Hip Hop taken to new levels.

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (755 of them)
I do believe you are right, John!

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 17 November 2003 04:21 (twenty years ago) link

LeRoi Jones - Blue People

Read it motherfuckers.

and while you're at it don't miss Mr. Baraka's insightful, inspiring poem about the WTC disaster

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Monday, 17 November 2003 04:22 (twenty years ago) link

subthread: are pop-hip-hop purists the modern equivalent of trad-jazz heads?

Is the so called "progressive" really all that progressive?


and while you're at it don't miss Mr. Baraka's insightful, inspiring poem about the WTC disaster

And yet, Blues People is a more incredible work than anything anyone on ILM has accomplished...a more important work as well. That I can't believe more of you haven't read.
Baraka Rock-a's.

ddrake, Monday, 17 November 2003 04:25 (twenty years ago) link

a more important work as well

ddrake exposes his secret rockist heart non-shockah!

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Monday, 17 November 2003 04:28 (twenty years ago) link

Blues People is rockist?! Coulda fooled me. Certainly its somewhat dated, but its historical importance is relevent. Hardly "Rockist." Its not the concern of "authenticity," rather the whole way in which music is approached by various facets of American culture....but for another time.

I'm not gonna get much support here from the ILM regs, even if some of them agree with me, so I'ma bounce and get some homework done.
Gimme a book report on Blues People, Ned. Word.

ddrake, Monday, 17 November 2003 04:31 (twenty years ago) link

Remind me again how you've assumed you know what everyone here has read/listened to/thought again? I missed the proof of your omniscience here.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 17 November 2003 04:32 (twenty years ago) link

And yet, Blues People is a more incredible work than anything anyone on ILM has accomplished

And yet, The Decameron is a more complex work than Jones/Baraka has produced...wft is your point? If people can't write masterpieces, they shouldn't say anything? Not that I'm conceding Blues People (which I have read, ages ago, thanks so much) is a masterpiece, just wondering if it's your opinion that only the authors of masterpieces should talk.

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Monday, 17 November 2003 04:33 (twenty years ago) link

Remind me again how you've assumed you know what everyone here has read/listened to/thought again? I missed the proof of your omniscience here.

If you've read it, you clearly haven't comprehended it.

And yet, The Decameron is a more complex work than Jones/Baraka has produced...wft is your point? If people can't write masterpieces, they shouldn't say anything? Not that I'm conceding Blues People (which I have read, ages ago, thanks so much) is a masterpiece, just wondering if it's your opinion that only the authors of masterpieces should talk

And how does an article about the WTC relate to anything we're talking about in this thread? You were using it to discredit his OTHER book, which I believe has relevence in this conversation.

ddrake, Monday, 17 November 2003 04:35 (twenty years ago) link

If people can't write masterpieces, they shouldn't say anything?

John, this is the same person who thinks he needs to know everything and anything about a genre before commenting on it properly and yet is more than happy to accuse you of knowing nothing about something if you happen to have general conclusions that don't match with his own. And yes, that includes assuming you haven't read something he has, because obviously only he knows about it and is more than happy to tell you at high volume if necessary. If arguing with Geir is like punching Jello, arguing with ddrake is like punching stinky Jello that complains about your sense of humor as well and then gets bitter and hides.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 17 November 2003 04:36 (twenty years ago) link

haha - "clearly"

cinniblount (James Blount), Monday, 17 November 2003 04:37 (twenty years ago) link

If you've read it, you clearly haven't comprehended it.

