brexit negging when yr mandate is is trash: or further chronicles of a garbage-fire

"Lol! things can actually get worse than this!"

dude the EU has totally done a stand-up job on protecting us from the worst ravages of Austrian economics

The worst is not so long as we can say 'this is the worst', of course. But it's a tough message to get over to people for whom things are plenty shit already, as the referendum demonstrated.

tell that to people with terminal illnesses who have been put on ESA by PIP assessors. "Lol! things can actually get worse than this!"

explain to me how we repair our social care system when the economy has crashed post-Brexit. I know this thread is just a kneejerk backslap zingfest, but please explain it to me.

just print some fookin' money idk. The point I'm making is life couldn't get any worse for some people. My partner is going to a PIP appeal on monday herself, so i am not just being a zingy bastard. it was a heartfelt barb at remoaner type messaging. But ftr I did vote Remain and was against the ref.

And tbr, the cruelty of the current benefits regime is nothing to do with scarcity of resources

calzino, sorry if i sounded like a cunt and i'm enraged on your behalf for what your partner is going through. my dad had the same condition and i can't imagine what it would have been like to have had to deal with it in the current landscape.

the eu has many, many faults, but we are fuckedfuckedfucked outside of it. societies generally don't make decisions that benefit their most vulnerable when their economies collapse.

I don't think there are many ardent Brexiteers on this board, but like I've said before there is something a little irksome about the way some people in other spheres of public discourse have thrown their toys out of the pram over this one thing in a way that I've never seen them do over near 40 years of the country being turned into a Friedmanite hellscape. and that's one reason why the kneejerk zings get zung.

One reason why leaving the EU *might* benefit a Corbyn government would be freedom from EU rules preventing central banks from lending directly to government, which could enable them to pursue a more activist economic policy encouraging job creation etc. If there was a hole in the Labour campaign last time, it was the question "how will you create jobs?", particularly in areas like the post-industrial Midlands where the Corbyn surge didn't really happen. This is an area where left-wing parties tend to struggle and having more levers to pull would help.

The alternative of course is that too much money is printed at once and we end up in an inflation spiral.

Ultimately the change in public attitudes re: Brexit hasn't really happened yet, the public needs to stare properly into the abyss and appreciate that it's doing so in order for their to be any democratic legitimacy for the "stop Brexit" brigade. That just hasn't happened yet.

there is something a little irksome about the way some people in other spheres of public discourse have thrown their toys out of the pram over this one thing in a way that I've never seen them do over near 40 years of the country being turned into a Friedmanite hellscape

FWIW I don't think there are many (if any) of those people on this board.

me neither, it's why I said elsewhere. but that Remoaner vibe does infect public discourse and does drag class into the argument in damaging ways. your previous post was otm.

also obviously I include cheerleaders for Blair and Brown and their governments as being contributors to the Friedmanite hellscape

something a little irksome about the way some people in other spheres of public discourse have thrown their toys out of the pram over this one thing in a way that I've never seen them do over near 40 years of the country being turned into a Friedmanite hellscape

I might be one of those people, so, I think it's just because it was such a sudden thing (easier to pinpoint the moment than 40 years of cumulative decline)

plus idk I am not super politically or economically literate or eloquent or persuasive, so in the past my level of political debate has been (12-year-old voice) "w-well I think <Thatcher / Blair's PFI deals / war in Iraq / bank bailouts / austerity / etc> is wrong and bad and based on lies and we should be nice to people!" and then the reply is "no, you're wrong and bad and based on lies!" or "lol commie" or "you can't just print money so we need to make people suffer, they probably deserve it anyway" and I'm not really smart enough to formulate a persuasive comeback

not that I am saying I have formulated any persuasive comebacks re Brexit, but it's an easier target, and easier to find a bubble for some communal toy-throwing and back-patting, I guess

I appreciate Brexit will have drastic consequences on the UK economy. But I can't bring myself to be as EU positive as mr Bragg, and in the hypocritical position of being extremely anti-austerity (but just in the UK - and fuck our friends in Greece etc). 10 years ago I probably would go weeks without even having a thought about the EU or how people live in it's poorer countries. But due to many experiences things done changed in me since then and I am not trying to be captain virtuous, but I get genuinely pissed at how people at the bottom bear the brunt of failed capitalism.

starting to feel a bit like we're back where we started. tories in power and labour arguing with each other. as much as everyone talks about how shaky the government is, it's not hard to imagine this going on for some time.

But I can't bring myself to be as EU positive as mr Bragg

You know what Lib Dems are like.

starting to feel a bit like we're back where we started. tories in power and labour arguing with each other. as much as everyone talks about how shaky the government is, it's not hard to imagine this going on for some time.

