Star Trek: Classic or Dud?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (3720 of them)

(xpost to Shakey)

Tuomas, Monday, 6 February 2017 17:16 (seven years ago) link

right they'd have to re-edit the entire thing from the original film (assuming they still have it) and then re-do all the effects - an insane amount of time and money and effort

Οὖτις, Monday, 6 February 2017 17:20 (seven years ago) link

the actual DS9 live footage only exists on videotape and there is no original material on film.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Monday, 6 February 2017 17:20 (seven years ago) link

Yeah, but that's exactly what they did with TNG. Which was my point.

(xpost)

Tuomas, Monday, 6 February 2017 17:21 (seven years ago) link

TNG had original footage on film though, which made upscaling possible.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Monday, 6 February 2017 17:23 (seven years ago) link

or not upscaling but hi-res capture

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Monday, 6 February 2017 17:23 (seven years ago) link

the actual DS9 live footage only exists on videotape and there is no original material on film.

If this was the case, they could never remaster it on HD. As the guy interviewed in the article says it's possible, only very expensive, they still must have the the (non-effect) shots filmed in storage somewhere.

Tuomas, Monday, 6 February 2017 17:23 (seven years ago) link

In storage on film, I mean.

Tuomas, Monday, 6 February 2017 17:24 (seven years ago) link

ok, so you're saying they still shot some live aciton for DS9 on film a la TNG but the final edit was just to video, unlike TNG. i can see that.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Monday, 6 February 2017 17:26 (seven years ago) link

I think the real headline here is they had to bend over backward to remaster TNG and then priced individual seasons at $118 on release in order to keep their profit margins in line with other releases

mh 😏, Monday, 6 February 2017 17:27 (seven years ago) link

Yeah, that seems to be the case.

(xpost)

Tuomas, Monday, 6 February 2017 17:28 (seven years ago) link

I like Star Trek but there have to be a handful of people on the planet who'd pay over $100 for a single season on blu-ray disc. And some of those people are also the ones complaining how the crystalline entity doesn't look right now, and probably bought it just so they could make that complaint.

mh 😏, Monday, 6 February 2017 17:29 (seven years ago) link

_just_ a handful of people, that is

mh 😏, Monday, 6 February 2017 17:29 (seven years ago) link

The TNG Blurays weren't that expensive. They cost something like 40 euros per season, I remember thinking it was fairly cheap for 24 remastered episodes + hours of extra material.

Tuomas, Monday, 6 February 2017 17:30 (seven years ago) link

I mean, they cost that when they were originally released. Nowadays they must be even cheaper?

Tuomas, Monday, 6 February 2017 17:30 (seven years ago) link

Ok, I checked it, and I paid something between 30 and 55 euros per season for them, and I was buying them as soon as they came out. 55 euros must've been the standard price, but they often had special offers right away.

Tuomas, Monday, 6 February 2017 17:36 (seven years ago) link

ty for your support

mh 😏, Monday, 6 February 2017 17:42 (seven years ago) link

No prob.

Tuomas, Monday, 6 February 2017 19:01 (seven years ago) link

they're also all on netflix ain't they?

Nhex, Tuesday, 7 February 2017 01:52 (seven years ago) link

ok, so you're saying they still shot some live aciton for DS9 on film a la TNG but the final edit was just to video, unlike TNG. i can see that.

No, the final cut on both was to video - they went back to the uncut film negatives of TNG and remade every episode from the ground up. DS9 would require the same process but with even more CGI work and it's cost-prohibitive since it's even less popular than TNG (which may not have recouped the cost of the remaster) and disc sales have continued to decline over time. All it would take is one crazy billionaire to drop $40 million of his pocket change into sponsoring the project - maybe Peter Thiel could earn back some goodwill?

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Tuesday, 7 February 2017 02:44 (seven years ago) link

I'm surprised that TNG was shot on film.

akm, Tuesday, 7 February 2017 02:52 (seven years ago) link

all the '90s trek shows have the filmic look even with the fx

Nhex, Tuesday, 7 February 2017 05:38 (seven years ago) link

I'm pretty sure that, before digital cameras, most bigger-budget American TV shows were always shot on film? And videotape was mostly used on cheaper productions, like soap operas, talk shows, and lower-budget sitcoms? I don't know so much about technicalities of it, but shows shot on film certainly have a different look on them (especially when it comes to lighting), and you could see that even with old tube televisions. So if they a high enough budget to allow shooting on film, I think most shows opted for that to give them a more classy/cinematic look.

Tuomas, Tuesday, 7 February 2017 07:28 (seven years ago) link

I just wanted to show off my new deep-cut display name.

Dr. MC Selar (Leee), Tuesday, 14 February 2017 19:02 (seven years ago) link

three weeks pass...

I'm easily amused:
http://scrolldowntoriker.com/
https://twitter.com/RikerGoogling

And must watch just for Gates McFadden dancing at the beginning:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_vT5Al3DGLs

Downtown Julie Mau (Leee), Thursday, 9 March 2017 00:54 (seven years ago) link

wow. i love how they're all seemingly very drunk at these things.
and goddamn, levar burton is old!

Nhex, Thursday, 9 March 2017 04:00 (seven years ago) link

not as old (possibly) as rene auberjonois (odo) who I just saw in a film convincingly playing a 76 year old with nascent dementia.

brekekekexit collapse collapse (ledge), Thursday, 9 March 2017 18:34 (seven years ago) link

wow. i love how they're all seemingly very drunk at these things.

