Star Trek Discovery: The Bryan Fuller TV reboot

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1158 of them)

Speaking of corn kernels surviving, did anyone else notice they kept a few old-school sounds? Door openings, certain computer bleeps/comms bleeps?

Stoop Crone (Trayce), Wednesday, 4 October 2017 22:15 (six years ago) link

I only saw it for a moment, but I believe they re-used the red alert graphic from the TMP Enterprise on the Shenzhou.

Spencer Chow, Thursday, 5 October 2017 17:08 (six years ago) link

ah ha, found it:

http://trekcore.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/red-alert-696x354.jpg

Spencer Chow, Thursday, 5 October 2017 17:11 (six years ago) link

Saw ep 3 finally, it was a lot better than the first 2. Still on the fence about all this tho.

Stoop Crone (Trayce), Thursday, 5 October 2017 23:28 (six years ago) link

Off the fence, I was done when their new super drive was navigated by tweaking the nipples of an alien dust mite.

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Monday, 9 October 2017 10:33 (six years ago) link

Similarly off the STD boat. Humongous, card-carrying Trek dork here, but the oppressive negativity has been a serious turnoff. Troubled at the prospect of an intelligent creature being exploited against its will to power the ship's magical mushroom drive. Burnham looking constipated while crewmates lament "oh well, war" doesn't cut it.

Millsner, Monday, 9 October 2017 11:00 (six years ago) link

The bar I have set is that first season TNG episode where the slug aliens take over starfleet high command and Picard has to trick them and kill them

mh, Monday, 9 October 2017 14:55 (six years ago) link

Conspiracy? If only Discovery were that entertaining!

The parasite infiltration of Starfleet plot never got a follow-up because they morphed into the Borg in the writers' room.

Millsner, Monday, 9 October 2017 14:59 (six years ago) link

The dialogue is awful! "Who just saved us?" was lol bad.

the oppressive negativity has been a serious turnoff

Same. This has had a serious Oedipal complex about proving how much darker and more violent it is than its predecessors, with no charm whatsoever, nor any depth. Plus, the Starfleet officers are so dumb.

Klingon T'Kuvma Why Don't You Love Mah? (Leee), Tuesday, 10 October 2017 06:01 (six years ago) link

The Michelle Yeoh cameo was comforting, a glimpse of what could've been. But the series is intent on killing such nostalgia, and replacing it with movie-quality protection values.

Klingon T'Kuvma Why Don't You Love Mah? (Leee), Tuesday, 10 October 2017 06:07 (six years ago) link

throwing in Elon Musk with Zefram Cochrane, ugh

louise ck (milo z), Tuesday, 10 October 2017 10:36 (six years ago) link

spores must flow

mookieproof, Wednesday, 11 October 2017 02:53 (six years ago) link

yeah i thought michael was an interesting character after the first 2 eps & now she’s as boring as the rest of them. the crew seem extraneous/unimportant which OK WHUT, there’s zero curiosity or starfleet level anything going on here

i really do not know what it is i am watching

spores tho

lotta spores

Star Trek: Spore Wars

Squeaky Fromage (VegemiteGrrl), Wednesday, 11 October 2017 05:46 (six years ago) link

the kid from my so-called life tho!

mookieproof, Wednesday, 11 October 2017 05:56 (six years ago) link

remember in the 90s when there would be two trek shows airing simultaneously? i think at this point if we ever want that to happen again we have to suck it up and pretend like this is the best show ever made and that cbs all access is a great idea oh if only i could afford it

Flogging Mommy (diamonddave85), Wednesday, 11 October 2017 14:21 (six years ago) link

As it's on Netflix elsewhere in the world, I'm not sure the success (or not*) of CBS All Access is a dealbreaker.

One bad episode in 4 is not a bad strike rate for Trek. Though I'm gonna hold on watching it for a few weeks in the hope things get better.

Chuck_Tatum, Wednesday, 11 October 2017 14:30 (six years ago) link

* definitely not

Chuck_Tatum, Wednesday, 11 October 2017 14:31 (six years ago) link

spore travel would have negated most of TOS, TNG, and all of DS9, VOYAGER -- so it looks like the trajectory points to season finale timeline reset?

