Mouse on Mars

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (187 of them)
wheres the punk come from?

peter smith (plsmith), Tuesday, 27 July 2004 20:07 (nineteen years ago) link

Is there anything ambient/orchestral on it? I would miss that if it were gone

Sonny A. (Keiko), Tuesday, 27 July 2004 20:10 (nineteen years ago) link

The punk comes from the bits that rock, messily. And the vocals. No ambient, orchestral bits. Use old records for that.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 27 July 2004 20:31 (nineteen years ago) link

MoM's newest is maybe their best, i think... having only had a month+ with it, it's too hard to say yet... they're one of my favorites though, and hands down the best live act i have EVER seen... i have never seen such a sweaty crowd (LA, el rey, idiology tour). Autoditacker is actually what got me into electronic music along with aphex stuff, like most people... but while i don't listen to aphex much anymore, i still put MoM in all the time. i definitely prefer their poppier stuff (auto-, niun, idiology, and now, radical connector), but sound design-wise they're fantastic no matter what they're doing. plus the lyrics are brilliant... it makes contempo philosophizing fun.

firstworldman (firstworldman), Tuesday, 27 July 2004 20:39 (nineteen years ago) link

most rock people, i should clarify... aphex big bridge for rock people my age (23)...

firstworldman (firstworldman), Tuesday, 27 July 2004 20:40 (nineteen years ago) link

do the synths still sound like they have a bad cold? this really makes or breaks the deal for me.

TOMBOT, Tuesday, 27 July 2004 20:44 (nineteen years ago) link

absolutely... possibly tuberculosis... but other times they take big deep zen breaths, hold them in for half a song and then cough them out

firstworldman (firstworldman), Tuesday, 27 July 2004 20:49 (nineteen years ago) link

not to hate, but just want to mention this as someone who's been buying every release on sight for the last ten years... this is the first record of theirs I can't listen to, and I've tried several times over the last few months. I am happy they're obviously about to connect to a whole new audience, but I have to hop off the bus for this album.

(Jon L), Tuesday, 27 July 2004 21:19 (nineteen years ago) link

I've yet to see anything less than rave reviews in print & online though, right up to 'album of the year', many from people I generally respect, so don't let me stop you.

(Jon L), Tuesday, 27 July 2004 21:40 (nineteen years ago) link

there is something to be said for the stylistic consistency of mouse on mars (and the live-dodo-bird rarity of that style, given) that they inspire that kind of collector-scum wallet brutality, almost to the level of AFX and Stereolab but without all the japan-only/limited edition shit going on.

To be honest it's also what's driven me away, I'm with the above poster on buying practically everything over the last decade or so, but in my case I'm ready for a change. All I ask is one handraiser, one well-arranged piece of mayhem that can hold my attention for more than half a minute or so, and since we're talking about an album, no more of the filler that made idiology such a disappointment by the third or fourth listen.

Who are the vocalists?

TOMBOT, Tuesday, 27 July 2004 22:35 (nineteen years ago) link

a woman named niobe... and then dodo and maybe even the boys
themselves? has it even dropped yet? don't think so. i've yet
to see proper credits. hard to imagine getting sick of this
album so long as i don't overdoit in the beginning.

firstworldman (firstworldman), Tuesday, 27 July 2004 22:42 (nineteen years ago) link

It's Niobe that's the dealbreaker for me.

I loved the first two tracks on 'Idiology'... it came out so quickly after 'Niun', and so many of the tracks were so crazy / sloppy that I just took that album as a fun transitional blowing-off-of-steam from (which they obviously slaved over) and I didn't hold it against them.

This new one though, it's a statement...

