Star Trek Discovery: The Bryan Fuller TV reboot

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1158 of them)

If they streamed it only on the CBS app but allowed digital purchases on amazon, itunes, etc. it'd make more sense. but, afaik, they are making it only available on the CBS app

so irritating, I'd shell out for the entire season purchase even if it trickles out a week at a time as per usual

mh, Sunday, 24 September 2017 16:48 (six years ago) link

i'll probably wait until next year and stream the whole season then. or find "other ways" that will appear soon, i'm sure

Nhex, Sunday, 24 September 2017 17:00 (six years ago) link

I just did the free CBS trial on my tv device, but I guess it doesn't air until tonight? boo

mh, Sunday, 24 September 2017 17:22 (six years ago) link

I guess I hadn't been paying attention but, uh, you have to pay for some CBS streaming service to watch this beyond the first episode? Really? I hope everyone enjoys the first ST series to last exactly one season.

― Señor Winces (Old Lunch)

yeah i mean i know game of thrones seems to do ok and all but i'm not sure why directly adopting a piracy-based business model is cbs's schtick here

anyway when the streaming service fails they'll probably just toss it to another streaming service. doesn't necessarily doom the show.

bob lefse (rushomancy), Sunday, 24 September 2017 18:48 (six years ago) link

Phase II - proposed for Paramount Television Service, a fourth US network
Voyager (1995-2001), Enterprise (2001-2005) - designed to support UPN (1995-2006)

Einstein, Kazanga, Sitar (abanana), Sunday, 24 September 2017 18:56 (six years ago) link

nice ship -- too bad they haven't invented probes yet and have to send their first officer into lethal radiation

mookieproof, Monday, 25 September 2017 02:00 (six years ago) link

this was fun but fuck CBS for making me watch a thousand NAVY SEALS promos and then asking for money to keep watching

El Tomboto, Monday, 25 September 2017 02:15 (six years ago) link

points for having the main plot thread be about a black woman trying to tell everybody "no really, they're going to kill all of us" and being shouted down

El Tomboto, Monday, 25 September 2017 02:17 (six years ago) link

cbs has consistently been tightassed with digital access to its programming since the tv-web boom, it's annoying

j., Monday, 25 September 2017 03:20 (six years ago) link

Enjoying this!

First question: how can I get one of those dope uniforms

Squeaky Fromage (VegemiteGrrl), Monday, 25 September 2017 04:42 (six years ago) link

We signed up for free trial - canceled after 2nd ep & got a month free so 4 more episodes

But seriously $6 for 1 original show and commercials is a joke. $10 if you want commercial free? Eat a dick

Squeaky Fromage (VegemiteGrrl), Monday, 25 September 2017 05:20 (six years ago) link

A few minutes in, it looks right at least. The ship and cinematography look like a Star Trek show (vs. the new movies).

louise ck (milo z), Monday, 25 September 2017 05:43 (six years ago) link

New Klingons - ehhhhhhhh. The makeup is so heavy their faces barely move.

louise ck (milo z), Monday, 25 September 2017 06:02 (six years ago) link

Huh.

louise ck (milo z), Monday, 25 September 2017 06:59 (six years ago) link

The theme manages to have twelve different sections, goes a bit Mahler for some reason, not very catchy

Although I speak as someone who liked Faith of the Heart so ignore me

Chuck_Tatum, Monday, 25 September 2017 07:44 (six years ago) link

Only seen the first hour - I feel like I can semi-credibly guess which ideas/dialogue came from Fuller and what came from Kurtzman/Goldsman. Not bad but the character-backstory shit is hacky and painful.

a serious and fascinating fartist (Simon H.), Monday, 25 September 2017 14:13 (six years ago) link

Thought it was ok. Will keep watching.

But yeah, the theme tune is a mess

groovypanda, Monday, 25 September 2017 14:17 (six years ago) link

I liked the show!

At the beginning I was thinking "hmm, is this Star Trek enough?"

But, thinking back, the best shows start out with their own scope and integrate. Enterprise was slavishly devoted to tying into continuity while not fleshing out much history. More than anything I got the impression that someone (Fuller? looked like he was the writer w/Ortzman) had an understanding of what TNG and DS9 did well.

The previews make it look like it's going to be scientific discovery (hah!) in a time of war. Which is a clearer mission statement than we've gotten recently.

mh, Monday, 25 September 2017 14:20 (six years ago) link

Yeah did enjoy that and thought there was going to be more, but I guess CBS is running it as a weekly show and selling it on elsewhere.

Stevolende, Monday, 25 September 2017 14:30 (six years ago) link

Gotta free up airtime for those Chuck Lorre productions and NCIS: Anchorage.

Gewgaws for Meemaw (Old Lunch), Monday, 25 September 2017 14:38 (six years ago) link

I know it's a Toronto production, so I hate to say this but most of the sets looked pretty lacklustre. Felt like they were adding the occasional lens flares out of sheer desperation to spice it up. And yeahhh, the guys playing Klingons can't even act in all that get up. Hopefully they will sort it out as it goes along.

