KIDEODROME: scary "Kid's Youtube" algorithms, fringe programming, insert conspiracy theory here

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (356 of them)

Click tweet to read thread, obvs.

Jeff, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 11:38 (six years ago) link

Sorry if this is covered in the thread, can't open it, but surely the point isn't that algorithms are inherently bad, more that they encourage rather than supress disturbing images, and the alternative - teletubbies or whatever - has been designed by educational psychologists to support not just learning but emotional development and socialisation. 'Brain washing' is an emotional term with an obvious inherent bias to it and IMO not helpful in most arguments.

mfktz (Camaraderie at Arms Length), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 12:00 (six years ago) link

I couldn't quite work out which videos were automated and which were homemade trolly 4chan things? Like - is the video creation itself automatic, or is it that the algorithms are dictating editorial?

Chuck_Tatum, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 13:40 (six years ago) link

(Or that editorial is gaming the algorithms.)

Chuck_Tatum, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 13:40 (six years ago) link

https://youtu.be/8ZzxbDPwD9Y?t=5m6s

yeah ok these get pretty dark

frogbs, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 14:31 (six years ago) link

Need to create a kids' ILE as a safe space.

Slime C/D
Dorothy The POLLnosaur (voting ends in 5 days)

Eazy, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 14:38 (six years ago) link

but yea this stuff is like "I Don't Want My Pizza Burnin" combined with @horse_ebooks except aimed entirely at kids

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ERXq3r1Kq0Q

frogbs, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 14:44 (six years ago) link

The Dutch article has me properly creeped out and no mistake

stet, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 17:22 (six years ago) link

it lost me on the 20-step code breaking shit at the end but the videos mentioned look profoundly disturbing especially considering many of them have view counts in the millions

marcos, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 17:27 (six years ago) link

That's the weird part to me as well. These things sometimes have more than 10 million views! The ones with children acting are partic disturbing.

Le Bateau Ivre, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 17:33 (six years ago) link

are they gaming the counts somehow, like through bots?

sleeve, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 17:33 (six years ago) link

Reminds me a bit of Halloween III.

Eazy, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 17:37 (six years ago) link

I see from that dutch article that Pobosiec is pushing this on twitter, thus tying it back to the alt-right discussion.

cosmic brain dildo (Sparkle Motion), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 17:41 (six years ago) link

Those Bad Baby live action ones, which I think are Russian, are very strange and silly. I don't know if they would seem as weird to Russians or not.

Moodles, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 17:51 (six years ago) link

This has really consumed my thoughts and bummed me out for a few days. I think we've spent the last 10 years of internet completely dominated by the twin ideologies of "the free market is good" and "tech means innovation." Both of which, as it turned out, are patently untrue.

I really see this as an economic/capitalism issue more than anything. Imagine being a poor single parent exhausted from working two jobs or, even worse, having to bring your kid to your night job because no one can watch them. No one with a shred of empathy would blame that person for wanting to hand their phone to their kid and say "please keep yourself occupied." The problem is that owning, say, a digital copy of a season of Peppa Pig is like $12.99 on iTunes or Google Play. Or Sesame Street costs $14.99 or whatever a month to stream on HBO. A Disney Movie is whatever, $12.99 HD or something. The easiest thing to do is end up on YouTube where users upload versions of these things for free. Jobs are paying less, people are struggling more and there's decreasing incentive for someone on a small income to actually do these things through the legal channels.

Now, for the middle and upper classes I think it's more a culture of tech snobbishness that reminds me of the FAG BUYS MUSIC cartoon circulating a few years ago when this was mostly a music problem.

And the fact that YouTube/Google not only ENCOURAGES this, but PROFITS off it, is a disgusting failure. It reminds me of Uber or something where they just broke the fucking law until it became part of society and then everyone just throws up their hands and says "what can you do." This entire thing is a product of the free market, but we're all a little complicit. It's all very saddening and just once more proof that we live in a disgusting dystopia where white libertarian tech bros are going to start dictating government policy in about 10 years if not sooner

"the fgti incident?" (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 17:57 (six years ago) link

wow @ that Dutch article, y'all weren't kidding about some of that

what exactly is the point of all this? does this sort of content do better with Youtube's algorithms or do they think that kids will seek that out, much like a 12-year old peeking at rotten.com ? or is there something more nefarious there? this seems like a different phenomenon than the AI-generated Animals for Kids videos

frogbs, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 17:59 (six years ago) link

xpost to me

And, you know, it takes beaming uncanny valley violence into the brains of unsuspecting children for everyone to see that the last decade of the economy has been leading up to this, and we've all been living this on a macro level in ways we didn't really notice. "You know, Fox turned into a hardcore sex channel so gradually, I didn't even notice"

"the fgti incident?" (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 18:02 (six years ago) link

xp from the alt-right thread:

want to rescind my earlier comments about how this is more market failure than child abuse. I've seen some more Animals For Kids videos that can only be described as intentionally created to harm young children. the sections with guns. these people aren't getting a Nickelodeon show, hopefully they'll be exposed and held to account.

evidently on youtube kids until recently, millions of hits. profoundly upsetting. there's a very, very good reason Bridle didn't link. I'd unwatch if I could.

