Len Deighton - ripe for rehabilitation?

I've got a couple of Amblers at home courtesy of my other half's father. Not started either yet but will report back (I'm reading one of those British Library crime thrillers which is at least fast-paced)

Epitaph for a Spy and Background to Danger are also good; all the pre-'45 stuff is variations on a theme, really.

i love ambler and he can kind of do no wrong, though i'd need to go over titles again to pick out ones that aren't in print but good. he's faster than anyone else i've ever read at setting things up with economy of dialogue, character strokes and scenery that i think should be obligatory study for any writer.

i sometimes go back and read the beginning of his books and think "you get *here* in *two pages*! how?!"

Here's the full Amis review mentioned in the Ambler story. Some good catty lines.

http://www.the-tls.co.uk/articles/public/kingsley-amis-licence-to-kill/

Ambler is wonderful: 1940s/50s stuff probably the best, but he doesn't ever lose the magic.

Finished Funeral in Berlin - sad to say I found it a bit of a slog, but I'm guessing the things I disliked are the exact things that Deighton's fans love about him: the stop/start plotting, the endless banter, the sense of never really knowing what's happening - it's like the spy version of Turn of the Screw.

Perhaps if all that had been tied to a more enjoyable sentence-writing style, I would've liked it more - but generally I found the prose a bit purple, and the jokey dialogue - although fun at first - sort of relentlessly hits the same larky note throughout. (As everyone else is as much of a wiseass as Harry, he stops standing out.)

THAT SAID I will try another one - first couple of chapters of Berlin Game are promising.

Good writeup here: https://astrofella.wordpress.com/2014/09/14/funeral-in-berlin-len-deighton/

What gives the novel its peculiarly Deightonesque quality, is that the narrator – who holds all the cards ie has his suspicions and is calculating the angles on all the scenarios mentioned above – does not share this knowledge with the reader. In this novel, as in Ipcress, it is only at the very, very end that any kind of order or pattern emerges from the events described, and then only in laconic conversations with his secretary or boss – and even this ‘final roundup’ still leaves holes in the narrative and motivation.

It's those "Deightonesque" qualities that lost me - but I can see why they'd be appealing to another reader.

God help me I kinda want to watch ITV get The Ipcress File wrong

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PT0yc_6J3FA

They should have remade it with Dennis Pennis as Palmer.

Who's the little twerp playing Harry Palmer?

The Michael Caine cosplay is a groaner

Didn't realise until now that Deighton drew and designed the cover for the first UK edition of On the Road

https://rarebooksleuth.com/collections/beats/products/on-the-road-jack-kerouac-first-u-k-edition-first-printing

https://thumbs.worthpoint.com/zoom/images1/1/0417/06/jack-kerouac-road-first-uk-edition_1_4b1589fe4aa5686349661b9aa45a3b85.jpg

ffs

https://i.imgur.com/f3Yzqvw.png

hahaha

https://i.imgur.com/f3Yzqvw.png

:-)

https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0515/8846/4815/products/kerouac_1296x.jpg?v=1611863986

... signed too!