Manitobiloba (Kim), Monday, 25 September 2017 15:35 (six years ago) link

I'm guessing the backgrounds in the Klingon ship were put there in post-production, because they were pretty ornate?

mh, Monday, 25 September 2017 15:44 (six years ago) link

I thought the story was engaging & the character development pretty solid for a 2-ep premiere. I am so used to expecting exposition dumps for new shows but this played out like a mini movie, it was kinda thrilling tbh

I think the Michael character has been set up with good layers & i’m really interested to follow her journey now

Doug Jones was great & I loved Michelle Yeoh

Klingon makeup looks more like the movie Romulans but dont they always seem to screw around with their look iirc?

Mr Veg had some gripes about how it doesn’t look like it’s taking place before the original series but i wasnt too bothered by that myself

Squeaky Fromage (VegemiteGrrl), Monday, 25 September 2017 16:41 (six years ago) link

I was wondering if teh original Klingons were supposed to look like evil humans intentionally. Seem to be a bit Hispanic pirate update in the tv series or something don't they? Is that why they were made to look less human.

Stevolende, Monday, 25 September 2017 16:45 (six years ago) link

Latest look has shades of Tudor era doublet and hose and tunic look don't it?

Stevolende, Monday, 25 September 2017 16:46 (six years ago) link

klingons lose a bit of menace when they sound like they're trying to talk through a retainer.
https://vignette.wikia.nocookie.net/villains/images/1/1f/Shelley.png
today ish a good day to die, you turdsh!

Philip Nunez, Monday, 25 September 2017 16:56 (six years ago) link

lol

Squeaky Fromage (VegemiteGrrl), Monday, 25 September 2017 16:59 (six years ago) link

should I watch this or is it going to be totally cancelled within a year

akm, Monday, 25 September 2017 17:22 (six years ago) link

(I hated enterprise and found most of voyager boring as fuck)

akm, Monday, 25 September 2017 17:22 (six years ago) link

it won't get "cancelled"... i'm sure first season's in the can
also, if they're really using this as a push for CBS All Access (I wonder how The Good Fight did) they'll probably keep it alive for that alone, regardless of ratings or quality. i mean look at Netflix's insane stable of shows, who knows how well any of these do or how much they cost to keep going with the verticality of it all

Nhex, Monday, 25 September 2017 17:27 (six years ago) link

i can't even imagine picking up another subscription tv service, not for this. piracy it is.

akm, Monday, 25 September 2017 17:43 (six years ago) link

The first hour was a disaster. tons of pilot-speak where characters explain things that should be obvious in their world. tons of phrases that they put in because they sounded cool despite not making sense -- how is a species both "prey" and "bred to sense death"? the michael actress ruins a bunch of her lines. i found michelle yeoh's accent distracting, but the rest of her performance was solid. filler with an optical scrambler that lets them do the "go back to old technology" bit, which has been done frequently in Star Trek but still sucks. crap CG during the space walk.

second hour does the "balance of terror" / enemy below thing. not the best use of it but it still works. lots of forced parallels that are more coincidental than meaningful. i was pleasantly surprised by the ending.

oh and i was distracted by trying to figure out where in the ST timelines this happens -- young Sarek + Klingons gone for a century = shortly before TOS, timeline still not split. i suppose ST fans will just look it up online.

Einstein, Kazanga, Sitar (abanana), Monday, 25 September 2017 18:42 (six years ago) link

Continuity-wise, Shran from Enterprise will be happy to see they've named a ship after him... it's certainly BEEN A LONG ROAAAAAAAAAAD

Philip Nunez, Monday, 25 September 2017 18:59 (six years ago) link

I thought this took place before Enterprise?

akm, Monday, 25 September 2017 19:28 (six years ago) link

100 years after Enterprise, or thereabouts. About a decade before the original series.

mh, Monday, 25 September 2017 19:32 (six years ago) link

Just read it said that it was supposed to be about 10 years before the Shatner series. But that might be open to debate.

Stevolende, Monday, 25 September 2017 19:34 (six years ago) link

They might run into, or at least hear about, the Enterprise commanded by Christopher Pike

mh, Monday, 25 September 2017 19:40 (six years ago) link

oh I'm sure they will at some point if not this year then next year when the ratings start to flag. expect a time travel episode with someone from TNG at some point too to revive interest.

akm, Monday, 25 September 2017 19:45 (six years ago) link

they've already got Sarek, what else do they need?

mh, Monday, 25 September 2017 19:47 (six years ago) link

Khan's older stoner brother Chad.