The big difference is the level of authority held by both leaders.

starting to feel a bit like we're back where we started. tories in power and labour arguing with each other and another n months of settling down and hoping that one or other party is secretly planning not to be 100% completely country-destroyingly Hard Batshit despite all their public announcements and most other evidence, because that's all you can do

hope it turns out better than the "May actually has some very cunning softer Brexit cards up her sleeve which she's fabulously misdirecting away from" theory

sorry I should stop talking about Brexit tho yes

btw an example of being frustrated by economic illiteracy/ineloquence: everyone bangs on abt how Labour would borrow and spend and 1. that's bad and 2. the Tories don't do just that and then just give it to their mates instead of public services or stimulating the wider economy

I'm p. sure 1 and 2 are annoyingly false but I don't feel safe enough to talk about it in case they go "ha-HA, explain to me some fancy economics-type words and draw me a graph of the spending deficit and the national debt over the past 30 years" and I'd have to go, "actually, I like using words but I don't really know what they mean or any numbers, bye"

perhaps it's just that I live in Oxford and occasionally meet a strain of very debating society Tory that loves to demolish anyone not using a word quite right and then deflect all actual points with strawmanning and whataboutery before going to talk to someone who looks more profitable to network with

" a strain of very debating society Tory that loves to demolish anyone not using a word quite right and then deflect all actual points with strawmanning and whataboutery before going to talk to someone who looks more profitable to network with"
lol, ain't that the truth!

Some of the very good stuff within Corbyn's manifesto wouldn't even be allowed without at least changing our relationship with the EU is another thing I was thinking but didn't manage to get into my last post, because it would probably take me 2 hours to write a neat and succinct Matt DC style paragraph!

wd just handwave those guys away with "fuck you, the whole thing needs rebuilding, for the many not the few blah blah gulags blah blah"

I don't meet many people as described in a passing spacecadet's post, but it makes me think of Nick Robinson, or maybe just most of the BBC's political crew!

oh the flashbacks

nick robinson had peter dowd mp shadow chief secretary to the treasury on the today programme this week and got him to repeat what the note left by liam byrne mp said :)

Like that whole 'there's no money' note hasn't been left by each exiting cabinet secretary since the '60s - these people know this and it's disingenuous of our Nick Robinsons to pretend otherwise.

by-election statements by hereditary lords are a gift that gives much: https://www.parliament.uk/documents/lords-information-office/2017/Arrangements-by-election-30-06-17.pdf

perhaps it's just that I live in Oxford and occasionally meet a strain of very debating society Tory that loves to demolish anyone not using a word quite right and then deflect all actual points with strawmanning and whataboutery before going to talk to someone who looks more profitable to network with

I know this type. Absolute rotters.

E.g. Rees Mogg telling John Snow that the election wasn't a shambles as a shambles is a butcher's slaughterhouse "I'm surprised you didn't know" - just googled that to remind myself of the details and the Express's headline on it says that "Snow receives a classic Rees Mogg tongue lashing".

Do this enough and then turn round and say 'we're tired of experts'

The strategy of it all is so wearying

Snow should have told Rees Mogg that he is totally ace and then added the big debating society style take-down - and that's an acronym for "a crap effort".

Well it would be just as witty and relevant as Mogg's "tongue lashing"!

E.g. Rees Mogg telling John Snow that the election wasn't a shambles as a shambles is a butcher's slaughterhouse "I'm surprised you didn't know" - just googled that to remind myself of the details and the Express's headline on it says that "Snow receives a classic Rees Mogg tongue lashing".

― Heavy Doors (jed_), Friday, June 30, 2017 11:10 AM (fifty-eight minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

jesus.

politicians should just start doing that with journos all the time

journo: this is a watershed moment for your government?
pol: no because a watershed is a dividing line that separates draining basins, I'm surprised you don't know that

It's sort of classic cunt behaviour, in that it's verbal pedantry from a party that loves to erode the meaning of words

e.g. if they're going to get specific about 'shambles' why do they get away with 'extremism', 'british values', etc

Tbf that kind of thing can feel delicious, at least temporarily, when done by one's own side.

IIRC, the hero of some Stephen Fry novel is met with a "poppycock!" from some stuck-up establishmentarianist, replies with "no, this is hard shit indeed", and then at the shocked mien of his opponent explains that the latter's invective comes from "pappe kak" ie "soft shit" in Dutch.

That is literally the only thing I remember from that book. Sorry for derail.

delicious poppycock

no you don't understand, poppage is the name of my cock!

delicious

mm-mm-mmm!

stephen fry is dreadful sorry

hi LJ! :D

As I said, sorry for derail.

To get us back on topic, it has come to my attention that Ian Lavery's sons are both donk DJs.

https://soundcloud.com/ianlavery11

https://soundcloud.com/ross-lavery-3

This absolutely enhances what was already a very good rep.

you know what they wanna do with the next Labour manifesto, right?

reverse Psychoactive Substances Act and legalise spice and m-cat again?

"Wimbledon warns supporters against political chants and slogans amid fears of outbreak of Henmanism Corbynism"

me since 10pm june 8th

Politic's is back baby. It's good again. Awoouu (wolf Howl)

— wint (@dril) February 18, 2015

wimbledon crowd surely rooting for chuka

Ed Balls please.