― Milton Parker, Tuesday, November 7, 2017 6:09 PM

sleeve, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 18:03 (six years ago) link

we have friends who work at home and they don't really engage w/their six yr old much, they hand her an iPad and let her go to town. when i bring our kid over for a play date, she always wants to watch something on the iPad. at dinner she wants to prop the iPad up and watch something. we went over there another time and she was crying inconsolably for an hour bc she wasn't allowed to use the iPad before we arrived. she's learned to buy apps on the iPad. our kid gets bored there now because he wants to play, and she just wants to watch the iPad. she watches a million unboxing videos too.

omar little, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 18:08 (six years ago) link

:(

sleeve, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 18:16 (six years ago) link

As somebody who was freaked out by the opening credits of Wall Street Week as a kid, just thinking about what I would have turned into with a steady diet of this pure incoherence is terrifying

I don't really want to live in a world where this is unregulated and we just let the algos do their thing. How the people who produce this and the people who enable it can sleep at night, I can't imagine

Brakhage, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 18:18 (six years ago) link

I'm sure most of the people who work at YouTube and Google sleep just fine

"the fgti incident?" (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 18:20 (six years ago) link

Basically, never allow your kids access to any part of the internet featuring any content created/uploaded by the general public, I guess?

Bernard Crunderdunder (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 18:23 (six years ago) link

I mean it's pretty well established that the anonymity of the internet allows people to be unfiltered id monsters.

Bernard Crunderdunder (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 18:25 (six years ago) link

I'm surprised by my visceral reaction too. Part of me wonders if it's overblown. If I was a teen, finding masses of bad-trip nonsense videos would have been hilarious. Now that I'm older I can't really be sanguine about it. It makes me despair that we've decided that if you can make money manipulating a system we depend on for more and more things in life, everything's ok. At some point you have to seize the reins, regulate, and stop people doing what is the equivalent of dumping dioxin into water mains

Brakhage, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 18:33 (six years ago) link

When I was 7 or 8, my mom cancelled pay cable after she saw me watching hair metal videos and Children of the Corn ... the thing that I saw that was the most disturbing was a documentary on Nostradamus' prophecies that was on PBS or something though. ... I think this thing is creepy like Halloween 3 (as mentioned upthread), but I don't see any real difference from unsupervised tv watching that was a touchstone of the Gen X latchkey kid era.

sarahell, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 18:34 (six years ago) link

Idk - I wonder if there have been scientific studies done on children to see whether seeing this stuff has real developmental consequences, or whether this is mostly a case of parents instinctively wanting to protect kids from bad things.

sarahell, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 18:38 (six years ago) link

i think part of the issue here is that the target audience is in the 1-4 range, not 7-8, also see Milton's post above re: content

sleeve, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 18:40 (six years ago) link

never allow your kids access to any part of the internet featuring any content created/uploaded by the general public, I guess?

p much. I have no problem w this.

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 18:40 (six years ago) link

I wonder if there have been scientific studies done on children to see whether seeing this stuff has real developmental consequences

too soon to know, I'd assume?

Simon H., Wednesday, 8 November 2017 18:41 (six years ago) link

I wonder if there have been scientific studies done on children to see whether seeing this stuff has real developmental consequences,

there hasn't been enough time to do this kind of thing, the internet's moved to fast and the kids haven't grown up yet

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 18:41 (six years ago) link

Yeah it's the age of kids that this stuff is aimed at that's all the more unsettling

cosmic brain dildo (Sparkle Motion), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 18:48 (six years ago) link

I barely remember anything from when I was that young. I would say ages 7-8 would be more disturbing.

sarahell, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 18:51 (six years ago) link

i can recall a lot of garbage, low quality animation & kids programming from when i was a child, but this seems like a new thing - to make these recombinative videos with intentionally harmful images. I haven't brought myself to watch any of them because the Medium article was unnerving enough.

cosmic brain dildo (Sparkle Motion), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 18:52 (six years ago) link

I'm certain that stuff at those early ages is more developmentally crucial than anything subsequent tbh

imago, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 18:53 (six years ago) link

but would they register as such to an infant?

sarahell, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 18:53 (six years ago) link

honestly, if the concern is about their development, they should be reading and drawing and engaging in physical activities rather than watching inane youtube videos.

sarahell, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 18:54 (six years ago) link

I would say ages 7-8 would be more disturbing.

