Star Trek: Classic or Dud?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (3720 of them)

I'm just happy it won't be in the Abrams stupidverse.

Jeff, Thursday, 11 August 2016 22:45 (seven years ago) link

Oh, I misread the article. It's not 10 years before Enterprise, it's 10 years before TOS.

jmm, Thursday, 11 August 2016 22:58 (seven years ago) link

I still agree w you about post-Voyager being better - don't like the prospect of more Easter Eggs in a pre-TOS show (ooh there's Sarek or T'Pol or Mudd or whoever)

Οὖτις, Thursday, 11 August 2016 23:02 (seven years ago) link

10 years pre-TOS probably means Battlestar: Garth of Izar

Philip Nunez, Thursday, 11 August 2016 23:06 (seven years ago) link

TNG-era Trek is the real Trek to me, but still, shit, this is Trek on TV (or thereabouts) and not in the Abramsverse and that is totally excites

Chuck_Tatum, Thursday, 11 August 2016 23:14 (seven years ago) link

It'd be funny if they make the sets, special effects, makeup, etc really cheesy since it's pre-TOS.

nickn, Thursday, 11 August 2016 23:52 (seven years ago) link

It should be in black and white

I wish you could see my home. It's... it's so... exciting (Jon not Jon), Thursday, 11 August 2016 23:52 (seven years ago) link

yeah i'm surprised at their insistence at relating everything new they make these days to TOS when TNG might be more definitive for most of the audience

ciderpress, Friday, 12 August 2016 00:00 (seven years ago) link

damn old-timers

Nhex, Friday, 12 August 2016 00:57 (seven years ago) link

This is why you must vote in my poll! MAKE IT POLL: ILX Star Trek nominations thread at last! VOTING ENDS 2016/09/09

write sed fread (Leee), Friday, 12 August 2016 00:59 (seven years ago) link

i certainly will, gotta offset the TOS-only voters

ciderpress, Friday, 12 August 2016 01:00 (seven years ago) link

"yeah i'm surprised at their insistence at relating everything new they make these days to TOS when TNG might be more definitive for most of the audience"

exactly, plus, it's not like we're likely to get any more TNG movies so why not give that cast a chance to do a cameo or two again?

akm, Friday, 12 August 2016 01:43 (seven years ago) link

data lives!
http://i.imgur.com/9wK6hrG.png

Philip Nunez, Friday, 12 August 2016 02:15 (seven years ago) link

Isn't this a different story every season? Maybe season 2 will be Old Worf or something.

Chuck_Tatum, Friday, 12 August 2016 08:58 (seven years ago) link

There's a lot to like about that different story every season idea. Except that season one of TNG, VOY, DS9 and ENT all kind of sucked...

I wish you could see my home. It's... it's so... exciting (Jon not Jon), Friday, 12 August 2016 15:04 (seven years ago) link

tl,dr the short answer is because the original series is iconic, popular, and highly valuable piece of intel prop

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 16 August 2016 18:03 (seven years ago) link

like more valuable, recognizable, famous w broader appeal than any other ST property

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 16 August 2016 18:07 (seven years ago) link

TNG had some bizarrely robust restraint in keeping the TOS nostalgia in check for a while. If it were made today, they'd be putting Kirk's brain into the main computer as some kind of AI sidekick that makes sarcastic quips at Picard while he pilots some dune buggy with his drinking buddy Scotty.

Philip Nunez, Tuesday, 16 August 2016 18:16 (seven years ago) link

the DS9 tribbles ep is the only good TOS throwback

ciderpress, Tuesday, 16 August 2016 18:56 (seven years ago) link

There are some minor good ones like that TNG episode where "time becomes a loop" when it turns out to be Captain Frasier Crane, which was a ship from the 'movie' era of the original series.

Sarek and Spock's episodes of TNG were pretty good too. I guess that isn't a throwback more than having them as guest stars.

I really don't get why they didn't go with a TNG sequel myself. Having Picard as a ambassador and some of the other cast as Star Fleet big wig guest stars could be cool if done well.

earlnash, Wednesday, 17 August 2016 04:12 (seven years ago) link

If it were made today, they'd be putting Kirk's brain into the main computer as some kind of AI sidekick that makes sarcastic quips at Picard while he pilots some dune buggy with his drinking buddy Scotty.

I remember examining a Trek novel once that sounded pretty much like this. It was the most bonkers version of Trek I could have fathomed. Luke Skywalker may have made an appearance.

great Canadian prog-psych debut from 1969 (Sparkle Motion), Wednesday, 17 August 2016 05:48 (seven years ago) link

This is...an odd sentence that I didn't expect Annalee to write:

This period also offers narrative comfort food for fans, reminding them of the "good old days" of the show before everybody got so uptight about the Prime Directive and started worrying about post-colonial politics on Bajor and other developing worlds.

uh...wasn't this like half the point of TNG/DS9, and what led to the quality of those shows? Figuring out ethics and morality when encountering strange new shit? And that an explicitly stated desire to return to some actiony TOS that led to Enterprise?

Sentient animated cat gif (kingfish), Wednesday, 17 August 2016 06:52 (seven years ago) link

well put

Nhex, Wednesday, 17 August 2016 06:56 (seven years ago) link

Regardless of what this new Trek is like, I've just resigned myself that there is never going to be a more utopian scifi TV show ever again. Just the same rehashing of the ragtag bunch, on a decrepit ship, cowboying it throughout the galaxy in a dystopian universe.

