Good Gulags are needed in these difficult times, the type that Solzhenitsyn + Shalamov would approve of imo.
― calzino, Sunday, 29 October 2017 23:21 (one year ago) Permalink
write 51 times i will not be a bad poster
― assawoman bay (harbl), Sunday, 29 October 2017 23:25 (one year ago) Permalink
i like the new party atmosphere on the Admin Log
― Karl Malone, Sunday, 29 October 2017 23:30 (one year ago) Permalink
Fuck me, Twitter and FB are click for like type meritocracies, and look at the fucking state of them for goodness sake. And 99% of football forum "content" is enough to drive you to ending it for good. I'd say do not change anything ILX.― calzino, Sunday, October 29, 2017 7:04 PM (thirty-six minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― calzino, Sunday, October 29, 2017 7:04 PM (thirty-six minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
Wisdom
― Treeship, Sunday, 29 October 2017 23:42 (one year ago) Permalink
Aw whaddi miss whaddi miss
― Gary Synaesthesia (darraghmac), Monday, 30 October 2017 00:11 (one year ago) Permalink
we're all cops
― ogmor, Sunday, October 29, 2017 11:16 PM (yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
Yes.
I think it's just one example that caused this post
― El Tomboto, Sunday, October 29, 2017 11:20 PM (yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
Not really. A bit though yeah, def.
Lots of people otm here, some a bit too eager even to my own liking but that comes with the territory.
Feels like the ilx massive wants to exclude a person or two for quite some time. And it's not happening. Fine by me, but the system seems flawed for 2017 realness. Which is why I asked 31 for 51.
― Le Bateau Ivre, Monday, 30 October 2017 00:13 (one year ago) Permalink
Shoulder to the wheel etc
― Le Bateau Ivre, Monday, 30 October 2017 00:14 (one year ago) Permalink
i think we need more posters
― Treeship, Monday, 30 October 2017 00:18 (one year ago) Permalink
is advertising in the budget?
― Treeship, Monday, 30 October 2017 00:19 (one year ago) Permalink
21 imo
― Gary Synaesthesia (darraghmac), Monday, 30 October 2017 00:21 (one year ago) Permalink
1
― Treeship, Monday, 30 October 2017 00:22 (one year ago) Permalink
11
― Le Bateau Ivre, Monday, 30 October 2017 00:22 (one year ago) Permalink
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SUFSB2plwzM
― Treeship, Monday, 30 October 2017 00:24 (one year ago) Permalink
Don't Cry vs November Rain has new answers
― Le Bateau Ivre, Monday, 30 October 2017 00:34 (one year ago) Permalink
so that was not a useful lead for finding out who you want iced
― Treeship, Monday, 30 October 2017 00:38 (one year ago) Permalink
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W3DllvVSsLc
― how's life, Monday, 30 October 2017 00:47 (one year ago) Permalink
Guys. I was going to wait but
I found the perfect venue for this year's ILX reunion
http://www.311cruise.com/
― Treeship, Monday, 30 October 2017 00:51 (one year ago) Permalink
So wait... we're complaining because there are less dickheads needing/getting flagged/banhammered because theres less of us now, and this is a problem why exactly?
― Stoop Crone (Trayce), Monday, 30 October 2017 02:09 (one year ago) Permalink
I think that brings up a good point - we might dislike certain posters more than we ever would have in, say, peak noize dude era, because there are less of us, and so the, uh, noize floor is more noticeable
― El Tomboto, Monday, 30 October 2017 02:17 (one year ago) Permalink
39, because I just rewatched the 39 Steps
― bernard snowy, Monday, 30 October 2017 02:20 (one year ago) Permalink
i support bernard snowy's proposal, seems sound.if it's true that there are fewer of us, that makes us more vulnerable to assholes hanging around forever, never to reach 51 but able to really derail every thread at their whim. i always thought 51 was kind of shockingly high but i guess people used to do a lot more lol-SBing and you had to compensate for that.