Yeah, I remember the video store's posted for Child's Play scaring the shit out of me as a kid, to the extent that I'd never face that section of the store.

Simon H., Wednesday, 8 November 2017 18:55 (six years ago) link

Agree that parenting-by-youtube is the issue here, over that of the actual content

imago, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 18:56 (six years ago) link

they should be reading and drawing and engaging in physical activities rather than watching inane youtube videos.

see Whiney's post above about how that option is increasingly tied to class/income

sleeve, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 18:57 (six years ago) link

bull fucking shit that reading, drawing or outside play are more expensive than a fucking ipad

imago, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 18:58 (six years ago) link

read the fucking post

sleeve, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 18:59 (six years ago) link

income, not really. the cost of the data plan to accommodate that isn't cheap -- compared to checking things out from the public library. Class = yes, unfortunately.

sarahell, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 18:59 (six years ago) link

yeah "don't let your kids watch TV or YouTube" sounds good until you have a 2nd one

frogbs, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 19:00 (six years ago) link

Whiney OTM

Experiences like these make me never want to deal with 'platforms' that exist to sell ads. (I'm on Mastodon, Fastmail for email, won't use Uber, etc. Twitter I can't seem to pry myself off) Which reminds me .. I have never given a dime to ILX. I'm ashamed that I've never asked if there was a mechanism. Is there?

Brakhage, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 19:01 (six years ago) link

Agree that parenting-by-youtube is the issue here, over that of the actual content


You can do both. Physically interacting with your kid while also preparing them for the future algorithmic world in which they will inhabit.

Jeff, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 19:02 (six years ago) link

xp yes, but you missed it this time around and it was fully funded, it's historically been difficult to contribute before the fundraising targets are reached

sleeve, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 19:02 (six years ago) link

The world is shit, and people are horrible -- the issue is how long do you wait until a child is forced to find this out.

sarahell, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 19:04 (six years ago) link

yeah "don't let your kids watch TV or YouTube" sounds good until you have a 2nd one

I have two kids. My 4yo son watches (exclusively, and under the supervision of either me or my wife) National Geographic animal videos in cases of emergency (ie he needs to be pacified while we're at a doctor's appointment or some shit like that). My 9yo daughter does not have access to youtube.

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 19:04 (six years ago) link

Agree that parenting-by-youtube is the issue here, over that of the actual content

Have you seen the actual content?

the Hannah Montana of the Korean War (DJP), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 19:05 (six years ago) link

There are a few pics of my son I've put on FB, but increasingly fewer. They're pretty much all flattering to him, I think. But if he wants them down in later years there'll be no argument from me. A small set are private on Flickr for family members; all the rest are shared privately via the iOS photos app so that relatives can keep in touch.

I've mostly gone analogue recently too, so some have been sent in the post, classic-style

stet, Thursday, 14 December 2017 12:23 (six years ago) link

With my kids, I've definitely found that starting at about age 4, they are old enough to have a basic understanding of what social media is. We ask before putting any of their pictures up (they often say "no"). Even then, it's never public.

We share stuff with relatives/friends through google photos.

silverfish, Thursday, 14 December 2017 16:27 (six years ago) link

four months pass...

yesterday in work a family came in and the child already had their mother's phone in their hand and I could see they were watching a creepy Pregnant Elsa With Spiderman video and I was torn between wanting to watch the video with them in fascination and wanting to tell the parents to actually look at what's happening on the screen

boxedjoy, Tuesday, 8 May 2018 11:37 (five years ago) link

three months pass...

everyone like 5 months ago: the fact that kids youtube is literally full of bizarre algorithm-made uncanny valley kids videos is a nightmare and probably fucking with children's psyche
everyone currently: johnny doo doo doo doo doo doo doo johnny doo doo doo doo doo doo doo joh

— baby goku (@grillinkrillin) August 28, 2018

frogbs, Wednesday, 29 August 2018 18:27 (five years ago) link

related content

https://jezebel.com/would-you-have-sex-with-johny-johny-yes-papa-1828635224

this is the video that's driving everyone nuts. for some reason it's off YouTube

https://www.dailymotion.com/embed/video/x6sm5v3

frogbs, Wednesday, 29 August 2018 18:34 (five years ago) link

The "for some reason" is that YT finally grasped that there was a problem and removed/kid-blocked a lot of the worst videos.

