Joy Division: Classic Or Dud?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (650 of them)
on dvd yes. was there an extra tony wilson commentary?

gaz (gaz), Thursday, 16 September 2004 02:30 (nineteen years ago) link

yes, a great one!

adam. (nordicskilla), Thursday, 16 September 2004 02:33 (nineteen years ago) link

which has had the effect of giving you an epiphany?

gaz (gaz), Thursday, 16 September 2004 02:35 (nineteen years ago) link

Does this bug anyone else?
______
no

Heh. Well I'm already getting used to it, listening to it again.
I'm d/ling the whole box set right now. I only ever had Substance growing up.
That was a little jarring the first time I heard it - a little alarm went off.
It totally sounds like he just fucked up a couple times and never got around to overdubbing it.
But then the song's called "Disorder" so whatever.

AaronHz (AaronHz), Thursday, 16 September 2004 02:50 (nineteen years ago) link

I now am the owner of a book bag with Ian Curtis's photo on it with the inscription DANCE DANCE DANCE DANCE TO THE RADIO

Allyzay Science Explosion (allyzay), Thursday, 16 September 2004 02:54 (nineteen years ago) link

This pic of Ian Curtis:

ihttp://users.net1plus.com/steff/ian3.jpg

Allyzay Science Explosion (allyzay), Thursday, 16 September 2004 02:59 (nineteen years ago) link

Did you make the bag, or where did you get it?

Just downloaded the video of JD playing "Transmission" on a television show in September 1979. Extremely disturbing to watch -- Curtis looks terribly ill in it, and it is edited very obviously so that one sees as little of him as possible.

"Transmission" is the greatest song of all time.

snazz, Thursday, 16 September 2004 03:04 (nineteen years ago) link

Where'd you get the video? on a p2p or is there a link?

AaronHz (AaronHz), Thursday, 16 September 2004 03:07 (nineteen years ago) link

Slsk. Not hard to find. Less disturbing, and great: the video of them playing "Shadowplay" for another TV show.

I'm not sure if I could rock an Ian Curtis bookbag, but I at least want the option.

snazz, Thursday, 16 September 2004 03:11 (nineteen years ago) link

I never noticed anything wrong with the bass on "Disorder". In fact I'd always thought of it as one of Hook's best basslines. Do you just think it's out of tune or you don't like how it's recorded?

That's a really flattering picture of Ian Curtis. Cool.

sundar subramanian (sundar), Thursday, 16 September 2004 03:14 (nineteen years ago) link

I must be going mad.
YES the bassline sounds great except for a couple little lower register fills he does that sounded off key to me.
I'll listen to it again. Maybe I'm imagining things.

AaronHz (AaronHz), Thursday, 16 September 2004 03:19 (nineteen years ago) link

Eh, it sounded worse the other night. I was probably high or something.
I'm referring to the instrumental sections between the verses of course.

AaronHz (AaronHz), Thursday, 16 September 2004 03:28 (nineteen years ago) link

But those low notes DO sound a bit flat...
WAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!
It must be all the Steely Dan I'm listening to. I'm getting picky about technical shit.

AaronHz (AaronHz), Thursday, 16 September 2004 03:35 (nineteen years ago) link

The Tony Wilson commentary on the 24 Hour Party People DVD is fantastic. Tony Wilson doing commentary on Steve Coogan doing commentary as Tony Wilson is somewhat surreal.

And Joy Division = classic classic classic.

minolta (minolta), Thursday, 16 September 2004 03:43 (nineteen years ago) link

Joy Division have some nice tunes, but I think spending the money on the box/the glut of recent live releases = ridiculous.

I mean, "Transmission" and "Love Will Tear Us Apart" are absolutely essential & classic tunes, but as a whole, I just don't get it. I also agree with Tom's assessment that lyrically they're pretty dire, but would also add that I think Hannet's production on the drums was not up to snuff; they sound more often than not like full jugs of water. I'm basing all of this on Substance, BTW.

Ian c=====8 (orion), Thursday, 16 September 2004 03:49 (nineteen years ago) link

I now am the owner of a book bag with Ian Curtis's photo on it with the inscription DANCE DANCE DANCE DANCE TO THE RADIO

ARAGHADFADFGA HDFASDFASD.

(That was my inarticulate expression of jealousy. Please note my comments about "Transmission" at the start of the thread.)