― Doctor Casino, Monday, 30 October 2017 02:55 (one year ago) Permalink
btw at first glance I assumed this was a thread about flagging anyone who posted some lifestyle article about how age 31 is "the new 51"
― Doctor Casino, Monday, 30 October 2017 02:56 (one year ago) Permalink
would support that flag policy btw
why are we proposing a solution to a problem we do not have, is the question
― k3vin k., Monday, 30 October 2017 02:57 (one year ago) Permalink
^^^^^
― brimstead, Monday, 30 October 2017 03:05 (one year ago) Permalink
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n6U-TGahwvs
― k3vin k., Monday, 30 October 2017 02:57 (forty-four minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
There aren't any fp's. Try to keep up.
― Gary Synaesthesia (darraghmac), Monday, 30 October 2017 03:42 (one year ago) Permalink
I just flag the really bad posts with each of my 27 sock accounts
― mh, Monday, 30 October 2017 04:56 (one year ago) Permalink
I suspect this poll was prompted by a particular poster who may have been 51'ed under a different username, but came back and is still a frequent irritant. My sense is that if any poster rises to the level of unacceptability requiring ejection, ILX will muster the necessary 51 FPs.
I personally doubt that there have been many posters who accumulated more than 31 active FPs who did not also pass the 51 threshold soon afterwards, but that is merely a guess on my part. Picking the 'right' number is not a science, but a fairly inexact heuristic. I'm fine with any number, as long as it is high enough that it cannot be driven by relatively small cabal. 51 has been adequately functional so far, imo.
I also note that 51 has deeply entered ILX lore. Changing it would render that lore illegible.
― A is for (Aimless), Monday, 30 October 2017 05:19 (one year ago) Permalink
52
― j., Monday, 30 October 2017 05:29 (one year ago) Permalink
the 51'd should be redirected to a false ilx full of bots
― you are juror number 144 and we will excuse you (Sufjan Grafton), Monday, 30 October 2017 06:57 (one year ago) Permalink
ERROR #36536424 SARCASTIC RESPONSE NOT FOUND
― Pope Urban the Legend (Noodle Vague), Monday, 30 October 2017 07:02 (one year ago) Permalink
stet would probably add a tell to be sure that he himself never got trapped in fake ilx. something subtle but absurd. like mordy bot always posting about jenga in the boardgame thread.
― you are juror number 144 and we will excuse you (Sufjan Grafton), Monday, 30 October 2017 07:36 (one year ago) Permalink
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ixL_jmGRDXY
― Le Bateau Ivre, Monday, 30 October 2017 07:54 (one year ago) Permalink
you can't just rename Area 51
― StanM, Monday, 30 October 2017 08:05 (one year ago) Permalink
BTW, the admin log is now flashing pink.
― Mark G, Monday, 30 October 2017 08:09 (one year ago) Permalink
you say this like it's a bad thing
― k3vin k., Monday, 30 October 2017 09:30 (one year ago) Permalink
Thing is, on the rare occasions that a particularly obnoxious or abusive/racist/homophobic new poster appears, they tend to attract 10-20 FPs almost immediately which alerts us to them. Most of the time it's so obvious that we just ban them straight away, in the same way we would if we came across those posts by reading a thread normally.
As far as it goes for ILX regulars, the high threshold is kind of the point. You need to piss off a lot of people to get to that point. A lower threshold would be more open to abuse and as Kevin K says it's a solution to a problem we don't really have right now.
― Matt DC, Monday, 30 October 2017 09:41 (one year ago) Permalink
manufactured pop 'music' sucks, where's the fuckin rock
― imago, Monday, 30 October 2017 10:10 (one year ago) Permalink
Capitalism is nuff fab.
