hahahahahaha Atlas Shrugged is being made into a movie! with Angelina Jolie! [EDIT: actually not anymore! oh well!]

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (518 of them)
Oh, c'mon there has to be some seething lurker out there who wants to defend Rand.

Coach Dave (Fluffy Bear Hearts Rainbows), Thursday, 19 October 2006 15:31 (seventeen years ago) link

Squirrel Police?

A-ron Hubbard (Hurting), Thursday, 19 October 2006 15:32 (seventeen years ago) link

Who needs a lurker when you've got Dang P.

milo z (mlp), Thursday, 19 October 2006 15:33 (seventeen years ago) link

maybe we can find someone from this?

The Atlasphere: Ayn Rand Dating & Networking

ath (ath), Thursday, 19 October 2006 15:34 (seventeen years ago) link

MYRIGHTFULLYEARNEDSPACE.COM

ath (ath), Thursday, 19 October 2006 15:35 (seventeen years ago) link

The problem is that any of Rand's ideas that carry any intellectual weight have been formulated by better thinkers.

James Herbert Dip (noodle vague), Thursday, 19 October 2006 15:36 (seventeen years ago) link

I hope neil peart gets a part in this.

timmy tannin (pompous), Thursday, 19 October 2006 15:40 (seventeen years ago) link

even the name objectivist is goofy.

jhoshea megafauna (scoopsnoodle), Thursday, 19 October 2006 15:44 (seventeen years ago) link

shit, i can't find a screengrab of Officer Barbrady talking about Atlas Shrugged was so bad he's never going to read again

kingfish prætor (kingfish 2.0), Thursday, 19 October 2006 16:51 (seventeen years ago) link

anyone heard penn jillette's radio show? libertarian talk radio.

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Thursday, 19 October 2006 17:16 (seventeen years ago) link

Dude endorsed the Lib.party candidate two years ago, too

kingfish prætor (kingfish 2.0), Thursday, 19 October 2006 17:21 (seventeen years ago) link

Rand is good for telling people what they want to hear

OTM. I've a few objectivist friends and in each of their cases they were already predisposed to a high degree of self-centeredness and isolation. Sara has done this frightening self-indoctrination thing where she's read Atlas & Fountainhead twice a year for the last 8 years.

Her political philosophy is "as long as the government let's me close the door to my house and leaves me the fuck alone, I don't care what else it does (to you or anyone else)."

Hoosteen (Hoosteen), Thursday, 19 October 2006 17:31 (seventeen years ago) link

sounds like a totally happy well-adjusted person yep

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 19 October 2006 17:33 (seventeen years ago) link

Books: David Sedaris, Harry Potter, anything by Ayn Rand

and what (ooo), Thursday, 19 October 2006 17:34 (seventeen years ago) link

Yeah, that's the experience that I've had with folks I met in school who were really into it. They were a shade of nerd or geek whose socialization was damaged even moreso than most, to the point where it was infected by some reagan rugged individual bullshit and resulted in this almost full-on retreat. It's like their defense mechanism was this self-fulfilling isolation.

My fave philosophy prof who pointed out that trying to focus on selfishness and asshole self-centeredness as a means to actually develop a self tends to result in hilarious failure. "Selfishness is not selfish enough" or some such.

kingfish prætor (kingfish 2.0), Thursday, 19 October 2006 17:39 (seventeen years ago) link

as far as i know that's already happening. there's a lot of suburban youths of voting age who are disconnected from the rest of society (or at least any social diversity one might find living in stripmall subdivisions that tend to homogenize class and race) that feel like their taxes are wasted on programs they don't have any use for, and they're burdened by RESTRICTIVE LAWS against drugs and guns and helmets. combine this (what i guess you could call a randian sense of independence) with an already growing athiest sentiment that severs any potential affiliation with the republican right, as well as a contempt for what they see as a "bullshit two party system," and the libertarians emerge as the new conservative party for an upper-middle class 18-25 generation further from the working poor than ever.

I see this as fairly otm. I'm in the buckle of the Bible Belt, and I just don't see that many politically engaged, under 25, right wing Christians these days. Perhaps it will come with age?

Will (will), Thursday, 19 October 2006 17:50 (seventeen years ago) link

eh - that description's been accurate for at least 20 years, and I don't see no Libertarian/Randian nat'l political movement.

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 19 October 2006 17:51 (seventeen years ago) link

That's because they all have capital gains they need to protect and inheritance taxes on mummy's estate to dodge, so they just vote Republican.

milo z (mlp), Thursday, 19 October 2006 17:54 (seventeen years ago) link

x-post

True: all we do see is decline in participation at the polls.

Hoosteen (Hoosteen), Thursday, 19 October 2006 17:55 (seventeen years ago) link

uh yeah apathy doesn't make you a libertarian. that makes you a non-voter. people 18-25 don't vote!

