The Lysergic Acid Diethylamidiotic Joe Biden & Sarah Palin VP Presidential Debate thread in the 2 zero zero 8 (2008 party over oops)

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1985 of them)

so basically doing nabisco's biden-no-gaffes raindance - pretending to be Jamie Noble

Beatrix Kiddo, Wednesday, 1 October 2008 15:17 (fifteen years ago) link

http://i50.photobucket.com/albums/f308/sotoalf/bidendone.jpg

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 1 October 2008 15:19 (fifteen years ago) link

gabbneb, Wednesday, 1 October 2008 15:19 (fifteen years ago) link

Debate preview:

Palin: [generic non-answer]
Biden: Was I the only one listening? I thought it reeked!
Palin: No, I believe that's your old man smell lol!!!!!!!!alaska

john mccain's illegitimate black child (musically), Wednesday, 1 October 2008 15:28 (fifteen years ago) link

btw I expect Palin to "win"

john mccain's illegitimate black child (musically), Wednesday, 1 October 2008 15:28 (fifteen years ago) link

u guys pailin is totally gonna make some awesome blunders - GET PSYCHED!

joe six pack (ice crӕm), Wednesday, 1 October 2008 15:38 (fifteen years ago) link

"what do you talk about when you have nothing to say?" = a good line

caek, Wednesday, 1 October 2008 15:52 (fifteen years ago) link

battle of blunderdome

eman, Wednesday, 1 October 2008 15:56 (fifteen years ago) link

you guys i'm sooooo worried that the dems are gonna go at this with total hubris (which is sooo them in this election!) and not pay any attention to the judgment of informed people, while palin will impress people by gaining steam over an hour even though she can't seem to say three words without scaring away independent voters. Based on the last month, I have SO MUCH MORE FAITH in the McCain/Palin campaign playing this smartly than the dems.

da croupier, Wednesday, 1 October 2008 16:03 (fifteen years ago) link

I get the fear/pessimism, but "based on the last month"?

caek, Wednesday, 1 October 2008 16:06 (fifteen years ago) link

this is gonna be fucking painful viewing. i'm really torn on whether to watch it with a crowd or just stay home with the volume really low.

in any case, biden i think needs to come off like a knowledgable and patient adult, basically treat it like a conversation with gwen ifill, and some other nitwit showed up and decided to say something.

any word on the physical layout? are they going to be sitting next to each other across a desk from ifill?

goole, Wednesday, 1 October 2008 16:07 (fifteen years ago) link

I get the fear/pessimism, but "based on the last month"?

Think it through, caek.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 1 October 2008 16:07 (fifteen years ago) link

head hurts.

caek, Wednesday, 1 October 2008 16:08 (fifteen years ago) link

oh yes.

caek, Wednesday, 1 October 2008 16:08 (fifteen years ago) link

v. good.

caek, Wednesday, 1 October 2008 16:08 (fifteen years ago) link

If Palin turns out to be a Flowers For Algernon type, this would be the best result of them all, just for the general wtf

xp croup - see we can lol now because a lot of Dems WILL worry anyway, even though whatever possible zings and poll bumps Palin/McCain (come on, that's really the ticket, right?) gain, they will decay pretty quickly even well before all those Alaskan death trials to come on Oct 10th.

Mackro Mackro, Wednesday, 1 October 2008 16:09 (fifteen years ago) link

alternately, I hope Palin totally goes lil Jon.

Mackro Mackro, Wednesday, 1 October 2008 16:10 (fifteen years ago) link

and U+K lil Jon Palin photoshop kthxby

Mackro Mackro, Wednesday, 1 October 2008 16:11 (fifteen years ago) link

any word on the physical layout? are they going to be sitting next to each other across a desk from ifill?

Lecterns this time.

jaymc, Wednesday, 1 October 2008 16:12 (fifteen years ago) link

I think Palin will do the zingers but she may become emboldened and go just that little bit to far. I think she has more hubris than all the other candidates put together.

jane hussein lane (suzy), Wednesday, 1 October 2008 16:12 (fifteen years ago) link

(xpost) I think Palin has a win by default, frankly, because she's already more about personality and symbolism than qualifications to people who like her, and people who don't have such abysmal expectations that she can't do much damage. Damage control is the key here.

in any case, biden i think needs to come off like a knowledgable and patient adult, basically treat it like a conversation with gwen ifill, and some other nitwit showed up and decided to say something.

