Are you cool with forks making Spotify playlists out of every rolling thread without permission?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (679 of them)

The amount of discussion on ILM - even the amount of just posting comment-free links! - has completely fallen off a cliff over the past year (ignoring those ghastly Rate Your Music nostalgia-wank polls). Rolling threads are virtually the only thing keeping it half alive given that most single-song threads die after 2 answers anyway.

lex pretend, Saturday, 4 February 2017 14:46 (seven years ago) link

the actual ironic thing about these bloody Spotify data dumps is that no one's particularly invested in keeping any rolling thread an exhaustive document of what's going on in that genre anyway, so tons of music will never make it onto your precious playlists. gosh you might have to go looking for it yourself and engaging with the genre outside ILM!

lex pretend, Saturday, 4 February 2017 14:49 (seven years ago) link

gosh!

ogmor, Saturday, 4 February 2017 15:06 (seven years ago) link

pretty sure smartphones and youtube links have wayyyyy more to do w any putative changes in music discussion here than forks's playlists, but of course those and othrr factors have been discussed with great thought and participation on other threads not created to flame a specific poster...

if you don't like the playlists don't listen to them? i can assure you that they are not why i avoid rolling threads, a practice i had established long before forks started doing this. I guess that makes me a leech. hot tip tho, y'all should stop doing EOY polls I'd you want to keep sideline-sitters like myself from cream-skimming the best stuff to come out of the rolling threads...

stein beck ii: the wrath of grapes (Doctor Casino), Saturday, 4 February 2017 15:11 (seven years ago) link

There have always been people who have used ILM primarily as a recommendation engine, and it's kind of interesting/unsurprising that the people who take the dimmest view of that are also the ones whose jobs/lives allow them to basically sit there listening to music all day if they want to. Most people don't have that luxury.

I'm not sure who these posters are who apparently only ever engage with genres through ILM playlists through. Like I'm curious as to who you actually think that is?

Matt DC, Saturday, 4 February 2017 15:15 (seven years ago) link

forks, don't change the game for these hoes

Neanderthal, Saturday, 4 February 2017 15:33 (seven years ago) link

The over-excitable thread about an individual song or album is almost a thing of the past, and that's what enabled a song like, say, Desloc Piccalo's 'Drums' to be heard more widely.

― Matt DC, Saturday, February 4, 2017 5:07 AM (seven hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

a year ago people were freaking out about the existence of an excitable thread about kaitlyn aurelia smith

a self-reinforcing downward spiral of male-centric indie (katherine), Saturday, 4 February 2017 17:19 (seven years ago) link

(I don't give a single shit about someone making a playlist about my ORIGINAL DISCUSSION DO NOT STEAL and find it ridiculous that anyone else does, but the reason I post to rolling threads is that almost every time I have opened a thread for an artist or album I love, I'm lucky if one person responds. Single-artist/song threads only work if there's a pre-existing fanbase, which should be obvious.)

a self-reinforcing downward spiral of male-centric indie (katherine), Saturday, 4 February 2017 17:21 (seven years ago) link

i think rolling threads have a place but it feels like there are more of them every year & people are getting sorted into smaller and smaller buckets. i understand why e.g. the metal and bobbins ones need to exist but some of the more specific ones less so

ciderpress, Saturday, 4 February 2017 17:49 (seven years ago) link

i've found in recent years that the 'Favorite Tracks + Albums 20XX' thread is the most valuable rolling thread to me since it covers the whole spectrum

ciderpress, Saturday, 4 February 2017 18:08 (seven years ago) link

I'm not sure who these posters are who apparently only ever engage with genres through ILM playlists through. Like I'm curious as to who you actually think that is?

― Matt DC, Saturday, 4 February 2017 15:15 (two hours ago) Permalink

*looks at poll results*

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Saturday, 4 February 2017 18:17 (seven years ago) link

I don't see how you can compare someone posting an audio link in a thread with someone skimming all the audio links from a thread but that's just me... rolling rap thread has been full of youtubes and audio links from day one

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Saturday, 4 February 2017 18:18 (seven years ago) link

what year is this

Neanderthal, Saturday, 4 February 2017 18:29 (seven years ago) link

1933

aaaaaaaauuuuuuuuu (melting robot) (WilliamC), Saturday, 4 February 2017 18:32 (seven years ago) link

YouTube links tend to expire quickly though, that's the whole problem. Theoretically making it easier to hear all the stuff in those threads should actually increase participation so I think there's something else going on here that's distinct from whether or not anyone's making playlists.

I think more generally the group of posters who are really interested in hearing and discussing new music (vs posting lists or making New Jersey facsimiles or 'albums where the first song is the worst' type threads) has been shrinking for some time. And that affects both the rolling threads and the kind of threads that Katherine mentions.

And that pool of posters is spread more and more thinly as tastes diversify. For better or worse there's a much wider range of music covered here in a lot less depth.

Like these was a time where people would post a new thread every time a mix CD came out from a popular DJ and it would get earnestly discussed (or facetiously discussed). Now there's a rolling mixes thread which is mostly a set of links with "nice mix here" written next to it.

I do think the increasing age of the average poster is a big factor, as is the fact that people are less likely to be posting from their computers (and are therefore going to be posting much shorter messages). Short of actively promoting the board to a load of younger people I don't know what the answer is.