Yes, these things always seem like such a blast. I don't know if it's in that particular vid (the panel is split into 3 Youtubes), but when the moderator mentions "Yesterday's Enterprise", lolz at the cast members going, "Is that the one with time traveling? Oh, and Tasha Yar's sister!"

Downtown Julie Mau (Leee), Thursday, 9 March 2017 22:15 (seven years ago) link

I saw this last weekend, it was p great. My favorite piece was the fake cereal box tbh.

http://www.chabotspace.org/startrek

Οὖτις, Thursday, 9 March 2017 22:29 (seven years ago) link

i've been working through DS9 for the first time and just saw "the visitor" for the first time, and holy shit what a gut wrenching episode. i knew the episode was special when it managed to bring me to tears a couple of times.

sure the frame story was a bit cheesy at time, but it's definitely the best episode i've seen by far

just another (diamonddave85), Friday, 10 March 2017 15:50 (seven years ago) link

Candyman brings it.

Jeff, Friday, 10 March 2017 15:52 (seven years ago) link

the visitor is total classic

ciderpress, Friday, 10 March 2017 16:33 (seven years ago) link

Yeah, it's grand. Soon after this first broadcast I stopped regularly watching both then-current series -- my interests were starting to drift elsewhere, in combination with me moving into what was the final phase of my increasingly stress-filled grad school life -- and aside from an idle eye on the movies I've never really 'returned' to Trek in full. But having this as a bit of an unplanned send-off was lovely.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 10 March 2017 16:54 (seven years ago) link

one month passes...

I started (re)watching a few Voyager episodes, and either I've had bad luck picking the episodes or the series was simply terrible. (I'm being rhetorical here.) The forced bonhomie is what bothers me the worst -- you've got Starfleet and former Maquis together on the same ship and marooned light-decades away from home, yet it's a big corny-joke making family.

...and DON'T *bleeep* IT UP! (Leee), Tuesday, 11 April 2017 19:16 (seven years ago) link

terrible show

watching a few TOS episodes a week w/my daughter has been a real pleasure

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 11 April 2017 19:17 (seven years ago) link

just watch all the bryan fuller-written eps of voyager and you're good

clouds, Tuesday, 11 April 2017 23:51 (seven years ago) link

Bashir-Worf Hypothesis: a relationship with the Dax symbiont affects the subject's world view.

Bashir-Worf Hypothesis (Leee), Friday, 21 April 2017 18:57 (seven years ago) link

The forced bonhomie is what bothers me the worst -- you've got Starfleet and former Maquis together on the same ship and marooned light-decades away from home, yet it's a big corny-joke making family.

It's worth reading the second volume of the recent Trek oral history just to see pretty much every single person who ever worked on the show continually drag Berman & Braga on this very topic. "By the end of the pilot they're all in Starfleet uniforms and reporting to Janeway like it's no big thing, WGAF?" Writers who transitioned from DS9 were especially pissed at setting up this group that was going to be used on Voyager just to see the entire premise instantly pissed away.

Lauren Schumer Donor (Phil D.), Friday, 21 April 2017 19:11 (seven years ago) link

Yeah, as a criticism it definitely sticks and the first 2/3 seasons aren't all that...but beyond that I can watch a lot of it compared to NG.

xyzzzz__, Friday, 21 April 2017 19:34 (seven years ago) link

voyager has a bunch of fun high-concept episodes but few good character-based ones

ciderpress, Friday, 21 April 2017 19:53 (seven years ago) link

Do you count "Bride of Chaotica" as one of the former? Because I watched it recently and was incredibly bored.

Bashir-Worf Hypothesis (Leee), Friday, 21 April 2017 20:00 (seven years ago) link

the one where everyone is dying from some incurable disease which leads them to find out they're copies of the real voyager and crew

clouds, Friday, 21 April 2017 20:09 (seven years ago) link

Living Witness is probably the best example of what I mean

ciderpress, Friday, 21 April 2017 20:23 (seven years ago) link

two weeks pass...

I've been thinking more about Voyager (who knows why) and it's not even the Maquis/Starfleet thing that bugs me -- it's that the writing/dialogue is so artificial and dumb which leads to very little on-screen chemistry between the bridge crew. Basically, any non-holographic/ex-Borg character interacting with any other non-holographic/ex-Borg character is bad -- Janeway is probably the worst of the bunch, even though Mulgrew is perfectly fine as an actor!

Bashir-Worf Hypothesis (Leee), Tuesday, 9 May 2017 20:34 (six years ago) link

It would probably be more interesting to watch 45 minutes of the actors having lunch in full makeup than any given episode of the series.

Philip Nunez, Tuesday, 9 May 2017 20:38 (six years ago) link

my daughter and I just got to the Space Seed last week, she was so into it

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 9 May 2017 23:02 (six years ago) link

Not only were the actors boring, they stayed boring for SEVEN WHOLE SEASONS. That's an almost respectable commitment.

Chuck_Tatum, Tuesday, 9 May 2017 23:38 (six years ago) link

wtf is this vic fontaine shit? and apparently he becomes a recurring character?

just another (diamonddave85), Wednesday, 10 May 2017 15:08 (six years ago) link

Vic Fontaine was a bad idea, but the actor/singer playing him is enjoyable, and the episode with him and PTSD Nog is really good, so they kinda manage to salvage that it could've been.

Tuomas, Wednesday, 10 May 2017 15:20 (six years ago) link

Apparently he was only added to the show because Ira Steven Behr loves '50s crooner music. And they originally intended to cast Frank Sinatra Jr. for the role!

Tuomas, Wednesday, 10 May 2017 15:22 (six years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.