This is pretty OTM. And I think it has to be watched in drinking game mode or it will be too painful.

Maria, Wednesday, 1 October 2008 16:13 (fifteen years ago) link

I usually find Rich Lowry the least repulsive of all the Corner folks, but WTF

Of course, Palin has a lot to bone up on, and there will probably be, even in the best of circumstances, a few things she doesn't know. That's why she needs a straight-forward and/or self-deprecating way to occasionally say, "I don't know." People will be much more forgiving of that than round-about and very transparent attempts to try to talk her way through it, which are much more discrediting. Her potential ace-in-the-hole, of course, is Joe Biden. He'll very likely find a way to be an ass, whether he's confronting her or deferring to her.

Mr. Que, Wednesday, 1 October 2008 16:19 (fifteen years ago) link

it's okay to call the Democratic VP nominee an ass now, guys, FYI

Mr. Que, Wednesday, 1 October 2008 16:19 (fifteen years ago) link

It's only a win for the repubs if they can actually get a bounce, and right now Palin is the least popular of any pres/vp candidate. LEAST. Why do people keep pushing how popular she is? She has a loud fanbase but it's not getting bigger. There is NO REASON to believe more exposure to her will change this. A lack of faith in Biden rocking shit is one thing, but this faith in the repubs to change the game after all that's happened is something can't begin to fathom.

da croupier, Wednesday, 1 October 2008 16:19 (fifteen years ago) link

you all are giving the exceeding expectations factor waaay to much credence here. every time palin has opened her mouth shes told a really obvious lie and/or said something undeniably retarded. theres no reason to believe shell be anything other than awful in this debate.

i mean john mccain already "suspended his campaign" just trying to avoid this shit.

joe six pack (ice crӕm), Wednesday, 1 October 2008 16:20 (fifteen years ago) link

"She needs to admit her ignorance!"

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 1 October 2008 16:21 (fifteen years ago) link

Based on all the ph3ar, it seems Biden is going to lose no matter what he does just because he's older and wittier.

I mean what the fuck is wrong with the US? (I know right?)

Also, even when she waffles, Palin has proven to be a very good and subtle liar. This works for Palin on TV, so this is where Biden's performance really matters re: how he will find a way to call her out on her lies. This debate, whether fair or not, is for Biden to lose.

Mackro Mackro, Wednesday, 1 October 2008 16:25 (fifteen years ago) link

ok what sort of crazy parallel dimension did u just arrive from

joe six pack (ice crӕm), Wednesday, 1 October 2008 16:27 (fifteen years ago) link

She has NOT been a good and subtle liar. Even if you didn't know she was lying when interviewed by Couric, she was shifty, her grammar awful. She sounded like someone caught.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 1 October 2008 16:27 (fifteen years ago) link

based on how her favorability rating has plummeted from like +30 to -10 since her nomination its likely that she hasnt been doing anything well

joe six pack (ice crӕm), Wednesday, 1 October 2008 16:29 (fifteen years ago) link

I think she has, at base, the non-oily appeal and generator of warm feelings that Mitt Romney has.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 1 October 2008 16:31 (fifteen years ago) link

Granholm is Palin's stand-in in the debate prep -- and although Granholm is a fairly incompetent governor, I wonder if they will really be able to simulate Palin's dunderheadedness adequately enough to truly prepare Biden.

Nicole, Wednesday, 1 October 2008 16:32 (fifteen years ago) link

She's pretty base.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 1 October 2008 16:32 (fifteen years ago) link

If Granholm just waves the red flag any time he gets near a phrase like "little lady," he'll be fine.

da croupier, Wednesday, 1 October 2008 16:37 (fifteen years ago) link

ok what sort of crazy parallel dimension did u just arrive from

There are too many crazy parallel dimensions across the country in this election.

I mean how many "I think McCain's ok, but i REALLY LIKE PALIN OMG!" bursts on TV does it take to get that across? Granted, I don't make it clear which parallel universe POV I speak from disingenuously.