Matt DC, Saturday, 4 February 2017 18:37 (seven years ago) link

^^^ nice mix here

tales of a scorched-earth nothing (Doctor Casino), Saturday, 4 February 2017 18:40 (seven years ago) link

more like

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u2W1Wi2U9sQ

F♯ A♯ (∞), Saturday, 4 February 2017 18:42 (seven years ago) link

i support this threadjacking 100%!

Neanderthal, Saturday, 4 February 2017 18:43 (seven years ago) link

specifically 3'04" if ure asking

F♯ A♯ (∞), Saturday, 4 February 2017 18:43 (seven years ago) link

all included in the threads playlist tho just in case

F♯ A♯ (∞), Saturday, 4 February 2017 18:45 (seven years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=izQB2-Kmiic

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Mbxe33BYW8

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sKU78O7T_fw

seriously though, again, there are whole threads devoted to the meta discussion of theories about whether, how, and why ILM posting style/discourse has changed over time. it's an interesting topic, i have things i'd add, but i think it'd be nice to use one of those rather than one that was started as an ad hominem against one poster. possible starting points:

Any reason why ILM is so quiet these days?
Longtime ILXors - how has this board changed over time?

tales of a scorched-earth nothing (Doctor Casino), Saturday, 4 February 2017 18:45 (seven years ago) link

I for one cannot imagine why younger people would not want to post here

a self-reinforcing downward spiral of male-centric indie (katherine), Saturday, 4 February 2017 18:59 (seven years ago) link

not enough Brony love

Neanderthal, Saturday, 4 February 2017 19:03 (seven years ago) link

lol katherine

though she denies it to the press, (Joan Crawford Loves Chachi), Saturday, 4 February 2017 19:51 (seven years ago) link

where do young people discuss music these days?

soref, Saturday, 4 February 2017 19:57 (seven years ago) link

on the toilet

Neanderthal, Saturday, 4 February 2017 19:58 (seven years ago) link

Twitter

Spottie, Saturday, 4 February 2017 20:56 (seven years ago) link

snapchats of moleskines

Sufjan Grafton, Saturday, 4 February 2017 21:12 (seven years ago) link

and drone filmed facebook live post

Sufjan Grafton, Saturday, 4 February 2017 21:13 (seven years ago) link

and rustic batard

Sufjan Grafton, Saturday, 4 February 2017 21:17 (seven years ago) link

I kind of like that the youtubes disappear, that a record wafts in on the breeze and after a while off it goes again. There are too many records, most of them are bad, and the few good ones lead to serene feelings not speaking. a doff of the cap is its sentence on the page

saer, Saturday, 4 February 2017 22:19 (seven years ago) link

so basically, the problem is simultaneously that Spotify playlists will forever draw people away from the thread, but also that YouTube links are impermanent

a self-reinforcing downward spiral of male-centric indie (katherine), Saturday, 4 February 2017 23:22 (seven years ago) link

personally, I

1) get overwhelmed by bombardments of Youtube clips

2) don't use / like Spotify

and

3) prefer the more in-depth discussions found on dedicated album / artist / label threads

Wimmels, Saturday, 4 February 2017 23:31 (seven years ago) link

ghastly Rate Your Music nostalgia-wank polls

he he

niels, Monday, 6 February 2017 17:04 (seven years ago) link

another thread where the decline of the entire internet is discussed can be found here The Golden age of Internet comes to a close?

niels, Monday, 6 February 2017 17:12 (seven years ago) link

Pssh, 284 posts and no mention of forks's playlists. FAKE NEWS.

tales of a scorched-earth nothing (Doctor Casino), Monday, 6 February 2017 17:40 (seven years ago) link

i just want to say for the record that tho i'm sympathetic to people who want forks to knock it off with the playlists it's ultimately not something that bothers me personally at all

but i do think it's lame and annoying that forks bumps rolling threads to note only that the playlist has been updated. it does begin to feel like somebody programmed a computer to eat the threads.

if forks has a different way to alert playlist subscribers that the playlist is updated then i think it's fine, and my apologies if this has already been addressed in this thread i didn't read

J0rdan S., Wednesday, 8 February 2017 04:38 (seven years ago) link

The reason why he tells you about it is probably that he's not a robot but an actual human bring putting in unpaid work for the benefit of the community so it would be nice if said community notices it, you know. A bumped thread hurts no one.

human and working on getting beer (longneck), Wednesday, 8 February 2017 07:33 (seven years ago) link

Spotify playlists on ILM: don't ask, don't tell.

human and working on getting beer (longneck), Wednesday, 8 February 2017 07:50 (seven years ago) link

^gets it

i believe that (s)he is sincere (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 8 February 2017 09:03 (seven years ago) link

four years pass...

plug-in or applet or whatever the fuck that could pull all the music on a page by name seems like something that would catch on big if it was done right. This could be the next hipster puppies ILX success story. Call it "forks" and buy me dinner and I'll give you permission.
― ulysses, Thursday, 4 February 2016 21:52

I have a friend who's supposedly working on such an app at the moment by the way.
― posted with permission by (dog latin), Friday, February 5, 2016 9:01 AM

how did this work out dl?

i cannot help if you made yourself not funny (forksclovetofu), Monday, 31 January 2022 17:28 (two years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.