Thread of What Is Fascism And Is Donald Trump A Fascist

i ran the movie do not resist last night (for an audience of ~4 people, doesn't get the blood up like GMOs i guess) and tho there wasn't a single mention of trump (was prob all shot before he declared) watching it this weekend made it clear what the bloc of law enforcement that's for fascism in the ferguson era looks+thinks like -- lots of talk of delusional cop-haters who don't understand that the only thing that keeps them alive in a howling void of evil and violence is law enforcement, and specifically law enforcement's capacity to inflict violence -- and then all of a sudden james comey showed up and said every night he lied to his little girl, because his little girl thought there were monsters under her bed, and he lied, and he told her monsters aren't real

good luck us!

the monsters aren't hiding under the bed, they're kissing her goodnight :/ </trenchant>

national trenchant week

ran the above movie again tonight to another small and radically quiet audience, F5ing the returns in the booth alone. so these guys have the executive, the legislature, and the security services, huh.

this is extremely good imo

https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/the-supermanagerial-reich/#!

pretty good read, thanks

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Yh0jAxOxGE

pretty good read, thanks

― El Tomboto, Friday, November 18, 2016 2:22 AM (seven minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

the lovely latebloomer linked it on fb fwiw

tombot, can i ask for your thoughts on the vibe in dc right now

revived DC thread to answer since I don't know what anybody else is vibing

cool, thx

Reading the thread title, my first thought was: I guess we're going to find out.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/donald-trump-is-actually-a-fascist/2016/12/09/e193a2b6-bd77-11e6-94ac-3d324840106c_story.html

Nevertheless, the bourgeoisie does not like the 'plebian' method of resolving its tasks. It was always hostile of Jacobinism, which cleared the road for the development of bourgeois society with its blood. The fascists are immeasurably closer to the decadent bourgeoisie than the Jacobins were to the rising bourgeoisie. Nevertheless, the sober bourgeoisie does not look very favorably even upon the fascist mode of resolving its tasks, for the concussions, although they are brought forth in the interests of bourgeois society, are linked up with dangers to it. Therefore, the opposition between fascism and the bourgeois parties.

The big bourgeoisie likes fascism as little as a man with aching molars likes to have his teeth pulled. The sober circles of bourgeois society have followed with misgivings the work of the dentist Pilsudski, but in the last analysis they have become reconciled to the inevitable, though with threats, with horse-trades and all sorts of bargaining. Thus the petty bourgeoisie's idol of yesterday becomes transformed into the gendarme of capital.

Economist writing of risks re: Trump's policies raises the dread F word:

https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/trump-corporatism-innovation-economic-growth-by-edmund-s--phelps-2017-01

Finally, and worst of all, Trump thinks that bullying corporations, such as Ford and Carrier, and aiding others, such as Google, will boost output and employment. This is an expansion of corporatist policy the likes of which have not been seen since the fascist German and Italian economies of the 1930s. If this thinking persists, there will be more interference in the business sector to protect incumbents and block newcomers. This will clog the economy’s arteries, most likely preventing far more innovation than it stimulates among the established insiders.

I don't know enough about economics to know if this dude's focus on innovation is right-on or not, just saw it and thought of this thread

that "red blood of patriotism" line was legit terrifying

(in the inauguration speech)

a truly hitlerian speech all around

emboldened mods starting already imo

under the guise of "discriminatory speech"

what freedom of speech i say to ye brothers and sisters

let us stand together and in unison let our voices pound against the drum of fascism

http://harpers.org/archive/1941/08/who-goes-nazi/

this comment of mine has aged "well"

TLDR: he's a fascist

― wizzz! (amateurist), Tuesday, June 14, 2016 9:02 PM (seven months ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Corey Robin:

Before I wrote my book on conservatism, I was a student of the politics of fear. My first book, which was based on more than a decade of research, was an analysis of how political theorists since Hobbes have understood the politics of fear. In the second part of the book, I offered my own counter-analysis of the politics of fear in the United States. Fear, American Style, I called it.

Here’s what I learned about it: the worst, most terrible things that the United States has done have almost never happened through an assault on American institutions; they’ve always happened through American institutions and practices.

These are the elements of the American polity that have offered especially potent tools and instruments of intimidation and coercion: federalism, the separation of powers, social pluralism and the rule of law.