Mackro Mackro, Wednesday, 1 October 2008 16:38 (fifteen years ago) link

i think you'd feel better if you were paying more attention.

da croupier, Wednesday, 1 October 2008 16:40 (fifteen years ago) link

Man, shoulda just gotten Tina Fey to be the stand-in, go for broke.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 1 October 2008 16:40 (fifteen years ago) link

Palin = Boris Johnson?

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 1 October 2008 16:44 (fifteen years ago) link

I'm pretty confident the Dems have this election, so I'm not all Scanners about this, but don't say I'm not paying attention. There are plenty of people who can outvote me in numbers who are *not* paying attention who are SMITTEN with Palin. This election will likely not be a stampede, even if all polls indicate so.

I'm kinda ignoring polls right now, because polls are less and less accurate as the years go by since they still used the land-line standard.

Mackro Mackro, Wednesday, 1 October 2008 16:46 (fifteen years ago) link

maybe you should take massive drops in Palin's popularity in polls with a grain of salt rather than ignoring them and freaking out every time you see a fundie wacko yell.

da croupier, Wednesday, 1 October 2008 16:47 (fifteen years ago) link

She has a loud fanbase but it's not getting bigger. There is NO REASON to believe more exposure to her will change this.

The concern is not that people will like her more, it's that they will like Biden and hence the Democrats less.

mitya, Wednesday, 1 October 2008 16:48 (fifteen years ago) link

hahaha ned yes

Maria, Wednesday, 1 October 2008 16:52 (fifteen years ago) link

i have faith in biden not flicking his tongue between his fingers at Palin. Which is what it would take for America to like him less than Palin after she's spoken for an hour.

da croupier, Wednesday, 1 October 2008 16:52 (fifteen years ago) link

i think we're in an xp helix here, but again, I'm speaking in context of the debate.

I don't think the VP debate will be nearly as exciting or damaging to Palin as most people think. That's all I'm saying. Maybe Palin will melt down. Entirely possible. It's entirely possible Biden will be a total asshole and Palin will shine too.

Who the fuck cares in the end anyway. There isn't much precedent for VP debates changing things.

Palin's popularity is just likely to inch up again, after which a lot of democrats most of which are NOT ON ILX will freak out, that's all I'm claiming.

But that will again be temporary once October gets into gear, when half of the Alaska GOP is thinking about life in a cold dark cell then.

Mackro Mackro, Wednesday, 1 October 2008 16:53 (fifteen years ago) link

"Shit, Granholm, why didn't you tell him it was bad idea to yell 'LOOK AT DEM PUPPIES!' at her?"

"I thought it was a good tactic. D'oh, we done bad!"

da croupier, Wednesday, 1 October 2008 16:54 (fifteen years ago) link

because polls are less and less accurate as the years go by since they still used the land-line standard.

Many but not all:

Riverdale Park, Md.: Which pollsters are being the most creative at tackling the problem of the under-35s being "cell-phone only," and thus hard to reach?

Charles Franklin: A number of pollsters have been including cell only folks for most of the year. Gallup, Pew, CBS/NYT, NBC/WSJ and I think Time. Field in California does as well. It is going to be increasingly common.

jaymc, Wednesday, 1 October 2008 16:54 (fifteen years ago) link

(Charles Franklin is with Pollster.com.)

jaymc, Wednesday, 1 October 2008 16:54 (fifteen years ago) link

I think election polls will be twittered before they get to the cell-phone stage, frankly.

Mackro Mackro, Wednesday, 1 October 2008 16:56 (fifteen years ago) link

("just got asked about election. I said I think the erection is alright, lol." - oct 29, 2012)

Mackro Mackro, Wednesday, 1 October 2008 16:57 (fifteen years ago) link

I like how everyone who is shouting "pay attention!" is conveniently ignoring that Palin did pretty much exactly the same thing in the Alaskan gubernatorial race as she's doing here and that she won that race.

I don't expect her to be particularly impressive or convincing to ME but I've already decided who I'm voting for. Clearly there is still a non-negligible segment of people who aren't convinced by Obama and I don't want a fluffy performance from Palin in the debate to make people feel better about deciding to vote for the crazy old white man.

i am the small cat (HI DERE), Wednesday, 1 October 2008 17:02 (fifteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.