21st Century Feminists Suck

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (225 of them)
This is all very interesting but I'd like some more examples of academic idiocy. Those first two were pretty funny.

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Monday, 24 February 2003 21:15 (twenty-one years ago) link

i've had more things shouted at me on the street in broad daylight and i'm of rather, uh, unslight build

jess (dubplatestyle), Monday, 24 February 2003 21:15 (twenty-one years ago) link

This is quite an interesting article, in the web journal I co-edit. Sheesh.

Cozen (Cozen), Monday, 24 February 2003 21:16 (twenty-one years ago) link

Look Dan I'm not saying it's right, I'm just saying that's how it is. I want it to change. But just wishing things will change, without acknowledging what they are, isn't doing anything. And media saturation or not, there are still PLENTY of men out there who do not know that domestic violence is wrong. I live in "Media Capital of the World" New York City - yet domestic violence is a major problem here. A friend of mine works with the Brooklyn DA's department on domestic violence - would you like me to ask her for current statistics on how widespread a problem it is?

hstencil, Monday, 24 February 2003 21:16 (twenty-one years ago) link

That's the Susheela Math one.

Cozen (Cozen), Monday, 24 February 2003 21:17 (twenty-one years ago) link

My friend with a typical romulan scenester haircut and slight build got called a "Weezer Faggot" by a passing heavily customized car..... best insult ever!

Jonathan Williams (ex machina), Monday, 24 February 2003 21:22 (twenty-one years ago) link

Speaking from personal experience (knowing a man who is violent), ads that convey it's not "socially acceptable" are not going to work in certain economic strata where "social acceptability" is a laughable rather than persuasive concept. I can't speak for wealthy or middle-class environments, because I have no familiarity with those environments. Guys who think someone's got it coming - man or woman - really believe that. I'm sorry - I wish I could explain it all here, but it's too complicated. I just think that the approach taken by most feminists and domestic violence people (of which I was one for many years) is misguided and doesn't take into consideration the fact that people with economic hardships need each other and can't just throw someone out of their society.

Perhaps there should be a separate thread for this issue, though.

N. Cognito, Monday, 24 February 2003 21:27 (twenty-one years ago) link

It is worth mentioning that the studies I've seen (yes, several) suggest that domestic violence is no more common in the lower/working/poorer classes than in wealthier sectors. I think this is an entirely false distinction.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Monday, 24 February 2003 21:30 (twenty-one years ago) link

Okay, putting words into my mouth REALLY pisses me off.

I did not and have never said that domestic abuse wasn't a widespread problem. I said that domestic abuse is not socially acceptable. You say it is, largely because it exists. For evidence of this, you are offering the words of people who have committed domestic abuse as proof that people find it to be socially acceptable. I'm sorry, that's fucking stupid. Are you expecting these guys to break down and admit that they are wrong so that they can open themselves up to full prosecution? Surely I'm not the only one who thinks that is a dangerously naive view of how people who contravene socially accepted norms behave?

Painting aggressors as victims: Classic or Idiotic?

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 24 February 2003 21:31 (twenty-one years ago) link

small point: there is no capital-f "Feminism" like a club or an army with lockstep views (though plenty of folx on the er right or centerward edge of the crowd will complain it is such), there are countless feminisms, that's the point.

g.cannon (gcannon), Monday, 24 February 2003 21:39 (twenty-one years ago) link

Martin, I'm just saying that the context needs to be taken into consideration. I don't know how much is happening in which income bracket, but I do know economics is a complicating factor in DV. If one wants to help lower class women, they have to understand that and yes, make that distinction.

N. Cognito, Monday, 24 February 2003 21:39 (twenty-one years ago) link

I think it is much more socially acceptable than it should be, and not for reasons so far mentioned. For a start, loads of victims' parents will tell their daughters to try to sort it out for the sake of the children - this is not a view of it as vile and intolerable (nor is it sensible: 80% of men who abuse their partners abuse the children too). Police still don't take it terribly seriously. Sentences are extremely light - a long series of brutal, hospitalising beatings and horrific sexual abuse (you really do not want to hear about it) can lead to prison terms under a year.

(I'm in London and you're in Boston: maybe the situation is better there.)(Also, however nasty and ignored domestic violence is, those quotes at the start of all this are funny and stupid, and not to do with domestic violence at all. Had the title not tried to turn this into a general dismissal of modern feminists, I'd have been quite happy with the thread maintaining that tone.)

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Monday, 24 February 2003 21:40 (twenty-one years ago) link

NC, yes, you're right: the main difference is that poorer women flee to families or to refuges, wealthier ones might dash off to Paris and stay in a hotel while lawyers deal with it. I thought you were implying it was somehow more accepted and/or prevalent in those poorer strata, and I wanted to argue against that.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Monday, 24 February 2003 21:41 (twenty-one years ago) link

Okay, putting words into my mouth REALLY pisses me off.

Who's putting words in your mouth?