(Jon L), Tuesday, 27 July 2004 22:44 (nineteen years ago) link

meant to type:

blowing-off-of-stream from the previous record (which they obviously slaved over)

(Jon L), Tuesday, 27 July 2004 22:45 (nineteen years ago) link

I love this record. Took me a while to get into them, only after I got a free copy of Idiology, which is now one of my favourite records ever. I saw them with stereolab *many* years ago but didn't get it. I will be sorely dissapointed if they don't tour this properly.

hmmm (hmmm), Wednesday, 28 July 2004 07:11 (nineteen years ago) link

Dusted: Mouse on Mars interview
http://www.dustedmagazine.com/features/276

DJ Martian (djmartian), Tuesday, 3 August 2004 13:19 (nineteen years ago) link

one month passes...
bump.

Got the new one today. reactions from those who have it already? "Instrumentals" bores me a bit tbh, but "Rost Pocks" & "Idiology" are fab. One of those acts where I'm actually wary of hearing more of their records in case they don't match up to the same standard.

Mmmm "Send Me Shivers" is doing it for me at the moment :)

Subtly processed female vocals = big weakness of mine, I don't really enjoy Sophie Rimheden though, but adore Ellen Allien. Should I really be buying disco records?

ruffle bar (grumpy_bastard), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 08:32 (nineteen years ago) link

one month passes...
fuck.

MoM are as bad as Autechre for zero-critical-agreement on what is their best work. I'll probably try 'Glam' next I think.

This one is such a dissapointment. I think I'm going to sell it.

i contribute something on ilm?? (i lurk on ilm), Friday, 15 October 2004 01:18 (nineteen years ago) link

six months pass...
This - http://www.quio.poemproducer.com/ (mp3's thru link) is what 'Radical Connector' should have sounded like! :-O

Search

Rost Pocks
Idiology
Instrumentals
Vulvaland
Niun Niggung

find/download - 'Untitled States Of'

Destroy

Radical Connector

(Yet to hear 'Autoditacker'& not too bothered tbh, want to hear 'Glam' eventually. Probably sleeping on Iaora Tahiti unfairly).

fandango (fandango), Saturday, 30 April 2005 00:01 (eighteen years ago) link

Glam is awesome, their best imo.

Amon (eman), Saturday, 30 April 2005 01:20 (eighteen years ago) link

>> is what 'Radical Connector' should have sounded like!


Radical Connector is one of the best records of the last 10 years. Thank fuck it doesn't sound like you think it should.

Brad Laner (Brad Laner), Saturday, 30 April 2005 02:59 (eighteen years ago) link

wow Brad chill tf out.

I love MOM usually, I just happened to find it a predictable and sonically boring record.

I'm intrigued you have such a strong reaction though. Care to defend it some more? I'd be interested to read another perspective on it, I didn't find the reviews at the time hugely englightening.

fandango (fandango), Saturday, 30 April 2005 12:46 (eighteen years ago) link

sorry, just hate to see such a fine album dismissed filppantly , and for personal (somewhat obvious if you know my history) reasons, I hate when so called fans turn on a group for a percieved "change of direction".
No idea how you can call RC sonically boring. it's anything but. I know of few other electronic based records that are as elastically funky and incredibly dense. then mix in the
almost Satie-esque orchestral/melodic elements and yes, pop song aspects and there you go. easily my fave MoM, and I've been listening since the beginning.

Brad Laner (Brad Laner), Saturday, 30 April 2005 16:52 (eighteen years ago) link

What, exactly, was predictable about Radical Connector?

Thermo Thinwall (Thermo Thinwall), Saturday, 30 April 2005 17:23 (eighteen years ago) link

It sounds just like the other glitchpop records their contemporaries were making in 2001 when they made their best record!

Sonny, Ah!!1 (Sonny A.), Saturday, 30 April 2005 17:51 (eighteen years ago) link

Cheers to them for "following their muse" or whatever but it was the worst possible direction they could have gone in

Sonny, Ah!!1 (Sonny A.), Saturday, 30 April 2005 17:55 (eighteen years ago) link

If it seems like I'm 'turning on them' I'm not at all. I'll still be tuned in to their next move & hopefully even get to see them live this year (they're on quite a few festival line ups).