The great thing about Tom's argument is that it's a FINE argument for why lyrics need not be paramount. ;-)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 16 September 2004 05:31 (nineteen years ago) link

So fucking classic.

djdee2005 (djdee2005), Thursday, 16 September 2004 05:33 (nineteen years ago) link

'I mean, "Transmission" and "Love Will Tear Us Apart" are absolutely essential & classic tunes, but as a whole, I just don't get it. I also agree with Tom's assessment that lyrically they're pretty dire, but would also add that I think Hannet's production on the drums was not up to snuff; they sound more often than not like full jugs of water. I'm basing all of this on Substance, BTW. '

GET UNKNOWN PLEASURES AND CLOSER NOW THEN DAMMIT!!!

latebloomer (latebloomer), Thursday, 16 September 2004 09:53 (nineteen years ago) link

I can see why Tom said what he said and he has a point about the lyrics. One thing that really works is the way that plainer,less pompous lines burst out from the song - e.g " That keep calling me/They keep calling me/Keep on calling me/They keep calling me" that follows the fairly preposterous/meaningless "Imperialistic house of prayer/conquistadors who took their share" in Dead Souls. The repetition is good too, but the delivery is terrifyingly intense. It's so great you can forgive the dodgy verses.

Likewise the "Dance, dance, dance, dance, dance to the radio" in Transmission - a lyric so startlingly out of place here, seemingly flown in from a top 10 pop hit. Again the delivery is brutal.

Also "Where have they been? " (Decades)

Tom's point about LWTUA is well-made. Also Ceremony ("All she asks the strength to hold me/then again the same old story"). Actually these are brilliant lines, simply brilliant. Also the first line of the song is fantastic : "This is why events unnerve me".

Dr. C (Dr. C), Thursday, 16 September 2004 10:21 (nineteen years ago) link

The "Disorder" bassline is probably my favorite bassline of all time!

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 16 September 2004 16:46 (nineteen years ago) link

If I were still 17 and I saw ally with that bag on the train she would be my secret girlfriend in my mind for the next two weeks.

kyle (akmonday), Thursday, 16 September 2004 16:47 (nineteen years ago) link

is it like a kate spade bag?

amateur!!st, Thursday, 16 September 2004 16:48 (nineteen years ago) link

The great thing about Tom's argument is that it's a FINE argument for why lyrics need not be paramount. ;-)

-- Ned Raggett (ne...), September 16th, 2004.

OTM.

latebloomer (latebloomer), Thursday, 16 September 2004 16:49 (nineteen years ago) link

..but of course, the thing is that Tom actually engages with the lyrics, treats them as an object worthy of consideration, parses them out and renders a judgement. There's a big difference between that and Raggett's mindnumbing blitheness.

Reed Moore (diamond), Thursday, 16 September 2004 16:53 (nineteen years ago) link

TS: Raggett's Mindnumbing Blitheness vs. Ned's Atomic Dustbin

amateur!!st, Thursday, 16 September 2004 16:55 (nineteen years ago) link

i just hate, hate people's insistance on the importance of lyrics. music is about sound, not words. most musicians can't write decent lyrics anyway.

latebloomer (latebloomer), Thursday, 16 September 2004 17:01 (nineteen years ago) link

that's why i tend to hate singer-songwriter sorts of music.

latebloomer (latebloomer), Thursday, 16 September 2004 17:02 (nineteen years ago) link

WARNING: NOT A REAL DEBATE

amateur!!st, Thursday, 16 September 2004 17:03 (nineteen years ago) link

Sorry, that sounded harsh but I think it's a bit disingenuous of Ned to pull an ages old Ewing comment out of context in order to defend his own intractable position ("arguing that lyrics need not be paramount" -- is that what Tom was doing?) Plus the basic fact that we get it Ned, new schtick plz k thx etc.

ANyway, Joy Division rocks! I still haven't picked up the box set, what's wrong with me, etc

Reed Moore (diamond), Thursday, 16 September 2004 17:06 (nineteen years ago) link

the box set, as good as it is, has the most insufferably pretentious/nonsensical liner notes EVER and i do not mean that lightly. (rivalled only by the liner notes to the reissue of sonic youth's daydream nation. but i think those might be a joke.)

amateur!!st, Thursday, 16 September 2004 17:07 (nineteen years ago) link

OF COURSE that's what Tom was doing! Did you even go back and look at the context before spouting off?

Dan Perry '08 (Dan Perry), Thursday, 16 September 2004 17:08 (nineteen years ago) link

Does anyone know if the version of "24 Hours" from some vinyl pressings of Still has appeared anywhere on CD???