SOME LOW END BRO (TOMBOT), Thursday, 19 October 2006 17:56 (seventeen years ago) link

soon enough it'll be people 18-30!

SOME LOW END BRO (TOMBOT), Thursday, 19 October 2006 17:57 (seventeen years ago) link

Apathy doesn't make you a libertarian, but it makes you less likely to care what the government is doing UNLESS of course it intrudes on your personal affairs.

It's a remarkably libertarian sentiment, I think.

Hoosteen (Hoosteen), Thursday, 19 October 2006 18:07 (seventeen years ago) link

Obviously I'm not suggesting that every frat boy who doesn't vote is in fact holed up in his room reading Anarchy, State & Utopia, but I think you get my meaning.

Hoosteen (Hoosteen), Thursday, 19 October 2006 18:09 (seventeen years ago) link

Maxim: The All-Objectivist Issue!

Eppy (Eppy), Thursday, 19 October 2006 18:59 (seventeen years ago) link

Eppy (Eppy), Thursday, 19 October 2006 19:11 (seventeen years ago) link

Maxim: The All-Objectivist Issue!

oh dear Lord. Would this be less toxic or even more toxic than those "Conservative T-shirts!@!!1" pop-ups?

kingfish prætor (kingfish 2.0), Thursday, 19 October 2006 19:30 (seventeen years ago) link

I've met a fair number of people who think of the Rand novels in positive terms who are not Objectivist-types. Regardless of what the crazy lady intended or how far the hard-line nerd cult feels it should be taken, the philosophy can be so broadly applied; it's essentially Nietzchian self-empowerment concepts in a thriller context.
Atlas Shrugged:The Movie should be entertaining. No matter how straight they play the material, some plot elements are so bizarre the movie is bound to be even a little excentric.

Spoiler Spoiler Spoiler
Spoiler Spoiler Spoiler
Villians design a sound-wave machine that can make things explode, which is tested on a goat in a public ceremony.
End Spoiler End Spoiler
End Spoiler End Spoiler

I remember the novel having some entertaining set pieces, and the Epic cinema prose which praises American landscapes and industrial machinary is effectively visceral in doses. The most ineresting thing about it though is the fact that the villians are all defined as passive-aggressive types who used their emotions to manipulate people. This aspect, if adapted correctly may resonate massively with the emo backlash in the culture.

theodore (herbert hebert), Thursday, 19 October 2006 20:05 (seventeen years ago) link

We don't want to hear it, Mr. Rand Apologist.

milo z (mlp), Thursday, 19 October 2006 20:14 (seventeen years ago) link

come on. i know a few perfectly lovely people who were objectivists in high school and got over it sometime during college. it's a good rebellion against some image of traditional christian values, and just seems to last as long as it takes to find or construct something a bit less crazy. (also the whole "you are not responsible for anyone else's happiness, and nobody is responsible for yours" thing helped me get through a long high school breakup without being a complete doormat, even though i never went so far as to actually be objectivist.)

i love "sewer, gas, and electric." it starts out with a parody of the first scene of atlas shrugged. but everything's better when you add a mutant flying shark.

Maria (Maria), Thursday, 19 October 2006 20:14 (seventeen years ago) link

oh I'll happily admit I went through an Ayn Rand phase around age 15-16.

Then I moved on to James Joyce and the Pogues or something, I forget.

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 19 October 2006 20:16 (seventeen years ago) link

yeah i think i was also in the midst of a buddhism phase at the same time. it was followed by a christian theology phase, and it kinda stuck, and now i'm kinda christian. go figure.

Maria (Maria), Thursday, 19 October 2006 20:26 (seventeen years ago) link

lol @ people comparing Ayn Rand to Nietzsche. The biggest fan of Nietzsche I know is a Marxist and hates Rand with a burning passion.

I never went through a "Rand phase" because I read Anthem at age 14 and thought it was a poorly written, melodramatic pile of BS. (But I won 30 bucks from the Ayn Rand Institute for the essay I wrote about it.)

Curt1s St3ph3ns, Thursday, 19 October 2006 20:35 (seventeen years ago) link

I really like Nietzshe and really dislike Rand.

kingfish prætor (kingfish 2.0), Thursday, 19 October 2006 20:37 (seventeen years ago) link

my Nietzsche phase was college, for sure - but like kingfish I still really appreciate Nietzsche in my dotage, whereas I find Ayn Rand beyond laughable.

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 19 October 2006 20:38 (seventeen years ago) link

Somebody ought to do a paper on why Rand, Marx & Nietzsche all appeal so much to disaffected white kids from 15-20, despite the fact that nothing they have to say makes a goddamn bit of sense. Why those three crazy people? Why not Kant or something? Seriously.