Moves like Javert (Ye Mad Puffin), Wednesday, 29 August 2018 19:44 (five years ago) link

other than driving people insane idk what the issue with this one was

frogbs, Wednesday, 29 August 2018 19:59 (five years ago) link

giving kids brainworms that disturb grown adults

Nhex, Thursday, 30 August 2018 04:06 (five years ago) link

there's a corollary to this sort of thing in games: https://heterogenoustasks.wordpress.com/2018/05/02/caregiver-fantasy/

aloha darkness my old friend (katherine), Friday, 31 August 2018 14:37 (five years ago) link

(specifically the Elsa part)

aloha darkness my old friend (katherine), Friday, 31 August 2018 14:39 (five years ago) link

one year passes...

ITS BACK

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YXspEaYCrc4

where did this place in our tracks poll

frogbs, Monday, 17 February 2020 19:51 (four years ago) link

thanks

doorstep jetski (dog latin), Monday, 17 February 2020 22:50 (four years ago) link

one year passes...

Yeah, it's interesting, I've seen some Twitter chat about it - you can download the actual paper here https://academic.oup.com/brain/advance-article/doi/10.1093/brain/awab316/6356504

kinder, Thursday, 2 September 2021 07:31 (two years ago) link

two years pass...

So let's talk about Skibidi Toilet. Anyone else have kids heavily into this?

the world is your octopus (Camaraderie at Arms Length), Sunday, 8 October 2023 20:37 (six months ago) link

My kid is almost 18 now so no, but I had to look this up

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skibidi_Toilet

why is the internet filled with dumb shit like this, I do not know. this stuff is obv intentionaly being made by an actual person unlike some of the things above which appeared to have been randomly generated nonsense, which is almost worse.

I? not I! He! He! HIM! (akm), Sunday, 8 October 2023 21:51 (six months ago) link

I don't have kids but I've watched a few Skibidi Toilet videos. It's funny! Completely juvenile, pointless and random, yes, but sometimes you can allow yourself to enjoy a puerile absurdity. I definitely get why kids like it.

emil.y, Sunday, 8 October 2023 21:56 (six months ago) link

I am not anti-Skibidi Toilet per se, enjoyed the absurdity of the first 10 or so videos, just lost interest when it stopped being funny and started building lore. Kids are more into it than ever but I have no idea what is going on now.

the world is your octopus (Camaraderie at Arms Length), Sunday, 8 October 2023 22:04 (six months ago) link

actually this is a pretty good thread for this work of bona fide genius which i've been hitherto unable to find an ilx home for

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ci3f_BqQk-A

imago, Sunday, 8 October 2023 22:17 (six months ago) link

I am just assuming it will go the way of Baby Shark and Johnny Johnny Yes Papa.

The Royal House of Hangover (Ye Mad Puffin), Monday, 9 October 2023 01:46 (six months ago) link

Hadn't heard of this before but watching a few videos I can totally see the appeal of this

...eh you get the gist of it (dog latin), Monday, 9 October 2023 09:11 (six months ago) link

Yeah, it's like Usavich for a new generation. The absurdity of the concept aside, it's downright explicable compared to a lot of the newfangled cultural obsessions that baffle my aging brain.

Prop Dramedy (Old Lunch), Monday, 9 October 2023 10:43 (six months ago) link

I don't find it especially baffling - just a continuation of "weird internet stuff" that's been going on for ages now

...eh you get the gist of it (dog latin), Monday, 9 October 2023 11:26 (six months ago) link

Whereas I recently stumbled upon a random Roblox video and it pretty much fried my cortex

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ydd9Z4p8mM

Prop Dramedy (Old Lunch), Monday, 9 October 2023 11:46 (six months ago) link

Nope, not a clue

...eh you get the gist of it (dog latin), Monday, 9 October 2023 14:15 (six months ago) link

Kids ask me for Skibidi Toilet stuff at my job everyday, it's... weird

Nhex, Monday, 9 October 2023 15:19 (six months ago) link

Kids ask me for Skibidi Toilet stuff at my job everyday, it's... weird


What’s your job?!

deep wubs and tribral rhythms (Boring, Maryland), Tuesday, 10 October 2023 01:27 (six months ago) link

Work at the Kideo shop

...eh you get the gist of it (dog latin), Tuesday, 10 October 2023 01:35 (six months ago) link

When my kids started talking about Skibidi Toilet, I thought it was a callback to this video I kept showing them when they were far too young for it

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mDFBTdToRmw

the new drip king (DJP), Tuesday, 10 October 2023 03:04 (six months ago) link

first thing I thought of too! it made me rewatch it and now I love it even more so c'mon "Skibidi Toilet" is not all bad

frogbs, Tuesday, 10 October 2023 14:05 (six months ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.