All the elements of the American experience that liberals and conservatives have so cherished as bulwarks of American freedom have also been sources and instruments of political fear. In all the cases I looked at, coercion, intimidation, repression and violence were leveraged through these mechanisms, not in spite of them....

The truth of the matter is that Trump and Bannon could get most if not all of what they want – in terms of the revanchism of race, gender and class, the white Christian nation that they seem to wish for – without strongman politics.

American institutions offer more than enough resources for revanchism. That Trump and Bannon seem not to know this – that they are willing to make opponents of the military and the security establishment, that they are willing to arouse into opposition and conjure enemies out of potential friends – may be their biggest weakness of all. And if they do know this, but seek strongman politics anyway, then they’re willing to put strongman politics above and beyond the project of social revanchism that their base seeks. Which may be their second biggest weakness of all.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/feb/02/american-institutions-wont-keep-you-safe-trumps-excesses

xxp I got eight paragraphs into that before thinking to check the date.

this comment of mine has aged "well"

TLDR: he's a fascist
― wizzz! (amateurist), Tuesday, June 14, 2016 9:02 PM (seven months ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

― wizzz! (amateurist), Thursday, February 2, 2017 1:04 PM (seventeen minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

yep

Actually Donald Trump isn't a fascist, he is a dumb whiny man-baby with freedom fries where his testicles should be

I'd like to amend my previous post:

Actually Donald Trump isn't just a fascist, he is also a dumb whiny man-baby with freedom fries where his testicles should be

Sometimes the difference between being a whiny man-baby or being a fascist man-baby is whether you are the head of state.

that dorothy thompson piece is awesome

Dorothy Thompson == Esquire link

Very telling quote:

I think young D over there is the only born Nazi in the room. Young D is the spoiled only son of a doting mother. He has never been crossed in his life. He spends his time at the game of seeing what he can get away with. He is constantly arrested for speeding and his mother pays the fines. He has been ruthless toward two wives and his mother pays the alimony. His life is spent in sensation-seeking and theatricality. He is utterly inconsiderate of everybody. He is very good-looking, in a vacuous, cavalier way, and inordinately vain. He would certainly fancy himself in a uniform that gave him a chance to swagger and lord it over others.

Remind you of anyone?

Esquire Harpers (sorry)

so it turns out that even if he'd like to be an authoritarian, it's too much work

btw someone just wrotes a book about the Nazis' use of opioids, so i suggest we all send it to Yam for his birthday.

wasn't it about nazis and speed?

yes, the rank-and-file Nazis relied largely on speed, acc to the NYTBR piece i read, but the Fuhrer's personal cocktails were a bit more diverse.

At some point, wasn't he getting loaded up with a lot of same shit JFK would regularly get dosed with?

i'm an ilxor, not a doctor.

http://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2017/03/07/518986612/author-says-hitler-was-blitzed-on-cocaine-and-opiates-during-the-war

just mr morbius, please

really want to read that book, thanks for the reminder doc

"Dr. Morell prescribed well"

Great chemists, the Germans.

Hmm, is the jury still out on this?

Well, you can't say we did not give him a chance ... to prove beyond a doubt that he is a fascist.

Perhaps "dysfunctional fascism" is the best description of this admin

can't even make the trains run on time ffs

My old teacher has written a book about Trump as a fascist, based on his campaign and his inauguration speech, and we discussed it yesterday in my anti-fascism study-group. And it struck me, while his argument that Trump is a fascist was pretty well done, based on his campaign style/imagery/rhetoric and the speech, and the politics that he had done in the first few weeks, the analysis didn't really describe what has happened since then. If 'Trumpism' is a thing, if Trump was trying to be a fascist leader, then his project has pretty much failed completely by now. The Luther Strange fiasco might have been the final nail in the coffin.

Of course, Steve Bannon is still out there, trying to create a new wave for 2018 with people like Roy Moore, so it's not as if fascism in America has been defeated. But 'Trumpism'? That's pretty much over, and has left a semi-senile twitter-feed in charge of a country. IMO.

The “kneel before Zod” approach is closer to how Trump thought the job would be than most folks understood at the time https://t.co/dIYrXEeyGi

— Maggie Haberman (@maggieNYT) December 14, 2017

I still can't believe that clip exists, it sends chills down my spine just thinking of it

she is 100% one of those reality show contestants whose villainy was actually maybe underplayed.

This thread hasn't been updated in a while. I guess the question is moot now, isn't it?

the answer is yes