & Nico. Or if not a "classic," at least a great rock record. It sounded like Document was their bid for immortality. It seemed promising at first, full of piss and wit and vinegar and anger. But it just drags way too much by the end. I'm always relieved when it's over, not amazed and left wanting more. Who knew at the time that their artistic failure/decline would lead them to become one of the most massively popular MOR bands of the 90s? More power to 'em.

Fastnbulbous (Fastnbulbous), Thursday, 16 March 2006 07:04 (eighteen years ago) link

count me with the old-timers who lost interest in rem with these 2 albums (did pay a little attention around out of time/automatic before completely writing them off). i liked the murk and mystery of the first 3, even the difficult Fables. once they went for a more "friendly"? sound they were just another run-of-the mill 80s rock band (i had moved on to here TS: Double Nickels on the Dime vs. Zen Arcade)

timmy tannin (pompous), Thursday, 16 March 2006 07:26 (eighteen years ago) link

xpost I like how they lose their allure and then the next year you're still excited for their next record. On one level it sounds like you just can't get your REM fan saga story straight, but on another level, I feel like I've felt this way about REM for the last like three albums.

Doctor Casino (Doctor Casino), Thursday, 16 March 2006 07:43 (eighteen years ago) link

I couldn't help but root for them to not be boring.

Fastnbulbous (Fastnbulbous), Thursday, 16 March 2006 18:18 (eighteen years ago) link

Fables was when I first realized how boring they could be. Then Up and Reveal showed how really boring they could be.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Thursday, 16 March 2006 18:21 (eighteen years ago) link

six months pass...
"Begin the Begin" opens the new comp. Vindication!

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Wednesday, 4 October 2006 17:21 (seventeen years ago) link

I still love this thread, but I'm puzzled by what needed vindicatin' given that it's been LRP by landslide since post 1.

Nonetheless...

rogermexico (rogermexico), Wednesday, 4 October 2006 19:09 (seventeen years ago) link

http://www.jccomics.com/Vindicator.jpg

YOU HAVE BEEN VINDICATED

rogermexico (rogermexico), Wednesday, 4 October 2006 19:10 (seventeen years ago) link

one year passes...

LET'S BEGIN AGAIN

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 03:29 (sixteen years ago) link

birdie in the hand

kamerad, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 03:45 (sixteen years ago) link

As for Docment...the second side is pretty damn weak. Only "Finest Worksong" and "Exhuming McCarthy" on the A rock/swing as much as, say, "Just A Touch."

Oh, that's too harsh. I like Side Two of Document. Fireplace and King Of Birds especially have a weird, hypnotic vibe. And, from Side One, Welcome To The Occupation, Exhuming McCarthy, and Disturbance At The Heron House are pretty powerful political screeds, for a rock band.

Worst thing about Document to me is that it's the first R.E.M. disc that really abandons their Southern Gothic rock sound. That sound wasn't too prominent on Life's Rich Pageant, but it's there. Frankly, to the extent that even small elements of that sound make it onto Document, they do so on Side Two (which is probably why it's the side I prefer on the disc).

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 5 February 2008 03:54 (sixteen years ago) link

I've embarrassed myself elsewhere on ILM repping for side 2 of Document and won't reprise that here. But I'll take side 2 over side 1 of it, and even over side 2 of LRP. The songs on side 2 of Document are still so mysterious to me, and I think their lack of straightforwardness confounds the standard account that REM was "selling out" at that time. Those songs are just as murky as those on Murmur.

Euler, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 03:58 (sixteen years ago) link

billboard's preview of the new album mentions '...pageant' as a reference point. it's less than 35 minutes long too!

pisces, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 04:05 (sixteen years ago) link

I've been let down by those comparisons before ("New Adventures in Hi-Fi is a throwback to the early R.E.M. sound!"). I ain't hopeful.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 5 February 2008 04:14 (sixteen years ago) link

(And mind you, I like New Adventures a lot, but there's no comparison to their early stuff. . . .).

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 5 February 2008 04:15 (sixteen years ago) link

shorter, faster and louder is all well and good, but I dunno if recent songs would suddenly become great if they were shorter faster and louder.

da croupier, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 04:16 (sixteen years ago) link

i have both these albums on one CD-R now! I used to own them on cassette. Still probably would go with Document.

da croupier, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 04:17 (sixteen years ago) link

The second side of Document really feels "of a piece" to me in a way that no other sections of these records do (unless you count "Begin the Begin" and "These Days" as a section.)

"The insurgency began and we missed it" EERILY PROPHETIC SHOCKAH.

Guayaquil (eephus!), Tuesday, 5 February 2008 04:18 (sixteen years ago) link

Have any of the songs from the new record been heard, e.g. live or leaked?

Guayaquil (eephus!), Tuesday, 5 February 2008 04:19 (sixteen years ago) link

I think one is streaming on R.E.M.'s Home Page.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 5 February 2008 04:20 (sixteen years ago) link

there was some song that someone put the youtube link on ilx it had a riff worthy of side two of New Adventures and Michael was standing sideways, reading the lyrics from a laptop. I stopped the video when I saw him visibly scrolling down.

Does he have a memory disorder? Is there a reason he's incapable of memorizing songs he's written?

da croupier, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 04:21 (sixteen years ago) link

He's distracted.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 5 February 2008 04:24 (sixteen years ago) link

I began listening to live versions of a couple of the new songs on Hype Machine. Couldn't even get through them. Again, I'm not hopeful for the new disc.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 5 February 2008 04:25 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cRVxOmu87MA

pisces, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 04:26 (sixteen years ago) link

THERE it is, that desperate thing.

da croupier, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 04:28 (sixteen years ago) link

It's been a bad decade, please don't take a youtube.

da croupier, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 04:29 (sixteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.