Hillary Clinton: Classic or Dud?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1576 of them)

Yes, I feel bad for this insanely wealthy and powerful person who continually does and says stupid things.

a serious and fascinating fartist (Simon H.), Saturday, 23 September 2017 04:12 (six years ago) link

Recognizing how much and how long she's been viciously attacked simply requires you to accept a set of easily established objective facts and to imagine what effect they might have on her psyche. Whether or not you "feel bad for" her is entirely at your option.

A is for (Aimless), Saturday, 23 September 2017 04:25 (six years ago) link

Yes.

a serious and fascinating fartist (Simon H.), Saturday, 23 September 2017 04:28 (six years ago) link

she is christlike in her suffering, whether you accept her into your heart is up to you

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Saturday, 23 September 2017 05:07 (six years ago) link

no politician in history has been treated worse

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Saturday, 23 September 2017 05:09 (six years ago) link

saw Hamilton with no complications

ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 23 September 2017 05:11 (six years ago) link

america has been gaslighting her since 1992, no shit she's paranoid. she lost the election, she's allowed to be.

bob lefse (rushomancy), Sunday, 24 September 2017 00:12 (six years ago) link

I'm glad to learn the word "pullulates" but otherwise Sam Kriss is a not v enlightening choice for this assignment

a serious and fascinating fartist (Simon H.), Sunday, 24 September 2017 05:39 (six years ago) link

i know people clown on her & her campaign for that "abuelita" stuff but i would like hillary clinton to be my grandmother. this should probably go in the other thread about posts you shouldn't have posted but whatever fuck it i'm tired

flappy bird, Sunday, 24 September 2017 13:01 (six years ago) link

but his emails!

http://www.politico.com/story/2017/09/24/jared-kushner-private-email-white-house-243071

what a sexist country we are :)

reggie (qualmsley), Sunday, 24 September 2017 21:46 (six years ago) link

Yeah, I wish I had a super rich grandma too.

louise ck (milo z), Sunday, 24 September 2017 21:47 (six years ago) link

it's like a reflex with some people, the same way racism is. mrga

reggie (qualmsley), Sunday, 24 September 2017 21:57 (six years ago) link

man, if this is what you all think of HRC, it makes me wonder what sort of contempt you must have reserved for the likes of Strom Thurmond, Robert Byrd or Ted Cruz. it must burn in you like the all-consuming fires of hell. how do you survive it?

A is for (Aimless), Monday, 25 September 2017 04:38 (six years ago) link

it's fine.

j., Monday, 25 September 2017 04:58 (six years ago) link

j OTM

Week of Wonders (Ross), Monday, 25 September 2017 06:35 (six years ago) link

I think all of the people you mentioned are men, so they're cool

President Keyes, Monday, 25 September 2017 13:22 (six years ago) link

Her book is egregious.

Treeship, Monday, 25 September 2017 13:31 (six years ago) link

Her book is egregious.

Treeship, Monday, 25 September 2017 13:31 (six years ago) link

You're egregious.

the Rain Man of nationalism. (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 25 September 2017 13:32 (six years ago) link

Hillarygregious

stop the mandolinsanity (Ye Mad Puffin), Monday, 25 September 2017 13:33 (six years ago) link

a basket of egregious

President Keyes, Monday, 25 September 2017 13:34 (six years ago) link

How do you survive in the world when you take criticism of a ruling class war hawk so personally?

How do you survive in the world when you take criticism of a the publication of a book by a ruling class war hawk so personally?

President Keyes, Monday, 25 September 2017 14:12 (six years ago) link

How do you survive in the world when you take criticism of the publication of a book ^that almost no one here has actually read^ by a ruling class war hawk so personally?

Karl Malone, Monday, 25 September 2017 14:14 (six years ago) link

How will the wolf survive when the hawk rules the skies?

President Keyes, Monday, 25 September 2017 14:21 (six years ago) link

We should probably read the book, huh?

Frederik B, Monday, 25 September 2017 14:25 (six years ago) link

i) Ruling class war hawks by definition have more power and influence than Internet randos who criticize them so I'm not sure the two things are equivalent. ii) I don't see anyone here taking the book especially personally as much as making sarcastic comments about it? The defenders do seem to be taking it pretty personally, though.

xps Ha, was going to add that I haven't actually read the book so.