I'm sorry I don't know your history :-/ I can understand your ire if that's what you thought I was saying.

I don't think it was a huge change of direction was it? It just didn't work for me very well YMMV obviously. 'Predictable' only in regards to their previous work. From anyone else, far from it.

I just heard that mp3 and the structures reminded me vaguely of Idiology + playfully odd hip-hop over the top. It sounded 'fun' and inventive (and funky) similar to how I'd expected RC might have been. I hadn't imagined any specific sound or linear 'progression' like that, they don't do much of that do they? :-)

fandango (fandango), Saturday, 30 April 2005 18:19 (eighteen years ago) link

I don't think it was a bad direction to move towards, but I expected them to sound much more comfortable with it than the record did.

fandango (fandango), Saturday, 30 April 2005 19:56 (eighteen years ago) link

so you can divine the comfort level of the artist ?
that's extraordinary ! methinks you may be projecting a tad.
In any case, that's a rather nutty criteria for judging the merits of a record.

and Sonny, I'm pretty certain there are plenty of worse directions they could have gone.
freak folk fer instance ? jeez, so melodramatic.

pity MoM, such asinine 'fans'.

Brad Laner (Brad Laner), Saturday, 30 April 2005 20:54 (eighteen years ago) link

Hmmm, you're misunderstanding somewhat.

I only meant the final product sounded un-comfortable (stilted, forced, 'meta', the most 'IDM' (in a bad way) record they've done).

I'm sure they had a blast making it but it didn't come across in the finished product for me. Which is most untypical.

Maybe I am projecting, who really knows? I didn't however come here to continue slagging it off in some "me right/you wrong" fashion.

That said, I'm obviously not stimulating much in the way of meaningful conversation about it either so I guess I'll leave it!

Thanks for the reply upthread btw. What is your 'history' here in a nutshell, or a link? curious.

fandango (fandango), Saturday, 30 April 2005 21:12 (eighteen years ago) link

'Predictable' only in regards to their previous work
Maybe I'm misunderstanding - but Radical wasn't like anything else they'd ever done before. I don't remember singing, for starters, on any of their previous work. Even if you removed the vocals the music itself wasn't quite like anything they'd done before either. I know their sound had evolved over the previous years but even with that in mind I would not have ever predicted them to put out an album anything at all like Radical.

Thermo Thinwall (Thermo Thinwall), Saturday, 30 April 2005 21:55 (eighteen years ago) link

Hmmm. Okay I guess I mean I heard that this was going to be a more commercial 'pop' album & was psyched about what they might bring to it. Less noise and more ... well I had no idea what the hell they might do really!

But all this seemed to mean was smoothing away the most jarring, spastic edges in their music, incorporate more 'pop' conventional funk rhythms & plain verse-chorus-verse structures. Even the best tracks like the one with Niobe on just didn't go anywhere, compared to their usual ever-shifting tunes.

As for previous work there are vocals on - Actionist Respoke, Doit, Die Seele Von Brian Wilson, Cache Coeur Naif, Schnick-schnack for starters.

fandango (fandango), Saturday, 30 April 2005 22:15 (eighteen years ago) link

I still think they have the potential to be amazing at it for what it's worth. They can write amazingly original melodies using sounds that are also very, very original & almost totally outside of whatever the current fashions might be.

fandango (fandango), Saturday, 30 April 2005 22:23 (eighteen years ago) link

ack. really 'leaving it' now.

fandango (fandango), Saturday, 30 April 2005 23:20 (eighteen years ago) link

Sorta know what fandango means about the "comfort" aspect; for all that the grooves on Radical Connector would appear to be their most straightforward, they're actually more awkward-sounding and less, er, fluid thant the group's previous stuff. It's like they were trying to add a house element to their music without having actually heard of house before, only reading about it.