SOME LOW END BRO (TOMBOT), Thursday, 19 October 2006 20:41 (seventeen years ago) link

And yeah they seem mutually exclusive!

SOME LOW END BRO (TOMBOT), Thursday, 19 October 2006 20:42 (seventeen years ago) link

Marx makes a lot of sense.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Thursday, 19 October 2006 20:43 (seventeen years ago) link

I don't know any 15 year olds that could understand Kant. Rand wrote a novel and Marx & Nietzsche wrote manifestos.

Eppy (Eppy), Thursday, 19 October 2006 20:44 (seventeen years ago) link

Nietszche's basically highbrow self-help, isn't he? (I haven't read all that much Nietszche, so it's possible I'm too quick to judge)

A-ron Hubbard (Hurting), Thursday, 19 October 2006 20:44 (seventeen years ago) link

And I case Nietzsche appeals to teens because he's like the ultimate rebel philosophist, man.

(x-post)

Yeah, I can't imagine any 15 year old reading anything from Marx except the Communist Maniphesto.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Thursday, 19 October 2006 20:45 (seventeen years ago) link

Er, you can read Nietzsche as highbrow self-help, just like you can read him as a proto-Nazi, but I don't think either of those are what he was really going for. Nietzsche's basically a political philosopher.

Eppy (Eppy), Thursday, 19 October 2006 20:47 (seventeen years ago) link

Marx makes tons of sense on a lot of points and is way too complex for the majority of 15-20 yo's to grasp beyond the most basic level. Actually this goes for Nietszche too (tho there is a good deal more nonsense in Nietzsche due to his poetic propensities and questionable mental balance).

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 19 October 2006 20:47 (seventeen years ago) link

There's a lot of other Marxist writing you can get your hands on that's not actually Das Kapital, though. But yeah, that doesn't really mean they're comprehending it, just that they're mad about Wal-Mart or something.

Eppy (Eppy), Thursday, 19 October 2006 20:50 (seventeen years ago) link

Basically if you like computers a lot you're into Rand, if you have ever considered vegetarianism you're into Marx, and if you like industrial music you dig Nietzsche.

Eppy (Eppy), Thursday, 19 October 2006 20:51 (seventeen years ago) link

I never went through a "Rand phase" because I read Anthem at age 14 and thought it was a poorly written, melodramatic pile of BS. (But I won 30 bucks from the Ayn Rand Institute for the essay I wrote about it.)

Now that's how Rand makes in-roads in education. Every English class from seventh grade on had a poster for their essay contest. I never could bring myself to enter.

(I never had a Rand phase - I had an Orwell/Hemingway/pine-for-the-glorious-Spanish Republic phase. I call that phase "my teenage years.")

milo z (mlp), Thursday, 19 October 2006 20:58 (seventeen years ago) link

Only thing Marx ever got right was when he talked about how wage labor can kill you.

And Nietzsche had plenty of problem, mainly involving women. Either in his take on them("Everything Nietzsche ever knew about women was second-hand and third-rate" -Walter Kaufman) or his nutzoid sister who shacked up with a proto-nazi husband and put out a random blather of N's notes and called it "Will to Power."

kingfish prætor (kingfish 2.0), Thursday, 19 October 2006 21:07 (seventeen years ago) link

i'm by no means a marxist but comparing him with rand is the biggest bullshit i've ever heard. his writings on the US civil war are fantastic (light-years ahead of anything any libertarian ever wrote about it, for sure).

J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Thursday, 19 October 2006 21:48 (seventeen years ago) link

Somebody ought to do a paper on why Rand, Marx & Nietzsche all appeal so much to disaffected white kids from 15-20, despite the fact that nothing they have to say makes a goddamn bit of sense. Why those three crazy people? Why not Kant or something? Seriously.

I don't remember Marxist boy's opinion on Kant, but I know he's read him and a ton of other philosophers. (He and another friend of mine are in a Facebook group called "Let the General Will Be Sovereign" where argue about Rousseau.)

Curt1s St3ph3ns, Thursday, 19 October 2006 21:54 (seventeen years ago) link

Nietzsche's basically a political philosopher.

-- Eppy (epp...) (webmail), Today 5:47 PM. (Eppy) (link)

EH?

I've only read half of Twilight of the Idols and am in the process of reading Thus Spoke Zarathustra but I wouldn't call him a political philosopher. He seems like more of a moral philosopher determined to tear down rationalist and Christian tradition

Curt1s St3ph3ns, Thursday, 19 October 2006 22:02 (seventeen years ago) link

Logic, reason and happiness wasnt really Nietzsches thing, but his influence is obvious, read the fountainhead .

Kiwi (Kiwi), Thursday, 19 October 2006 22:30 (seventeen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.