Jeff, Wednesday, 17 August 2016 08:40 (seven years ago) link

TNG: too good for this world

great Canadian prog-psych debut from 1969 (Sparkle Motion), Wednesday, 17 August 2016 14:54 (seven years ago) link

lol the Enterprise tv show was both past and future because instead of just skirting around the prime directive for plot devices they leaned heavily on THE TEMPORAL PRIME DIRECTIVE

mh, Wednesday, 17 August 2016 16:01 (seven years ago) link

imo the last season of Enterprise was better because the really weird, heavy-handed directions on what they could and couldn't do were finally weakened

they wasted most of the show's run on some temporal cold war thing that was hot garbage

mh, Wednesday, 17 August 2016 16:03 (seven years ago) link

Weird when Mass Effect becomes the thing more Star Trek than actual Star Trek, as it were. Do the studio heads(and some fans, it seems) just want Battlestar in a Starfleet uniform?

Hell, the reboot movies were Star Wars flicks on a Federation starship, but I always attributed that to Abrams _really_ wanting to do SW and grabbing any genre funding to do so.

Sentient animated cat gif (kingfish), Wednesday, 17 August 2016 16:17 (seven years ago) link

On original broadcast, Enterprise lost me after about 3 episodes and I never went back.

Watching the whole thing last year finally, I have to say I enjoyed most of it way more than I thought I would.

I wish you could see my home. It's... it's so... exciting (Jon not Jon), Wednesday, 17 August 2016 16:22 (seven years ago) link

Series finale was made of human shit though

I wish you could see my home. It's... it's so... exciting (Jon not Jon), Wednesday, 17 August 2016 16:23 (seven years ago) link

lol yeah

mh, Wednesday, 17 August 2016 16:27 (seven years ago) link

pretty much all the trek series besides TOS took until season 4 to really hit their stride, i dunno why this kept repeating but enterprise didn't get a chance to keep going like the other 3

ciderpress, Wednesday, 17 August 2016 16:34 (seven years ago) link

There's loads of good stuff in S2-3 of TNG!

Chuck_Tatum, Wednesday, 17 August 2016 16:41 (seven years ago) link

enterprise, aka the "hot vulcan decontamination shower" show

mh, Wednesday, 17 August 2016 16:43 (seven years ago) link

xp sure, but there's a lot of stumbling too, season 4-6 are a lot more consistent

ciderpress, Wednesday, 17 August 2016 17:11 (seven years ago) link

Yeah S3s of TNG and DS9 were fine, they were already starting to ramp up by the end

Nhex, Wednesday, 17 August 2016 17:13 (seven years ago) link

Gunna rep for one of my fave podcasts now, call the Greatest Generation, describing themselves as "A Star Trek podcast by two guys who are a bit embarrassed to have a Star Trek podcast."

They go thru great pains in recapping some of the S1 & 2 eps.

https://art19.com/shows/the-greatest-generation

Sentient animated cat gif (kingfish), Wednesday, 17 August 2016 17:29 (seven years ago) link

sounds similar to the great pains I experience while watching them

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 17 August 2016 17:34 (seven years ago) link

one thing i learned from that imdb ratings chart posted upthread is that people really love Q episodes

ciderpress, Wednesday, 17 August 2016 17:35 (seven years ago) link

or i guess it was posted in the other trek thread whoops

ciderpress, Wednesday, 17 August 2016 17:35 (seven years ago) link

Q was one of TNG's best characters/ideas

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 17 August 2016 17:36 (seven years ago) link

i listened a different podcast called Mission Log all the way through TOS and into part of TNG before it got overwhleming... not sure i could do it again with another show

a simba man (Will M.), Wednesday, 17 August 2016 17:44 (seven years ago) link

Q is a good character but a horrible plot device when dumped into a show. Luckily they used the whole Q thing very, very sparingly. It's deus ex machina joking around on screen.

Voyager begins in a similar way, with a near-omniscient being dumping them into the premise.

mh, Wednesday, 17 August 2016 18:10 (seven years ago) link

yeah it was a fine line to tread but I think they did it well in general - Q's appearance gave an "anything can happen!" feel to the plots, which injected a bit of excitement/uncertainty into what was generally a very staid and predictable environment.

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 17 August 2016 18:11 (seven years ago) link

They eventually got a little overused by late Voyager but the Borg are really a good counterpoint to the Federation. Equal treatment of all species, post-scarcity economy (no economy at all, really) and uninterested in absorbing whole pre-technical civilizations into their organization. Outside of the technical trappings, the only real difference was the recognition of individuality as useful.

mh, Wednesday, 17 August 2016 18:16 (seven years ago) link

the mechanics (as opposed to the moral or conceptual subjects) of tng plots are all magic plots resolved by geordie casting spells, so Q is fine

le Histoire du Edgy Miley (difficult listening hour), Wednesday, 17 August 2016 18:19 (seven years ago) link

he has a tendency to trigger a Silliness that can be disappointing if you were expecting spaceships and course-plotting -- the robin hood ep etc -- but w TOS you have to make a similar peace w the theme park planets they occasionally visit.

le Histoire du Edgy Miley (difficult listening hour), Wednesday, 17 August 2016 18:22 (seven years ago) link

^^^

Borg and Q are easily my two favorite things about TNG

xp

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 17 August 2016 18:22 (seven years ago) link

yeah mh otm the borg are the best trek antagonists. (well maybe the terran empire.) the romulans in TOS serve a similar function of shadowing the (earlier + more imperialist) good guys -- as warlike cousins to vulcans they're temperamentally a terran/vulcan hybrid and these are the two races seen to have the most influence over the culture+practice of starfleet; romulan episodes (thinking of "balance of terror" and "the enterprise incident") often involve the pressures of romulan politics and the relationships of individuals to institutions blah blah -- but the borg are a much more complete and scary idea of a mirror-enemy.

le Histoire du Edgy Miley (difficult listening hour), Wednesday, 17 August 2016 18:30 (seven years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.