This is not good proof of your omniscience.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 17 November 2003 04:37 (twenty years ago) link

he goes to wooster ned

cinniblount (James Blount), Monday, 17 November 2003 04:37 (twenty years ago) link

http://nihilistdisco.matterwave.net/images/FYOU.jpg

Nihilist Pop Star (mjt), Monday, 17 November 2003 04:38 (twenty years ago) link

Alas, I don't know much about Wooster. On this point, ddrake surely knows more than me.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 17 November 2003 04:39 (twenty years ago) link

Nihilist I kiss thee.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 17 November 2003 04:39 (twenty years ago) link

ddrake you really need to read Baraka's WTC poem - it's foul enough to make you reexamine anything you might've thought about his previous work

Nihilist Pop Star I dunno if that was for one, some or all of us on this thread which showed ilx at its worst, refusing to give a straight answer to somebody whose question was a fine, honest question, but either way, that's one awesome picture

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Monday, 17 November 2003 04:39 (twenty years ago) link

wooster = elmer fudd pronunciation of 'cock'

cinniblount (James Blount), Monday, 17 November 2003 04:40 (twenty years ago) link

Clarity!

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 17 November 2003 04:40 (twenty years ago) link

5 minutes of talking about hip hop on this board and I feel like killing everyone.
The irony of the whole position you are taking here is it precludes us from any discussion on music...ever. Other than making each other aware of different performers. What is the point in arguing the relative quality of a recording when it is the listener's experience and context that decides whether it's worth hearing anyway?
I would argue that greater appreciation of the music comes with knowledge of the culture from whence it comes.
Many people seem to think that they are evaluating hip hop from some sort of universal perspective, in a vacuum of what makes ALL good music, while their own predjudices and cultural context betray the fact that they are evaluating this music from a biased perspective regardless.
Blizow.

John, this is the same person who thinks he needs to know everything and anything about a genre before commenting on it properly and yet is more than happy to accuse you of knowing nothing about something if you happen to have general conclusions that don't match with his own. And yes, that includes assuming you haven't read something he has, because obviously only he knows about it and is more than happy to tell you at high volume if necessary. If arguing with Geir is like punching Jello, arguing with ddrake is like punching stinky Jello that complains about your sense of humor as well and then gets bitter and hides.

Ned is clearly someone who thinks he comprehends what I am saying without actually listening to what I am saying. "Cultural Context" = "Knowing everything about a genre"?
"high volume"? We're on a message board. Congratulations, you have better hearing than I.
Personal attack, comparison to the village idiot, hilarious.

ddrake, Monday, 17 November 2003 04:41 (twenty years ago) link

ddrake you really need to read Baraka's WTC poem - it's foul enough to make you reexamine anything you might've thought about his previous work

What a "rockist" perspective of literature! R Kelly is a pedophile, therefore I no longer can listen to the Ignition Remix.

ddrake, Monday, 17 November 2003 04:43 (twenty years ago) link

R Kelly is a pedophile, therefore I no longer can listen to the Ignition Remix.

HAHAHA! You picked the wrong example there! But John can do the honors.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 17 November 2003 04:43 (twenty years ago) link

how is that 'rockist' ddrake? explain yon prophet!

cinniblount (James Blount), Monday, 17 November 2003 04:44 (twenty years ago) link

cinniblount

Your relevence to this thread's discussion is nonexistent.
Its like 5th grade again! Gang up on me and take my lunch money, please.

ddrake, Monday, 17 November 2003 04:44 (twenty years ago) link

to answer the thread question, a few suggestions:
sensational
mush records (v. varied output, some may be what you're looking for, some may not. a little less self-consciously whiny than some anticon)
dalek
encore (on 75 ark)

again, not sure those really answer the question per se but are worth checking out. the only example of #1 i can think of at the moment is the roots, "water" off phrenology, which i think is consciously an evocation of prog in a hip hop context.

#2 i don't know of any off the top of my head but i would love to hear this attempted. why not?

#4 try digging into non-western hip hop, you're certain to hear some more unusual flows that way.

rgeary (rgeary), Monday, 17 November 2003 04:45 (twenty years ago) link

I would argue that greater appreciation of the music comes with knowledge of the culture from whence it comes.

Fine, but that's a very arguable position - not one you can "Bam!" as though revealing the Truth From On High. I'd argue that context limits the capacity for insight, and a fair number of people who think about reading/interpretation would tend to agree.

