itt: pictures of dinosaurs gazing haplessly at the arriving meteor

i am not being allowed post a picture of a flaming asteroid falling on two dinosaurs doing it on a giant ocean-bound cheese

http://pre00.deviantart.net/08cb/th/pre/f/2016/138/5/0/duiarn_by_chiiaros-da2zf4o.png

https://cdn.drawception.com/images/panels/2015/3-4/fmXZZMs6ON-6.png

https://demonsresume.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/night-of-the-comet.jpg

http://t03.deviantart.net/mI78Zg5CpZvx-3xmYqu5n5EooYo=/fit-in/700x350/filters:fixed_height(100,100):origin()/pre13/c7b2/th/pre/i/2011/288/4/2/three_dinosaurs_and_a_meteor_by_duderoth-d4cxij0.png

CGI ones are all dud

Kid-drawn ones all classic

excellent thread mark

http://cdn.nlgeek-bogatovka.savviihq.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/extinction_dino.jpg.61a6d06296e91a206a3de57c7617e206-620x315.jpg

http://www.donaldedavis.com/PARTS/wavepic.jpeghttp://www.donaldedavis.com/PARTS/K-TCLOSE.jpg

http://www.history.com/s3static/video-thumbnails/AETN-History_VMS/806/291/History_Ask_History_Dinosaurs_SF_HD_1104x622-16x9.jpg

face-hugger an intriguing addition there

could be dreads

dinodreads

If that meteor had come just half a minute later, it would have hit somewhere in either the Atlantic or Pacific. Either location would have made some killer waves (literally), but at least it wouldn’t have killed as many dinos.

http://www.popsci.com/

I don't think this one's appeared yet

http://yucatanexpatlife.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/crateristock700.jpg

kind of a "Houses of the Holy" vibe to it imo

CGI ones are all dud

― Never changed username before (cardamon), Friday, 19 May 2017 14:32 (one hour ago)

sorry you feel that way. imho CGI stock images have an eerie, hyperreal quality that perfectly suits the subject matter

http://i.imgur.com/9VMDZfp.jpg

For sheer verisimilitude, I prefer the photos taken at the time. Unfortunately the resolution tends to be poor because camera technology was very rudimentary.

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/originals/9e/5f/f5/9e5ff561d13d23704544abb2ea9580ee.jpg

What were the dominant theories of dino extinction before the asteroid version took hold? Apparently it was first posited in the 50s but hard evidence didn't turn up til 1980? It's what I grew up with... just was wondering if generic dino picture books from 1955 (with, one imagines, great hand-painted illustrations) would have gone with the meteor or something more boring.

https://preview.ibb.co/gYhrFv/asteroids.jpg

inspired by my parents recent unironic trip to the creation museum, where apparently this (minus the poster) is a real exhibit

i have mine and my dad's (and one of my grandad's) dinosaur books in storage -- they all have great pictures but no big theories of extinction that i remember, it wasn't really an issue (catastrophism only came back in fashion in the 1980s)

i should post some photos from them

there isn't a meteor in the dinosaur sequence from Fantasia iirc? It just gets really hot and dry, then they all die.

iirc one of the theories in the 70's was "the mammals ate all the eggs"

some earlier theories here

http://www.history.com/topics/why-did-the-dinosaurs-die-out

going off by what i learnt over 15 years ago but wasn't it a meteor and climate change that caused their extinction?

oh pre-that i think one was flatulance wasn't it?

shouldn't rely on comedy skits to teach me stuff tho

http://www.sciencephoto.com/image/843180/530wm/F0181247-End_of_cretaceous_KT_event%2C_illustration-SPL.jpg

https://s3media.247sports.com/Uploads/Assets/802/508/508802.jpg

http://www.doodydoodles.com/sitebuilder/images/EPOCH_FAIL-585x462.jpg

the very early theories of what created fossils tended to be semi-bibilical: that they were bones of creatures that hadn't survived the flood (or perhaps more than one flood, or some kind of catastrophic upheaval, there were various ideas)

dinosaurs were named as a species a couple of decades before darwin's published the origin of species and by the time they were being sought and taxonomised in number, the darwinist orthodoxy was gradualism rather than catastrophes (stephen jay gould wrote several interesting essays on this, not least bcz he thought that "punctuated equilibrium" was the process: in other words not a pure gradualism)

the alvarez thesis was a big deal, in 1980 -- not least bcz it got caught up by the anti-nuclear movement, who extrapolated the idea of nuclear winter from the alvarez proposal, that vast clouds of dust kicked up by the comet/asteroid had blotted out sunlight for decades, shifting the climate

shifting the climate

― mark s, Friday, May 19, 2017 1:24 PM (three minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

read this as shitting the climate

so what i remember from dad's books that he had as a kid is just that people handwaved the vanishing of the dinosaurs as ordinary evolution over a very long time and climate shifts maybe caused by varitions in the sun's brightness or whatever

(they also often had maps of the landmasses in various eras -- pangeaa and gondwanaland etc -- but continental drift wasn't established as the general scientific consensus until the mid-60s, so they handwaved how prehistoric animals had crossed large oceans with "vegetable mats", and draw in the likely routes the mats must have taken, across from africa to south america and so on: dad was a naturalist, more focused on plants than animals, but he said the conference where the consensus changed was a huge deal, lots of ppl went to it thinking they were the only ones who really believed in continental drift, and then they all realised everyone else had started believing it also, and the episteme changed overnight, and a lot of older naturalists basically retired as the embittered old school… he may have been dramatising a bit, but it was a very fast shift)

(the key new evidence came from sonar, invented in ww2, being used to map the ocean beds in the 50s and all the volcanic rifts which are the motor of the movement)

http://www.littlestuffedbull.com/images/2012/addamskindle/addams12.jpg

and that's how unicorns were born

according to Mr. Freeze in "Batman and Robin", it was the ice age that killed the dinosaurs

the permian was a much slower event than the cretaceous wipeout, but for some reason it's imagery scares me more. The anoxic oceans where 95% of life was wiped out and the bacteria dense pondwater giving the planet a sickly pink glow from space. And just the idea of choking to death in a nightmare hothouse world.

Yeah some of the CGI ones are alright but still prefer kid-drawn and lovingly hand-painted

I remember 'mammals ate the eggs' and flatulence - also pictures of large predatory dinosaurs always stood up on two legs roaring into the air

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicxulub_crater

currently popular theory is this crater's time of impact lines up well with the major extinction period

(they also often had maps of the landmasses in various eras -- pangeaa and gondwanaland etc -- but continental drift wasn't established as the general scientific consensus until the mid-60s,

Did not know this - but they were aware of the landmasses having been in different place from I suppose sea-creature fossils found on land?

wegener had proposed continental drift back in 1912 -- based on the way africa so obviously fits into south america, and many other less obvious tesselations and geological similarities between jigsawed pieces -- but no one could think of a mechanism for the plates to move, as the whole crust was assumed to be solid, and the idea wasn't taken up

http://pre09.deviantart.net/f64d/th/pre/i/2015/117/9/9/dinosaur_extinction_by_sriramgubbi-d8r97qa.jpg

http://www.michaelbloodmeteorites.com/CKTEvent.jpg

http://www.michaelbloodmeteorites.com/CWetumpkaNo2Giclee16x20.jpg

Always has to be at least two animal species on display

haha otm

long detailed essay in the rise of interest in exploring reasons why dinosaurs became extinct: http://palaeo.gly.bris.ac.uk/Essays/Dino90.html

author puts the turning point at the start of the 1970s

wait what happened in the 1970s that killed dinos

Glam rock.