Star Wars Anthology shit talk (Rogue One, Young Solo, TBD)

y

MCU muted colors suck and is why none of the films stand out visually. feels like a stylistic choice regurgitated from the 90s to pander to the manbaby demographic. there is a cultural line from Image Comics to Limp Bizkit's "Faith" to Gears of War to those "gritty", "dark", desaturated fucking movies.

Star Wars seems to sill be colorful though who knows w this Rogue One thing.

Muted colors equalling "gritty"? -- I blame Matt Mahurin.

the executives were losing their shit over Edwards' handling of this movie so I dont know if the final product is 'his vision'. it sounds like they basically fired him. I have a good source on this but I cant name names.. hes currently working on episode 8.

to compare, episode 8 is already in the can with about a day or so's worth of reshoots and about a year to do post production. rogue one is a dumpster fire that has 50m worth of reshoots being done the summer before release. I hope it works out.

I knew I could believe in Rian Johnson

If one judges by the look of the trailers Rogue One at least *looks* fantastic. Much more visually epic and exciting than JJ Abrams' "TV Guy With A Big Budget" approach on Force Awakens. If Edwards was indeed fired at would be cool if he went out with the best looking SW film to date.

*it would be cool

I have a guy and he confirms what we all know: Darth Vader doesn't fuck. His dick did get burned off. fyi

skipping this one if there isnt at least a jackoff sesh

not to be captain save a jj but if you think force awakens didn't look fantastic you need yr eyes replaced imo

https://cdn.ampproject.org/i/s/thefilmrealm.files.wordpress.com/2016/06/rey-sledding-force-awakens-900.jpg?w=768

i'm psyched for Rogue One but Gareth Edwards track record to me is very much all hat & no cowboy as far as his "visually fantastic" style is concerned. Monsters and Godzilla were 90% insufferably boring sweaty characters staring at the horizon and/or running

Xpost ) yes that was one of the few shits where I went "aaah". Not enough of them, imho. My eyes are fine.

Err "shots" lol

smdh

I have a guy and he confirms what we all know: Darth Vader doesn't fuck. His dick did get burned off. fyi

tbh this is kind of a relief - the thought of a wheezing vader pumping away at some poor unfortunate with his armour round his ankles is... disturbing

I find your lack of dick disturbing

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=htqVHdIB2qs

http://www.vulture.com/2016/12/rogue-one-gareth-edwards-tony-gilroy.html

Optimistic about Gilroy being heavily involved why because he good at job

Not if you read what happened with the script to bourne 3

i was thinking the same thing

They should just hire workmanlike hacks from now on.

The three Ip Man films are on American Netflix, and after watching the first one and consuming enough whiskey, I'm struck with a _strong_ impulse to find the filmmakers/studio execs and grab them by the neck & shoulders, yelling "Goddamit, you got Donnie Yen and Wen Jiang in a Star Wars film, don't fuck this up!"

Gilroy made Duplicity and Michael Clayton, right? Those are not great.

Michael Clayton is awesome, fuck you

kingfish I think in terms of managing your own expectations you have probably made a gross error by watching Ip Man before going to see this.
hindsight is always etc. though, it was unavoidable

http://www.vulture.com/2016/12/gareth-edwards-on-rogue-one-diversity-reshoots.html

I don't know enough about the business to tell how much of this answer is dancing:

A lot has been written about the reshoots that were done on this film, and it's rumored that Tony Gilroy came in and shot some of the new material himself. What really happened?

Tony is a great writer and he had done a few days' work on Godzilla. We had always planned to do these pickup shoots, and in this day and age when everything has gone digital, you don't have to be so literal about preproduction, production, and postproduction — the whole thing blurs together. When we did the pickup shoots, Tony came in to write the screenplay for those scenes, and because we shot it documentary-style and had so much material, essentially, we ended up being a bit crunched for time. So we all dove in and did different things: Tony did some second-unit on the pickup shoot and so did I, and we went from 600 visual effects to 1,600 visual effects. The scope of the movie just got bigger, and so there was this divide-and-conquer mentality that went on. I think the results are really good and that's all that matters, is the movie.

lol "documentary style"

(Xpost) my takeaway: There was a lot of unscripted stuff (improv?) going on in Edwards' shoot and they got stuck with a ton of footage to wade through. Lucasfilm didn't want any waste so they called in Gilroy to try and make it all slot in. Or something.

https://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/uhyisxycrq0b3lp7n29q.gif

yikes

Tight

fart joke

http://www.ew.com/article/2016/12/11/strong-non-spoiler-first-reactions-rogue-one-star-wars-story

Got tix for late Wednesday showing. Can't wait.

some complained about an abundance of fan service, with numerous in-jokes and references for die-hard fans

Oh nooooo

Please don't throw me in the briar patch, whatever you do

yeah that sucks, if true.

well fuck there goes my plan to keep my expectations deliberately low

Ste are you familiar with the story of the tar baby

lol

or br'er rabbit even ;)

some complained about an abundance of fan service, with numerous in-jokes and references for die-hard fans

this gives me the same reaction a lot of people feel towards undecided voters

https://twitter.com/GermainLussier/status/807868306694602752

all of the little team-building cuts in the trailers were extra clips, maybe?

there were a couple lines that sounded like voiceovers just for the trailers

Yeah I was expecting one of the characters in the movie to say "in theaters Friday!" but apparently that line is not in the movie :(

disappointing

reviews are in. The more negative takes sound sadly plausible

https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/rogue_one_a_star_wars_story/reviews/?sort=rotten

although Richard Brody does rather undermine his credibility with this:

There’s none of the Shakespearean space politics, enticingly florid dialogue, or experiential thrills of the best of George Lucas’s “Star Wars” entries (“Attack of the Clones” and “Revenge of the Sith”).

Yeah, he wrote a piece on that last year in the wave of prequel revisionism:

http://www.newyorker.com/culture/cultural-comment/what-the-seven-star-wars-films-reveal-about-george-lucas

oh yeah I remember that now. That was a weird little interlude

http://www.avclub.com/review/rogue-one-adventure-star-wars-dark-side-247345

Liked it.

That reminds me to remove bookmark