RAdiohead

I didn't think I was being vicious. I was actually trying to discuss some of the things around the music that was being described. why was [x] song the 'angriest' what made it angry in the first place. Sure, I didn't hear the music but there is the music and then there is the 'matter' that surrounds it. and i have heard radiohead...

also, are there a set of chords which make music mournful and why do they keep doing it over and over...

I was honestly curious about some of these descriptions and just trying to get some discussion but I think the way i put things in a bad way and i accept that.

Julio- I wish the fleas of a 1000 reindeer nestle in your genitals

that is all.

I appreciated your descriptions, Mel. It's helpful because I know a little about your taste & have seen some of your writing so I have an idea where you're coming from. Where would you place these new songs in the context of the last three albums? Is there a place where they "fit," in terms of production, mood, etc?

Yeah I wonder!!!!

Lyrically it's the same ground as the previous two; oblique, cryptic phrases, dealing with some vague non-specific dread. You know.

that is all.''

heh. forget about being nice and civil for now. Posting under our own names would be a start...

uh this is my real name.. as much of one as you need to know- would posting 'Paul' be any more informative?.. and it was all in fun really... well, mostly at least.

that would be 'indie' love then (lurve is too 'black' and therefore not allowed heh). Indie love= I slap her but I do not tell I'm in love with her (because i do not know how).

As far as my friends and I can determine, this request came from a girl that we refer to as "asscrack girl". Her real name has yet to be determined.

if you did such thing I might actually come out on top after yesterday. Though ppl don't like doomie I think.

Melissa's been hanging with J-Lo, kewl.

In other words what I'm asking is please don't threaten to delete anything, and please don't delete anything either unless it falls into the (pretty tight) guidelines you know about as a moderator. People should be civil on web boards because they want to be not because they're told to be.

I actually sort of agree, though I do think that the songs themselves are good too.

well, the nanny state thing was a joke but it's what Graham's threat to ban me deserved (I did keep quiet for quite a while, its when ppl started commenting on the fact that he threatened to delete ILM that I thought i should say something).

I still made an attempt to defend myself.

''Oh yeah FWIW I agree that Julio was being an arsehole and that if Mel felt hurt by it it's his fault not hers.''

Whatever I say I have to take full responsibility for. I was an arsehole for the way I put things, I should have just made a couple of general comments and asked a question and left it at that. If i had to turn the clock back I would have still asked it.

Fair enough! Which is exactly why you should leave the generally thankless work of moderating it to other people :)

I think of them as a band, just not a very good one.

They really do cease to be "Radiohead" the moment they get offstage.

What do you mean by this? Are Thom Yorke and Jonny Greenwood playing against each other on guitars in alternate tunings? Whacking at their strings with screwdrivers? Or is it something in the singing? It sounds interesting.