― calzino, Monday, 30 October 2017 10:12 (one year ago) Permalink
donald trump is just a guy doing his best
― imago, Monday, 30 October 2017 10:19 (one year ago) Permalink
pizza is best left to the British
― Pope Urban the Legend (Noodle Vague), Monday, 30 October 2017 11:05 (one year ago) Permalink
ok, this started as a flaggable posts riff, but seriously, wouldn't the true ilx equivalent of likes/+1s be a tick.jpg link and an invisible tally of clicks until a post hits 51 and is then auto added to an aggregated excelsior page.
― Roberto Spiralli, Monday, 30 October 2017 11:26 (one year ago) Permalink
You can like an unfunny post tbf
― Gary Synaesthesia (darraghmac), Monday, 30 October 2017 11:31 (one year ago) Permalink
I only FP for dumb revives. Revive with caution my Gs.
― nashwan, Monday, 30 October 2017 11:32 (one year ago) Permalink
I'll take the risk
― Gary Synaesthesia (darraghmac), Monday, 30 October 2017 11:40 (one year ago) Permalink
The football forum I post to has an interesting system that isn't without its flaws. There's a Like button AND a LOL button, as well as a FP button. Three buttons for every post! The biggest difficulty comes with LOLs, which are handed out both for genuinely humorous content and embarrassing nonsense. I've thought maybe a fourth button - LOL @ - to differentiate from 'LOL with' - and perhaps a fifth, a sort of 'super like', which you can dole out thrice per week to distinguish full hero-worship from the posts you vaguely concur with. A sixth button would be a 'dislike' - not as strong as a flag but nonetheless admonitory in nature. Other buttons for gratitude, shock or incomprehension suggest themselves. It really is limitless when you think about it
― imago, Monday, 30 October 2017 11:52 (one year ago) Permalink
a good system would be one where -- right below where someone posts -- there's a space where you can put a follow-up comment, perhaps of approval or derision, perhaps a further joke, perhaps suggesting the thread steer more towards your own interests
― mark s, Monday, 30 October 2017 11:55 (one year ago) Permalink
that is sedition and you belong in a facility
― imago, Monday, 30 October 2017 11:57 (one year ago) Permalink
instead of having options for how ppl express themselves, you want to force them to communicate in a box
― Roberto Spiralli, Monday, 30 October 2017 12:04 (one year ago) Permalink
D-40, the only reason you got an FP from me recently (I can't recall if I ever did it in the distant past) was that you direct invited me to:
Lol flag post me then u wuss― Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Thursday, August 16, 2018 6:25 PM
Seems like if anyone is "openly plotting" to get you banned, it is you.
― A is for (Aimless), Saturday, 18 August 2018 18:40 (ten months ago) Permalink
im confidently pointing out that just bc you in particular, or even four ilxors in particular, are very mad at me for not deferring to your wisdom, that degree of anger doesnt really translate outside the clusterfuck
― ILX’s bad boy (D-40), Saturday, 18 August 2018 19:03 (ten months ago) Permalink
mad at you? you overestimate your importance in my life.
― A is for (Aimless), Saturday, 18 August 2018 19:10 (ten months ago) Permalink
mad enough to FP?
― ILX’s bad boy (D-40), Saturday, 18 August 2018 19:14 (ten months ago) Permalink
or fantasize abt me being banned itt
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IWfYIUBiTKA
― Trϵϵship, Saturday, 18 August 2018 19:28 (ten months ago) Permalink
*credits roll*
*thread is locked*
Hey guys, have you seen these flowers growing outside? They're just beautiful, and that heady bouquet...you really need to go check this out for yourself. Take your time with it, enjoy the experience. Go on and treat yourself.
― Melted Belts, Priced To Move (Old Lunch), Saturday, 18 August 2018 19:35 (ten months ago) Permalink
I figure when you specifically asked me to do something that only takes two clicks and five seconds to accomplish, it would be wrong to deny such a small favor. Really, I can't see why you think that repeatedly hitting yourself is such a smart move, but you seem hell bent on it.