Ned I'm assuming he read the Ignition thread, but to discredit the example: if Kelly wrote songs that were as wretched as his behavior, that'd be different. When a writer adds something wretched to his body of work, it's fair to reevaluate that entire body of work and individual texts within it. Bam!

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Monday, 17 November 2003 04:45 (twenty years ago) link

here "wretched" = "ethically suspect"

cue Momus's entrance

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Monday, 17 November 2003 04:46 (twenty years ago) link

Its like 5th grade again!

And for today, class, the word to spell correctly is 'relevance.'

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 17 November 2003 04:46 (twenty years ago) link

http://nihilistdisco.matterwave.net/images/FYOU.jpg
Ain't nothing wrong with kissing a 13 year old.

Nihilist Pop Star (mjt), Monday, 17 November 2003 04:46 (twenty years ago) link

*i'll add to my suggestions that i don't think any of these acts "take hip hop to new levels," and maybe all of the things the original poster is looking for may not necessarily do so, but it's worth trying/hearing new things.

rob geary (rgeary), Monday, 17 November 2003 04:47 (twenty years ago) link

ddrake stop playing dodgeball! it's like third grade again!

cinniblount (James Blount), Monday, 17 November 2003 04:48 (twenty years ago) link

ie. if you got something to say fukker say it cuz you ain't said shit yet

cinniblount (James Blount), Monday, 17 November 2003 04:48 (twenty years ago) link

except that you think black people of today emulating white people of a hundred years ago would represent 'progress'

cinniblount (James Blount), Monday, 17 November 2003 04:49 (twenty years ago) link

they teach you that at wooster?

cinniblount (James Blount), Monday, 17 November 2003 04:49 (twenty years ago) link

Oh, the usual academic posturing. You've made a pretty big assumption about me ddrake, one I'm not sure you could back up. I doubt you have any elite access to some proper hip hop appreciation, even if you are knowledgable. Instead of anwering a question, you simply hide behind pseudo-intellectual bullshit, spouting off about "cultural context" and "aesthetic purpose" like it has anything to do with the question. And race politics certainly do not figure into my pursuit even if I admit that hip hop is rooted in black American culture. I think your equating blackness with conservative dance music is more loaded with racism than anything I said.

Now please, say something relevant or shut up. :-)


James

James Slone (Freon Trotsky), Monday, 17 November 2003 04:49 (twenty years ago) link

http://nihilistdisco.matterwave.net/images/killer.jpg

Nihilist Pop Star (mjt), Monday, 17 November 2003 04:49 (twenty years ago) link

Fine, but that's a very arguable position - not one you can "Bam!" as though revealing the Truth From On High. I'd argue that context limits the capacity for insight, and a fair number of people who think about reading/interpretation would tend to agree.

So why when I argue this position am I met with comparisons to this Geir fellow? Who I felt like disembowling the moment I read his posts, incidently.

Ned I'm assuming he read the Ignition thread, but to discredit the example: if Kelly wrote songs that were as wretched as his behavior, that'd be different. When a writer adds something wretched to his body of work, it's fair to reevaluate that entire body of work and individual texts within it. Bam!

I didn't see that thread, but while I see yr point, I don't think that this is the case here. While Baraka may have become senile in his old age, and Blues People is not an airtight argument per se, it is one that deserves fair treatment. Judge it in the context of the WTC writing if you must, but keep in mind - different time, place, and completely different issue.
I can't think of a musical example to compare it to, but let me put it this way: No matter how offensive this poem may be, it doesn't change the continued relevence of the work he has done in the past.

ie. if you got something to say fukker say it cuz you ain't said shit yet
The irony!

And for today, class, the word to spell correctly is 'relevance.'

Yeah, this board needs an edit button. Blow me.

ddrake, Monday, 17 November 2003 04:49 (twenty years ago) link

ddrake dodgeball!

cinniblount (James Blount), Monday, 17 November 2003 04:51 (twenty years ago) link

You've made a pretty big assumption about me ddrake, one I'm not sure you could back up.

