space is dope imo

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (95 of them)

http://www.smokymtnastro.org/images/Autumn/NGC4414Xannotated.jpg

nomar, Thursday, 8 September 2016 19:00 (three years ago) link

one month passes...

http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/13/health/hubble-telescope-galaxies-trnd/index.html

(CNN)Turns out we were wrong; there aren't 200 billion galaxies in the universe.

It's more like 2 trillion.

Yes, TRILLION!

That's the latest from NASA, which announced Thursday the number of galaxies in our observable universe is 10 times higher than previously projected.

This revelation was possible, thanks to that font of discovery -- the Hubble Space Telescope.

nomar, Thursday, 13 October 2016 22:28 (three years ago) link

Good bump

One of my stags is gonna be a camping trip here with telescopes and whiskey:

the kids are alt right (darraghmac), Thursday, 13 October 2016 22:32 (three years ago) link

All trillion editing mistakes can been

veggie sticks potato snacks (Sufjan Grafton), Friday, 14 October 2016 05:39 (three years ago) link

http://io9.gizmodo.com/5799335/five-weird-theories-of-what-lies-outside-the-universe

We know with some certainty that there's "more universe" out there beyond that boundary, though. Astronomers think space might be infinite, with "stuff" (energy, galaxies, etc.) distributed pretty much the same as it is in the observable universe. If it is, that has some seriously weird implications for what lies out there. Beyond the Hubble Volume you won't just find more, different planets. You will eventually find every possible thing. Read that again and let it sink in. Everything. If you go far enough, you'll find another solar system with an Earth identical in every way except that you had cereal for breakfast this morning instead of eggs. And another where you skipped breakfast. And one where you got up early and robbed a bank. In fact, cosmologists think that if you go far enough, you will find another Hubble Volume that is perfectly identical to ours. There's another version of you out there mirroring your every action 10 to the 10^188 meters away. That may seem unlikely, but then, infinity is awfully infinite.

nomar, Friday, 14 October 2016 18:07 (three years ago) link

one month passes...

It's really hard to tell / define how big it really is because it is so big

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VY_Canis_Majoris#Controversy

El Tomboto, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 18:01 (two years ago) link

are there any good quality videos on youtube that talk about huge space is

I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 18:07 (two years ago) link

like i know there is carl sagan stuff but anything newer?

I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 18:08 (two years ago) link

space is deep imo

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dGwq620thqo

nomar, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 18:15 (two years ago) link

the Sagan stuff in the first ep of Cosmos is still painfully beyond my genuine comprehension, think of how vast one galaxy is and then multiply out by a vast number of galaxies at vast distances from one another, i think it is literally incomprehensible in any sense other than mathematically

Our Sweet Fredrest (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 18:18 (two years ago) link

http://cdn.iflscience.com/images/0db4bb8d-d7ba-5e57-8fb6-477b01ea9159/extra_large-1464361445-767-this-is-what-andromeda-would-look-like-at-night-if-it-were-brighter.jpg

http://www.iflscience.com/space/what-andromeda-would-look-night-if-it-were-brighter/

if possible for Andromeda to be more luminous, it would appear roughly six times larger than our moon. But at 2.5 million light-years from Earth, the galaxy is not as easily seen as the crescent in our sky—which is only 238,900 miles (384,400 kilometers) from Earth.

“As a side note, its worth noting that the "size" of the Andromeda galaxy only really corresponds to that part of Andromeda that everyone is familiar with,” says McConnachie. “That part of Andromeda is most of the disk, which is where the overwhelming majority of the stars are located. However, if you include the much fainter outer parts of the galaxy, then the actual spatial extent of Andromeda is much, much, much larger.”

The full extent of Andromeda, according to McConnachie, is at least 20 degrees across, or the equivalent of more than 40 full moons!

nomar, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 18:21 (two years ago) link

http://arstechnica.com/science/2016/12/brightest-ever-supernova-isnt-a-supernova-after-all/

...convinced the researchers that the bright flash was probably caused by a star being torn apart and spaghetti-fied.

El Tomboto, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 18:49 (two years ago) link

It's really hard to tell / define how big it really is because it is so big

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VY_Canis_Majoris#Controversy

― El Tomboto

it seems that UY Scuti might be a better contender for largest known star at this point

http://i.imgur.com/7aYbwwY.png

UY Scuti is a bright red supergiant and pulsating variable star in the constellation Scutum. It is a current and leading candidate for being the largest known star by radius and is also one of the most luminous of its kind.[citation needed] It has an estimated radius of 1,708 solar radii (1.188×109 kilometres; 7.94 astronomical units); thus a volume nearly 5 billion times that of the Sun. It is approximately 2.9 kiloparsecs (9,500 light-years) from Earth. If placed at the center of the Solar System, its photosphere would at least engulf the orbit of Jupiter.

nomar, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 23:20 (two years ago) link

two months pass...

they make good beer too

(•̪●) (carne asada), Wednesday, 22 February 2017 22:00 (two years ago) link

sorry didnt realise this was going down in caek's corner

(•̪●) (carne asada), Wednesday, 22 February 2017 22:01 (two years ago) link

one year passes...

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.