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 16 September 2004 17:09 (nineteen years ago) link

who the fuck argues that "lyrics need be paramount" around here?

http://www.easterncoastcostume.com/Pages/crowns/strawman.jpg

amateur!!st, Thursday, 16 September 2004 17:10 (nineteen years ago) link

Right, Dan, in this instance -- sure, Tom is saying they aren't important. I meant in terms of an overall philosophy, a way of approaching all music ever, which is the way Ned approaches it; that was my point. I've read enough of Tom's writing to know that he gives them a lot of consideration at times.

Reed Moore (diamond), Thursday, 16 September 2004 17:11 (nineteen years ago) link

i get the (perhaps false) impression that ned sort of enjoys lazily mischaracterizing those who would argue with him re. lyrics. (i mean, seriously, who argues that "lyrics need be paramount" around here, or anywhere?) whenever we get into actual debate ned proves more respectful and nuanced. so the "blithe" comments that rob decries feel a bit like a sucker-punch delivered after you've already shaken hands. i know it's not intended as such. but perhaps that explains the anger than ned's ostensibly harmless comments sometimes provoke.

amateur!!st, Thursday, 16 September 2004 17:17 (nineteen years ago) link

I CRUCIFY YOUR OFF-HANDED COMMENTS WITH GUNS

Dan Perry '08 (Dan Perry), Thursday, 16 September 2004 17:22 (nineteen years ago) link

the box set, as good as it is, has the most insufferably pretentious/nonsensical liner notes EVER and i do not mean that lightly. (rivalled only by the liner notes to the reissue of sonic youth's daydream nation. but i think those might be a joke.)
-- amateur!!st (-...), September 16th, 2004.

i sure hope they're a joke.

latebloomer (latebloomer), Thursday, 16 September 2004 17:23 (nineteen years ago) link


I CRUCIFY YOUR OFF-HANDED COMMENTS WITH GUNS
-- Dan Perry '08 (djperr...), September 16th, 2004.

staple guns?

amateur!!st, Thursday, 16 September 2004 17:26 (nineteen years ago) link

best liner notes ever.

cºzen (Cozen), Thursday, 16 September 2004 17:30 (nineteen years ago) link

he uses pretension to protect himself from feeling, abt JD above all — the meaning is there all hidden behind the words but he dursn't let it free or communicate it directly it would overwhelm him

actually i suspect a *lot* of writers do something very like this, but morley is the only one i'm aware of who uses such nakedly useless stretches of deliberately(?) tiresome "literary" playfulness to mark the Three Chilling Dots (like [INSERT REALITY HERE] , and not using words which merely divert or move or distort to do so...])

(i didn't "get" this till i read ±nothing, whgere it's unavoidable)

so the tension is something like: clearly very able and literate writer who is also very extremely unusually perceptive abt ppl's motivations and feelings, deliberately choosing a style which contantly occludes and gets in the way of the blunt of expression of same....

-- mark s (mar...) (webmail), August 7th, 2003 1:58 PM. (mark s) (link)

"And so all of this bled fed wed and headed dead or alive into the drastic mind and body of Joy Division (who were outgrowing their mind and body and packing more time into the time they had than they had time for) and all of this, all these coincidences and transmissions and transitions and (r)apt moments and exotic settings and mild distortions, it all added up, and put them into this unique position where they were both the last ever great rock group (after The Velvet Underground, The Stooges, MC5, The Doors, Television, the Sex Pistols) and the first ever great rock band (before The Pixies, My Bloody Valentine, Nine Inch Nails, Nirvana, Smashing Pumpkins, Radiohead) ... they were some twisted turning point some tunnel of light and dark and love and hate that you must journey through from one era to the next if you are to make any new sense... Joy Division summoned up in a rocket shell in their time and place all the great rock - surface and substance, pose and power - that there ever was and ever will be."

haha i like that sentence:

i. it has terrific rhythmic poise, and.
ii. is pitch-perfect in its invocation of mockable faux innocence, as a mask for actual genuinely (silly but knowingly silly) belief


-- mark s (mar...) (webmail), August 7th, 2003 2:41 PM. (mark s) (link)

the sentence in question has been very effective in getting us to disagree and explore more than the merely bald author-transparent journalistic report and/or critical claim being, er, claimed = it is doing the work it intended to do = it is a good sentence not a bad sentence (= the writer is not afraid to use "bad writing" — and thus the trashing of his own reputation as a stylist — as a device to produce lively, autonomous thinking on the part of the writer)*

