Since the mighty Joke have not toured the UK for 6 years, maybe we're all suffering from PMT (pre manic tension) ! Inukko admitted only hearing post 1994 work - there is a treasure trove of stuff to indulge yourself in - go ahead, enjoy.
And as for the objection to the robust defence, abuse !?! Those living in glass houses shouldn't throw stones. We're not the elitest ones. Honest.
― The Jester, Thursday, 22 March 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
saying things like "do you get a monthly magazine and a little badge for joining?" (um... no), "Have they gone yet?", continually trying to emphasise some sort of 'us-and-them' situation. "Do these people roam the internet stamping out any critisism of KJ?" - no. someone who reads ILM is also a member of the gathering. (can you reconcile those two apparent contradictions?) they sent through a link to this page. quite simple really.
not that i'm defending everything said by the various members of the gathering. some of it was pretty moronic. but that's the point - i shouldn't have to defend it. try to see us a individuals, please. don't lump us all into one category.
if you choose to describe kj as "hopeless" then you should expect some people to get a bit pissed off, y'know? i'm sorry, but they _are_ a very influential band. and it's 'exorcism', not 'exorcist'. the song title is an analogy, it's about the release of suppressed emotions and aspects of our minds that perhaps we don't face up to because we find them ugly. it has nothing to do with "A goth- apocolyptic version of Spinal Tap".
i suggest dr c should think twice before he dismisses a generally well-respected and certainly very original band's entire output as "hopeless" and "preposterous". or at least be prepared to justify his claims when people who like said band unexpected turn up, rather than get all defensive and try to paint a false picture of the fans as a bunch of internet bullies. c'mon, of course we're gonna fight back!
anyway, on a separate note - i agree with jerry when he says kj isn't something you should want to like. it's a feeling you either identify with or you don't. it can sometimes take time to happen, but you'll know when you've got it. and it you don't know what i'm talking about then you don't like them.
― The Last Laugh, Thursday, 22 March 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
Well why are you offering such arrogant and ignorant criticism of one of the industrial scene's most influential groups then?
― Darrin Addams, Thursday, 22 March 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
We discuss music and bands. A lot of bands. There are no set ones we like, there are no set ones we don't. It's about individuals expressing their individual tastes.
All the threads "classic or dud" involve people saying whether a band is 'classic' or a band is 'dud'. Bands are generally used to criticism and rightly do not give a fuck what we think on the incredibly tiny chance that they would even encounter this forum anyway. So everything from reasoned discussion to jokey abuse *of bands* is fair game. Killing Joke have hardly been alone in getting slated by a couple of posters.
If teasing, mocking or abusing bands bothers you, you're probably better off in another forum. We, collectively, did not 'pick a fight' with anyone.
What isn't generally accepted is abuse between posters, because it turns threads into huge boring slagfests. Now some people who post here regularly have overstepped the mark and some people who don't post here regularly have overstepped the mark too. The mark is pretty much an unwritten and unspoken one so that's going to happen occasionally. But as moderator I'm now suggesting that people take the personal stuff to e-mail and any further discussion in the thread is taken to be about the band and not a personal slight on anyone.
Thanks to everyone - regulars or not - who contributed intelligently.
― Tom, Thursday, 22 March 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
― christine, Friday, 23 March 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
― nick fitzpatrick, Friday, 23 March 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
― Adam Helfer, Sunday, 25 March 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
― Dr. C, Monday, 26 March 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
I pity him so.
― Nicole, Monday, 26 March 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
I'm getting into this..
― Nick Dastoor, Monday, 26 March 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
― Madchen, Monday, 26 March 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
― The Jester, Monday, 26 March 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
― Alex in NYC, Monday, 26 March 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
― Sterling Clover, Monday, 26 March 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
― DG, Monday, 26 March 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
― The Last Laugh, Friday, 30 March 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
― , Wednesday, 4 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
― Nicole, Wednesday, 4 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
― Geordie Racer, Thursday, 5 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
― Alex in NYC, Sunday, 8 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
― Trubshaw, Wednesday, 20 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
― Alex in NYC, Thursday, 7 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 7 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
Trying again:
http://thepolywog.com/copshootcop/posters/images/livedemo-01.jpg
Martyn Atkins has some interesting things to say about Jaz....
― Brian MacDonald, Thursday, 7 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
To Alex -- okay, looks like what you're trying to do is put a picture here rather than create a link, correct? You've got the address, but you're not putting in the right HTML tags to make it work. Do this instead:
http://thepolywog.com/copshootcop/posters/images/livedemo- 01.jpg
Now, I've added extra spaces here so you can see the code -- when you try it, remove the space before IMG, both spaces on either side of the equal sign, and the final space between the end quote mark and the end caret. That should result in presenting the image as a post.
― Ned Raggett, Friday, 8 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
― Brian MacDonald, Friday, 8 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
― alex in nyc, Friday, 8 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
― Trying again, Friday, 8 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
― Last attempt., Friday, 8 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
http://www.maliciousdamage.com/gallery/jaz/jaz86.htm
― Tadeusz Suchodolski, Friday, 8 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
― Alex in NYC, Friday, 8 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
Only joking, Alex ;)
― Dr. C, Friday, 8 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
1) It's basically a proto-type for Jay-Z-Nas-Throwdown, innit? Except all the nutters are on the same side.
2) I'm not sure, but this may be the first recorded case of Alex in NYC using the word "pabulum" on ILM.
I wuv this board so.
― Tim, Friday, 8 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
― DG, Friday, 8 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
― Mickey Black Eyes, Friday, 8 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
Not that this means I loathe / love the Joke, mind you. The one clip I heard @ Amazon this morning (whilst shopping) didn't do much for me, except make me giggle a bit. (I'm on antibiotics, though, so don't mind me if I laugh @ inappropriate times.)
― David Raposa, Friday, 8 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
― John Darnielle, Friday, 8 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
For the record, information on the offending symphonic records (aided & abetted by a Mr. Jaz "Not Pazz" Coleman) can be found here. And here. AND here. AAAAAAAAAAND ... oh, just check his list of credits. (Working for Disney - how's that for HONOURING THE FIRE!?!)