Philip Nunez, Wednesday, 11 October 2017 17:38 (six years ago) link

I think we're going to end up with another Star Trek directive against a particular technology after this goes horribly awry

like, no genetic enhancement technology (KHAAAAAAN!), no time travel (temporal prime directive), no biophysics-based travel

mh, Wednesday, 11 October 2017 17:55 (six years ago) link

i would imagine if she were aware that the tech existed at some point, janeway would've considered breaking whatever directive against its use. i think maybe discovery and its tech were ultra-top-secret and it wouldn't have been something future starfleet officers would know about

Flogging Mommy (diamonddave85), Wednesday, 11 October 2017 18:03 (six years ago) link

I'd imagine creating a spore drive is not exactly trivial

mh, Wednesday, 11 October 2017 18:32 (six years ago) link

you'd have to first turn the saucer section into a turntable.
then you need a DJ.

Philip Nunez, Wednesday, 11 October 2017 18:34 (six years ago) link

well yeah but it's something i'm sure they'd brainstorm. and since voyager takes place like 100 years later, they might have the technology to make a spore drive in less than 75 years

Flogging Mommy (diamonddave85), Wednesday, 11 October 2017 18:48 (six years ago) link

they did get mad at that other federation ship that was using hyper-dimensional aliens as super jet fuel.

Philip Nunez, Wednesday, 11 October 2017 18:52 (six years ago) link

it's just a really big water bear

mh, Wednesday, 11 October 2017 18:55 (six years ago) link

i'm hoping that the series ends in a humanist "humans, vulcans, klingons, we're all just really big water bears, maaaaaaaaaan"

Philip Nunez, Wednesday, 11 October 2017 19:02 (six years ago) link

you'd have to first turn the saucer section into a turntable.

This really didn't help me get over my thinking of a pizza slicer every time the ship appeared on screen (and I really like the ship) - I have no idea why revolving is necessary

As to the severe canon violation of this spore thing, I guess at some point all of these spore lifeforms are going to get wiped out, or it'll be mandated that using them as a propulsion system is unethical, or the spores will just turn on people and teleport them into the middle of a star every time they're forced to take anyone anywhere. But before that happens we have to have a character made of spores so it can have awkward conversations with people a la Persis Khambatta in Trek the Motion Picture

Brakhage, Wednesday, 11 October 2017 20:31 (six years ago) link

the entire cast of TNG is actually spores who have taken new forms

mh, Wednesday, 11 October 2017 20:32 (six years ago) link

"You humans ... cannot be everywhere at once? It must be so ... limiting"

Brakhage, Wednesday, 11 October 2017 20:33 (six years ago) link

x mh bwahhhhh hah ha, solves that canon problem then

Brakhage, Wednesday, 11 October 2017 20:34 (six years ago) link

more like star trek human after all amirite

Einstein, Bazinga, Sitar (abanana), Friday, 13 October 2017 09:34 (six years ago) link

The tardigrade breakdown just to let them go all Minority Report with their screen technology was seriously eye-roll inducing, still not as bad as the Clockwork Orange scene.

I'm watching CBS's new Navy SEAL show (as long as I'm borrowing a CBS All Access login...) and Discovery feels more similar to that than it does any prior Star Trek.

louise ck (milo z), Monday, 16 October 2017 04:29 (six years ago) link

tardigrade warp "able to materialize anywhere in the universe" = warp 10, making this the second time warp 10 has been connected to animals

Einstein, Bazinga, Sitar (abanana), Monday, 16 October 2017 07:23 (six years ago) link

In the new episode I counted them saying "DNA" 6 times which is voyager levels of technobabble. still, best episode yet.

Einstein, Bazinga, Sitar (abanana), Monday, 16 October 2017 08:29 (six years ago) link

The spore drive tech is very Dune like. Spores = spice?

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Monday, 16 October 2017 10:01 (six years ago) link

This show is officially bad, quantitatively speaking.

(I'm not a robot.) (Leee), Monday, 16 October 2017 17:55 (six years ago) link

I ... like this show.

remy bean, Monday, 16 October 2017 18:59 (six years ago) link

Quantitatively speaking == there aren't enough episodes? But qualitatively it's fine?