No purposes. Sounds. (Sund4r), Monday, 25 September 2017 14:25 (six years ago) link

I don't think anyone takes it personally on any side?

Frederik B, Monday, 25 September 2017 14:29 (six years ago) link

Doug Henwood read it so i don't have to....

http://washingtonbabylon.com/3128-2/

but goodbye forever, HRC

ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Monday, 25 September 2017 15:34 (six years ago) link

is her book better than her husband's book? because her husband's book sucked.

bob lefse (rushomancy), Monday, 25 September 2017 16:16 (six years ago) link

who 👏 has 👏 the 👏 pdf

flappy bird, Monday, 25 September 2017 16:40 (six years ago) link

I am admittedly sort of encouraged by that passage Henwood cites at the end of the review. That's a significant reversal and a move in the right direction.

The defenders do seem to be taking it pretty personally, though.

If, by this, you mean to indicate I and others are reacting as if the criticism were being directed at us personally, then I don't see it. I don't feel personally attacked or criticized at all. otoh, if you only mean to say we are reacting as if the criticism is being directed at a person, not an effigy, then yeah, you're right.

A is for (Aimless), Monday, 25 September 2017 16:48 (six years ago) link

Well one poster compared her to an actual abuse victim because she has suffered the slings and arrows of the media.

Somewhere in the middle for me. The level of smearing and the amount of bile leveled at HRC since early 1992 is certainly unprecedented for an American female politician, if only because there was never a female politician at her level prior to the 90s. But it comes with the job. I voted for her, I fuckin wish she was President every day, but she can't help making these completely oblivious & self-centered observations stemming from her (understandable) persecution complex. She hasn't recognized that Clintonism is dead and gone, and young people are becoming increasingly more leftist, especially since she lost the election. HRC losing to Trump demonstrated to so many that Clintonism & Obama compromise-style politics ain't gonna cut it anymore.

flappy bird, Monday, 25 September 2017 17:36 (six years ago) link

If you are actually being persecuted all of the time, it is patently unfair to call it a "persecution complex".

Marcus Hiles Remains Steadfast About Planting Trees.jpg (DJP), Monday, 25 September 2017 17:38 (six years ago) link

You're right. Her paranoia is justified. & I can only imagine how that would cloud one's vision.

flappy bird, Monday, 25 September 2017 17:41 (six years ago) link

i would say the sitting president of the united states still using the idea of sending her to prison as a way to get the crowd riled up, still wanting to revisit that email/benghazi bullshit, etc, i don't think it's a complex yeah.

nomar, Monday, 25 September 2017 17:43 (six years ago) link

the level of smearing and the amount of bile leveled at HRC since early 1992 is certainly unprecedented for an American female politician, and was basically destined to be early on for the first woman who had the spine to run for president for real in a country as bigoted, class-riven, and sexist as the US. mrga

reggie (qualmsley), Monday, 25 September 2017 18:00 (six years ago) link

Shirley Chisholm might have taken issue with the second half of that sentence.

shirley chisholm would have proudly voted for hillary clinton

reggie (qualmsley), Monday, 25 September 2017 18:16 (six years ago) link

i'm about halfway through reminck's essay (which i'm surprised no one anywhere is talking about) and while it's convincing me that i do not need to read the book, i do feel a little bad for her.

k3vin k., Monday, 25 September 2017 18:19 (six years ago) link

i feel bad for all of us that the russians colluded with hillary's seditious, senile opponent and hacked our election. the whole thing is still so fucked up

reggie (qualmsley), Monday, 25 September 2017 18:21 (six years ago) link

sedition, now that just brings the 1790s back in an instant

ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Monday, 25 September 2017 18:22 (six years ago) link

I think that's more than a bit presumptuous xp

it is necessary to assume the election was lost fairly

imago, Monday, 25 September 2017 18:28 (six years ago) link

also as bad as trump is hillary is no saint

reggie (qualmsley), Monday, 25 September 2017 18:47 (six years ago) link

I meant presumptuous to assume Chisholm would support Clinton. She certainly would have wanted a female president but Clinton is not in line with her politics.


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.