Not all messages are displayed:
show all messages (137 of them)
The main difference between Dadrock/britpop has to be that the former doesn't stretch to the art school/glam end of the latter (Pulp), nor the punkier stuff like Elastica. Supergrass would borderline perhaps? The second album displays definite dadrock tendencies, it sounds like a conscious attempt to aim for some sort of rock classicism. (Good record though). Not sure about Blur though.
― Gavin in Leeds, Friday, 1 May 2009 08:31 (fourteen years ago) link
Dadrock i dont think meant bands that dads were into, it meant kids making retro music that sounded like the bands dads listened to from 20+ years ago. So the actual 60/70s bands weren't "dadrock"
Obviously with mojo and Q jumping on the bandwagon some dads did get into 90s stuff because they sounded like the bands from their youth.
― pfunkboy (Herman G. Neuname), Friday, 1 May 2009 12:21 (fourteen years ago) link
No. If Jimmy Buffet is dadrock, I hate dadrock.
Jimmy Buffet is something else. Something horrible and lame.
― Daniel, Esq., Saturday, 2 May 2009 17:28 (fourteen years ago) link
I know a couple of 30-something dudes who like Animal Collective. I don't feel uncool in the slightest for thinking they're turd.
― Sickamous Mouthall (Scik Mouthy), Thursday, 30 April 2009 15:18 (2 days ago) Permalink
Ed III, Ned, Southall OTMFM
― sorry for british (country matters), Thursday, 30 April 2009 15:20 (2 days ago) Permalink
THANKS for that opinion!
I had missed it the previous 20 times it was posted.
and well done Robin for bringing up the rear with the hell ditto yet once more.
― fandango, Saturday, 2 May 2009 17:35 (fourteen years ago) link
go on, tell us how overrated Nirvana and Radiohead are again please. Vintage Challops 10 years+, serve without "cool".
― fandango, Saturday, 2 May 2009 17:44 (fourteen years ago) link
nine years pass...