Mordy, Monday, 16 October 2017 19:01 (six years ago) link

The thing that I found most unbelievable in this one (out of a lot of generally unbelievable things) is that Starfleet would allow their one-of-a-kind, most-top-secret weapon-to-end-wars ship to take what could easily have been a one-way trip behind enemy lines to rescue Captain Ends J. Means

I kept hoping the admiral would say 'yep, consider him dead, we're not endangering the entire course of this war to to save one guy. In fact, if you do come across him, kill him yourself if he can't be extracted'

Brakhage, Monday, 16 October 2017 19:52 (six years ago) link

The mirror sting was pretty boss though

Brakhage, Monday, 16 October 2017 19:56 (six years ago) link

Quantitatively speaking == there aren't enough episodes? But qualitatively it's fine?

Qualitatively this thing has been abysmal since the third episode, we've just got a majority of bad episodes now.

(I'm not a robot.) (Leee), Monday, 16 October 2017 22:19 (six years ago) link

it's good enough that we're still watching it which is really the only relevant criteria for whether a show is good or bad

Mordy, Monday, 16 October 2017 22:22 (six years ago) link

idk, I'm on the verge of hatewatching / praying to Q that it stops being repugnant.

(I'm not a robot.) (Leee), Tuesday, 17 October 2017 00:42 (six years ago) link

I do a see a lot of fan productions being on the dark/militaristic end of the spectrum, to the point that maybe this is what ST's fanbase wants now, and I'd point the finger at DS9 being the turning point.

Philip Nunez, Tuesday, 17 October 2017 20:59 (six years ago) link

Love this more than any Trek since I camped out at the St. Paul campus commons to watch Next Gen in the '90s.

I think the utopian radicalism is still there, just pressed against hard times and reluctant to speechify, which feels appropriate on both counts. The direction/action/FX make the battles as scary as they are striking, and I think the romantic plot and Elephant Man voices of the Klingons oddly give them more humanity than previous incarnations—they're still camp, just more enjoyably so. I love the silent shots, how each show starts with what feels like a cold open that just keeps going, the tense dialogue in suspenseful situations that packs as much evocative meaning as the original series but without underlining itself (sometimes orders must be disobeyed, sometimes monsters aren't, sometimes shame interferes with repair), and stays with me after the plot particulars fade. I like that the show includes a character with autism, but love the suggestion that she still has trouble fitting into this flawed utopia, and that the moral standard of the 23rd Century—and the leading role—may be held by someone other than the Captain.

Peter Scholtes, Tuesday, 17 October 2017 22:28 (six years ago) link

appreciate the enthusiasm, Peter

mh, Wednesday, 18 October 2017 03:15 (six years ago) link

Girlfriend (not a natural trekkie) loved Voyager and is loving this and so am I.

Popture, Wednesday, 18 October 2017 11:26 (six years ago) link

i can understand the reluctance of a star trek show being produced today to fully embrace the series' 'utopian radicalism' (great phrase btw peter) in favour of darker moral shades but i just don't understand why you'd choose to set it within a few years of the original series' swashbuckling optimism, where the clash of tones is going to be the most jarring

like, wouldn't it make more sense, and have more potential for drama, to set it years past tng/ds9/voyager? if you wanted to push past roddenberry's 'no personal conflict' rule like this show does, there's a million interesting stories you could tell. like, every human organisation in history has faltered and fallen eventually - wouldn't it be interesting to ask what would make a future starfleet wobble on its axis and threaten to collapse? what would save it?

anyway, enough fan fiction - it just really bugs me that they're trying to squeeze a morally-compromised star trek story into a place where it doesn't quite fit imo

midas / medusa cage match (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 18 October 2017 11:51 (six years ago) link

we find out why they have all these rules and directives: the federation of the original series was built on top of a stack of dead bodies

mh, Wednesday, 18 October 2017 13:42 (six years ago) link

bizzaro, I think that, from a studio's perspective, a post-TNG/DS9/Voyager show wouldn't be able draw in the civilian/non-Trekkie viewership. Kirk/Spock are so much well-established in American pop culture, Picard memes aside.

(I am a robot.) (Leee), Wednesday, 18 October 2017 17:17 (six years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.