Or to put it another way, compare/contrast with Delay's Luomo project, which went for the sensuous feel of house first and only later added the strong 4/4 whomp. Mouse on Mars go straight for the whomp but don't seem too concerned with or even aware of how the music should feel. I'm not sure if this makes the album bad or just odd; it's one of those albums which I feel quite conflicted about while listening to it.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Sunday, 1 May 2005 01:50 (eighteen years ago) link

are those complaints ? because that criticism is one of the best things about that album.
it feels GREAT. as in elastic, alive, non-pedantic about what "kind" of music it's "supposed" to be....ack ! christ, I give up on you folks.

Brad Laner (Brad Laner), Sunday, 1 May 2005 02:17 (eighteen years ago) link

I was thinking today about how much it bothers me that people think of Idiology as a transitional "blowing-off-steam" record. It may be a little sloppy, but there are so many new great ideas on it that I can't believe it isn't more people's favorite. When it came out it sounded to me like a NEW krautrock record, like what Faust and that lot would be doing if they were just coming out. (And, yeah, imagine Faust playing "Presence" -- nice!) It lags in the middle a bit, but I think the first six songs and the last two are the strongest testament to what they're capable of.

Fandango and Tim pretty much nail what falters with the new record. Their ability to shift genres was one of the things that drew me to them, but what kept me coming back was the way they always maintained that [x] element that makes them sound like them. Radical Connector sounds like MoM doing pastiche, for the first time in their career, rather than really inhabiting a genre.

Brad: Yes, it is honestly my opinion that this was the worst direction they could have gone in. I like it O.K., but it just seemed like a very boring thing to do in 2004 -- as if their pandering to the pitchfork set who just discovered that it's okay to like pop music. I was disappointed because I think those people are dense and I think one of my favorite groups can do better than them. Something folkier would have been great, despite any trends, because the folk elements in Niun Niggung and Idiology were interesting and distinctly their own -- which realy illustrates how they used to lead trends but fell behind with the last album.

But I guess you have your own opinion about what works for them, even if you're a dick about it.

Sonny, Ah!!1 (Sonny A.), Monday, 2 May 2005 04:19 (eighteen years ago) link

I think the moment they decided to add singing to their music was when it went wrong. I mean, they did use vocals before Idiology, but in a processed manner, more as effects. I wouldn't mind them doing decent uplifting house music, but I tried to listen to their latest album, and the vocals were just so soulless, emotionless. Another thing which can be traced all the way to Niun Niggung is that they start using these these distorted, drill'n'bass/IDM beats, which I personally hate. In retrospect it feels like they hit their peak with Autoditacker; that's when they found that special quality, that otherwordly sound that was distinctly theirs and no one elses. Now bands like Yello, when they find their own special thing, can stick with it for decades, but I guess you can't blame MoM for wanting to move forward. It's just that, the more they've moved "forward", the less distinct they sound, and the less interested I am with them.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Monday, 2 May 2005 05:47 (eighteen years ago) link

[sorry, just hate to see such a fine album dismissed filppantly , and for personal (somewhat obvious if you know my history) reasons, I hate when so called fans turn on a group for a percieved "change of direction".] -- Brad Laner

i also am one who feels this is their worst record, and feel "conflicted" listening to it for some unapparent reason. I can say that live, they had their vocalist/drummer centre stage pounding away, smiling, and i was just hankering for more knob twiddling and scattered beats/waves/whatever from the other dude. after idiology i bought radical connector without a thought, and i've not listened to it since. the new single (i heard after buying) i find extremely annoying. but it's only an opinion (personal reasons are unavoidable!) brad, and i dig that any of their albums can and are favourites to different people.

saying that, i'll take Instrumentals over anything else they've done.

Aaron Ef. (aaron ef.), Monday, 2 May 2005 15:18 (eighteen years ago) link

pity MoM, such asinine 'fans'.

-- Brad Laner (b...), April 30th, 2005.