I did not and have never said that domestic abuse wasn't a widespread problem. I said that domestic abuse is not socially acceptable. You say it is, largely because it exists. For evidence of this, you are offering the words of people who have committed domestic abuse as proof that people find it to be socially acceptable. I'm sorry, that's fucking stupid. Are you expecting these guys to break down and admit that they are wrong so that they can open themselves up to full prosecution? Surely I'm not the only one who thinks that is a dangerously naive view of how people who contravene socially accepted norms behave?

That is so not what I've been writing, at all. Martin's posts are pretty close to the point that I thought I was making. I certainly wasn't "offering the words of people who have committed domestic abuse" in anything I wrote, and to state that is just as much "putting words in my mouth" as you claim has happened to you.

Painting aggressors as victims: Classic or Idiotic?

Uh, that's not what I did, at all.

hstencil, Monday, 24 February 2003 21:49 (twenty-one years ago) link

My point is that I don't think putting guys in jail is helping understand / solve the problem. The implication in the most common responses to DV is : you don't "need" him. This isn't realistic for a lot of people. It isn't naive for women to hope that men will change - many communities need for men to change instead of isolating them by turning them into cons.

N. Cognito, Monday, 24 February 2003 21:50 (twenty-one years ago) link

I think we can all agree that women are equal to men in rights.

oh yeah a cursory glance at any cultural artifact SCREAMS that, right. excuse me while i go fix my bikini and get into a mud-wrestling match, gotta prove my worth somehow!

maura (maura), Monday, 24 February 2003 21:58 (twenty-one years ago) link

can i watch?

jess (dubplatestyle), Monday, 24 February 2003 21:58 (twenty-one years ago) link

Post pics.

No One (SiggyBaby), Monday, 24 February 2003 21:59 (twenty-one years ago) link

i don't know where andrew's girlfriend was studying, but i finished a gender studies degree a couple of years ago and it was nothing like what andrew describes. IMO, someone who makes generalisations about "21st century feminists" is as much of a moron as anyone who takes note of phallic symbols in graphs.

di smith (lucylurex), Monday, 24 February 2003 22:01 (twenty-one years ago) link

hey, you have every right to dress up as a skank and flash your boobs to drunk fratboys (that's a redundancy)

You could make the case that men don't have the right to dress up in a bikini and mud wrestle...at least not if the want the right to not get the shit kicked out of them.

oops (Oops), Monday, 24 February 2003 22:01 (twenty-one years ago) link

even before di's post I think its kinda poor to generalise (not the last time this will be said but there you go).

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Monday, 24 February 2003 22:04 (twenty-one years ago) link

i agree with julio and di, and i hope that this thread dies quickly.

maura (maura), Monday, 24 February 2003 22:06 (twenty-one years ago) link

Yeah, this thread title is awful.

Amateurist (amateurist), Monday, 24 February 2003 22:07 (twenty-one years ago) link

"Amusing anecdotes of academic tomfoolery" would be better.

Amateurist (amateurist), Monday, 24 February 2003 22:10 (twenty-one years ago) link

Maura, bikinis and mudwrestling are empowering to women, haven't you heard?

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Monday, 24 February 2003 22:15 (twenty-one years ago) link

Hstencil: perhaps we souldn't have had the argument we had had you presented examples like Martin's rather than the one you did (domestic violence exists and the guys committing it claim that they didn't realize it's wrong, therefore it is socially acceptable).

I, for one, thought that the "we" Andrew was referring to was the ILX community, not the entire global society, so I didn't have a problem with his statement because I don't think anyone who regularly posts to this board thinks that women are inferior to men.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 24 February 2003 22:23 (twenty-one years ago) link

I'm going to climb up on this cross here and state that discussing the uses of words like "penetrate," "thrust," "invade" etc etc etc is in fact a decent use of time with potentially interesting results bearing on gender relations, and that the function/behavior of language is in fact a valid subject of feminist inquiry.

And moreover that overreacting to academic feminist rhetoric is the biggest most boring DUD of all time with the possible exception of the songtitle "Don't Bomb When You Are the Bomb" which exists on its own rarefied cloud of dudness

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Monday, 24 February 2003 22:26 (twenty-one years ago) link

(domestic violence exists and the guys committing it claim that they didn't realize it's wrong, therefore it is socially acceptable).

Dan I never made this claim. I claimed that it's socially acceptible because it exists, not because of anything its perpetrators or victims claim.

hstencil, Monday, 24 February 2003 22:32 (twenty-one years ago) link

is momus dead or something?

jess (dubplatestyle), Monday, 24 February 2003 22:36 (twenty-one years ago) link

quiet Jess the only good thing about this thread is that Momus hasn't noticed it yet

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Monday, 24 February 2003 22:42 (twenty-one years ago) link

And moreover that overreacting to academic feminist rhetoric is the biggest most boring DUD of all time...

What about "it's all about oil"?