Philip Nunez, Monday, 25 September 2017 19:51 (six years ago) link

CHAAAAAAAAAD

mh, Monday, 25 September 2017 19:53 (six years ago) link

lol

Οὖτις, Monday, 25 September 2017 19:57 (six years ago) link

I liked this quite a bit and I think it's about as good as a Star Trek show could be in 2017. It's not what I would consider ideal, but it's what works now. Hopefully, they can keep it up.

Spencer Chow, Monday, 25 September 2017 22:37 (six years ago) link

the internet informs me that giving strong female characters traditionally male names is a 'trademark' of fuller or one of the other three dozen executive producers

i don't really gi

mookieproof, Monday, 25 September 2017 23:01 (six years ago) link

i’ve met several women named michael, just kind of figured they decided in the future “michelle” is just how french people pronounce the name

mh, Tuesday, 26 September 2017 00:16 (six years ago) link

and let’s not forget queen of all michaels, michael hyatt aka mama barksdale

http://static1.businessinsider.com/image/558867506da8111716adf0f6-840-688/screen%20shot%202015-06-22%20at%203.51.04%20pm.png

Squeaky Fromage (VegemiteGrrl), Tuesday, 26 September 2017 00:56 (six years ago) link

whoa, Michelle Yeoh

however i will probly never watch

ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 26 September 2017 01:05 (six years ago) link

who plays Sarek?

ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 26 September 2017 01:05 (six years ago) link

james frain

Squeaky Fromage (VegemiteGrrl), Tuesday, 26 September 2017 01:25 (six years ago) link

which is weird bc he’s the “bad guy” in like, everything. so seeing him play sarek is some cognitive dissonance like “ok well i ~guess~ he’s cool bc he’s sarek ...but it’s james frain so he might be plotting the downfall of the entire starfleet!”

Squeaky Fromage (VegemiteGrrl), Tuesday, 26 September 2017 01:27 (six years ago) link

yes! so bad

mookieproof, Tuesday, 16 April 2024 05:47 (one week ago) link

Joran, the pick-me serial killer

ɥɯ ︵ (°□°) (mh), Tuesday, 16 April 2024 14:05 (one week ago) link

Discovery this season seems like a video game, collect all the pieces of the puzzle type quest. The graphics seem kinda gamey too cf Michael surfing on a spaceship in a "warp bubble".

BrianB, Tuesday, 16 April 2024 16:01 (one week ago) link

So, I thought I didn't enjoy last nights episode for various reasons, but...
it turns out its one of the most liked/popular of the show!? Clearly I missed something. All I kept thinking was "if Burnham and Stamets kept reappearing in the past how come they dont remember it happening before? Why isnt Burnham fighting herself breaking the frickin timeline? What have I missed?" Apparently the whole thing was a callback to a VOY episode called "Shattered" which completely escaped me, so ok.

Also bummed they mentioned Lorca but he was conveniently out on a mission *kicks dirt, grumbles*

The bit where Stamets was desperately trying not to fuck the timeline up by saying the wrong thing was pretty funny, tbf. Also Reno's one appearance. "ah no, are you stuck in a time loop?" *rolls eyes*

Stoop Crone (Trayce), Thursday, 18 April 2024 22:48 (one week ago) link

i know this is an ongoing thing but it just takes so much longer to DO LITERALLY ANYTHING on this ship in this seriez because everyone has to use the right tone & let everyone’s voice be heard and omg this episode would be half as long on a normally fuctioning ship that just fucking takes orders lol

werewolves of laudanum (VegemiteGrrl), Friday, 19 April 2024 03:54 (six days ago) link

covert anti-woke series in the guise of a woke one

stet, Friday, 19 April 2024 16:53 (six days ago) link

kind of fond indulgent lol at the idea that I am invested enough in these characters and their GROWTH to welcome a time-travelling retrospective looking back on how much they've all changed

like, the robot woman who not a day goes by that we don't think about - I could barely remember her - although I looked her up and remembered that she was a completely anonymous character until she got given a back-story about 5 seconds before she was killed off

Kraal Disorientation Chamber (emsworth), Monday, 22 April 2024 04:28 (three days ago) link

totally!

werewolves of laudanum (VegemiteGrrl), Monday, 22 April 2024 05:21 (three days ago) link

Remember Michael and Spock talking about their feelings and childhood trauma for ten important minutes when they were supposed to be saving all of human existence? lol

papal hotwife (milo z), Monday, 22 April 2024 05:26 (three days ago) link

he was a completely anonymous character until she got given a back-story about 5 seconds before she was killed off

Haaha yes that bit was the worst. I was all "wait, did I miss an episode or 2? Who is this again!?"

Stoop Crone (Trayce), Monday, 22 April 2024 06:01 (three days ago) link

death of robot lady episode is the only thing i can remember about this show that isn't jason isaacs or michelle yeoh

did they get isaacs back for this last season - isn't his non-mirror-version unaccounted for? failure if not

Chuck_Tatum, Monday, 22 April 2024 12:54 (three days ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.