Who will be the next American to win the Nobel Prize for Literature?

https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5522ccefe4b023edbe76f185/t/552914fbe4b0719b1e02e0f2/1428755709937/norman-wisdom-exhibition-1422980008_20141003-1740-Norman-Wisdom-1.jpg

johnny joey dee dee

Sadly no longer eligible but good suggestions.

Ken Nordine is still alive though.

... and Tom Lehrer.

xxps - from day 1 Dylan has appropriated without attribution, mixed the elements together and presented that shell to the outside world, like a virus mixing and matching the proteins on its surface to blend in with the host. The esteem in which he's held isn't his fault, nor is it a shell game by someone in a position of advantage. He's popular and lauded because he does it so well, like some kind of ur-folk-artist who refracts the mythology underpinning our culture into fascinating patterns. When the culture needs a winsome yokel troubadour, here he is. Socially conscious protest singer, check, back to the roots in a basement, yep, confessional self-lacerating introvert, man of faith, etc etc and on up to a catalyst for unifying "base" popular culture with highbrow academia via the most prestigious high-culture prize. Which he salts with the lowbrow everyman readings of the canon, as imposed on schoolchildren.
It's not an original thesis I know, but I honestly don't get the outrage at Dylan being absolutely consistent, and consistently brilliant, at cultural appropriation and distillation. It's what he does, it's what he has done from day 1. For me it's an incredible achievement, and in a sly backhanded way absolutely deserves the Nobel.

Dude...

You write as if Dylan invented appropriation.

Or stealing from sparknotes.

Yeah I agree with all of that.

n.b. I work at an independent bookstore, and the people there are pretty serious about working at an independent bookstore, and they mostly think Dylan should have his Nobel taken away for the plagiarism.

I mean I agree with MatthewK

Not Mr B

The main (fanatical) Dylan fan I know was all lolwot? when he heard about him getting the Nobel Prize.

... before Fred tars all Dylan fans with the same brush.

The best part of Dylan is that he is *both* a cultural shapeshifter/postmodern trickster spitting Americana back at us in refracted, magical forms, *and* a genuinely brilliant, empathetic writer and songwriter whose words have meant as much to me as anyone else's. I am slightly weirded out by the plagiarism stuff, but I can't deny that Chronicles was an incredible reading experience. There was an immediacy and presence in the narration that seemed stunning to me in 2005 when I read it, having known Dylan previously through his cryptic songwriting. The fact that this voice, this vivid, present, humane and human voice was a collage of plagiarism is just... whoa.

Like, the chronicles plagiarism was, if nothing else, fucking weird. The narrative seemed so seamless and genuine.

I get the same thing from The Waste Land, and the best parts of the Cantos, so I know the feeling.

I don't think that the Sparknotes plagiarism is some kind of "easter egg". It's just Dylan being Dylan - someone's who's never been afraid to steal from high and low and any place in between - and most likely not someone overly concerned about scholarly standards for attribution. I thought it was an okay speech before the Sparknotes thing broke, and I think it's an okay speech now. I thought his Musicares speech at the Grammy's a couple years ago was better. Is it a better speech than I could do? Hell yeah. But judging Dylan based on the quality of a speech is almost as weird as, I dunno, giving him a prize for literature?

Frederik, never claimed originality, in fact quite the opposite would be the obvious conclusion to draw! I think the T. S. Eliot comparison is useful except for Dylan's vivid human qualities which I think TSE kept at arm's length.

And Treeship OTM - anyway we are all just a collage of culture and reference, it's not like we invented the words we speak.

Where were you guys when melania trump needed you?

lol

dang

I'd believe a "blackhearted gesture asserting nothing matters" coming from the Trump campaign.

URL doesn't seem to work but the piece from New Republic was a nice kinda funny round-up. We can safely assume no Americans will win. Or should we etc.

Sergo Pitol would be my favourite from the very obscure list. He's great.

https://68.media.tumblr.com/avatar_b6d87f043c25_128.png

The next American winner of the Nobel *heart emoji*

My fucking lord

They've managed to be worse than last year.

mark s otm

He's written one book I thought was excellent (When We Were Orphans), one I enjoyed despite its flaws (Never Let Me Go). The other two I've read have been two out of the three books I've given up on in the last 15 years (The Unconsoled and The Buried Giant, the latter was almost unreadable).

"who, in novels of great emotional force, has uncovered the abyss beneath our illusory sense of connection with the world".

I've only read Never Let Me Go. I didn't even know he was on the radar for a Nobel.

I threw Never Let Me Go across the room on two different occasions.

it was a sudden change of plans when tom petty died.

He's written one book I thought was excellent (When We Were Orphans), one I enjoyed despite its flaws (Never Let Me Go). The other two I've read have been two out of the three books I've given up on in the last 15 years (The Unconsoled and The Buried Giant, the latter was almost unreadable).

His rep mainly rests on the 3 books not mentioned here tho

The only novel of his I loved was THE REMAINS OF THE DAY, which is almost at the level of THE GOOD SOLDIER as a novel about ironic withholding of info.

the butler didn't do it

http://mobile.eurweb.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/forest-whitaker-lee-daniels-the-butler.jpg

I wrote a snarky little article about 10 years ago telling people to put £20 on him getting the nobel because he was the kind of writer who wins prizes. Was thinking just a couple of weeks ago how wrong that seemed now, but, well, good on him. And good intuition, younger dumber me.

God I am no good for this world take me now thanks.

Is it just me or is this not a bit, um, up itself? pic.twitter.com/EjRiT125hZ

— Ally Fogg (@AllyFogg) October 5, 2017

The only novel of his I loved was THE REMAINS OF THE DAY, which is almost at the level of THE GOOD SOLDIER as a novel about ironic withholding of info.

― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, October 5, 2017 2:55 PM (nine hours ago)

yes, this is a perfect book imo. was assigned it in high school (oddly enough) and reread it a couple years ago and thought it held up beautifully. not a single wrong note.

No lit Nobel this year because of a sexual assault scandal

Kanye is going to be bitterly disappointed.

2018: Polish writer Olga Tokarczuk
2019: Austrian writer Peter Handke

They're never going to change, are they?

Lol

They had to give one of these to a woman so they choose someone who has just started being published in English recently. Usually the winners are in some kind of conversation for a long time before being awarded by their weird obscure process. It's just as much of a reveal as Handle's win.

Everybody loves Peter Handke, the Austrian Nobel laureate who likes to explore the periphery and the specificity of human experience! [shortly] We regret to inform you that Peter Handke is Frank Furedi in a vampire mask and will be appearing on the Moral Maze this week

— 1st International Paul Crowther Brigade (@pdkmitchell) October 10, 2019

Hey at least it wasn't the Peace Prize

The Swedes don't really care whether it's published in English or not. She's been translated into Swedish regularly since 2002.

yeah I don't really get xyzzzz's post

we had to read "offending the audience" in high school, good times.