― A is for (Aimless), Saturday, 18 August 2018 19:40 (ten months ago) Permalink
I mean, I took a few minutes away from my 5 month break to post about deej being ridic and delusional and give him a few fp's for good measure. It's like getting one of those "I Voted!" stickers
― sarahell, Saturday, 18 August 2018 19:43 (ten months ago) Permalink
ayyyyyyyy
― the late great, Saturday, 18 August 2018 20:59 (ten months ago) Permalink
the reason theres a 51 vote bar is bc your personal issues w me are ultimately irrelevant, is the pt
― ILX’s bad boy (D-40), Saturday, 18 August 2018 21:00 (ten months ago) Permalink
how many posters is it that have unrelated personal issues w/ deej's posting style now"cunt" is also not a cool hip putdown. altho i'm told that for britishers it is *not* a sexist slur?FP'd you for racism btw
― 16, 35, DCP, Go! (sic), Saturday, 18 August 2018 21:12 (ten months ago) Permalink
she's your queen too pal
― imago, Saturday, 18 August 2018 21:16 (ten months ago) Permalink
how many posters is it that have unrelated personal issues w/ deej's posting style now
and how much is 'my posting style' the issue vs 'my ideological pov'
― ILX’s bad boy (D-40), Saturday, 18 August 2018 21:18 (ten months ago) Permalink
I'd be fine with it if the old cunt's proxy would sack our government againxpost
― 16, 35, DCP, Go! (sic), Saturday, 18 August 2018 21:19 (ten months ago) Permalink
hasn't sacked ours yet and I literally can't imagine how yours is any worse
― imago, Saturday, 18 August 2018 21:20 (ten months ago) Permalink
Excuse me, calling a woman a c*nt is just not on.
― Scottish Country Twerking (Tom D.), Saturday, 18 August 2018 21:25 (ten months ago) Permalink
Bloody colonials.
― Scottish Country Twerking (Tom D.), Saturday, 18 August 2018 21:26 (ten months ago) Permalink
Your people use 'cunt' where a civilized gentleman such as yours truly might utter 'jolly good morning' though
― imago, Saturday, 18 August 2018 21:29 (ten months ago) Permalink
― ILX’s bad boy (D-40), Saturday, 18 August 2018 21:18 (eleven minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
ask them i guess
― flaneur brayin (darraghmac), Saturday, 18 August 2018 21:30 (ten months ago) Permalink
insofar as defensiveness is an ideology they're indistinguishable
― imago, Saturday, 18 August 2018 21:33 (ten months ago) Permalink
well, last time it was because we had just abolished conscription, withdrawn from Vietnam, made university free, abolished the death penalty, released Papua New Guinea to be an independent country under the UN, brought in universal health care, instituted laws against racial discrimination, returned land rights to native people, set up arts grants and community radio licences, lowered the voting age to 18, allowed our third largest state-equivalent to elect senators, federally funded the connecting of homes to sewers, cut international tariffs, funded state schools, allowed single mothers to receive welfare for the first time, and brought in both equal pay and a minimum wage for women.
so I guess you guys still have a way to sink before Betty needs to step in again, yeah
― 16, 35, DCP, Go! (sic), Saturday, 18 August 2018 21:53 (ten months ago) Permalink
Good to see sarahell
I like deej, Katherine and turrican - in fighting is sad but what can you do
― Ross, Monday, 20 August 2018 12:55 (nine months ago) Permalink
would sack our government again
be careful what you wish for, folks
― ▫◌▫ (sic), Friday, 24 August 2018 20:31 (nine months ago) Permalink
bring it down to one and the last person left can just agree with themselves all day long
― topical mlady (darraghmac), Sunday, 6 January 2019 19:26 (five months ago) Permalink
seriously tho
― |Restore| |Restart| |Quit| (Doctor Casino), Friday, 1 February 2019 21:31 (four months ago) Permalink
― david waster phallus (darraghmac), Friday, 1 February 2019 22:40 (four months ago) Permalink