Power to the peo-POLL: The John Lennon Hits Poll

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (78 of them)

damn right. i still love the bit in the 1988 Imagine film where he's playing it on piano for the first time, to those 2 geezers who's names escape me i'm sorry to say. it's really fallen off the radar that film, i think it got crushed under the weight of 'Anthology'.

piscesx, Thursday, 15 June 2017 13:01 (six years ago) link

About the credits, if Lennon thought she deserved to get some, why didn't he change them at the time ?
I would have been easy since he's the only one credited... and he had 10y to do it...

AlXTC from Paris, Thursday, 15 June 2017 13:11 (six years ago) link

Probably because she's been collecting the royalties as heir to them, so it makes no direct financial difference.

Mark G, Thursday, 15 June 2017 13:14 (six years ago) link

hmm. these changes (like the mccartney-lennon inversion) so long after one of the main person concerned has passed seem a bit uncalled for imo.
especially since they won't change anything financially.

AlXTC from Paris, Thursday, 15 June 2017 13:40 (six years ago) link

They extend the copyright, reportedly.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 15 June 2017 13:43 (six years ago) link

ah ok, THAT is a good reason !
same for the mccartney/lennon, then, I suppose.

AlXTC from Paris, Thursday, 15 June 2017 13:52 (six years ago) link

copyright extended 70 years after death of last heir

the Rain Man of nationalism. (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 15 June 2017 14:04 (six years ago) link

oh then that doesn't change anything, then...

AlXTC from Paris, Thursday, 15 June 2017 14:09 (six years ago) link

That's not how creative copyright works, is it? It's not the heir, it's 70 years after the death of its author. From the Washington Post:

Adding Ono to the credits of “Imagine” is significant in part because it would extend the amount of time the song would be able to reap income for its creators, as Variety pointed out. A song enters the public domain 70 years after the death of its last songwriter.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 15 June 2017 14:14 (six years ago) link

So adding Yoko extends the copyright by at least 37 years.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 15 June 2017 14:15 (six years ago) link

also on the subject of her influence; the original design of the 1964 Grapefruit isn't.. a million miles away from a certain album

https://www.manhattanrarebooks.com/pictures/1079.jpg

piscesx, Thursday, 15 June 2017 15:27 (six years ago) link

That's not how creative copyright works, is it? It's not the heir, it's 70 years after the death of its author. From the Washington Post:

Adding Ono to the credits of “Imagine” is significant in part because it would extend the amount of time the song would be able to reap income for its creators, as Variety pointed out. A song enters the public domain 70 years after the death of its last songwriter.

― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 15 June 2017 14:14 (two hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Ah ha HA!

Which also explains why "Happy Birthday to you" wasn't supposed to come out of copyright until 2030, despite its original authors writing it in 1893. Because it got 'reassigned' to some other people in 1933 or something. (They packed all that in, you can sing it for free now)

Mark G, Thursday, 15 June 2017 17:06 (six years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.