(*i'm being a bit devil's advocate here in the sense that i think this device quite often fails w.morley, who uses it A LOT, risking catastrophe on a routine basis... i approve of this w/o always being convinced by it...)**

(**it's like football or something: a goal is better if it looked like it was a real mad thing to try but still goes in)***

(***i know fuck all abt sport)

-- mark s (mar...) (webmail), August 7th, 2003 4:01 PM. (mark s) (link)

cºzen (Cozen), Thursday, 16 September 2004 17:34 (nineteen years ago) link

c0zen are you being sarcastic? i mean, sure, it's interesting to ask why someone would write in the way that morley does in the liner notes to the joy division box set. but i don't think that makes them "good," insofar as they are expressing nothing at all and i would never want to read them again except in the sense that one sometimes slows down when passing a car wreck.

amateur!!st, Thursday, 16 September 2004 17:37 (nineteen years ago) link

i. it has terrific rhythmic poise, and.
ii. is pitch-perfect in its invocation of mockable faux innocence, as a mask for actual genuinely (silly but knowingly silly) belief

i like mark s, but like a lot of his posts his reading is--how you say in UK?--too clever by half.

amateur!!st, Thursday, 16 September 2004 17:38 (nineteen years ago) link

it's been so long since I've read them tbh but line notes generally aren't up to much so these don't have too high to jump.

cºzen (Cozen), Thursday, 16 September 2004 17:40 (nineteen years ago) link

i mean yeah, the morley thing read to me like a parody of pomo- and lester bangs-inspired critical nonsense, but then what is it doing in a joy division box set? is it like alan sokal's piece for social text, a parody that was designed to deceive an editor into believing it's sincere?

if it's not a parody, then it's truly pathetic.

amateur!!st, Thursday, 16 September 2004 17:44 (nineteen years ago) link

I love Joy Division's lyrics. They rule. I can't see them ever falling from my top 5 bands of all-time list.

scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 16 September 2004 18:06 (nineteen years ago) link

Slightly off-topic but ...
I was in the local record store last week looking at posters, most of which were pretty dire. I mentioned to the clerk that I had almost bought this wall-sized Joy Division poster from them about two years earlier, but when I came in with the $, the poster was gone.
She walked into the storeroom for a minute or two and returned with the poster. She had just found the rolled up and dusty poster leaning against a wall the day before. I guess someone had put it on hold two years previous and had never returned for it. She gave it to me for free, and it now dominated one wall of my office.

Bruce S. Urquhart (BanjoMania), Thursday, 16 September 2004 18:08 (nineteen years ago) link

Is anyone here able to clarify if there is a difference between the extras on the UK issued DVD of 24 Hr Party People and the extras on the U.S. one? Was the aforementioned Wilson voiceover on the UK or US version?

Bimble (bimble), Thursday, 16 September 2004 18:17 (nineteen years ago) link

I don't really think the LWTUA lyrics are all that great TBH. There are some good lines, and it sounds OK with the music, and yes, he's talking about real relationships but isn't it a string of cliches from the langauge POV? "Routine bites hard/And ambition runs low/And resentment rides high/And emotions won't grow/And we're changing our ways/Taking different roads"

I think it's a problem Curtis had in general. "24 Hours" starts out great and then he throws in that bastardized Shakespeare "A cloud hangs over me/Marks every move".

With "Dead Souls", I don't think "Imperialistic house of prayer/Conquistadors who took their share" is meaningless. It makes sense, I think, in that he's looking at human history ("Figures from the past stand tall") and seeing nothing but oppression and exploitation. It is rather overblown though - in this and other qualities, he sort of reminds me of Neil Peart as a lyricist sometimes (seem to somehow be fixated with 19th century concerns, overblown 'literary' language, moralistic sense, near-solipsistic macho-geeky perspective). Of course he's very different in others and sometimes wrote some brilliantly introspective lines.

I like "Shadowplay" and "Colony" lyrically.

sundar subramanian (sundar), Thursday, 16 September 2004 18:18 (nineteen years ago) link

where did that mark s. thing come from anyway?

amateur!!st, Thursday, 16 September 2004 18:34 (nineteen years ago) link

the paul morley thread on ile which I'm loathe to link to cs I don't agree with anything I ever said on it.

cºzen (Cozen), Thursday, 16 September 2004 18:35 (nineteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.