You have discovered the joy that is ddrake! Revel in his love for you, for without someone to demonize, he would not exist.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 17 November 2003 04:51 (twenty years ago) link

So why when I argue this position am I met with comparisons to this Geir fellow? Who I felt like disembowling the moment I read his posts, incidently.

Precisely.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 17 November 2003 04:52 (twenty years ago) link

Nihilist I double kiss thee.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 17 November 2003 04:52 (twenty years ago) link

i'm sorry i even posted to this thread.

rob geary (rgeary), Monday, 17 November 2003 04:53 (twenty years ago) link

ddrake when oberlin sent you the thin envelope did you take it hard?

cinniblount (James Blount), Monday, 17 November 2003 04:54 (twenty years ago) link

be honest ddrake

cinniblount (James Blount), Monday, 17 November 2003 04:54 (twenty years ago) link

Also, I don't think that hip hop would be improved by any of this, but simply opened up and expanded. Having more options doesn't nullify already existing stylistic choices. The staples of the genre wouldn't be under any kind of threat by more all-inclusiveness.
Why is it so threatening to want to explore new sounds?

James Slone (Freon Trotsky), Monday, 17 November 2003 04:54 (twenty years ago) link

Why is it so threatening to want to explore new sounds?

Because ddrake said so. (So okay, maybe entirely taking it back to him all the time isn't the best approach, but he likes the attention.)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 17 November 2003 04:55 (twenty years ago) link

and plz more details about how black artists need to emulate dead white artists if they want to make 'progress'

cinniblount (James Blount), Monday, 17 November 2003 04:56 (twenty years ago) link

I mean the people who wish hip-hop would 'expand it's sonic pallette' or 'let in more of the globe' - do you people own radios?

cinniblount (James Blount), Monday, 17 November 2003 04:56 (twenty years ago) link

http://nihilistdisco.matterwave.net/images/1-1.jpg

Nihilist Pop Star (mjt), Monday, 17 November 2003 04:56 (twenty years ago) link

Oh, the usual academic posturing. You've made a pretty big assumption about me ddrake, one I'm not sure you could back up. I doubt you have any elite access to some proper hip hop appreciation, even if you are knowledgable. Instead of anwering a question, you simply hide behind pseudo-intellectual bullshit, spouting off about "cultural context" and "aesthetic purpose" like it has anything to do with the question. And race politics certainly do not figure into my pursuit even if I admit that hip hop is rooted in black American culture. I think your equating blackness with conservative dance music is more loaded with racism than anything I said.
Now please, say something relevant or shut up. :-)

Ooh, an actual argument.

"academic posturing..." as if I've learned this in college. No, its impossible that these are my OWN ideas and from experience, I have come to these conclusions? Please, my black history professor freshman year was on tenure, I learned shit in that class. Ha.

Someone needs to ban the prefix "psuedo."
Not bullshit. This is a serious argument I'm making, and I don't see why its necessary to belittle it with accusations of "psuedo-intellectualism." I wouldn't accuse INTENTIONAL race politics of coming into yr question, but rather culturally ingrained issues of race. I certainly wouldn't claim to be the all-knowledgeable god of hip hop, but man, discussing hip hop on ILM makes me want to hurl.

There's a difference between Sun Ra and Art Ensemble of Chicago and Anthony Braxton and Bill Evans (token white progressive dude) and ... Yes and Rush and Genesis. If you are looking for the Sun Ra/Art Ensemble/etc. artists, I'll tell you when I find some. Meanwhile, I'd like to point out that my initial comments were directed towards the assumed "progressivism" of using instrumental solos. How "trad" can you GET?! Frankly, yr number 4 I'd be very interested in seeing more of. Admittedly, my initial white comment was meant to provoke. It did. I am happy. yay!

Because ddrake said so.

It really is like being out on the playground again.
Cinniblount has yet to say anything relevent.
PS: didn't apply to Oberlin
PPS: Oberlin is a shitty school
PPPS: You suck.

ddrake, Monday, 17 November 2003 04:57 (twenty years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.