Tne minute I first heard a MoM track I thought myself a fan cos I just loved the music. After that I several albums and they were all awesome, especially Idiology. When I heard RC it was the kind of gentle letdown that comes from a good release following back-to-back mindblowing albums. It was like playing Mortal Kombat III for the first time, thinking "Yes, this is cool, but sweet Jesus on a bicycle MK II was so much better than MK I - and so much better than the new stuff.

I like RC but I don't listen to it much anymore. If it wasn't MoM i probably wouldn't give it much of a chance anyways.

Adam Bruneau (oliver8bit), Monday, 2 May 2005 15:38 (eighteen years ago) link

Btw. Did anybody listen to that Quio song then?

I thought it was fun, especially so to hear AGF in hip-hop producer mode even if it does (perhaps, inevitably) end up coming out a little tigerbeat6-ish.

fandango (fandango), Monday, 2 May 2005 16:33 (eighteen years ago) link

It did seem upthread that I didn't like Idiology -- I love most of that record, especially the noisy bits. Blowing-off-steam was not meant as an insult when the results are that interesting. Ten thousand points for 'the illking', their acoustic chamber music arrangement/homage to David Behrman's Leapday Night (I always wondered listening to Microstoria if Jan knew about that record, and then this track finally directly referenced it)

with Connector they backgrounded the densely detailed squirky pure electronics that occupied the soloist position on previous records, and put all the detail work into the manipulation & editing of the vocals.

vocals are demanding, they have to be much louder than anything else in the mix to sound right, and when the focus is on them it kind of keeps the music from disruptively shifting around as much as earlier MoM -- Connector is much more straightforward. For me, the vocals are simply not to my taste & I miss the left turns; that's my problem. The jam at the end of "Spaceship" really grew on me & I'm still buying their next record on sight.

milton parker (Jon L), Monday, 2 May 2005 19:19 (eighteen years ago) link

three months pass...
Has anyone heard this? Supposedly a collaboration between Herbert and Mouse on Mars. I'm somewhat suprised I've not heard about till yesterday when looking around on discogs.com

T. Weiss (Timmy), Thursday, 18 August 2005 16:45 (eighteen years ago) link

i listened to 'radical connector' a lot last year, partly trying to get it to sink in faster; so i was surprised to play 'the end' the other day after a long break from the record and hear all kinds of shit that i never remembered being there. a lot of the rhythms and figures on that record are so blunt that i pay too much attention to them and overlook other parts of the music (this is not unique to mouse on mars, though).

Josh (Josh), Thursday, 18 August 2005 17:17 (eighteen years ago) link

Someone's got to have heard that DJs Collapse 12!

T. Weiss (Timmy), Friday, 19 August 2005 20:00 (eighteen years ago) link

I listened to it a long while back. I think it was solid, but am hard pressed to remember anything distinctive about it. As though it sounded exactly what you would imagine a collaboration between MoM and Herbert would sound like.

Alexander (Alexander Buckiewicz-Smith), Friday, 19 August 2005 21:33 (eighteen years ago) link

two years pass...

These guys were fantastic tonight at O2 London. So fun..

mmmm, Sunday, 27 April 2008 23:58 (sixteen years ago) link

two years pass...

Ugh seriously is this band ever going to tour the US again? The last time they played, Ratatat and Junior Boys were opening for them

mink della reese (Stevie D(eux)), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 17:42 (thirteen years ago) link

and when are they going to release new material? any idea what they're up to??

frogbs, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 18:36 (thirteen years ago) link

three months pass...

man, autoditacker really needed some time to marinate with me. listened to it tonight and i have to say it's probably as good as the first two.

am I diversified? (blank), Sunday, 17 July 2011 06:40 (twelve years ago) link

six months pass...

THERE IS A NEW ALBUM

I have one thing to say: "Roxanne Shanté" (Stevie D(eux)), Monday, 13 February 2012 19:46 (twelve years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.