Cozen (Cozen), Monday, 24 February 2003 22:42 (twenty-one years ago) link

*gives jess a friendly punch in the stomach*

Cozen (Cozen), Monday, 24 February 2003 22:43 (twenty-one years ago) link

(Jess, he's just resting and surely would not be on a thread abt. feminism unless there to annoy me and Kate!)

suzy (suzy), Monday, 24 February 2003 22:52 (twenty-one years ago) link

Dan I never made this claim. I claimed that it's socially acceptible because it exists, not because of anything its perpetrators or victims claim.

"I would assume that one of the reasons I've see anti-domestic violence ads in public transit are because some men might not know it's a crime. I.e. it's 'acceptible' to them."

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 24 February 2003 22:58 (twenty-one years ago) link

Zing!

oops (Oops), Monday, 24 February 2003 23:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

but Dan that's a huge leap from speculation on my part to you assuming that I'm "offering the words of people who have committed domestic abuse." And that speculation on my part comes from seeing ads in the Chicago subway that were of the "Yes you big dumb guy - domestic violence IS a serious crime!" variety. Yes people commit murder and know that it's wrong beforehand however I'm not convinced that all perpetrators know this, but that's different from saying that's what they claim.

hstencil, Monday, 24 February 2003 23:02 (twenty-one years ago) link

Quite frankly, unless you are retarded you should have a fairly good grasp of what's illegal and what isn't, I don't care how stupid you are. You're removing responsibility from the perpetrator by saying, "But they were too dumb to know better!"

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 24 February 2003 23:09 (twenty-one years ago) link

I claimed that it's socially acceptible because it exists

I'm not certain that "socially acceptable" is neccesarily the correct term (if only because it is loaded with all sorts of nasty moral connotations), but there certainly is a wide-spread societal acceptance of the idea that domestic violence or rape is a male crime perpetrated against female victims, despite the fact that this is empirically false. I'm not sure if that's what you meant though.

-M, Monday, 24 February 2003 23:12 (twenty-one years ago) link

Uh that's not exactly what I'm saying either. Never mind.

hstencil, Monday, 24 February 2003 23:12 (twenty-one years ago) link

My last post was to Dan.

hstencil, Monday, 24 February 2003 23:13 (twenty-one years ago) link

thank you john darnielle for being the only sane one here.

mark p (Mark P), Monday, 24 February 2003 23:15 (twenty-one years ago) link

I'm going to climb up on this cross here and state that discussing the uses of words like "penetrate," "thrust," "invade" etc etc etc is in fact a decent use of time with potentially interesting results bearing on gender relations, and that the function/behavior of language is in fact a valid subject of feminist inquiry.

I agree. This is the same question that is at stake when people bring up the issue of censorship and so-called hate speech legislation.

And moreover that overreacting to academic feminist rhetoric is the biggest most boring DUD of all time with the possible exception of the songtitle "Don't Bomb When You Are the Bomb" which exists on its own rarefied cloud of dudness

Nooooo!!!!!! Don't you dare diss Blur!!! :)

-M, Monday, 24 February 2003 23:16 (twenty-one years ago) link

(Also, however nasty and ignored domestic violence is, those quotes at the start of all this are funny and stupid, and not to do with domestic violence at all. Had the title not tried to turn this into a general dismissal of modern feminists, I'd have been quite happy with the thread maintaining that tone.)

Martin is totally OTM- this thread wouldn't have been so bad if Andrew had just titled it "the gender studies class my gf's attending sucks" (not that everyone would have agreed with him, mind you, but the examples he quotes in that first post are worthy of dissertation, at least.)

Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Monday, 24 February 2003 23:26 (twenty-one years ago) link

Nooooo!!!!!! Don't you dare diss Blur!!! :)

You've not been on ILM much, have you? :)

Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Monday, 24 February 2003 23:27 (twenty-one years ago) link

I don't understand this thread at all, but these seem U+K if they haven't been discussed yet..

Q1: Would someone go around bragging about beating their wife?
Q2: Would someone go around bragging about beating someone in a fight?

Graham (graham), Monday, 24 February 2003 23:30 (twenty-one years ago) link

Graham, there really are people who do brag about beating their wife. Really. Also, do bear in mind that it used to be legal: the expression 'rule of thumb' derives from the fact that it was illegal to beat your wife with a stick or cane thicker than the average thumb.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Monday, 24 February 2003 23:42 (twenty-one years ago) link

21st Century Feminists Suck

But do they swallow?

*runs away to bed*

Lara (Lara), Monday, 24 February 2003 23:43 (twenty-one years ago) link

Also, do bear in mind that it used to be legal: the expression 'rule of thumb' derives from the fact that it was illegal to beat your wife with a stick or cane thicker than the average thumb.

No, that's an urban legend.

Phil (phil), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 00:03 (twenty-one years ago) link

> RESUME SANCTIMONIOUS_GRANDSTANDING.BAS
> OK

Phil (phil), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 00:10 (twenty-one years ago) link

i'll second the thanks to John for getting up on that cross. Unpacking the symbolism of apparently transparent methodologies is as basic as questioning why black is bad and white is good (symbolically)

gaz (gaz), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 00:24 (twenty-one years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.